We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEthan Nelson
Modified over 3 years ago
All rights reserved © 2000, Alcatel, Paris. Alcatel position on ITU-T Prepared for Martigny#2 27-28 Feb 2001
All rights reserved © 2000, Alcatel, Paris. Standardisation Department - date, page n° 2 Preliminary remarks Alcatel works in standards using resources and strategy from its Business Divisions We dont have a full-time ITU-T only team Our corporate team is small (7 people) and our role is to co-ordinate (but not to direct) and to inform Linkage between standards and products is therefore very tight Experts work in areas that can show real return on investment Experts work in bodies that show real leadership
All rights reserved © 2000, Alcatel, Paris. Standardisation Department - date, page n° 3 Preliminary remarks Relationships and roles Relationships between fora and SDOs is very complex Most companies have multiple memberships which offer, via internal mechanisms and parallel participation, a valuable addition to formal links between SDOs ITURegional bodies Local units Countries Industry Fora IETF
All rights reserved © 2000, Alcatel, Paris. Standardisation Department - date, page n° 4 Preliminary remarks Food chains in standards 4 Distinct layers Some bodies have multiple roles while others only lead in one layer Given subject can only be understood if you follow and understand the whole chain ITU-T is sometimes only invited to act at the standards making level Some fora should be seen as complements and not competitors e.g. for NGN ISC/MSF > IETF/ITU-T > IMTC + ISC/TIPHON/IMTC Standards Making Requirements Inter- operability Marketing
All rights reserved © 2000, Alcatel, Paris. Standardisation Department - date, page n° 5 ITU-T place in industry Do you agree/disagree that the ITU-T remains one of the best places for Industry? ITU-T is one of many places from which we obtain industrial agreements to base product development ITU-T is an important source of requirements for our customers RFI/RFQ ITU-T is the place for technical debate and consensus making in a number of selected areas SG11: BICC, N-ISDN/IN maintenance SG15: xDSL, Optical networking SG16: H.323, megaco/H.248
All rights reserved © 2000, Alcatel, Paris. Standardisation Department - date, page n° 6 Alcatel expectation from ITU-T What are your expectations from ITU-T? Currently Alcatel only expects that industry will use the ITU-T when results can be obtained in a reasonable delay in an area for which it has leadership BUT often the ITU-T is behind the regional bodies and so only has a role documenting the differences and options as it globalises essential regional solutions If satisfied/or not satisfied by ITU-T, mention the reasons. End-to-end delays (creation to publication) National rules governing contribution approval sometimes introduces excessive delays and constrains technical debates Is this sort of national control now needed for work that is targeting AAP approval?
All rights reserved © 2000, Alcatel, Paris. Standardisation Department - date, page n° 7 Making ITU-T more attractive How could we make ITU-T more attractive and more efficient? Reduce delays AAP has improved approval delays BUT we now need to reduce delays in input preparation (national issues) and publication Also need to re-look at the timing of work - length and frequency of meetings at working level, more tele-working, etc. Build from areas of excellence Cut out rubber stamping
All rights reserved © 2000, Alcatel, Paris. Standardisation Department - date, page n° 8 Promoting ITU-T How to promote the ITU-T? Best promotion is via successes H.248/megaco (ITU-T SG16/IETF joint work) jointNM (ITU-T SG4, ETSI, T!, IETF) Need to bring the operators back (ILEC and CLEC) to better drive the requirements phase How to convince young people to join ITU-T activities? They what to work on issues that are relevant, which show real progress and where real technical debate is possible They have little interest in politics, multi-body issues (national preparation, etc.) nor in multi-week meetings with long dead periods in-between
All rights reserved © 2000, Alcatel, Paris. Standardisation Department - date, page n° 9 IT-related technologies Do you think it is time for ITU to cover IT-related technologies in addition to telecommunication technologies? Not directly but ITU-T could better cover the inclusion of IT technologies into telecom systems IT world is currently changing far too rapidly for ITU-T processes
All rights reserved © 2000, Alcatel, Paris. Standardisation Department - date, page n° 10 Suggestions for ITU-T Reform What would be your suggestions for the ITU Reform? De-politicise technical work Introduce Technical Recommendation with SMs and MSs contributing and approving on an equal footing Replace Questions with a more project/work item organisation Introduce better planning and shorter time scales Delays of greater than 2-3 years from initiation to completion of a task are no longer acceptable Find a better role to work with the rest of the telecom standardisation world Critical issue as the partnership project model becomes more and more common
All rights reserved © 2000, Alcatel, Paris. Standardisation Department - date, page n° 11 Concluding remarks ITU-T is important and is worth saving BUT it could die, or worse become irrelevant, if all players do not recognise the risk it is facing Most players in industry would prefer global solutions and so would prefer to get agreements at ITU-T level BUT what industry needs more is a timely agreement and so it doesnt really care where this is reached as long as it is agreed Main issues under discussion in ITU Reform require support from all nations otherwise nothing will get agreed at PP-02 BUT some countries dont seem to understand the danger ITU-T is facing
M2M Consolidation August 17-18, 2011 Washington D.C. 1 ARIB/TTC’s Feedback on Consolidation Issues M2MCons02_06.
1 From R&D to Competitiveness - notes on the standardisation link Francisco da Silva Portugal Telecom Chairman of ETSI Board.
LME/DMU Inge Jonsson 1 ITU - TSB Informal Consultations Document No. 9 Martigny, February 2000 Source:ERICSSON (Mr. I. Jönsson) Title.
4.1  Criteria for Successful Consolidation ATIS Delegation Presenter: Gale Lightfoot (Cisco Systems) Meeting of Potential M2M Consolidation Partners.
International Telecommunication Union Informal Forum Summit San Francisco, July 2003 PROGRESS REPORT ON ACTION ITEMS SINCE THE 2001 IFS Greg Jones.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All The Internet of Things (IoT) aka Machine 2 Machine (M2M) Bilel Jamoussi Chief, Study Groups Department.
International Telecommunication Union © ITU-T Study Group 17 Use of ITU-T Formal Languages Amardeo Sarma NEC Europe Ltd.
SWE IG Meeting Paris, CRE XBID Overview Supported by.
ITU and Standards Arthur Levin Chief, Operations and Planning
3GPP's co-operation with the ITU Dr
3 Chapter Fundamentals of Organization Structure ©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a.
3 Chapter Fundamentals of Organization Structure ©2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a.
3G.IP/ R1 3G.IP 2002 Charter. 3G.IP/ R1 2 3G.IP Mission Statement u Actively promote a common IP based wireless system for third generation.
International Telecommunication Union Arab Regional Preparatory Meeting for the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12) Cairo, Egypt,
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications 1 ITU-T Status Report on Disaster Relief and Early warning SOURCE:ITU-T TITLE:ITU-T Status Report.
CJK9, Zhangjiajie, China 1/14 Discussion: [Drafted] 3GPPs works in CJK Cooperation CJK 9, Zhangjiajie, China April 8-10,2009 Changho RYOO
IP-Telecoms Interworking Workshop Geneva January 2000 Page -1 Numbering / Addressing in Private Integrated Services Networks (PISN)
© The Delos Partnership 2005 Process Owners and their role Application to the Delos Model.
Introducing the Sectors and Provider Responsiveness Team Lee Thomas Skills Development Manager 20 th September 2007.
Devolution in Greater Manchester October 2015 Alex Gardiner, New Economy.
© 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
ETSIs Collaboration with Academia and Research communities RFID and Telecommunication Services WORKSHOP 25 May 2004, ETSI, Sophia Antipolis Livia Rosu.
05/02/ “Report on general ETSI activities since GSC#8” Karl Heinz Rosenbrock ETSI Director-General GSC-9, Seoul SOURCE:ETSI TITLE:Report on general.
Operational Excellence and Sustainable Performance Improvement Date: 9 June, 2009.
How to commence the IT Modernization Process? 1 Tony Lester August 2011.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Client Logo LEAN ENTERPRISE Implementation Workshop.
Local Area Agreement Strengthening delivery Improving Outcomes Jon Bright Director of Policy and Delivery Birmingham City Council.
Sample Student Presentation Slides Strategic Management Case Analysis Dr. Paul N. Friga 2005.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
PARIS21 CONSORTIUM MEETING Paris, October 2002 Progress Report of the Task Team on Food, Agriculture and Rural Statistics Objectives Past activities.
Australian Centre for Innovation & International Competitiveness The Future by Professor Ron Johnston Victorian TAFE Association 19 May 2001 Swinburne.
Improvement Service / Scottish Centre for Regeneration Project: Embedding an Outcomes Approach in Community Regeneration & Tackling Poverty Effectively.
Workshop on “EU Enlargement: Regulatory Convergence in Non-acceding Countries” Athens 7 – 8 November 2003 Regulatory Convergence and Technical Standards.
GSC-8024 SOURCE:TSACC TITLE:ITU-T Study Group Restructuring AGENDA ITEM:GTSC 11 07/09/2015 ITU-T Study Group Restructuring J. MacFie Tel
20 October 2015 © The Marketing Practice 2008 Win-based marketing Tools that marketing could deliver in support of major bids.
SCMN/Relationships Text: Supply Chain Management From Vision to Implementation Fawcett, Ellram, ogden.
3rd meeting COTS team April 25, 2007, Helsinki. AGENDA 9.00Opening of meeting 9.05Approval of agenda, minutes, Goal setting 9.15Feedback on the specific.
Part I THE BIG PICTURE Chapter 2: Strategy and Sales Program Planning.
Company Name Sample Template Presenter Name
TeleManagement Forum The Driving Force Behind the New Generation of Operations Systems Software and Processes Jim Warner President & CEO TM Forum.
Mysoltani.ir سایت فیلم روشهای مشارکتی Technology Foresight Foresight is about preparing for the future. It is about deploying resources in the best.
Standards As An International Competitive Alternative October 25, 2004.
Business Breakthroughs Robert Osborne Business Breakthroughs Inc.
SEM11-06 Committee procedures ETSI Seminar © ETSI All rights reserved.
ASYCUDA Overview … a summary of the objectives of ASYCUDA implementation projects and features of the software for the Customs computer system.
Version 10.0 The High Performance Organisation Ltd ISO9001:2000 Foundation Workshop 1 ISO9001:2000 Foundation Workshop Welcome.
Version 10.0 The High Performance Organisation Ltd Creating A Process Based Management System 1 Welcome Creating a Process Based Management.
INTRODUCING OUR VISION To establish a non-exclusive, international travel agency consortium where network partners have the opportunity to earn higher.
Toolkit. Definition of corporate volunteering Any effort by an employer to encourage and assist employees to volunteer in the community.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.