Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

‘Missing’ Dimensions of Poverty and Gender Sanjeewanie Kariyawasam Centre for Poverty Analysis (CEPA)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "‘Missing’ Dimensions of Poverty and Gender Sanjeewanie Kariyawasam Centre for Poverty Analysis (CEPA)"— Presentation transcript:

1 ‘Missing’ Dimensions of Poverty and Gender Sanjeewanie Kariyawasam Centre for Poverty Analysis (CEPA)

2 Introduction Poverty is thought to be a multidimensional phenomenon But focus often only on consumption/income dimensions because of lack of survey data Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) on the ‘missing dimensions of poverty’ study – Employment Quality, Empowerment, Dignity, Physical Safety, Subjective and Psychological Wellbeing Survey Module was piloted in Badulla District

3 Study Frame Methodology – Stratified random sample – Sample size 229 (55% of respondents are females) – For this study, unit of analysis is respondent – Odds ratio analysis and factor analysis to construct deprivation Focus - Is there a gender difference in terms of: – Employment Quality -Having a good and decent job is associated with being out of poverty -Indicators: Protection, Job satisfaction, Discouraged employment – Subjective and Psychological Wellbeing -Not a dimension of poverty, but the expected end-result of development -Indicators: Subjective wellbeing – happiness and life satisfaction Psychological wellbeing – meaning in life, autonomy, competence, relatedness

4 Employment Quality; Protection Substantially more men are employed than women, though women are slightly better educated – in line with LFS data Low protection (60% deprived) from employment due to informality but study finds no gender difference Indicators of informality of employment MaleFemale Contract type (Casual / temporary) 41.8%40.9% No monthly payment of salary 36.4%35.1% No written contract 53.4%33.5% No sick leave 80.3%94.4% No paid holidays 81.3%94.4% No retirement pension 48.9%42.4% No social security benefits 51.8%42.4%

5 84% are dissatisfied about their job -two stage composite index, deprived on one or more indicators -More females report experiencing unfair treatment at work than males IndicatorsMaleFemale No respectful treatments 27.00%21.20% Unfair treatments 73.00%93.60% Not making good use of knowledge at work 24.40%10.70% No opportunity to advance and improve at work 62.80%58.20% No satisfying purpose at work 16.5%18.4% Not motivated to give best at work 15.6%12.8% No autonomy to organize self at work 32.1%29.1% Employment Quality; Job satisfaction

6 Employment Quality; Discouraged employment There is a gender dimension in relation to why people are not employed -\ -Females are not working mainly due to child care and household work -but are they interested but discouraged from looking for work? Types of discouraged employmentMaleFemale Unemployed, but waiting to hear about a job 10%2.6% Not working because of personal reasons such as household tasks, no one to leave children / dependent adults with 0%53.0% Not working because of illness, disability, no interest 14%15.2%

7 Subjective Wellbeing High levels of reporting of overall happiness across both genders – 90% are very happy or fairly happy – Among women lack of happiness is linked to low socioeconomic wellbeing High levels of life satisfaction across both genders – Over 90% are satisfied with life overall, food, local security, family, dignity, free choice, ability to help others and religion – More women than men are not satisfied with their ability to exercise free choice – Women who are not working are less satisfied about health, education, and work

8 Psychological Wellbeing 75% of respondents have meaning in their life – Males less positive about having clear meaning in life, satisfactory meaning and clear sense of what gives meaning to life – Higher educational attainments associated with having clear meaning of life irrespective of gender 84% of respondents have autonomy – 10% of both genders said they are not free to decide how to lead own life – Males are less positive about freedom to express ideas and opinions 93% of respondents are positive about their competence – Males less likely to say that others tell them that they are capable and feel a sense of accomplishment – Females are less likely to say that they feel very capable 82% of respondents feel relatedness – More males among those who said deprived

9 Conclusion Deprivation in terms of employment quality – Gender aspects on discouraged employment only However, there are high levels of subjective and psychological wellbeing – Gender aspects in autonomy, competence and life satisfaction with work, education etc Issues for further consideration Implications for using a single indicator or a dimension to compute generalised ‘deprivation’ Study findings generalisable to Badulla

10 Thank you!


Download ppt "‘Missing’ Dimensions of Poverty and Gender Sanjeewanie Kariyawasam Centre for Poverty Analysis (CEPA)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google