1. An Introduction

2. ‣ What we are announcing ‣ Why is this important to customers? (I.e. the business case) ‣ The current standards landscape ‣ What is CMIS? o Goals o Target scenarios o Workshop o Timeline

3. Content Management Interoperability Services Proposed Standard ‣ Starting in October 2006, EMC, IBM and Microsoft joined forces to propose the first Web services standard for exchanging content with and between ECM systems. ‣ Additional collaborators now include: Alfresco, OpenText, Oracle and SAP ‣ We are now announcing that the proposed standard is called the Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) and will be registered for public comment with OASIS starting 9/10 ‣ What we are releasing: ‣ Common Domain Model for CM (Data Model, Capabilities) ‣ Bindings: SOAP for System to System, REST/Atom for System to Application

4. Multiple content repositories and vendor specific systems ‣Discrete business units ‣Application specific ECM solutions ‣Mergers and acquisitions Results ‣Stove-piped information ‣Discrete environments ‣Multiple investments ‣Added costs ‣Loss of business flexibility ‣Increased complexity for developers Challenges Tech PubsEngineeringSales

5. Improved user access to content Increases enterprise effectiveness ‣ Easier for users to get access to the right information at the right time from their application Reduces application development costs and grows ISV’s addressable market ‣ Develop application once to access CMIS- compliant repositories Protects customer’s investment in applications and repositories ‣ Developed applications can run against multiple repositories Propels ECM industry to the next level of growth ‣ Defines a set of standards, technology and interface, that works across multiple vendor and technology providers. Benefits Tech PubsEngineeringSales

6.  Migrate content from one system to another.  Build/buy one-off connectors to enable interoperability in limited scenarios.  Federation  Current standards are not inclusive of all major ECM vendors We need an open standard that works across heterogeneous systems

7. Content Management Related Standards ‣ Java Content Repository (JSR 170/283) ‣ Atom / Atom Publishing Protocol: (APP) ‣ Java Portlet Specification (JSR 168), ASP.Net Webparts, Web Services for Remote Portlets (WSRP) ‣ WebDAV ‣ Other industry standards-related activities ‣ iECM Consortium ‣ ECM Publicly Available Specification (PAS) through British Standards Institution (BSI)

8. A standard for sharing information stored in disparate repositories that is designed to: ‣ Ensure interoperability for people and for applications among multiple content repositories across all platforms o Enable applications to target one or more ECM repositories uniformly for core content services ‣ Easy mapping to existing ECM systems o Expose standard set of APIs for existing capabilities of CM repositories o Leverage existing content ‣ Provide several protocol bindings using the common domain model: o Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) o Representational State Transfer (REST) / ATOM ‣ Exploit web technologies o Web 2.0 o Internet Scale o Service-orientation o Resource-orientation

9. Disclaimer: Product Plans by individual companies TBD

10. What CMIS is not intended to do ‣ Expose ALL capabilities of an ECM repository or application o Integrated ECM suites may still use proprietary interfaces for “better together” functionality where appropriate. ‣ Standardize designer/admin-type operations, e.g.: o Defining object types o Controlling security

11. ‣ Content Collaboration/ Aggregation: o Allow integration of content from different repositories, not just presentation/views. o E.g. “My Assigned Tasks/Documents” from multiple systems. o Allow customers to use the user interface of one application for the content of another. o Support Mashups and Web 2.0 Technologies  Content Centric Applications (e.g. BPM, multi- channel publishing) o Enable applications that can read or publish content to any repository as part of a business process, without needing specific connectors for each repository.

12. ‣ E-Discovery: o Enable e-Discovery applications that can work against any repository, while still leveraging key ECM concepts like object types & metadata, relationships and versioning. ‣ Archival: o Enable consistent archiving of information from business systems to CMIS-compliant repositories ‣ Compound / Virtual Document: o Enable consistent modeling, discovery and persistence of compound document relationships for CMIS-compliant repositories

13.  All seven vendors participated: Alfresco, EMC, IBM, Microsoft, OpenText, Oracle and SAP  Achieved Interoperability among the companies, including: ◦ IBM Lotus and Microsoft SharePoint clients on CMIS Providers ◦ SAP client on CMIS Providers

14. REST/Atom Binding Web Service (SOAP) Binding ConsumerProviderConsumerProvider Alfresco BEA/Oracle EMC IBM MSFT OpenText SAP

15. DateEvent October 2006CMIS effort started by IBM, EMC and Microsoft. July 2007Version 0.1 of spec completed August 2008CMIS Interoperability Workshop September 2008Spec transitioned to OASIS End of year 2009(?)CMIS specification ratified by OASIS TBDCMIS 1.0 supported in IBM, MS, EMC, other vendors’ products

16. CMIS Technical Overview

17.  SOAP: ◦ Service-oriented binding ◦ Uses a CMIS-specific schema.  REST/ATOM: ◦ Resource-based binding ◦ Leverages the ATOM/APP formats with CMIS- specific extensions.  E.g. Performing an HTTP “get” on a Folder’s URL returns an ATOM feed of its children, with an extra CMIS XML block for each child’s metadata. ◦ Browse-able by standard ATOM feed readers.

18.  Core objects: ◦ Document  May have zero, one or more than one byte-stream in addition to metadata ◦ Folder ◦ Relationship  A typed relationship between one document or folder to another.  Object Types: ◦ Hierarchical “Object Types” define metadata schema of all objects.  Hierarchy: ◦ Content is organized into folders  Versioning: ◦ Major/minor versioning of Documents ◦ Linear versioning model (no “branching” into version trees)

19.  SQL-based query syntax  Includes: ◦ Full-text indexing (optional) ◦ Returning relevancy scores ◦ Property-specific queries (e.g. where ModifiedDate > 6/11/2007) ◦ Wildcards

20.  Authentication is handled by each protocol  Authorization context is exposed via an “AllowableAction” collection on every object ◦ Identifies what actions a user can perform, given their permissions & the object state.

21.  CMIS Repositories can optionally support the following capabilities: ◦ Multi-filing/un-filing: Allows documents to be filed in >1 folder concurrently, or un-filed.  Used in applications like case management (where a single document may be relevant to multiple cases). ◦ Full-text Query support: Allows repositories to support property-only queries. ◦ “SQL Join” Query Support: Allowed repositories to specify whether they support “joining” of query results.

22.  Repository Services ◦ getRepositories ◦ getRepositoryInfo ◦ getTypeDefinition ◦ getTypes  Navigation Services ◦ getCheckedOutDocs ◦ getChildren ◦ getDescendants ◦ getFolderParents ◦ getObjectParents  Policy Services ◦ applyPolicy ◦ getAppliedPolicies ◦ removePolicy  Versioning Services ◦ cancelCheckout ◦ checkin ◦ checkout ◦ deleteAllVersions ◦ getAllVersions ◦ getPropertiesofLatestVersion  Object Services ◦ createDocument ◦ createFolder ◦ createPolicy ◦ createRelationship ◦ deleteContentStream ◦ deleteObject ◦ deleteTree ◦ getAllowableActions ◦ getContentStream ◦ getProperties ◦ moveObject ◦ setContentStream ◦ updateProperties  Discovery Services ◦ Query  Multi-Filing Services ◦ addObjectToFolder ◦ removeObjectFromFolder  Relationship Services ◦ getRelationships