1. Twenty Years and More: Research into Minority Religions, New Religious Movements and 'the New Spirituality' INFORM and CESNUR in association with ISORECEA April 16-20, 2008 - London School of Economics

2. Shifting Legal Frameworks for Protection of Non-Traditional Religious Communities in Post-Communist Lands Presiding and Introducing: W. Cole DURHAM, Jr. (Brigham Young University, Provo) The Changing Legal Setting for Religious Groups in Russia - Alexander VERKHOVSKY (Director, SOVA Centre for Information and Analysis, Moscow) The Changing Legal Setting for Religious Groups in Russia - Alexander VERKHOVSKY (Director, SOVA Centre for Information and Analysis, Moscow) Position of Non-traditional Religious Communities Following the Adoption of the Romanian Law on Religious Freedom and the General Regime of Religious Denominations - Romanita IORDACHE (Human Rights Lawyer, Center for Legal Resources, Romania) Position of Non-traditional Religious Communities Following the Adoption of the Romanian Law on Religious Freedom and the General Regime of Religious Denominations - Romanita IORDACHE (Human Rights Lawyer, Center for Legal Resources, Romania) Religious Rights in the Georgian Setting - Archil GIORGADZE (Head of Human Rights Protection Unit, Office of the Prosecutor General of Georgia) Religious Rights in the Georgian Setting - Archil GIORGADZE (Head of Human Rights Protection Unit, Office of the Prosecutor General of Georgia)

3. Position of Non-traditional Religious Communities Following the Adoption of the Romanian Law on Religious Freedom and the General Regime of Religious Denominations by Romanita IORDACHE Full comment of Romanian Law published in "österreichisches Archiv für recht & religion 2007, pp. 194-221". The article is available at http://www.univie.ac.at/recht-religion/archiv http://www.univie.ac.at/recht-religion/archiv

4. Background of the Romanian 2006 Law Situation of religious minorities prior to 1948 Situation of religious minorities prior to 1948 Religious freedom between 1948-1989 – 14 state recognized/ controlled religious denominations Religious freedom between 1948-1989 – 14 state recognized/ controlled religious denominations Status of religious minorities between 1989 -2006 – 18 state recognized religious denominations Status of religious minorities between 1989 -2006 – 18 state recognized religious denominations

5. Status of religious minorities between 1989 - 2006 – restrictive process based on Decree 177/1948 State recognized religious denominations State recognized religious denominations Religious denominations not recognized by the state: Religious denominations not recognized by the state: –No legal personality –Registered as religious associations=NGOs –Attempts of being recognized as culte The case of Jehovah Witnesses – Supreme Court cases (4) + ECHR case –friendly settlement The case of Jehovah Witnesses – Supreme Court cases (4) + ECHR case –friendly settlement

6. Constitutional guarantees – Art.29 (1) Freedom of thought, opinion, and religious beliefs shall not be restricted in any form whatsoever. No one shall be compelled to embrace an opinion or religion contrary to his own convictions. (1) Freedom of thought, opinion, and religious beliefs shall not be restricted in any form whatsoever. No one shall be compelled to embrace an opinion or religion contrary to his own convictions. (2) Freedom of conscience is guaranteed; it must be manifested in a spirit of tolerance and mutual respect. (2) Freedom of conscience is guaranteed; it must be manifested in a spirit of tolerance and mutual respect. (3) All religions shall be free and organized in accordance with their own statutes, under the terms laid down by law. (3) All religions shall be free and organized in accordance with their own statutes, under the terms laid down by law. (4) Any forms, means, acts or actions of religious enmity shall be prohibited in the relationships among the cults. (4) Any forms, means, acts or actions of religious enmity shall be prohibited in the relationships among the cults. (5) Religious cults shall be autonomous from the State and shall enjoy support from it, including the facilitation of religious assistance in the army, in hospitals, prisons, homes and orphanages. (5) Religious cults shall be autonomous from the State and shall enjoy support from it, including the facilitation of religious assistance in the army, in hospitals, prisons, homes and orphanages. (6) Parents or legal tutors have the right to ensure, in accordance with their own convictions, the education of minor children whose responsibility devolves on them. (6) Parents or legal tutors have the right to ensure, in accordance with their own convictions, the education of minor children whose responsibility devolves on them.

7. Adoption of 2006 law Previous drafts – 4-5 Previous drafts – 4-5 Stakeholders: Stakeholders: –State recognized religious denominations – variety of positions – approval by ROC/dissent of GCC (conditioned), JW (rejected) & Baptists, Adventists – withdrew endorsement –Denominations not recognized –International concerns: OSCE, Venice Commission, US Helsinki Commission –Domestic concerns: anti-religious groups and human rights NGOs Voting process - tacit approval by Senate=no debate on the floor and no voting - Chamber of Deputies – slow process; surprise adoption – one vote against, one abstention and majority pro

8. Main provisions of the 2006 law No definition of religion No definition of religion Protection of forum internum Protection of forum internum Art. 9 ECHR + legitimate aims for limitations – “public security” Art. 9 ECHR + legitimate aims for limitations – “public security” Three tier system Three tier system Preferential status of dominant ROC Preferential status of dominant ROC Autonomy of state recognized religious denominations  public utility status Autonomy of state recognized religious denominations  public utility status

9. Main provisions of the 2006 law (2) Art. 9 – quasi – Separation/ Neutrality/Equality Clause Art. 9 – quasi – Separation/ Neutrality/Equality Clause (1) There is no State Religion in Romania; the State is neutral towards any religious persuasion or atheistic ideology. (2) The denominations are equal before the law and public authorities. The State, though its authorities, shall neither promote nor support the granting of privileges or the instatement of discrimination towards any denomination. Art. 13 – prohibition of religious defamation and public offending of religious symbols Art. 13 – prohibition of religious defamation and public offending of religious symbols Sensitive issue – restitution of religious assets seized after 1948 – postponed (Art.30) Sensitive issue – restitution of religious assets seized after 1948 – postponed (Art.30)

10. Conditions for registration as first tier status – different standards Previously recognized  simplified procedure Previously recognized  simplified procedure Newcomers: Newcomers: –religious associations that, “through their activities and number of worshipers, provide guarantees of sustainability, stability and public interest (?).” –bylaws and canon codes of recognised denominations are to be recognised “insofar as they do not, in their contents, threaten public security, order, health and morality or the fundamental human rights and liberties.” –high numerical threshold of 0.1 per cent of the population Romanian citizens residing in Romania (approximately 22,000 people) to qualify for ‘religious denomination’ status, = highest in OSCE –a strict time-requirement of a 12-year waiting period

11. Registration as religious associations 300 believers (only Romanian citizens or residents in Romania) = 3 persons establishing a NFP association  impact on management of temporal issues of religious communities (access to public subsidies, tax exemptions, property, labor relations, relation with authorities – education, pastoral support in detention, army, hospitals etc.) 300 believers (only Romanian citizens or residents in Romania) = 3 persons establishing a NFP association  impact on management of temporal issues of religious communities (access to public subsidies, tax exemptions, property, labor relations, relation with authorities – education, pastoral support in detention, army, hospitals etc.) Process- SSRA issues an opinion – 8 so far  judge Process- SSRA issues an opinion – 8 so far  judge

12. Impact of law on NRMs Duty to transform status for NRMs previously registered as religious associations Duty to transform status for NRMs previously registered as religious associations Restrictive criteria for registration for NRMs currently seeking legal status as first tier or second tier denominations Restrictive criteria for registration for NRMs currently seeking legal status as first tier or second tier denominations Disparate impact of some provisions of the law (prohibition of offense against religious symbols, provisions on access to graveyards, taxation, education, pastoral support etc.) Disparate impact of some provisions of the law (prohibition of offense against religious symbols, provisions on access to graveyards, taxation, education, pastoral support etc.) Encouraging further attacks – see decision of the national equality body following a complaint filed by Bahai in relation with the content of the Manuals of Religious Education approved by the MoE which used offensive language in relation with NRMs Encouraging further attacks – see decision of the national equality body following a complaint filed by Bahai in relation with the content of the Manuals of Religious Education approved by the MoE which used offensive language in relation with NRMs