Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012"— Presentation transcript:

1 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 Welcome to participants and opening of the Kick Off Event Dear colleagues. I know you all were expecting to see Luc Tytgat, Director of the Directorate Single Sky of Eurocontrol, to open this kick off event. This was also what was foreseen - up till yesterday evening, when Luc informed me that his travel plans had to be changed - to ensure him to have sufficient time in Frankfurt to get his connecting flight, he is taking an earlier flight from Brussels than foreseen. Hence Luc asked me to pass the following opening words to you: QUOTE Thank you very much - I have been informed that many persons and stakeholders from almost all ECAC States have registered for this workshop - for which I am truely happy. Many of you, be it national Focal Point (FP), or expert, took the time to travel to Brussels to be with us two days for this Kick Off Event. It is the first time that such a Kick Off Event has been held here in Brussels. In the past each year the Agency Contact Persons (CPs) did visit all national stakeholders (so: you here present) between mid Sep and mid Oct to perform a K/O Meeting, starting the annual LSSIP reporting process. As of this edition, and after consultation with various national stakeholders, we decided to change the approach and kick off the process here in Brussels. This has a number of advantages: you are able to see and hear the entire EIPR team, as all of them will do a presentation; it enables you as FPs to exchange views amongst each other on how you perform the implementation planning and reporting business within your administrations, and it also enables the EIPR team to do so called "wash out" meetings by early next year to go on site and finalise with you the LSSIP documents. I have always seen the ESSIP and LSSIP process as very important, already when I was working in the commission. It is the instrument to ensure to couple European planning with European reporting. Starting from a European ATM Implementation Plan, agreed by all stakeholders, then national stakeholders work together to collect and document the national progress and plans, through the LSSIP documents, and then the EIPR team, in consultation, shows the progress - or sometimes lack of progress - at European level - and this is then fed again into the ESSIP Plan, and we start again with the yearly cycle - for the benefit of all involved in the ATM Community. Specifically speaking about the LSSIP documents - I stress again that these are your national planning and reporting documents - hence you are responsible for ensuring to fill in correct data on time. Eurocontrol then gives support through guidance documents, templates, tools, direct support of a dedicated Contact Person, etc. Then speaking about the main input to the LSSIP documents: there is the ESSIP Plan, which is now since 2 years firmly linked to the European ATM Master Plan - in fact it is the level three of this master plan. The benefits of this approach are clear: the EIPR deliverables are already now extensively used in the Interim Deployment Steering Group, and they are referred to in the SESAR Deployment Guidance material. Furthermore I have nominated the head of EIPR as the DSS Focal Point for the SESAR pilot common project, because of the role that ESSIP, and LSSIP, shall play as instruments for deployment planning in the future decision making process. Hence the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, adapted as needed, will be the core of the planning and reporting of the SESAR Deployment. Tomorrow, 12 Sep, there is a session of the IDSG - where the EIPR team, and some of you in the audience, will attend. The ESSIP Report for the first time this year includes specific recommendations - very much like done in the Report on SES Legislation Implementation. These recommendations will be presented to AAB/4 (Oct) for follow up, and a number of them have already been addressed. But I repeat myself, for a good quality of such monitoring of deployment, it is absolutely vital to have a good quality of the LSSIP reporting. If some of you would question some of the recommendations in the ESSIP Report - remember, they depend on a quality and timely input throughout the LSSIP reporting. I would like to stress this again, and it will be mentioned again through the various presentations. Finally speaking about SES Reporting. Four years ago we started to integrate this SES and FUA reporting within the at that time LCIP mechanism. There were many benefits, and it proved to be working well. Yet you are aware that this part of the process is 'owned' by the Commission. For the moment the current so called Framework Agreement between the Commission and Eurocontrol (which deals with much more than the SES Reporting) needs to be renewed. This means that currently we have no mandate yet from the Commission to continue this reporting. Furthermore the Commission informed us only yesterday evening on the fact that, and I quote. The Commission is reflecting upon the future of SES reporting, in conjunction with EASA and Eurocontrol. Pending the conclusions of this analysis and the entry into force of the new FA, no questionnaires will be addressed to Member States, and this presumably until the beginning of the next year. End of quote. As we have received this only yesterday, we did not yet have sufficient time to study the impact of this - but it seems rather unlikely that these two chapters on SES and FUA will be within this cycle of the LSSIP reporting. We will now speak with EC and EASA and discuss interim measures. This means that the remaining part of the LSSIP reporting is becoming even more important - the collection of progress and plans of ESSIP Objectives. We have less information to be collected through the LSSIP, we have less Objectives - meaning that we can even focus more on the quality, accuracy and timeliness of the reported data. I have one more publicity point to be mentioned: as you know DSS provides technical support to States to assist them in meeting their NSA/CAA obligations. If some of you want to explore this avenue further, we have here some brochures. If needed, contact me, or your CP. I wish you a good kick off event, and I hand over the floor back to Danny. UNQUOTE EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

2 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 Review and acceptance of Kick off Event Agenda EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

3 28/03/2017 Danny DEBALS – on behalf of Luc TYTGAT, Director DSS ESSIP Report; SES Report including generic findings/recommendations List of the LSSIP 2012 actions Overall conclusion of lessons learnt Predrag VRANJKOVIC, DSS/EIPR Oscar ALFARO, DSS/EIPR Adriatik KOKONA, DSS/EIPR Danny DEBALS, DSS/EIPR Bernd HILL, DSS/EIPR Valerie OBLIN, DSS/EIPR Danny DEBALS – on behalf of UK/CAA Ana Paula FRANGOLHO, DSS/EIPR Oscar ALFARO, DSS/EIPR Review and acceptance of Kick off Event Agenda Show various proposed changes: PRB issues to be covered under Item 6 Item 4 – resorting + wrap up by D. DEBALS Items 5/7/8 – different presenters  aim: ensure the entire EIPR team will be speaking (refer to the printed copies that the audience has available, including ESSIP Plan, etc.) Specific for Item 6: presenting the UK signature process, on behalf of UK Remind: This event is about changes to the entire process, not foreseen to be an explanation of the process itself  see your CP. Today plenary, tomorrow session with your CP Not all deliverables ready today: yes ESSIP Plan, yes slides for K/O Event, yes guidance on implementation progress, yes LSSIP Database – but not entirely Template / Strawman documents / LSSIP Guide. See the available printed material – e.g. list of who is who in EIPR team, etc. A slide reminding the timeline of issues, to be shown at the end of the day, and to be further discussed between you and the CP so to ensure all practicalities. Questions: after briefing + in the feedback questionnaire + also directly to your CP Questions on SES Reporting – please also pass these to EC Slides will be sent by end of the week, with comments in the notes part A WebEx is being held with ES colleagues Ingrid FEIJT, DSS/EIPR Fani TSIRANTONAKI, DSS/EIPR LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

4 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism in the changing European ATM environment ESSIP and LSSIP have been existing since the late ’90s; evolving gently through the years in their ‘comfort zone’. Very few of us could have envisaged, just a few years ago, the changes we have been witnessing in the last 24 months. And more changes are expected in the forthcoming ones. This presentation provides an overview on some of these changes, where they impact the ESSIP and LSSIP mechanisms EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

5 New environment Network Strategy Plan Eur. ATM Master Plan ESSIP Plan
28/03/2017 New environment Network Strategy Plan Eur. ATM Master Plan ESSIP Plan (Interim) Deployment Programme Common projects Today’s environment is very different from what it used to be just a few years back. The LSSIP would not exist without the ESSIP Plan, which has been and remains the cornerstone of our (and your) work. Nonetheless, there are new kids on the block and these already have (or it could be imagined that they will have, in the incoming future) a direct influence on the ESSIP Plan, and therefore on any activity related to that, including LSSIP. Some are already fully established, some are just sneaking in, others are expected to be fully fleshed out in the incoming months. Let’s briefly see one by one which are these elements. We’ll go through them more in detail in the next slides. ESSIP Plan: together with the ESSIP Report, constitutes the Implementation View of the Eur. ATM Master Plan. [CLICK] The European ATM Master Plan: which is very well known by most of you provides the roadmap for the development and deployment phases of the SESAR programme which constitutes the technological pillar of the Single European Sky policy. [CLICK] The production, maintenance and implementation of a Network Strategy Plan is one of the duties of the Network Manager. [CLICK] The (Interim) Deployment Programme (IDP) is currently being developed by the Interim Deployment Steering Group (IDSG), under the chair of the EC, to address the deployment of elements critical to performance, from now until At a certain point in time, the IDP will be replaced by a Deployment Programme, under the responsibility of the Deployment Manager. [CLICK] A common project is a tool foreseen in the Service Provision Regulation (Art. 15a of 550/2004) to assist the successful implementation of the ATM Master Plan. It consists of a comprehensive subset of implementation objectives extracted from the Master plan. [CLICK] So, what has this to do with LSSIP? We can see a ‘fil rouge’ among all these elements , which is the deployment of the Master Plan… using a metaphor … [CLICK] in the past, somehow, LSSIP= 42 trains . We may expect to move towards LSSIPs = 42 wagons/1 train National LSSIPs: Not 42 individual trains; 42 wagons of the same train What has this to do with LSSIP? LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

6 ESSIP and the Eur. ATM Master Plan
28/03/2017 ESSIP and the Eur. ATM Master Plan ESSIP Plan + ESSIP Report = Level 3 of Eur ATM MP European ATM Master Plan [CLICK] European ATM Master Plan: Within the Single European Sky (SES) initiative, the European ATM Master Plan is the agreed roadmap driving the modernisation of the Air Traffic Management system and connecting SESAR research and development with deployment. Relationship of ESSIP with the Eur. ATM Master Plan is not new. But is has evolved through the years. We started about 3 years ago, upon request of SCG, to align the ESSIP Plan to the mature elements of the Eur. ATM Master Plan (the OI steps and related enablers). We were able to improve this relationship to a point where last year we claimed that we were fully aligned to the mature elements of Level 3 (the Implementation view) of the Master Plan. [CLICK] But now ESSIP IS the Level 3 of the Master Plan. Therefore being now able to influence the Planning level (Level 2) in the ATM Master Plan hierarchy  Bi-directional relationship instead of uni-directional as in the past. [CLICK] ESSIP Plan is developed in close cooperation WPC02 and ECTL Teams; [CLICK] approved by both AAB and WPC. FOLLOWING the Q&A session after the presentation: within the current consultation process, after the approval of the proposed changes by both AAB and WPC, these are sent for endorsement to the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council (PC). There is an agreement between EUROCONTROL and SESAR JU governance that the endorsement procedure by the PC is recognised by the SESAR JU Administrative Board as the final instance for possible modifications to the ESSIP Plan. Following which, the ESSIP Plan, is accepted as deliverable of the SESAR JU, by the SESAR JU Admin Board. Proposals in ESSIP Plan developed by: - EUROCONTROL Teams; - SESAR JU WP C.02 Approved by AAB and SESAR WPC LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

7 ESSIP in the SESAR JU work structure
28/03/2017 ESSIP in the SESAR JU work structure WA2 Short/Medium Term European Deployment Planning and Reporting WA0 C.2 Project management WA1 European Deployment Outlook LSSIPs T015 - Day to Day Project management T002 - Performance Planning T007 – European Deployment Reports & Assessments T005 - Deployment Scenarios T001 – Process descrip- tion and maintenance T006 – ESSIP Outlines, Objectives and SLoAs development T003 – Financial Incentives - Generic T014 – Non-EU States coordination T004 – Financial Incentives - Specific The ESSIP Plan and ESSIP Report are 2 deliverables of the SESAR JU. This diagram shows the (new proposed) organisation of the Work Package (WPC2) responsible, inter alia, of the development of these 2 deliverables. [CLICK] Task 006 is responsible to develop proposals for new ESSIP objectives, or for modifications to existing ones. [CLICK] It’s deliverable is the ESSIP Plan. [CLICK] No need to explain the relationship of the ESSIP Plan with the LSSIPs. [CLICK] While LSSIPs are not a deliverable of the Master Plan, they are the source of information for Task 007, which… [CLICK] …is responsible of the production of the ESSIP Report. So, even if LSSIPs remain national documents, i.e. ARE NOT a deliverable of the SESAR JU, they are influenced, and strongly influence, deliverables of the SESAR JU. T0NN – IR/MP update coordination including DB data maintenance ESSIP Report ESSIP Plan LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

8 ESSIP coordination - Network Manager
28/03/2017 ESSIP coordination - Network Manager New Stakeholder group in ESSIP objectives: Network Manager (NMN) Currently no specific NMN SLoAs (Former AGY SLoAs, where applicable) New specific SLoAs/objectives to be coordinated with the development of ESSIP Plan Edition 2013 Inputs: Network Strategy Plan Use of ESSIP Plan in line with Commission Decision of 7/7/2011 on the nomination of the Network Manager Read the slide until Network Strategy Plan The NSP is part of the change process driven by the European ATM Master Plan, focusing on specific objectives, targeting current and known problems and taking stock of mainly short term solutions and best practices. As required in the Network Manager Implementing Rule, the Network Manager delivered in June a first version of the Network Strategy Plan. The use of the ESSIP Plan to implement actions in the Network Strategy Plan is in line with Commission Decision of on the nomination of the Network Manager (art. 2). LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

9 Interim Deployment Steering Group (IDSG)
28/03/2017 Interim Deployment Steering Group (IDSG) Established in Feb 2012; Chair: Head of SES Unit / EC; Members: civil & military representatives of States within SES area and from relevant ATM ops stakeholders (ANSPs, Airspace users, Airports, Network Manager), EASA, and SJU; A transitional arrangement to steer implementation of short term essential SESAR deployments critical to performance at European level; To remain active up to establishment and start of operations of SESAR deployment governance. Central task: steer, coordinate and monitor short term implementation activities on the basis of the Interim Deployment Programme (IDP); To collect and analyse relevant deployment data coming from, e.g., ESSIP and LSSIP reports, business plans, programme reports, performance plans and any additional complementary information … to support the execution of the IDP Now I would like to introduce you the IDSG. [CLICK] IDSG was created in Feb on the ‘ashes’ of the IP1 Steering Group (informal group) [CLICK] IDSG is led by EC. [CLICK] IDSG Members: civil and military representatives of the States within the SES area and also from the relevant ATM operational stakeholders (ANSPs, Airspace users, Airports, the Network Manager (NM)), EASA and SJU DSS/EIPR supports EC chair. [CLICK] IDSG is a transitional arrangements to be stopped when Deployment Manager is ready. (end 2014) [CLICK] Purpose of IDSG: to steer the implementation of essential SESAR Deployments [CLICK] IDSG will make use of available info (ESSIP/LSSIP, business plans, etc) to support execution of the Interim Deployment Programme. Let’s take a look at the IDP…[CLICK] LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

10 ESSIP(/LSSIP) in the context of IDSG
28/03/2017 ESSIP(/LSSIP) in the context of IDSG ATM Master Plan update 2012 ESSIP Plan ed 2012 ESSIP Plan ed 2013 Interim Deployment Programme ( ) IDSG This slide shows you on which basis IDSG has been working in the past months to develop the IDP. Inputs used are: ATM MP, ESSIP, NSP Interim Deployment Programme: The IDP focuses on key deployment activities, using as a starting point ‘so-called’ critical ESSIP objectives (re-organised to fit the purposes of project execution - according to implementation project view). The IDP will be submitted to the Single Sky Committee in October. If accepted, it will steer the deployment of most urgent actions in the period up to end 2014. A draft of the IDP will be discussed tomorrow 12 Sept by the IDSG. Impact on ESSIP Plan: [CLICK] complementary actions identified in the IDP will be used as inputs to develop the ESSIP Plan ed 2013 as either new SLoAs of existing objectives, or proposals for new ESSIP objectives. FOLLOWING the Q&A session after the presentation: the Interim Deployment Programme (IDP) is not a new plan that may duplicate what is already in the ESSIP Plan. The IDP builds on a subset of mature elements, derived from both the ESSIP Plan and the Network Strategy Plan, which have been identified as critical for the enhancement of the network performance, and which require strong coordination and synchronisation among all involved in their deployment. It does so by adding – where needed – complementary actions to those described in the relevant ESSIP objectives, and regrouping them with a project execution view. This view is then assessed with elements at local project level. Network Strategy Plan LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

11 ESSIP core activities in IDP outline v0.3
28/03/2017 ESSIP core activities in IDP outline v0.3 Relationship ESSIP objectives - IDP Activity Areas This table shows the relationship between ESSIP objectives and the activities proposed as a priority to be addressed in the IDP. As shown in the previous slide, the Master plan has been used as main input, in particular the operational changes in the SESAR baseline identified as essential. Starting point: mature implementation objectives described in the ESSIP (as the third layer of the Master plan), complemented by additional actions consistent with the Master plan and derived from the Network Strategy plan (NSP) identified by the NM as critical for network performance or proposed by the participating stakeholders. IMPORTANT: The ESSIP Plan becomes a single reference for the deployment planning at local level. For info only: Selection conducted according to the following criteria: Network Performance impact; Network Operations impact; Synchronisation needs; Relevance with regard to existing Regulations; Alignment with baseline's essential changes; Maturity for actual deployment within the IDSG timeframe ( ). The ESSIP Plan becomes a single reference for the deployment planning at local level LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

12 28/03/2017 ESSIP(/LSSIP) in the context of the setting up of the Deployment Programme EC Mandate to SESAR JU to draft a proposal on the content of a “pilot common project” Based on one or several essential operational changes identified in the ATM Master Plan level 1; Delivery of the proposal end April 2013: Use of SESAR JU consultation and cooperation mechanisms; Liaise with NM, PRB and EUROCONTROL’s DSS Consider the experience and methodologies used by IDSG Beyond the time-span , it is expected that the IDP will be taken over by a deployment programme, the execution of which would be attributed to a deployment coordinator. The content of the deployment programme will be defined through the establishment of a common project. A common project [ Repetition: is a tool foreseen in the Service Provision Regulation (Art. 15a of 550/2004) to assist the successful implementation of the ATM Master Plan. It consists of a comprehensive subset of implementation objectives extracted from the Master plan]. When adopted, the common project is then translated into implementation projects which are then integrated into the deployment programme. Common projects are eligible for Community funding within the multiannual financial framework. Recently the EC issued a mandate to the SESAR JU to develop a proposal for the pilot common project. Its delivery is expected by end of April 2013. This pilot common project will serve as a basis to select by early 2015 a deployment coordinator (deployment manager), and to identify a first set of implementation projects (the first Deployment Programme). In developing a proposal for the Pilot Common Project, the SJU has been asked to take into consideration the experience and methodologies used by IDSG. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

13 ESSIP/LSSIP yesterday: Self-contained
28/03/2017 ESSIP/LSSIP yesterday: Self-contained EU Regulations EUROCONTROL ATM Strategy ESSIP Plan ESSIP Report LSSIPs [CLICK] for quite a few years the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism has basically remained self-contained [CLICK] The inclusion of SES-related ESSIP objectives has marked a first evolution LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

14 ESSIP/LSSIP today & tomorrow: Multiple interactions
28/03/2017 ESSIP/LSSIP today & tomorrow: Multiple interactions EU Regulations ATM MP NSP ESSIP Plan LSSIPs ESSIP Report [CLICK] But that was nothing compared to the current situation and its envisaged evolution in the incoming months/years While it is anybody’s guess to know how ESSIP and LSSIP will be required to change, it seems very unlikely that they will not, in order to satisfy this complex environment, which at the moment is still in evolution. IDP Depl. Programme LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

15 Conclusions ESSIP/LSSIP is no longer a ‘static’ business;
28/03/2017 Conclusions ESSIP/LSSIP is no longer a ‘static’ business; ESSIP/LSSIP is no longer a EUROCONTROL-centric business; ESSIP/LSSIP is no longer a ‘simple’ business; ESSIP(/LSSIP) is fully integrated into Eur. ATM MP and related decision making processes, ultimately leading to the SESAR Deployment; Feeding the mentioned processes with timely and accurate information becomes crucial; and… LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

16 Conclusions (cont’d) 42 wagons, 1 train 28/03/2017
LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

17 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 ESSIP Report 2011 EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

18 The position of the ESSIP Report
28/03/2017 The position of the ESSIP Report ESSIP report closes the loop between planning and reporting. The main input is the information in the Part 2 of LSSIP. The interaction with the SES report is in the areas where the subject in National Regulator. This year ESSIP report fully relies on SES report in this aspect. The ESSIP report is also input to the ESSIP Plan (e.g. recommending that some objectives are achieved) but also to Level 2 of the European ATM Master Plan. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

19 What is new in the ESSIP Report for 2011?
28/03/2017 What is new in the ESSIP Report for 2011? Noracon - contributor ENAV - contributor Indra - reviewer Thales - reviewer NEW WAY OF WORKING SESAR WP C.02: European Deployment Reports and Assessments (D07) NEW CUSTOMERS IDSG, SESAR JU Noracon is the consortium of European ANSPs: Austrocontrol Avinor EANS Finavia IAA Isavia LFV Navair Swedavia NEW STRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

20 Main developments in 2011: positive
28/03/2017 Main developments in 2011: positive Implementation progress has improved in 2011 (green line). Number of ESSIP objectives progressing slower then plan has reduced (orange line). On the downside, number of ESSIP objectives reported as late in implementation has increased (red line) but at much lower rate then it was the case since 2007. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

21 Main developments in 2011: positive
28/03/2017 Main developments in 2011: positive Thank you for raising the awareness at the airports in your State. Significant improvement comparing to last year. Most of the airports that are in the applicability area of airport related ESSIP objectives now integrated in the LSSIP reporting. The process of raising awareness should continue. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

22 Main developments in 2011: positive
28/03/2017 Main developments in 2011: positive Airspace Users participation in ESSIP objective questionnaire: Air Astana Air France Bluejet BMW Continental Airlines Czech Airlines Condor Jet Air Fly Edelweiss Air KLM Malev Qantas South African Airlines Blue Panorama Martinair Thomas Cook Total fleet: 971 aircraft Airspace Users do not participate in LSSIP as a “classic” national stakeholder. A separate LSSIP-like exercise has been created for them (questionnaire containing all USE actions). This year 16 airlines reported. We will continue the exercise and hope the number of participating airlines will further grow – as explained at the K/O Event. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

23 Main developments in 2011: negative
28/03/2017 Main developments in 2011: negative 20 out of 49 ESSIP objectives recorded delays in the implementation (average 3 years) Commitment issues for 6 ESSIP objectives (range 1-13 States per objective) Data availability: 4 States reported missing data for one or more ESSIP objectives LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

24 ESSIP Implementation Monitoring (Ch. 4)
28/03/2017 ESSIP Implementation Monitoring (Ch. 4) Different interpretation of the objective progress ~ 75% 55% ~ 25% The detailed methodology can be found in the ESSIP Report for 2011, Chapter 3. Note the different interpretation of the objective progress: Some States are more conservative in the assessment of their progress, and some States are more optimistic. Common playing field in the interpretation of Objectives and Status of Implementation is necessary. Therefore, the guidance for the objective progress assessment has been amended to clarify the use of “Partially Completed” , “Not applicable” and “No Plan” status. This was again mentioned at the Event by a representative as very much needed. ESSIP Implementation Monitoring: A new indicator showing the level of reported adherence of national local plans to the European plan in the implementation of applicable ESSIP objectives. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

25 SESAR Deployment Baseline View (Ch. 5)
28/03/2017 SESAR Deployment Baseline View (Ch. 5) Operational Packages Operational Sub- Packages Operational Focus Areas Operational Improvement Steps ESSIP objectives Level 2 Level 3 European ATM Master Plan Operational Hierarchy Operational Package: Efficient and Green Terminal Airspace Operations For each of the 8 Operational Packages – dedicated analysis was made following the European ATM Master Plan Operational Hierarchy. Number of recommendations are defined for the SESAR WP C. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

26 Essential OI steps View (Ch. 6)
28/03/2017 Essential OI steps View (Ch. 6) 35 Essential Operational Improvements (OI steps) as defined in the SESAR WP C/ Project C.02, Task 2.2 “Short-Term Deployment Scenario Maintenance” All ESSIP objectives related to essential OIs (20) recommended to IDSG for inclusion in the Interim Deployment Programme Objectives analysed in detail: AOP05, AOP08, ATC07.1, COM10, FCM03, NAV03, ITY-AGDL Fully coordinated with the IDSG and produced as an input for the definition of Interim Deployment Programme. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels For all 35 essential OI Steps EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

27 Stakeholder Segment View (Ch. 7)
28/03/2017 Stakeholder Segment View (Ch. 7) National Regulators (covered in the SES Report) ANSPs Airports Military Authorities Airspace Users Ensure coordinated involvement of all national stakeholders in the LSSIP to harmonise the understanding of all ESSIP objectives’ implementation steps and status, thus ensuring a reliable assessment. As clarified at the Event, the data on Military Authorities collected through the LSSIPs are complemented by the data collected by the Civil-Military ATM Coordination Unit in Eurocontrol. This will be further properly clarified in the next ESSIP Report edition. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

28 28/03/2017 FAB View (Ch. 8) Produced jointly with Stakeholders participating in FAB projects Focus on ANSPs using ESSIP Implementation Monitoring method Objectives with FAB dimension only: Airspace Organisation and Management: AOM13.1, AOM19+20 Air Traffic Control: ATC02.2/.5/.6/.7, ATC12+15 Communication: COM06, COM0911 Flow Control Management: FCM01+03 Interoperability: ITY-ADQ, -AGDL, -AGVCS, -FMTP, -COTR. Ensure coordinated approach to the ESSIP in order to achieve harmonised understanding of all ESSIP objectives’ implementation steps and status, thus ensuring a reliable assessment, comparable throughout the FAB. Produced jointly by Eurocontrol and SESAR WP C partners. For most of the FABs the contributor was a Stakeholder involved in the FAB project. The idea was to complement the LSSIP data with “insider” view of the Stakeholder involved in the project. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

29 28/03/2017 Recommendations EUROCONTROL IDSG EC SJU EIPR DNM DSS REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC Relevant recommendations distributed to EC/IDSG, SESAR JU, DNM and DSS (Support to States) EIPR has already addressed its recommendations All these recommendations are distributed to the indicated subjects. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

30 National Stakeholders
28/03/2017 National Stakeholders FAB Airports ANSP’s NAA’s Recommendations REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC REC To be considered in the LSSIP 2012 REC REC These recommendations are to be addressed in the LSSIP No official letter will be sent. CP will review the recommendations with FP and provide more information on it or explain better the intention if needed. REC REC REC REC LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels REC EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

31 What is next? DATA QUALITY - ESSENTIAL
28/03/2017 What is next? ESSIP Report for 2011 to be presented to AAB/4 in October 2012 The planning of ESSIP Report for 2012 will start soon in coordination with SESAR WPC.02 partners And at the end: DATA QUALITY - ESSENTIAL Data quality is essential for this deliverable. Therefore, we kindly ask you to provide clear and concise data explaining your indicated status of implementation. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

32 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 SES Report including generic findings/recommendations EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

33 The position of the SES Report
28/03/2017 The position of the SES Report The report is produced following analysis of reports submitted by States in accordance with Article 12 of the framework Regulation and Article 8 of the flexible use of airspace (FUA) Regulation. In particular it is drawn from analysis of the SES and FUA sections of the LSSIP and, where relevant, complemented by information from other official publicly available EUROCONTROL and EU documents/sources. As such, this report forms part of the wider Local/European Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP/ESSIP) process. Its relationship to other reports is illustrated in the slide. Specific emphasis is put in its relationship with the ESSIP report trying to cross-feed each other while avoiding duplicating issues. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

34 2011 Cycle: SES Legislation Implementation Report - Highlights -
28/03/2017 2011 Cycle: SES Legislation Implementation Report - Highlights - LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

35 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2010 Highlights
28/03/2017 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2010 Highlights The institutional framework – i.e. separation regulation from service provision and NSA establishment, is in place, however: Level of progress in 2010 has slowed compared to previous years; Reported staff shortages by many NSAs remain worryingly high; Legal arrangements required for cross border ANS are not being put in place in the majority of States; Safety oversight of ASM/ATFM remains an issue; FABs/FAB initiatives have not yet started the process of inter-FAB coordination and cooperation; The lack of activity by NSAs in Interoperability (IOP) supervision is a matter of concern; No progress in establishment of enforcement measures for collection of air navigation charges; Monitoring of FUA performance remains low. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

36 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (I)
28/03/2017 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (I) NSA Resources Progress has been made in recruitment during 2011. NSAs reporting being adequately staffed or reporting a shortage below 15% has increased from 8 to 11. Recruitment plans for 3 NSAs are now approved (on hold in 2010). Still shortage of qualified auditors but no NSA reports now ‘0’ auditors. A number of NSAs remain understaffed. Overall 24% staff shortage. 8 NSAs still report recruitment plans on hold or under consideration LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

37 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (II)
28/03/2017 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (II) Cross-Border Service Provision Large improvement in information reported; better NSA awareness. Significant improvement (for the first time) in the conclusion of NSA-NSA arrangements. Improvement is largely within FABs. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

38 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (III)
28/03/2017 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (III) Safety Oversight Significant improvement in oversight of ASM/ATFM. Still 8 NSAs (9 in 2010) reported deficiencies in their processes for safety oversight LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

39 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (IV)
28/03/2017 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (IV) Interoperability 26 States (24 in 2010) indicated that processes for verification of compliance with IOP Regulation have been developed (and encouraging signs for the 3 remaining States). More NSAs having received DoVs (24 vs 18 in 2010) suggests that effectiveness of the oversight is improving. Verification of compliance with IRs by the NSAs has improved. Inconsistencies with ANSPs plans reported in other LSSIP sections remain. Difficult to assess the effectiveness of the current IRs (only 3 should be fully implemented), however indications of delays in COTR and DLS. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

40 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (V)
28/03/2017 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (V) Enforcement measures for the collection of air navigation charges Little progress made. Some States remain recalcitrant. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

41 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (VI)
28/03/2017 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (VI) FUA Performance Assessment LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

42 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (VII)
28/03/2017 SES Legislation Implementation Report – 2011 highlights (VII) Additional 2011 highlights: NSAs should use their fora (e.g. NCP) to find a common approach to: Certification and designation of AFIS providers. Oversight of the software safety assurance system Regulation. Various areas of the ATFM Regulation: handling critical events; monitoring adherence to ATFM departure slots and penalties for infringements. FUA performance assessment, FUA compliance monitoring (and the NSAs role in it). Additionally, further guidance is required for supporting the NSAs in: Establishing risk based approaches to ongoing oversight of the common requirements. Ensure a common approach is adopted to safety oversight, and in particular to ANS, ASM and AFTM audits. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

43 2011 Cycle: Lessons Learnt 28/03/2017
LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

44 Lessons Learnt – States’ Reports
28/03/2017 Lessons Learnt – States’ Reports Steady improvement by States in understanding, awareness and reporting quality over the four cycles. Consultation of the State Annual report with Agency LSSIP Contact Person before signature is advisable. The size of the reports remains at the limit of what is manageable both for States to report and EUROCONTROL to analyse. Some issues have reached a maturity level of implementation that would allow to extend the ‘simplified-version-for-compliant-States’ principle already used in the 2010 reporting cycle. Time and quality-wise States managed to deliver, so working arrangements seem to work. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

45 Lessons Learnt - SES Legislation Implementation Report
28/03/2017 Lessons Learnt - SES Legislation Implementation Report 2011 Report better than ‘10, ’09 & ’08 (deeper analysis by experts, LSSIP cross-check, maturity of data allows some benchmarking, etc.) Recommendations are more and more specific, the majority now focus on specific issues within individual States  better common understanding of the legislation. The overall SES Reporting process (including EC follow-up) shows improvements in key areas. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

46 Follow-up actions The Commission to inform States… 28/03/2017
LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

47 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 List of LSSIP 2012 Actions EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

48 Background of the Actions List
28/03/2017 Background of the Actions List 82 Actions in the list inherited from the previous LSSIP Workshops; 10 new Actions (83 to 92) added by EIPR Team; EIPR evaluated the progress made & proposed the way forward for each of the actions; Updated list including EIPR proposals was sent to the National FPs by end April 2012 for feedback 69 Actions derived from the LSSIP 2011 Workshop while 13 derived from the Workshops of the year 2010 and before; 10 new Actions are the result of the EIPR Analysis of the lessons learned from the LSSIP 2011 cycle. The lessons learned were mostly collected by all LSSIP CPs in collaboration with their respective National FPs. In addition, they are the result of the analysis of the Level 2 objectives by EIPR Objective Coordinators in support to drafting the ESSIP 2011 Report; LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

49 28/03/2017 State’s Responses 16 National Focal Points out of 42 responded and commented on the List (around 35%); On average 42 out of 92 Actions were commented (around 46%); The highest figure of responses given by a state was 99% (91 actions) while the lowest one only 10% (9 actions); 3 new actions (93 to 95) proposed by a National FP reaching the total number of 95 actions. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

50 28/03/2017 Action List for 2012 Most of the comments made by the FPs were taken into consideration in the final action list; This new list contains 28 actions, significantly less than the previous one with 82; 13 Actions planned to be finalised by 11 Sep 2012; 3 by end of 2012, 11 by end of June 2013; 1 Action (No 4) to be activated when requested by any FAB. Attention: any RSSIP not to replace LSSIP, but complementary. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

51 Most important topics addressed by the list of actions
28/03/2017 Most important topics addressed by the list of actions LSSIP Template quality improvements, No 1, 2, 25; Further improvements on the LSSIP document quality control, No 6-9, 24; Establishment of better links between ESSIP Objectives, OIs steps and KPAs/KPIs, No 12-16, 26; Enhancement of the LSSIP Database functionalities, No 5, 10, 11, 21, 27; Further quality improvement of LSSIP Level 2 information, No 17-20, 28 LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

52 Where are we & what should be done to implement successfully the list
28/03/2017 Where are we & what should be done to implement successfully the list 2 of the 13 actions planned to be finalised by 11 Sep remain in progress (No 3 & 5) Further improve collaboration and coordination between EIPR and all national representatives; Regular exchange of information on the progress made on the implementation of the actions by relevant actors i.e. every 3 or 4 months; Update of the list based on the progress made as necessary LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

53 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 Wrap up of lessons learnt EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

54 Wrap up See Item 7 CP-FP Action List 17 CP-FP ESSIP Report SES Report
28/03/2017 Wrap up ESSIP Report SES Report EIPR REC See Item 7 REC REC REC CP-FP REC DATA QUALITY - ESSENTIAL Ensure coordinated involvement of all national stakeholders in the LSSIP to harmonise the understanding of all ESSIP objectives’ implementation steps and status, thus ensuring a reliable assessment. Action List 17 Ensure coordinated approach to the ESSIP in order to achieve harmonised understanding of all ESSIP objectives’ implementation steps and status, thus ensuring a reliable assessment, comparable throughout the FAB. CP-FP LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

55 Wrap up See Item 6 See Item 8a See Item 7 See Item 8b 28/03/2017
Attention: item 24 not yet entirely finished. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

56 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 Overall changes in the LSSIP 2012 Process + Deliverables + Tools EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

57 LSSIP Process One Common Kick-off Event One local meeting
28/03/2017 LSSIP Process One Common Kick-off Event One local meeting One mandatory review of LSSIP level 2 All LSSIP Parts single Working Level Agreed and single signature page LSSIP Process overall Changes: The annual LSSIP Process starts with a Common Kick-off Event, held this year for the first time. One local meeting can be planned. It is to be arranged between the national LSSIP Focal Point and the LSSIP Contact Person of the EIPR Team. The EIPR Team will conduct one review at the level of Stakeholder Lines of Actions for each Objective. Relevant comments and suggestions, if any, will be made to each national Focal Point by mail. Once all Parts of the LSSIP are Working level agreed, that means agreed between the EIPR LSSIP Contact Person and the national Focal Point, then the report can be signed. New is that for this edition there is only one signature page necessary for the report (except SES & FUA). Finally, the LSSIP database will be frozen as from 01/03/2012. This means that you are not able to update any data as from that date onwards. Freezing of LSSIP Database 01/03/2013 LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

58 Deliverables, Guidance & Tools
28/03/2017 Deliverables, Guidance & Tools Changes in the LSSIP Template Valérie, Ana Paula, Oscar Avoiding repetitions & overlap Changes in the ESSIP Plan Octavian Significant changes & New Objectives Changes to Guidance Material Ingrid Updated LSSIP Guide & ppt slides (tips & tricks) Implementation progress definition Several Changes were made with regard to deliverables, the guidance material and the tools. In Detail these changes entail Changes in the LSSIP Template – will be presented this afternoon by Valérie, Ana Paula and Oscar. These changes were made to avoid repetitions and overlaps. Changes in the ESSIP Plan – will be presented this afternoon by Octavian. These changes were to the ESSIP Objectives. Octavian will also present information about two newly introduced ESSIP Objectives for this cycle, as you might have seen in the ESSIP Plan. Changes to Guidance Material – will be presented this afternoon by Ingrid. These contain an updated LSSIP Guide, updated PowerPoint slides with tips & trick and a updated definitions for the Implementation progress reporting. Changes to the LSSIP Tools – will be presented this afternoon by Fani. She will present you the upgraded LSSIP Map Tool. Changes to LSSIP Tools Fani Upgraded LSSIP Map Tool & New functionalities LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

59 LSSIP Process Better reporting Stay tuned Have a nice Lunch 28/03/2017
All the changes were made to help and support you, as national Focal Points, to do a better reporting. So stay tuned for this afternoon for the presentations on the detailed changes. In the meantime we wish you all a nice lunch. Lunch is served in front of this Conference room. Bon appetit. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

60 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 Changes in the LSSIP Template - overall EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

61 28/03/2017 LSSIP: Structure Same reporting set-up as previous Editions: Documents (Level 1 – Level 2) / Infrastructure (LSSIP Database - Web) New picture on the cover page Level 1 document remains in four parts, but Parts not more identified by numbers Former Parts III & IV swap position with each other (impacting also Executive Summary) One signature page covering all parts of LSSIP Level 1 (except SES + FUA Reports) Traffic & Performance Part further slimmed down eliminating all repetitions or overlapping with PRU Report and NOP IMPORTANT: take into account comment of EC 10 Sep on SES Reporting situation, as mentioned at the opening of the Kick/Off Event. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

62 28/03/2017 LSSIP: Naming of parts Former Part I = State Context (no change of title) Former Part II = ESSIP Objective Implementation (formerly: Implementation of ESSIP Objectives) Former Part IV = Traffic and ATM Performance (no change of title) Former Part III = Legislation Implementation (formerly: Implementation of SES Legislation) LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

63 UK LSSiP Signature Process
28/03/2017 UK LSSiP Signature Process 2012 Kick-off Meeting Eurocontrol 11/12 Sep 12 IMPORTANT: for more information, contact UK FP Mac MacKay. The purpose of this presentation is to provide an alternative good practice as applied in the UK. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012 63

64 LSSiP Signature Process
28/03/2017 LSSiP Signature Process Fundamental Issues Too many signatories Tight deadlines Labour intensive Cost prohibitive Too many signatories: It was always difficult with one master signature sheet, but was further exacerbated and unworkable with the introduction of 8 additional airports! Tight deadlines: The process was always tight, as the stakeholders required as much time as possible to provide accurate information up to the end of the calendar year. This then impacted on the SES/FUA reporting schedule, which then made it increasingly difficult to offset enough time to start the signature process on time to meet the Eurocontrol deadlines. Labour intensive: To both the LSSiP team member and stakeholders. Trying to arrange convenient times in very busy schedules, and then sticking to them, was always difficult. Cost prohibitive: The travel costs associated with either the LSSiP member having to courier the signature sheet around all the stakeholders or by using an independent company, made us realise that with so many stakeholders it was definitely not cost efficient and therefore was the main driver for us reconsidering our method and seeking to adapt the signature process. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012 64

65 Changes Required to Streamline Signature Process
28/03/2017 Changes Required to Streamline Signature Process Agreement from Stakeholders for one signature at State level Part II Approval Sheet provides the explanation for the governance Validation of all stakeholders’ submission is provided by confirmation to Focal Point Validations are maintained for audit and to satisfy State signatory LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012 65

66 28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012 66

67 Stakeholder Perspective
28/03/2017 Stakeholder Perspective Fundamentally Fully briefed at Focus Groups by the Focal Point and Data Manager at start of cycle Governance issues are accommodated Support provided throughout the process as and when required LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012 67

68 In Conclusion What have we gained? Satisfactory process
28/03/2017 In Conclusion What have we gained? Satisfactory process Efficient process Acceptable governance process Increased flexibility LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012 68

69 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 Changes in the LSSIP Template - Traffic and ATM Performance EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

70 Traffic and ATM Performance
28/03/2017 Traffic and ATM Performance Is a unique compilation of relevant performance data, organised at State level, and a quick overall reference to stakeholders and general public on performance matters It may constitute the foundation for aligning and linking the technical and operational implementation progress with relevant performance targets and overall European ATM performance LSSIP chapter 3 (National Projects) can provide an important source of information if completely reported, detailed and enhanced ATM is now performance driven, not only in Europe but also globally at ICAO level. In Europe the SESAR Programme has committed to very ambitious performance targets and the European Commission with the SES package II introduced a performance framework with quantified target setting. At National level, in the LSSIP documents, this performance environment shall also be reflected and 3 chapters are currently included. It was clarified at the event that there will be no duplication with other data. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

71 Traffic and ATM Performance data LSSIP year 2012
28/03/2017 Traffic and ATM Performance data LSSIP year 2012 Three chapters: Cost Efficiency – Small changes En-route Traffic & Capacity – No change in structure Airport Traffic & Capacity – No change in structure EIPR is responsible for coordinating and assembling the content and ensuring overall quality. Most data and information elements are not provided and filled in by States (unlike the other LSSIP parts), but are coming from various EUROCONTROL Units. This entails an extensive coordination effort and dependence upon the release of data. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

72 Cost Efficiency  IR 691 July 2010 (Performance Scheme) is in place
28/03/2017 Cost Efficiency  IR 691 July 2010 (Performance Scheme) is in place  Performance Plans were delivered  PRB monitoring activity will start soon For EU 27+: a common text will be developed with a link to monitoring activities done by PRB For non-EU States: it will include monitoring of the national cost-efficiency Performance Indicator (PI) for Enlarged Committee for Route Charges data will be used (meeting November 2012) Georgia & Azerbaijan will provide their data PRU provides support Estimated timing: Chapter available for distribution by December 2012 As clarified in one of the further Kick Off Meetings on 12 Sep, stakeholders may decide, if they wish so, to copy part of the information in the link to monitoring activities done by PRB, within the LSSIP part, to ensure that the entire document remains properly readable. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

73 En-route Traffic & Capacity
28/03/2017 En-route Traffic & Capacity Chapter coordinated with DNM/OPL (Operations Planning) who will gather and process the data Capacity Planning data to be available after coordination meetings with States (from mid November 2012 till mid January 2013) Same structure and content as in previous editions EUROCONTROL Contact Persons will send the chapter to national Focal Points and coordinate the final validation LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

74 Airport Traffic and Capacity (1)
28/03/2017 Airport Traffic and Capacity (1) This chapter is based on a tailored list of airports built around the following criteria: The main national airport of each State Airports with more than movements Airports identified as critical and having an impact in the network in terms of ATFM delays LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

75 Airport Traffic and Capacity (2)
28/03/2017 Airport Traffic and Capacity (2) Chapter includes information on Airport Traffic, Airport Delays, Capacity and Planned developments/delay reduction plan Three main sources of data: STATFOR MTF – available early October 2012 NM/CODA - delay section for critical airports Airport Corner (Airport Unit) - November 2012 Chapter will be distributed to national Focal Point by the second fortnight of November 2012 As clarified during the Event, the Airport Corner is a forum created in the context of the Network Manager/Airport Unit where around 40 main European airports participate and contribute by providing operational data related, amongst others, airport capacity, schedule events of operational nature, etc. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

76 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 Changes in the LSSIP Template – SES and FUA report EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

77 2012 Template – Drivers for Change
28/03/2017 2012 Template – Drivers for Change Lessons learnt from the 2011 reporting exercise New Regulations EC and EASA’s priorities IMPORTANT: take into account comment of EC 10 Sep on SES Reporting situation, as mentioned at the opening of the Kick/Off Event. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

78 2012 Template – Lessons Learnt
28/03/2017 2012 Template – Lessons Learnt Cross-Border: Maturity and level of implementation much improved  Reporting can be much simplified. Safety Oversight: Use of ‘short versions’ for compliant States to continue. Better link with ongoing compliance needed. FABs: Approach to be discussed with Commission. FUA: Section can be simplified. Link with performance scheme needs to be developed. Because of the information sent by FABs in June (ref FAB IR), the approach needs to be discussed with EC – to avoid duplication etc. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

79 2012 Template – New Regulations
28/03/2017 2012 Template – New Regulations Regulation (EU) No 677/ Rules for the Implementation of ATM Network Functions (not new but not covered last year) Regulation (EU) No 1206/ Requirements on Aircraft Identification for Surveillance (ACID) Regulation (EU) No 1207/ Requirements for the Performance and Interoperability of Surveillance (SPI) LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

80 2012 Template – EC and EASA’s priorities
28/03/2017 2012 Template – EC and EASA’s priorities TBD… LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

81 2012 Template – Non-EU, Non-ECAA States
28/03/2017 2012 Template – Non-EU, Non-ECAA States Coverage does not change (ESARRs and FUA implementation). Simplifications implemented for EU States (e.g. safety oversight, FUA) will be replicated. As clarified during the event, the LSSIP documents need to have a common structure for all States. Therefore the Part on Legislation Implementation for non-EU, non-ECAA States will be in line with the same Part for the other States. This applies to MD, UA, AM, AZ and TR. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

82 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 ESSIP Plan 2012 significant changes (New Objectives, significant changes of the existing ones, etc) The presentations contains the significant changes brought into the ESSIP Plan 2012, compared with the previous edition. It refers to significant changes but also to new, closed and removed objectives. EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

83 Outline Development context What has changed… Facts and figures
28/03/2017 Outline Development context What has changed… Facts and figures More details… Questions The slides will provide information on: The process followed in in order to define and implement the significant changes and the involvement of different stakeholders. More detailed definition of “significant change” Some comparative figures based on snapshots of Editions 2011 and 2012 More details about each modified objective as well as about the content of the new objectives Reasons for closing or removing objectives LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

84 ESSIP Plan Edition 2012- Part of WPC.2
28/03/2017 ESSIP Plan Edition Part of WPC.2 EUROCONTROL does not develop any more ESSIP objectives in isolation. The ESSIP plan is an official deliverable of SESAR JU EUROCONTROL is Task Leader within WP C.02 7 contributors (AIRBUS, ALENIA, DFS, ENAV, NATS, SEAC, THALES) 1 reviewer (INDRA) WPC.02 (Deployment/Performance planning and reporting) Partners provide: Input in developing Outline descriptions Feed-back in developing an ESSIP objective Feed-back in drafting an ESSIP Plan Document Review of ESSIP Plan Document EUROCONTROL is not the only “source” of ESSIP objectives. As the ESSIP Plan represents the level 3 of the European ATM Master Plan, it is also an official deliverable of the SESAR JU. As such, it is being developed through the mechanisms of the SESAR WP C.02, with the involvement of several stakeholders representing the industry. This involvement takes place all along the lifecycle of the ESSIP Objective development, from initiation up to the review and approval of the Plan. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

85 Significant changes (1/2)
28/03/2017 Significant changes (1/2) Modified objectives - 28 Changed references to OI Steps Dates aligned with OI Steps Change of scope, to align with SESAR Change of geographical scope (ex-SRC objectives) Changes triggered by the “Action list” (18 -changes to the applicability area for the airport ESSIP Objectives, 26 - the new Master Plan category of "essential" OI Steps) New objectives - 2 Closed objectives - 2 Removed objectives - 3 Listed in Annex A to the ESSIP Plan – Edition 2012 Many Objectives have changed for this Edition, notably in order to keep the alignment with the Master Plan, in the context of its update. Therefore the vast majority of the changes are either better references to the SESAR OI steps or changes in the dates associated to Full Operational Capabilities (FOC). In all the cases when a FOC date has been modified, it has been delayed. No dates were brought forward. As said, the reason for these date changes is to be found in the process of updating the European ATM Master Plan. Another set of changes is due to the reduction in the applicability area of the SRC objectives. This change will be addressed later on in the presentation. Two new objectives were added this edition, one triggered by SESAR (ATC-17) and the other by the publication of new EU legislation (ITY-SPI). 5 Objectives have disappeared, either because they are completed (2) or because they are overtaken by events in the context of the publication of new EU legislation in the field of surveillance (2). All the changes mentioned above are to be found in the Annex A to the ESSIP Plan 2012. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

86 Significant changes (2/2)
28/03/2017 Significant changes (2/2) In cooperation with SESAR JU WP C02; Reviewed by the relevant EUROCONTROL Teams; Approved by AAB and SJU WPC; Endorsed by the PC. All these changes were done with the involvement of several stakeholders and working arrangements. First they were mostly triggered in the context of the SESAR WP C.02. Afterwards they were reviewed by the relevant EUROCONTROL Teams, approved by the AAB and by the SJU WPC and last but not least, the Plan still being an EUROCONTROL document, endorsed by the Provisional Council through correspondence. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

87 28/03/2017 This picture gives a hive level view of the Objectives in Edition 2011, with quite an equal spread across the SES, SESAR and “legacy, pre SESAR era” ECIP Objectives. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

88 28/03/2017 Now, this is the situation for this year. It can be seen that the number of “legacy” ECIP objectives has been significantly reduced while the number of “SESAR” objectives is now much larger. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

89 28/03/2017 2011 2012 The same information as in the previous 2 slides, but in a different format. It can be also be observed that the overall number of objectives is slightly lower than last year. In practice for most of the States it is even lower because the 5 SRC objectives are now only applicable to the States which are not EU Members or have not signed aviation agreements with the EU. So the SRC objectives are now relevant for only 5 States: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Moldova, Turkey and Ukraine. For all the other States these objectives are “Not Applicable” so for them this reduction in the number of objectives is even more significant, from 49 to 41. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

90 Modified objectives (1/5)
28/03/2017 Modified objectives (1/5) AOM13.1 (Harmonize OAT and GAT handling) FOC aligned with OI step AOM-0301 (2015 → 2018) SLoA MIL 03 & 05 removed following the Eur ATM MP Update campaign AOM19 (Implement Advanced Airspace Management) Removed wrong reference to OI step DCB-0204 AOM20 (Implement ARN 7)) Removed references to OI Steps AOM-0203, DCB-0204, SDM-0103 AOP01.2 (Implement airside capacity enhancement method) FOC aligned with OI step AUO-0701 (2011 → 2013) More explicit links with OI Steps AOP03 (Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions) Link to OI Step AO-0103 removed The following 5 slides will provide factual information about the modifications brought to the objectives, presenting the modified objectives, one by one, in alphabetical order, the same you’ll find in the ESSIP Plan 2012. The first 4 Slides contain the objectives which were changed due to request coming from, SESAR and triggered notably the update of the European ATM Master Plan. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

91 Modified objectives (2/5)
28/03/2017 Modified objectives (2/5) AOP04.1 (Implement A-SMGCS Level 1) FOC aligned with OI step AO-0201 (2010 → 2011) AOP04.2 (Implement A-SMGCS Level 2) FOC aligned with OI step AO-0102 (2013 → 2017) AOP05 (Implement A-CDM) FOC aligned with OI steps AO-0601, AO-602a/b, AO-0603, DCB-0302 (2013 → 2016) AOP08 (Implement Airport Airside Capacity Planning Method) FOC aligned with OI step DCB-0201 (2011 → 2015) ATC02.5, 02.6, 02.7 (Implement APW, MSAW, APM Level 2) Scope changed to “SESAR/ECAC” (deployment according to local needs) FOC changed (2013 → 2016) Removed the references to the EUROCONTROL draft Specifications from the objectives description (but left as Supporting Material!) As far as the EUROCONTROL draft Specification are concerned, they were removed from the detailed objective description because of the their “draft” status. Moreover it is better to describe the objectives in a functional way. However, as these documents are technically mature they were maintained in the list of Supporting Material, so whoever want to use them to defines their system specifications is free to do so. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

92 Modified objectives (3/5)
28/03/2017 Modified objectives (3/5) ATC07.1 (Implement AMAN tools) Scope changed to “SESAR/ECAC” (at selected Airports and TMAs) FOC aligned with OI step TS-0102 (2010 → 2015) ATC12 (Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring) FOC aligned with OI step TS-0203 (2015 → 2016) ATC15 (Implement, in En-route, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations) FOC aligned with OI step TS-0305 (01/2017 → 12/2017) ATC16 (Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1) FOC aligned with EU Regulation 1332/2011 on common airspace usage requirements and operating procedures for airborne collision avoidance (01/2015 → 12/2015) COM09 (Migrate from X 25 to IP) FOC aligned with EU Regulation 283/2011 amending the FMTP Regulation (EC) No 633/2007 as regards the transitional arrangements (2011 → 2014) ENV02 (Implement Collaborative Environmental Management at Airports) Included link with OI step AO-0705 and 2 SLoAs to reflect this link FOC aligned with OI step AO-0705 (2013 → 2015) LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

93 Modified objectives (4/5)
28/03/2017 Modified objectives (4/5) FCM03 (Implement collaborative flight planning) FOC aligned with OI step IS-0102 (2010 → 2012) INF04 (Implement integrated briefing) FOC aligned with OI step IS-0201 (2007 → 2012) SLoA INF04 – ASP01 revised ITY-ADQ (Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information) Removed reference to OI Step IS-0203 NAV03 (Implementation of P-RNAV) Scope changed to “SESAR/ECAC” Removed reference to OI Step AOM-0602 FOC aligned with OI step AOM-0601 (2010 → 2012) NAV10 (Implement Approach Procedures with Vertical Guidance - APV) Removed wrong reference to OI step AOM-0603 LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

94 Modified objectives (5/5)
28/03/2017 Modified objectives (5/5) SRC-AUDI, -CHNG, -OVCA, -RLMK, -SLRD Overtaken by events Within the scope of Regulation (EU) 1034/2011 on safety oversight in air traffic management and air navigation services and amending Regulation (EU) No 691/2010 For EU+ States, local planning and compliance reporting included in the generic EU reporting mechanisms Scope changed to Multi National to allow the reporting by the non-EU+ States This is a different type of change, not triggered by SESAR. Our initial intention was to remove these objectives completely from the plan because all these subjects are now covered by the EU legislation therefore planning and compliance will have to be reported anyway through other reporting mechanisms, by the EU Member States and by the States which have aviation agreements with the EU. However as there are EUROCONTROL Member States which do not fall within the above categories and which whish to continue reporting, it was decided to keep these objectives in the ESSIP Plan, but with a limited scope, applicable only to Armenia, Azerbaijan, Moldova, Turkey and Ukraine. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

95 28/03/2017 New objectives (1/2) ATC17 (Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and transfer) Linked to the OI step CM-0201 Automated Assistance to Controller for Seamless Coordination, Transfer and Dialogue Complements the ITY-COTR Objective Includes the voluntary processes defined in Regulation (EC) 1032/2006 laying down requirements for automatic systems for the exchange of flight data for the purpose of notification, coordination and transfer of flights between air traffic control units Based on the EUROCONTROL OLDI Specification (v. 4.2) Implementation based on local needs, local business cases and bilateral agreements List of OLDI messages to be chosen from, included in the objective description This is a new objective triggered by SESAR. It is dealing with the automated coordination of flights between controllers and is based on the exchange of messages defined in version 4.2 of the EUROCONTROL Specification for On-Line Data Interchange (OLDI). It is important to note that even if the applicable area is ECAC, the implementation has to be done based on bilateral agreements, taking into account the local operational needs and the local business cases. The same about the OLDI messages to be implemented, as the Objective only provide a “shopping list” of messages to be chosen from for implementation so as to fix local needs. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

96 28/03/2017 New objectives (2/2) ITY-SPI (Surveillance performance and interoperability) Derived from Regulation (EU) 1207/2011 laying down requirements for the performance and the interoperability of surveillance for the single European sky But NOT all the regulatory requirements transposed in SLoAs Focussed on implementation actions by ANSPs and Airspace Users Compliance information to be complemented in the SES Annual Report Choice of the technology left at the level of ANSP Potential evolution of ITY-SPI once the technical choice will be made by the ANSPs This is an objective triggered by the publication of new SES legislation in the field of surveillance. The Objective focuses on concrete implementation actions which need to be put in place by stakeholders, notably ANSPs and Airspace Users in order to fulfil the requirements of the Regulation. Therefore this Objective will not cover all the stakeholders impacted by the Regulation as the Member States for example, which have to implement some high level requirements notably on better coordination between themselves are not covered by the Objective. In what concerns the reporting by the airspace users on the relevant lines of action, it is acknowledged that there is room for improvement as not many users are providing information. However the reporting by the airlines is gaining momentum and the trend over the last years is obviously positive. This positive trend is also captured in the annual ESSIP Report. In terms of possible improvements, the airspace users could also be involved through their participation in the SESAR WP C in order to significantly increase the number of users providing reports. By having the most accurate information about the implementation plans both on the ground as in the air, will significantly facilitate the deployment synchronisation and increase the transparency. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

97 28/03/2017 Closed objectives COM06 (Migration to ATS-Qsig digital signalling for ground telephone applications) and ITY-AGVCS (Air-Ground voice channel spacing above FL 195) Closed as “achieved” At least 80% of the SLoAs have been finalised by 80% of Stakeholders But… an ITY-AGVCS 2 may be expected in the near future (deployment of 8.33 kHz below FL 195) Two objectives were removed from the plan as they are considered achieved. One of them refers to the deployment of 8.33 kHz air-ground voice communications in the airspace above Flight Level 195, as required by the SES Regulation (EC) 1265/2007. However, a new Regulation has just been voted by the Single Sky Committee, gradually enlarging the scope of 8.33 kHz communications to the entire airspace. As this Regulation has not been published yet in the Official Journal of the European Union, it is premature to discuss a follow up of the ITY-AGVCS Objective. Once this Regulation will be published (expected before the end of the year) we could start a debate over the need of a related ITY ESSIP objective. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

98 Removed objectives SUR02, 04, 05
28/03/2017 Removed objectives SUR02, 04, 05 Original objectives, including timescales, overtaken by publication of Regulations (EU) 1206/2011 (ACID IR) and 1207/2011 (SPI IR) Implementation progress remains modest, with only one third of States having fully completed the actions required. A number of Administrations already aligned their National Plans to the Regulations Partially covered by ITY-SPI Potential evolution towards an extension of ITY-SPI These 3 Objectives dealing with the deployment of Mode S Elementary Surveillance, Mode S Enhanced Surveillance and ADS-B in non-radar airspace were removed as overtaken by the event of the publication of the SES Regulation on surveillance performance and interoperability. This new regulation has a technically independent approach, leaving the freedom to the service provider to chose the technology that suits them better in terms of safety, efficiency and costs. Therefore the 3 SUR objectives, being technology specific were in contradiction with the principles of the Regulation. However, once the ANSP will take a decision with regard the technology they want to implement, some new technology specific objective may be considered in order to synchronise the deployment. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

99 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 LSSIP Guidance Material Changes This presentation explains the changes made in the LSSIP Guidance Material. Why they were needed and what the major changes are. It also explains when Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) should be reported as Partially Completed (PC) and when an objective or SLoA should be reported as Not Applicable (N/A). EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

100 Why changes were needed?
28/03/2017 Why changes were needed? All identified issues of the Action’s List are being reviewed and will be updated in the Guide to LSSIP Production. Specific update to the “definition of implementation progress” Guidance As already mentioned in the earlier presentations, the Action List has triggered some issues where changes in the process were needed. All the issues raised derived from this Action’s List are identified and reviewed. Note that for the moment we are still updating the Guide to LSSIP Production, and it will be sent to you once it is ready, for your further perusal. This in fact is action item 24, which was supposed to be finished by today. Then action item nr 17 was to review the definition of the implementation progress Guidance. This was done end of June. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

101 Implementation Progress definition - Why changes were needed?
28/03/2017 Implementation Progress definition - Why changes were needed? Need for more coherence & consistency throughout the document; Increased pressure on LSSIP to reliably reflect the progress on implementation of ESSIP objectives as more and more LSSIP information is used as an input to the SESAR work and IDSG; Need to establish a common playing field for all states/stakeholders in monitoring and reporting progress of the ESSIP objectives and hence have a reliable indicator of the level of adherence of states plans to ESSIP objectives (ESSIP 2011); Avoid marginalisation of any specific stakeholders within a state for any Objectives. Why were changes needed? The implementation progress of SLoAs, Stakeholders and States in relation to the ESSIP Objectives may be interpreted and applied unevenly, with occasional inconsistency among the concerned stakeholders or from one LSSIP document to another. To ensure that the LSSIP mechanism continuously produces and provides planning, reporting & monitoring information of the highest quality more coherence & consistency are needed throughout the document. Another point is the increased pressure on LSSIP to reliably reflect the progress on implementation of ESSIP objectives. More and more LSSIP information is used as an input to the SESAR work and IDSG. Furthermore, the correct interpretation and verification of implementation progress reported by the Focal Points and other Stakeholders, is an important factor to ensure quality and European-wide uniformity of the LSSIP documents. Therefore, establishment of a common playing field for all is needed in order to have a reliable indicator of the level of adherence of stakeholders plans to ESSIP objectives. And finally, avoidance of marginalisation of any specific national stakeholders within a state for any Objectives is needed. Simply said Stakeholders are equally important when assessing the overall progress. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

102 Implementation Progress definition - What are the major changes?
28/03/2017 Implementation Progress definition - What are the major changes? Elimination of the term ‘low key stakeholder’ in the assessment of the objective’s progress. Hence consider all stakeholders equally important in assessing the progress of the objective at overall state level; Only exception: in case where the objective is ‘Not applicable’ to a stakeholder - hence not considered in the assessment of the objective’s progress; Better definition of ‘Partially Completed (PC)’ SLoA’s progress by the determination of the exact phase of implementation when the SLoA should be considered as PC; Two significant changes related to the ‘Not Applicable’ implementation progress definition. So what are those big changes? First of all the term ‘low key stakeholder’ has been eliminated from the assessment of the objective’s progress. In previous years we have experienced that stakeholder progresses differ through the SLoAs of a Stakeholder, which may complicate the assessment and also make it dependent of other aspects, such as if any specific SLoAs are less necessary or important to the end Objective in the general ESSIP implementation context or in that particular local context. In this way, all stakeholders are equally important in assessing the progress of the objective at overall state level. There is only one exception when a stakeholder is not considered in the assessment of the objective’s progress and that is in case where the objective is ‘Not applicable’ to a stakeholder. We also determined a better definition of the progress indicator ‘Partially Completed’. This means that the SLoAs progress should determine the exact phase of implementation when the SLoA should be considered as Partially Completed. Some examples will be given in the next slide. There are also two significant changes related to the implementation progress definition of Not Applicable. This will come back a bit later in the presentation. As clarified at the meeting, the document with the progress definitions will also be made available through the LSSIP DB. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

103 Implementation Progress definition - When should an SLoA be PC?
28/03/2017 Implementation Progress definition - When should an SLoA be PC? Hardware/Software is in operation but still in test mode waiting to be certified by appropriate authority; Any documentation released as a ‘Proposed Issue’ and waiting for approval by appropriate authority; Training has been conducted by the relevant personnel but still waiting to be formally certified/licensed by appropriate authorities as necessary; National legislation/regulation/directive/mandate developed/modified and finalised but still to be formally approved/endorsed/promulgated by appropriate authorities When should an SLoA be ‘PC’? [Mention all the examples …. then continue…] When you have determined that the SLoA should be Partially Completed the situation must be briefly but clearly explained in the respective ‘Field’ of the LSSIP database, in such a way that the reader understands what the local plans/schedule are to achieve full completion and to be aware of the advanced progress on the implementation of the SLoA. So to be qualified as Partially Completed the reported completion date shall be within the finish date of the ESSIPs SLoA. If this is not the case, then the SLoA must be reported ‘Late’. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

104 28/03/2017 Implementation Progress definition - When should an objective/SLoA be N/A? State/Stakeholder is not part of ESSIP ‘Applicability Area’; Stakeholder does not provide the required service i.e. number of SLoAs related to the Military or MUAC; Stakeholder has reviewed the SLoA and there is no intention to implement it because it is not justified particularly in terms of the ratio cost/benefit or there are national/local restrictions in terms of environment, legislation which prevent the Stakeholder to implement it; Stakeholder is implementing alternative solution (e.g. not following proposed EUROCONTROL guidelines) to the one described in the SLoA. The last two bullets are the two significant changes. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

105 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 LSSIP Tools EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

106 28/03/2017 LSSIP Database No changes in the functionalities or layout but the DB has been moved to a more powerful server and it is quite faster than before; New rules for errors and warnings will be integrated. Ensure that other FAB States have access to the own national LSSIP info through the FAB functionality in the LSSIP Database LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

107 28/03/2017 LSSIP MapTool (I) ‘This Tool allows you to view the implementation progress for all ESSIP Objectives and SLoAs, at the level of State/Airport, Stakeholder and SLoAs, on a map’. New layout; New functionalities; Thermometer integrated. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

108 28/03/2017 In one click, you have a global view of the implementation status of an ESSIP objective. LSSIP MapTool (II) LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

109 LSSIP MapTool (III) Click on any State
28/03/2017 LSSIP MapTool (III) Click on any State You get info for that State (at the level of the map i.e. Objective/Stkh/SloA) LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

110 LSSIP MapTool (IV) Click on ‘Raw Data’… 28/03/2017
LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

111 LSSIP MapTool (V) Click on Raw Data…
28/03/2017 LSSIP MapTool (V) Click on Raw Data… You get table with all States info (at the level of the map i.e. Objective/Stkh/SloA) exportable to Excel LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

112 LSSIP MapTool (VI) Click on ‘Thermometer’… 28/03/2017
LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

113 LSSIP MapTool (VII) Click on ‘Thermometer’…
28/03/2017 LSSIP MapTool (VII) Click on ‘Thermometer’… You get a pie chart and statistical graphs that show evolution in % or absolute figures LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

114 LSSIP Kick off Event 11-12 Sep 2012
28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012 Wrap-up of day 1, preparation of day 2 EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

115 Good presentations – few questions
28/03/2017 Conclusions day 1 Good networking Good presentations – few questions Good attendance: 36 States – 70 repr Good start for tomorrow Quality …. But also timeliness… LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

116 Schedule (I) Deadline Start Re-Start (if needed) Part - State Context
28/03/2017 Schedule (I) Deadline Start Kick-Off Event 11/12 Sep 2012 Re-Start (if needed) On-site kick-off meetings (Up to) 15 Oct 2012 Part - State Context Final 31 Dec 2012 Part - Implementation of ESSIP Objectives (Database) In-cycle review by EIPR experts (before WLA) Not later than 10 Feb 2013 Final (Database closed) 28 Feb 2013 Part - Traffic and ATM Performance (Where required) On-site capacity visits Mid-November 2012 to Mid-January 2013 Cost-Efficiency Chapter available for distribution December 2012 Airport Chapter distributed to FPs End November 2012 All Chapters Final IMPORTANT: take into account comment of EC 10 Sep on SES Reporting situation, as mentioned at the opening of the Kick/Off Event. LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

117 Schedule (II) Deadline
28/03/2017 Schedule (II) Deadline Part (EU+ States) – Implementation of Legislation Template ready and strawman distribution Depending on EC decision Final 31 Jan 2013 Part (non-EU+ States) - Implementation of Eurocontrol Regulatory Requirements & Specifications In line with EU+ States 28 Feb 2013 All Parts but Legislation Part Final = after all final actions and checks 21 Sep 2012 Signature Part (EU + States) – Implementation of Legislation – All Remaining Parts 31 Mar 2013 LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

118 Meet with your CP - where
28/03/2017 Practicalities day 2 Meet with your CP - when Meet with your CP - where LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012

119 28/03/2017 LSSIP Kick off Event 11 – 12 Sep 2012 EUROCONTROL Brussels EIPR Workshop Sep 2012


Download ppt "LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2012"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google