Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Planning and implementation

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Planning and implementation"— Presentation transcript:

1 Planning and implementation
WP/6 RCP and RSP Planning and implementation Presented to: SOCM/2 By: Tom Kraft Date: 8-10 February 2012

2 Introduction While the Asia/Pacific Region has an implementation plan for performance-based navigation no regional plan exists for the implementation of performance-based communication and surveillance A number of States in the Region have reduced separations that are predicated on certain communication, surveillance, and navigation requirements With an increasing proliferation of different aircraft FANS 1/A systems, and given current ground system implementations, it is possible that separations may be misapplied because the qualification criteria for communication and surveillance are not formally applied within the Asia/Pacific Region

3 Background In 2008, SOCM/1 recognized the concept of performance-based framework for communications and surveillance, prescribing global performance specifications and ensuring compliance In 2010, in accordance with ICAO Annex 6 and Doc 4444, GOLD provided Required Communication Performance (RCP) and Surveillance Performance (RSP) specifications Guidelines on prescribing specifications in airspace where reduced separations are predicated on certain communication, navigation and surveillance performance requirements Guidelines to States to aid in qualifying components of the operational system to the criteria prescribed by the performance specifications, including ANSP post-implementation monitoring In 2010, APANPIRG formally adopted the GOLD Supersedes the FANS 1/A Operations Manual (FOM) APANPIRG and other ATS coordinating groups need to continue to manage the GOLD implementation concerning communications and surveillance performance

4 Planning initiatives As implementation of reduced separations, in trail and climb/descent procedures, reroutes and other operational capabilities becomes more widespread, the regions of the world will need to plan for and implement a global performance based framework for communications and surveillance

5 Planning initiative examples
In June 2011, the North Atlantic Region System Planning Group endorsed its RCP and ADS-C Surveillance Performance Based Operations Implementation Plan, with an effective implementation date of February 2015. In March 2011, the ISPACG agreed to support the development of a performance-based framework for communications and surveillance within the region. ISPACG encouraged its ANSP members to implement system performance monitoring per the GOLD as an element of their respective safety management system (SMS) programs

6 NAT RCP/RSP planning tasks (1 of 2)
# Summary of task Lead Complete By Calendar Due Date 1 Draft RCP/RSP implementation plan CNSG IMG/38 & SPG/47 Completed 2 Identify Key Target Dates IMG 3 Confirm applicable performance specifications SARSIG 4 Update/develop operational concepts/procedures for data link services, RLongSM, RLatSM ATMG w/CNSG IMG/40 & SPG/48 May & June 2012 5 Develop GOLD material GOLD WG SPG/46 Amend SPG/49 June 2010 June 2013 6 Develop procedures for non-normal operations May & June 2012 7 Develop procedures for service restoration 8 Develop standards and guidance for flight plan descriptors CNSG w/ICAO IMG/40, SPG/48, 12th ANC May, June & Nov 2012 9 Draft/update PfA for Doc 7030 (Regional SUPPs) CNSG w/ATMG IMG/42 & SPG/49 May & June 2013 10 Amend AIPs and other State documents States Consistent with PfA 11 Implement RCP/RSP monitoring capability ANSPs Most ANSPs - 4Q 2011, required before trial start Jan 2013

7 NAT RCP/RSP planning tasks (2 of 2)
# Summary of task Lead Complete By Calendar Due Date 12 Measure performance for feasibility ANSPs, DLMA, CNSG, SARSIG Ongoing, prior to operational implementation Jan 2015 13 Provide ICAO/regional guidance to States on operator eligibility/aircraft equipage OPSAIR SG IMG/42 and SPG/49 May & June 2013 14 Develop State guidance material, operational readiness SOG, States, ANSPs, Users End 2014, prior to operational implementation Dec 2014 15 Conduct post-implementation monitoring/analysis ANSPs, CNSG, DLMA Ongoing after operational implementation 2015 and beyond 16 Clarify the interpretation of RCP and surveillance specification in terms of compliance/non-compliance CNSG IMG/42 & SPG/49 17 Conduct workshops to raise awareness on RCP and surveillance performance States Start pre-trial, complete prior to Operational Implementation

8 NAT RCP/RSP implementation plan
GOLD Jun 2010 Proposed PANS/ATM & GOLD Amendment Issue PANS/ATM & GOLD Amendment 4 Global 5, 8 5, 8 Plan Draft Jun 2008 Mature RCP/RSP Plan Proposed GOLD Amendment NAT Doc 006/007 Draft PfA NAT Doc 7030 GOLD Amendment PfA NAT Doc 7030 1 NAT Groups 1, 2, 3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 16 9 5, 9, 13,16 Plan update Target dates Performance specifications GOLD, NAT Doc 006/007 ADS-C conformance monitoring Procedures for reroutes, non-normal operations Flight plan indicators for specifications Operator/aircraft approval guidance update Technical/monitoring update Guidance on operational approval Draft PfA NAT Doc RLongSM, RLatSM NAT SPG/49 Adopt GOLD Amendment Process PfA DLMA Jun 2009 GOLD performance monitoring State AIPs & other docs 11 NAT States/ANSPs/DLMA 11 11 10, 14,17 12, 15 New York – < 2010 Gander – 1Q/2011 Shanwick – 4Q/2010 Santa Maria – 2Q/2011 Reykjavik –3Q/2011 Shannon –1Q/2013 Bodo – TBD RLongSM Trial NAT SPG/47 NAT SPG/48 12th ANC Data Link Mandate NAT SPG/49 OPLINKP OPLINKP D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M 2011 2012 2013

9 NAT RCP/RSP implementation plan
GOLD amendment Jun 2013 PANS/ATM amendment Nov 2012 5, 8 Global GOLD NAT adoption PfA NAT Doc 7030 5, 9 NAT Groups Program management Coordination GOLD performance monitoring State AIP and other documents Operational readiness 10, 14, 15, 17 NAT States/ANSPs/DLMA 15 10, 14, 17 Performance-based Concept RLongSM RLatSM NAT SPG/50 NAT SPG/51 NAT SPG/52 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M 2014 2015 2016

10 Purpose The performance-based framework is intended to fulfill a States obligation to ensure that the operational system meets requirements for intended uses The framework will enable optimum use of technologies, such as Iridium and SwiftBroadband, and implementations, such as I4 Classic Aero and Iridium Next

11 What needs to change To implement a performance-based communications and surveillance framework, changes will be needed to: Type design approval of aircraft, as necessary Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL) policies Related operational authorizations Regional SUPPs (ICAO Doc 7030 Amendments) and AIPs (or equivalent) Flight plan requirements ATC automation to act appropriately based on communication and surveillance equipment and capability indicators provided in the flight plan

12 Other applications It is expected that the performance-based framework would eventually apply to satellite communications (SATCOM) voice for air traffic control per the SATCOM Voice Guidance Material (SVGM) SVGM is currently under development by the Inter-Regional SATCOM Voice Task Force (IRSVTF)

13 Conclusion A regional – but globally compatible – plan is needed throughout the Asia-Pacific Regions for the implementation of performance-based framework for communication and surveillance

14 Action by the meeting 3.1 The meeting is invited to:
a) Note the information in this paper b) Cooperate with other regions and sub-regions within the Asia-Pacific Regions and North Atlantic Region c) Recommend to APANPIRG to include in its work program a planning and implementation initiative to effectively implement a performance based-framework Asia-Pacific Regions


Download ppt "Planning and implementation"

Similar presentations

Ads by Google