Presentation on theme: "Dr Yoshiaki Ichikawa, Chairman of ISO/TC 268/SC 1 and IEC TC 111 Standardization Activities on Smart Cities in ISO and IEC."— Presentation transcript:
Dr Yoshiaki Ichikawa, Chairman of ISO/TC 268/SC 1 and IEC TC 111 Standardization Activities on Smart Cities in ISO and IEC
Structure of ISO/TC TC268/SC1 Smart Community Infrastructures WG1 WG2 WG1 Infrastructure metrics Structure Scope Management System Officers Chairman: France Secretary: France Convenor: France Global City Indicators Convenor: Canada Chairman: Japan Vice chairman: China Secretary: Japan Smart Community Infrastructure Metrics Convenor: Japan TC:Technical committee, SC: Subcommittee, WG: Working Group, AHG: Ad-hoc Group TC268 Sustainable Development in Communities AHG1 System Aspects Common framework for development and operation of smart community infrastructures Convenor: Japan
Scope of ISO/TC 268/SC 1 3 Standardization in the field of smart community infrastructures, including basic concepts to define and describe smartness of community infrastructures as scalable and integrable systems, harmonized metrics for benchmarking, usage of the metrics for application to the diverse types of communities, and specifications for measurement, reporting and verification, ensuring avoidance of overlaps and contradictions with ISO/TC 268 deliverables. The proposed standards will focus on technical aspects of community infrastructures including energy, water, transportation, waste and ICT that support the operations and activities of communities. The concept of smartness is addressed in terms of performance relevant to technologically implementable solutions, in accordance with sustainable development in communities as elaborated in ISO/TC 268.
4 Outline of ISO/TC 268/SC 1 TitleSmart community infrastructures Creation2012 ChairpersonDr. Yoshi Ichikawa (JP) Vice-ChairDr. Biyu Wan (CN) SecretaryMr. Isao Endou (JP) TPMMr. Gerrit Harjung (ISO/CS) P-Members (16) Argentina, Austria, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Norway, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom O-Members (09) Brazil, Czech Republic, Egypt, Finland, India, Malaysia, Singapore, United States, UAE LiaisonsISO/TC 207, IEC/TC 111, ITU-T, GCIF, OECD, WBCSD MeetingsPreliminary meeting: May 2012, Tokyo, Japan 1 st plenary meeting: July 2012, AFNOR, France 2 nd plenary meeting: July 2013, Bornholm, Denmark
General Understanding on the Smart Community Infrastructures in TC 286/SC1 5 Smartness should be discussed taking into account the balance between multiple viewpoints of residents, community managers and environmental 1 Energy Power grid, Gas, Fuels (gas station),... 2 Water Water treatment process, Industrial water, Treated water, Water Reuse 3 Mobility Road traffic, Railroad, Airport, Port, River,... 4 Waste Waste recovery, Recycling,.. 5 ICT Multi-purpose big data, Distributed sensors, Monitoring, Wifi (1) Example of Community Infrastructures" (2) "Performances" reflected to Smartness 1Residents viewpoint Reliability, Availability, Service quality, Safety, etc 2Community managers viewpoint Operational efficiency, Resilience, Expandability, Security, etc 3Environmental viewpoint Climate change, Biodiversity, Resource efficiency, Air pollution, Water shortage, etc
Recognize the difference or gap between Community needs or issues and Infrastructure performance or requirement PerspectiveItems Residents Convenience Comfort Safety Resilience Community Manager Efficiency Economic vitality Demographic sustainability Environment Climate change Conservation of natural resources Biodiversity … Trade-offs Community Issues Items (indicative) Colloquial description Example (indicative, for discussion) Service quality can be used in anywhere Population per public tap or standpipe Area coverage rate of mobile phone network Average distance to nearest public transport station/stop Operational efficiency can be used any time Operating hours (24h365days) no need to waitFrequency of train services ease of use Information Extent of complexity of the procedure to use (contract, payment,etc) Maintainabilityeveryone can use Extent of barrier-free multiple language Resilience no limit of useEnergy consumption per capita no congestion (sufficient supply) Congestion level (e.g.120% of capacity) Bandwidth, speed of communication tasty Amount of materials that have negative effect on taste can use as expected or scheduled Rate of train delay ……… Infrastructure Performance Note: Items in the tables are indicative examples.
7 TR Review of existing activities - Review of relevant activities - Directions for future standardization TS General principles and requirements -Basic concept in community level -Neutral against specific infrastructure Application to particular types of community infrastructures - Apply the general principles & requirements (PWI 37151) to energy, water, transportation, waste and ICT as the first step Application to diverse types of communities - Apply the general principles & requirements (PWI 37151) to typical categories of communities Related areas - MRV, System aspects, etc (expected) 2014 (expected) Proposed roadmap for deliverables
8 IEC SEG on Smart Cities SEG (Systems Evaluation Group) on Smart Cities will be set up to; 1.Make an inventory of existing standards and standardization projects in progress in IEC, ITU-T and ISO. 2.Monitor TC/SC work in IEC to highlight any overlap of work or potential inconsistencies, 3.Liaise with ISO, ITU, and other organizations, fora and consortia. Represent IEC in the coordination and cooperation with other organizations, fora and consortia in the field of smart cities. 4.Draw a roadmap in IEC with a timeline that includes a reference architecture and prospective standardization projects. 5.The evaluation groups tasks also includes alignment of terms and definitions in electrotechnical field referring to smart cities, providing an efficient and transparent platform for information exchange and communication between IEC and other relevant stakeholder groups. 6.Participation in SEGs is open, but specific invitations will be made to ITU-T and ISO to take part in the Smart Cities SEG. For more information
Additional explanation available on the WEB ichikawa