1. Organisational Theory
Technology
RMIT University
RMIT University
Slide 1

2. Technology Objectives: Introduce the concept of technology
Discuss common assumptions about technology
To understand the relationship between technology, organisations, management and employees.  
To explore how the different perspectives view technology.
RMIT University
RMIT University
Slide 2

3. Thinking about Technology
A critical exploration of the claims and counterclaims of the relationship between technology and progress.
‘Why do we take so little for granted in the social sciences and so much for granted in the natural sciences?…what happens when you apply the scepticism normally reserved for social relations to technology?’ (Grint and Woolgar, 1997, 37).
Technology does not emerge from an objective exercise in problem solving.
RMIT University

4. Defining Technology
‘Technology’ is a fairly new word—coined by Jacob Bigelow, Harvard professor, in the 1820s.
Roots of the word are much older:
Techne (Greek): art, craft or skill
Teks (Indo-Euro): weave or fabricate
RMIT University

5. Defining Technology Modern Definition 1:
‘A system based on the application of knowledge, manifested in physical objects and organisational forms for the attainment of specific goals’
Assumption:
that technology comes about in order to meet an organisational or social need.
RMIT University

6. Questions concerning technological innovation
Do technologies comes about in order to meet an existing need? Keyhole surgery to cut costs?
Do we (creators) find ‘needs’ for a new technology?
Transistors replace valves – miniaturisation?
Are technologies invented for practical purposes?
Related to 1?
Are technologies invented for the ‘challenge’ or for symbolic purposes? Hydrogen Bomb? Logos?
RMIT University

7. Defining Technology Modern definition 2:
‘A system based on the application of knowledge, manifested in physical objects and organisational forms for the attainment of specific goals which maybe for practical reasons, symbolic reasons or for reasons of generating profit’.
An attempt to embrace key drivers and products?
RMIT University

8. Technology and Progress
A modernist duality: Common (modernist) assumptions:
Technological change is usually one of continuous improvements of existing technologies.
‘We’ can always make things better and faster.
The progressive element of technology makes it a unique human endeavour.
Advances in technology bring positive advances to an organisation.
An organisation’s level of progress can be measured in its advances in technology.
Does the evidence support these claims? Totally? Partially? Not at all?
RMIT University

9. Myth 1: Technology is ‘progressive’
Critical theorists and postmodernists argue:
Technology is a subversive force:
Technological change can be a subversive process that results in the modification or destruction of established organisational roles, relationships and values.
Examples:
1.Early 1800s, British manufacturers in the textile industry wanted to introduce new ‘more productive’ machines.
Workers objected for fear of its impact on their jobs and skills.
Formation of the ‘Luddites’ to destroy the ‘subversive’ technology.
2. China Today: the concept of toxic progress –polluted air and water.
RMIT University

10. Myth 2: Technology can ‘fix’ all problems Solving one problem generates new problems?
Car accidents  seat belts, air-bags
Hyper active kids  Retalin (prescription drugs)
Heroine addiction  methadone
Graffiti  resistant paints
Dangerous jobs  robotics
Global warming  carbon capture and storage/geosequestration
‘Ugly people’  cosmetics/cosmetic surgery
RMIT University

11. The Appeal of Technocracy: The myth of rational and objective leadership?
That organisations can be governed by engineers and technical experts (scientific managers) who attempt to solve workplace problems’ based on technical/scientific principles.
Tainted by the scientific value system - just another subjectivity?
RMIT University

12. The deficiencies of the technocratic delusion
Technology is often a source of organisational problems.
Goals for organisations are not always clear and often contested by various stakeholders (workers versus managers).
Technology is value-laden: not objective
it serves to benefit someone.
It is informed by those who control the institutional means for its creation
The techniques produced embody (objectify) the values and perspectives of individuals engaged in their production.
Humans are not as quick to change behaviour as a new machine or computer chip.
RMIT University

13. Technological Determinism
‘The assumption that technology determines—that is leads directly to—a particular form of society or organisation’ (Grint, 1998).
We are the ‘servants’ of technology rather than its ‘master’ (‘Frankenstein Monster’)
Generally rejected by classical modernists (control of), SI (constructed by), CT (used by hegamons) and PM (Tech-Human interface)
The technological imperative: technology as a cause of organisational structure – we select then accommodate it.
Robert Blauner concludes in his research on work in American industries that:
‘technology more than any other factor determines the nature of the job tasks performed by blue collar employees and has an important effect upon a number of aspects of alienation’ ?
resonates with CT
RMIT University

14. MODERNIST APPROACHES: structural typologies
Types of technology: (Perrow)
core technology – unit/organisation level (Woodward, Thompson)
supporting technology – task level – task variability (TV), task analysability (TA)
Two-by-two matrix TV (high, low) against TA (high, low)
Thompson’s Typology:
Distinguish between long linked (mass production continuous processing), mediating (bring people together for exchange) and intensive (coordinating two or more specialised abilities)
RMIT University

15. Woodward’s Industrial Organization (1965): A Modernist approach Organisational form reflects production technologies
Production Type
Production and Technological characteristics
Organisational structure
Unit and small batch production (shipbuilding)
Made to order. Unpredictable. Diverse products.
Specialised & flexible technologies
Highly skilled labour.
Structure: Flat, flexible
Control: Committees, teams. Skilled workers maintain some control over machines.
Mass production
(automobile)
Routinised & predictable
Conveyor & Assembly line
Automated (robotics)
Unskilled
Structure: Vertical, bureaucratic, specialised
Control: Managerial control of machines
Continuous production
(chemical)
Continuous flow & automated
Highly technical, computerised
Structure: vertical & organic
Control: committee, technicians monitor and manage production.
RMIT University

16. Child’s Strategic Choice:
Technology is a consequence of organisational structure and management’s ‘strategic choice’
An organisation can shape technological change through their ability to affect the supply and demand for a particular technology.
An organisation responsible for a sizable portion of an industry can greatly influence the technological development of the industry as a whole when it creates (or refrains from creating) new products. For example, Microsoft.
A technology might be selected not because of its innate superiority, but because it meets the needs of the power holder within that organisation.
RMIT University

17. Symbolic Interpretive Approaches:Technology as socially determined
technological changes are themselves socially engineered and all human relationships (including organisational relationships) are derived from and ultimately determined by cultural and/or social relationships rather than technological aspects.
RMIT University

18. SI: Expanding the Definition
Because technology is socially constructed Symbolic Interpretivists expand definition beyond physical objects to include symbols – words, images, metaphors and beyond task to include interactions between people and technologies.
Broadening the study of the socio-technical interface
Special interest in New (computer) technologies:
Stochastic – more open to producing the unexpected –reliability an issue
Continuous – in ways never imagined by modernists
Abstract – operator removed from technical operation
Tight coupling –human agency/technology
RMIT University

19. Social Construction of Technology
Symbolic interpretive approaches focus on how technologies are ‘constructed’ through interaction.
Reject modernist notion that technology:
determines organisational design
develop according to a particular ‘logic’, process or universal law.
RMIT University

20. Social Construction of Technology
Influences on technological design and use: institutionalisation
Market control (mimetic pressure)
Beta versus VHS, Microsoft versus Apple
Social acceptance (normative pressure)
1890s cars interpreted as ‘green’ alternative to horse-drawn carts
Today cars associated with environmental destruction.
Government policy (coercive pressure)
Criminalisation of hemp in 1937 allowed for DuPont’s synthetic fibres.
Gender (normative pressure)
Bicycle
RMIT University

21. Social Construction of Technology
Application/focus of SCOT as an analytical tool:
Identify the different interpretations of technology.
Analyse the problems and conflicts these interpretations give rise to.
Correct the design features of the technological artifacts.
RMIT University

22. Social Construction of Technology: conclusion
Technologies have different meanings to different groups.
“..technology is not a pure application of science; it is co-determined by social, cultural, economic and technical factors in the environment that contextualizes it” (Hatch and Cunliffe, 2006: 155).
RMIT University

23. Critical Theory Braverman and Labour Process Theory: power over
Harry Braverman’s key arguments:
Links Taylorist work redesign processes to Marxist class analysis.
Through the process of deskilling and work degradation, all employees are finding themselves in a similar disempowered and alienated position.
All work is becoming the same and workers are becoming extensions of machines.
Under the ‘logic’ of capitalism ‘deskilling’ is a universal process and the skilled craft worker is becoming extinct.
Through ‘deskilling’ workers have lost control over the production process and are largely powerless to stop any workplace changes (e.g. technological change, the hiring and firing of workers, managerial decision-making, shift rosters, speedup, etc.)
RMIT University

24. Postmodern Conceptions of Technology
Focus of research:
the relationship between technology and ‘self’ in organisations and the emergence of the techno-human interface.
Technologies of control (e.g. self-surveillance, discipline, focus on performance rather than values).
Technologies of representation: technologies used to represent individuals and work processes:(e.g. electronic systems to identify performance and make managerial decisions about merit and promotion among employees).
RMIT University

25. Postmodern Conceptions of Technology techno-human partnerships
Cyborganisation
A hybridised organisation: a techno-human construct
An organisation who has been taken over in whole or in part by computer or electromechancial devices (computers, software programmes, phone systems, copier machines, etc.).
An organisation determined by both machine and human intervention.
A techno-organic organisation
Dangers:
Human misuse and abuse of technology
Organisational members serve the technology instead of the technology serving the organisation.
• Organisational members often expect more from a technology than it can deliver.
Human and social elements become subordinated to technological capacities and/or imperatives.
RMIT University

26. Actor Network Theory: Techno –human equality?
Knowledge product of interactions – machines, people, buildings, concepts, written documents
Network not the actor that performs the act – humans just another element (Networks of relationship between human and non-human actors)
Networks are fluid and largely invisible
Two key assumptions:
Social world is materially heterogeneous – socio-technical ordering
Elements of network do not have an independent existence - principle of rationality
RMIT University