1. Defining CBFWA’s FY09 Workplan Members January 15, 2009

2. New Directions Work Plan 1.Support and Information Transfer 2.Funding Diversity 3.Project Review and Management Decisions 4.Develop and Adopt a Decision and Policy Framework 5.Monitoring and Evaluation 6.Public Relations

3. New Directions Work Plan Products 1.Support and Information Transfer Consensus amendment recommendations 2.Funding Diversity HEP contract, NOAA contract 3.Project Review and Management Decisions Long term work plans, Basinwide work plan 4.Develop and Adopt a Decision and Policy Framework Adaptive Management Framework (amendments, long term work plans) 5.Monitoring and Evaluation SOTR, coordinated M&E 6.Public Relations SOTR, Message to new Administration

4. CBFWA Organizational Chart Executive Director (Policy Coordinator) Manager Fish Passage Center Assistant Director Fish and Wildlife Program and Budget Coordinator IT/Web Services Anadromous Fish Mgmt Coordinator Resident Fish and SOTR Coordinator Wildlife Mitigation and RME Coordinator Executive Assistant Clerical Specialist Administrative & Accounting Asst. Financial Director Directly supported by CBFWA contract Anadromous Fish Advisory Committee Resident Fish Advisory Committee Wildlife Advisory Committee Fish Passage Advisory Committee Members Advisory Group Members

5. FY2009 Adaptive Management Activities Adaptive Management Framework Plan Implement Eva l uate Coordinated LTWP recommendations and analysis Coordinated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Coordinated integration of Program and ESA/BiOp monitoring Coordinated decision criteria for project/Program evaluation Coordinated recommendations on loss assessment protocols Program Effectiveness SOTR Project Effectiveness Project reviews/reporting Program implementation tracking Programmatic issues (committees)  Wildlife crediting  Resident fish substitution  Anadromous objectives  Ad-hoc workgroups, etc. Coordination between and among projects and programs

6. FY2009 Adaptive Management Activities Adaptive Management Framework Plan Implement Eva l uate Coordinated LTWP recommendations and analysis Coordinated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Coordinated integration of Program and ESA/BiOp monitoring Coordinated decision criteria for project/Program evaluation Coordinated recommendations on loss assessment protocols Program Effectiveness SOTR Project Effectiveness Project reviews/reporting Program implementation tracking Programmatic issues (committees)  Wildlife crediting  Resident fish substitution  Anadromous objectives  Ad-hoc workgroups, etc. Coordination between and among projects and programs 2.3 FTE 3.7 FTE 1.6 FTE 3.4 FTE

7. Program Implementation Schedule Coordinate LTWPs FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 Council Rolling Project Review Process Basinwide Management Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Programmatic issues addressed in ongoing forums Status of the Resource Report and Website Coordinated Program/ ESA/BiOp Monitoring Anad. Fish Biological Objectives Res. Fish Loss Assess. Protocols Wildlife Crediting Forum, Wildlife M&E

8. Foundation for Coordination Maintain CBFWA website (directory, calendar, databases, etc.) Maintain CBFWA committee web pages and management committee documents Tribal coordination and outreach CBFWA public relations and outreach Fish and Wildlife manager participation support (CBFWF)

9. Planning Deliverables Coordinated long term work plans (framework, analyses, definitions, etc.) Coordinated monitoring and evaluation plan for the Fish and Wildlife Program Coordinated FY10 monitoring for Program/ESA/BiOp Coordinated Basinwide Management Plan (coordination, lamprey, sturgeon, hatcheries, research, etc.) Coordinated recommendations on loss assessment protocols  operational losses for wildlife  resident fish losses

10. Implementation Deliverables Participate in Budget Oversight Group website and databases (transition to Taurus, link proposals to SOTR) Coordination between among projects and programs (i.e., coordinated monitoring) Anadromous fish biological objectives Coordinated strategies and policies regarding lamprey Coordinated resident fish loss assessment protocols Coordinated wildlife monitoring and evaluation Coordinated issue definition, white papers, analyses, work shops and conferences on Programmatic issues

11. Evaluation Deliverables Coordinated review and evaluation of ongoing projects and programs within the Fish and Wildlife Program Coordinated reporting of status and trends of fish and wildlife populations via the Status of the Resource report and website Coordinated project and Program recommendations to Council and BPA

12. CBFWA Staff Requirements CBFWA staff = 8 FTE equivalents Executive Director (policy coordinator) Program and Budget Coordinator Anadromous Fish Management Coordinator Resident Fish and SOTR Coordinator Wildlife and M&E Coordinator IT/Web support Administrative support (2) CBFWF staff = 3 FTE equivalents (supported through IDC) Human resources Accounting/project budgeting Administrative support (1)

13. Funding The proposed FY08 funding was $2,071,447 FY08 Actual funding, after Council deliberation, was $1,869,651 (reduction of $202,165) Reduced 1 FTE, staff travel, PR contract, IT support BPA target funding level for all coordination projects for FY09 is $2,400,000

14. Distributed Services Model The Colville Tribe requested that CBFWA investigate providing staff/services in Boise and Spokane The CBFWA Members developed several alternatives: Adjust duties of existing staff Add one staff member as Member liason Provide an office and staff in Spokane or Boise Provide an office and staff in Spokane and Boise The CBFWA Members chose the most cost effective alternative, which is to adjust existing staff responsibilities and providing increased travel budgets for staff to enhance outreach

15. Distributed Funding Model The Upper Columbia United Tribe members of CBFWA requested that CBFWA consider a distributed funding model The distributed funding model was best articulated by the Kalispel Tribe in their funding allocation strategy – the total coordination funding would be divided equally by all F&W Managers and then reallocated to the membership organizations The CBFWA Members discussed this proposal at length and chose to submit their coordination needs based on needs (statements of work)

16. Funding CBFWA’s funding level for FY2007 was $1,901,449 CBFWA’s funding level for FY2008 was $1,869,650 CBFWA’s proposed funding level for FY2009 is $1,891,253

17. Member Participation CBFWA Member Annual Estimated Cost of All Program Related Coordination FY08-09 BPA Contribution Through CBFWA % Requested from BPA Burns Paiute Tribe $ 40,000.00 $ 15,000.0038% Confederated Colville Tribes $ 80,000.00 $ 40,000.0050% Coeur d' Alene Tribe $ 135,000.00 $0% Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes $ 18,000.00 $ 6,000.0033% Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation $ 60,000.00 $ 30,000.0050% Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation $ 38,000.00 $ 15,000.0039% Idaho Fish and Game $ 107,000.00 $ 35,000.0033% Kootenai Tribe of Idaho $ 90,000.00 $0% Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks $ 25,000.00 $ 10,000.0040% NOAA Fisheries $ 30,000.00 $0% Nez Perce Tribe $ 185,000.00 $ 60,000.0027% Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife $ 157,000.00 $ 36,000.0022% Shoshone Bannock Tribe $ 75,000.00 $ 30,000.0040% Shoshone Paiute Tribe $ 130,000.00 $ 15,000.0012% US Fish and Wildlife Service $ 100,000.00 $ 6,000.006% Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $ 120,000.00 $ 50,000.0042% Yakama Nation $ 145,000.00 $ 12,000.008%