Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Development and Regulation of Medical Products (MEDR-101)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Development and Regulation of Medical Products (MEDR-101)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Development and Regulation of Medical Products (MEDR-101)
Prof. Moustafa M. Mohamed Vice dean Faculty of Allied Medical Science Pharos University in Alexandria

2 Medical Device Design Controls
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Medical Device Design Controls Introduction to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Definitions Classes of devices Design control overview Risk assessment Verification and Validation testing Software Quality Assurance Labeling Post design transfer issues C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

3 FDA Oversight in a Medical Device Life Cycle
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) FDA Oversight in a Medical Device Life Cycle FDA review Research Design and Development Good Clinical Practice Clinical Trial Controls Good Laboratory Practice Investigational Devices Exemptions (IDE’s) 510(k) Clearance Produce Marketing Association (PMA) Document Controls Design Controls Good Lab Practices Document Controls Electronic Records Manufacture and Service Obsolescence Recalls Complaints Medical Device Reporting Quality Systems Requirements Establishment Registration Labeling Controls Design controls Record Retention C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

4 Intended use Product Class
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Intended use Product Class Class I-Simple, Low risk. General controls needed (registration, labeling, GMP) Class II- More complex, Medium risk. Need approval (some exemptions ) Class III- Complex, High risk. Generally life support, life sustaining, preventing impairment to human health or unreasonable risk to human life. Premarket Approval (PMA) needed prior to market. C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

5 2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Requirements All Class II and Class III devices, and some Class I devices require design controls. Written procedures required. Procedures are controlled via document control. Information about the design must be readily available to Food and Drug Administration FDA – Design History Files. Design controls can continue through the manufacturing and service phase. C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

6 2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Examples C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

7 2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Quality System A Medical Device Quality System is designed to assure that products are Safe and Effective for their Intended Use and Consistently meet the specifications as defined by results of clinical and/or detailed technical design and validation C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

8 Design Process of Medical Equipment

9 Design Control Elements
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Design Control Elements Design Planning Design Input (Requirements) Design Output (Specifications) Design Reviews (Technical) Design Verification (Meets Specifications) Design Validation (Meets clinical needs) Design Transfer (Moves from Design to Manufacturing) Design Changes (Formal Process) Design History File (DHF) C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

10 Design Planning Feasibility Studies Risk Assessments
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Design Planning Feasibility Studies Risk Assessments Project Plan Defines Interfaces with Others Stage-Gate Methodology Constantly Changing C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

11 Design Input-Feasibility
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Design Input-Feasibility Where Customers Technical Papers Medical experts Service people What Intended Use Technical Requirements Safety Issues How Documented Approved Filed Formal Change Control System C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

12 2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Risk Assessment C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

13 2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Definitions Harm: Physical injury or damage to the health of people, or damage to property or the environment Hazard: Potential sources of harm Risk: Combination of the probability of Occurrence of Harm and the Severity of the harm Risk Analysis: Systematic use of available information to identify hazards and estimate the risk Residual Risk: Risk remaining after protective measures and mitigations are taken Severity: A measure of the possible consequences of the risk As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP): The residual risk is reduced to a level which is as low as can be reasonable implemented without sacrificing patient safety or clinical utility. The risk/benefit ratio is determined to be acceptable in light of technical feasibility and economic feasibility of implementing additional controls. C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

14 Design Output Final design specifications
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Design Output Final design specifications Quantitative Documented Approved Final specifications are contained in the design history file. Final risk assessments completed. Clinical testing may be needed. C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

15 Design Reviews Formal Process Required for Phase Approval Checklists
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Design Reviews Formal Process Required for Phase Approval Checklists Minutes Attendees- one not associated with items reviewed Areas covered Action items/open issues Open items closed for final release Formal design review prior to release for manufacture and distribution C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

16 Design Verification and Validation
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Design Verification and Validation Demonstrates that all the risks have been mitigated. Demonstrates that specifications have been met. Uses a trace matrix between risk assessment, specs and V&V plans. Clinical trials may be needed to demonstrate safety and/or effectiveness. C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

17 Design Verification And Validation
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Design Verification And Validation Verification - meets specification Validation - meets intended use Written procedure required. Testing must be documented, reviewed and approved. Software must be verified and validated. Manufacturing processes must be verified and validated. C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

18 Design Transfer Design moves from R&D to manufacturing
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Design Transfer Design moves from R&D to manufacturing Manufacturing and production specifications are documented Manufacturing risk assessment may be needed Manufacturing IQ, OQ, PQ IQ - Installation Qualification (Equipment) OQ - Operational Qualification( 1st ones meet specs) PQ - Performance Qualification (Consistently repeatable) C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

19 2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Design Changes All changes to the design after release must be formally controlled (Change Control). Re-validation may be needed Continues for the life of product. Documentation control system is necessary. C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

20 Labeling 21 CFR 801 Section 201(k) defines "label" as a:
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Labeling 21 CFR 801 Section 201(k) defines "label" as a: "display of written, printed, or graphic matter upon the immediate container of any article..." The term "immediate container" does not include package liners. Any word, statement, or other information appearing on the immediate container must also appear "on the outside container or wrapper, if any there be, of the retain package of such article, or is easily legible through the outside container of wrapper." Section 201(m) defines "labeling" as: "all labels and other written, printed, or graphic matter (1) upon any article or any of its containers or wrappers, or (2) accompanying such article" at any time while a device is held for sale after shipment or delivery for shipment in interstate commerce. The term "accompanying" is interpreted liberally to mean more than physical association with the product. It extends to posters, tags, pamphlets, circulars, booklets, brochures, instruction books, direction sheets, fillers, etc. "Accompanying" also includes labeling that is brought together with the device after shipment or delivery for shipment in interstate commerce. Advertising According to an appellate court decision: "Most, if not all advertising, is labeling. The term 'labeling' is defined in the FFDCA as including all printed matter accompanying any article. Congress did not, and we cannot, exclude from the definition printed matter which constitutes advertising.“ Medical device manufacturers must incorporate in their quality assurance (QA) program several elements that relate to labeling in order to meet the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements of the Quality System regulation. The QA program must be adequate to ensure that labeling meets the GMP device master record requirements with respect to legibility, adhesion, etc., and ensure that labeling operations are controlled so that correct labeling is always issued and used. Labeling includes equipment labels, control labels, package labels, directions for use, maintenance manuals, etc. The displays on CRT's and other electronic message panels are considered labeling if instructions, prompts, cautions, and parameter identification information are given. Various sections of the QS regulation have an impact on labeling: Section 21 CFR (b) requires the inspection and testing of incoming materials including labeling; and 21 CFR (f) requires buildings to be of suitable design and have sufficient space for packaging and labeling operations. 21 CFR deals with specific requirements for the control of labeling. It applies to the application of labeling to ensure legibility under normal conditions of use over the expected life of the device; and also applies to inspection, handling, storage, and distribution of labeling. FDA considers a device to be adulterated if these requirements are not met. These requirements do not apply to the adequacy of labeling content, except to make sure the content meets labeling specifications contained in the device master record. However, failure to comply with GMP requirements, such as proofreading and change control, could result in labeling content errors. In such cases, the device is misbranded and adulterated. Specifications are required in the design history file (DHF) 21 CFR for the content and physical design parameters of labels. Labeling specifications are: engineering drawing and/or artwork for each label, appropriate inspection or control procedures, and appropriate procedures for attaching the labels. All procedures, drawings, and artwork must have the name of the preparer, an approval signature, and a date. The approval signature, date, etc., may be on the backside of artwork or on a label approval form. Further, artwork may contain only an identification code or title if the "content" of the artwork is duplicated on approved engineering drawings or adequately identified (cross-referenced) with respect to the label approval form. Hard copy labels, package inserts, and similar labeling are specified and purchased as components. For correct purchase and use of labeling, specifications are usually stated on engineering drawings and/or purchase specifications. Thus, artwork or "copy" alone will not fulfill the device master record requirements for labeling except for the most simplistic labeling such as brief errata sheets. The engineering drawings or purchase specifications and mounting procedure must specify, as appropriate, the label substrate, dimensions, ink, finish, mounting method, etc., so that the purchased label will remain attached and legible during the customary conditions of processing, storage, handling, distribution, and use. Front panels, other instrument panels, meters, fuses, pushbuttons, and the like often are labels or contain labels and must, as appropriate, meet device master record and control requirements. Component specifications, assembly drawings, and test/inspection procedures may be appropriate controls to prevent mixup of meters, pushbuttons, and other labeled instrument controls. Controls to prevent mixups are generally not needed for front and other instrument panels. Whether a firm considers a software driven display to be labeling or data makes little difference under the Quality System regulation, because either way, the finished device labeling or data must meet the device master record specifications. When firms develop and validate software, they should also review these electronic displays to see that the "labeling" meets all applicable requirements, such as adherence to specifications in the device master record, correct parameter identification, agreement with the instruction manual, and of course, correct display of performance data. When reviewing or auditing labeling operations, it is wise to keep in mind that the Quality System regulation contains flexible requirements and thus allows flexibility in a quality assurance program. The degree of labeling control needed to satisfy the Quality System regulation varies considerably for different devices and operations. In order to avoid wasting money and increasing the cost of health care, manufacturers need to give considerable and prudent thought to the appropriate level of control needed for their operations. Information and guidelines presented in this chapter should aid manufacturers in making these decisions. The level of control needed should be reconsidered when products are added or changed. Likewise, the controls needed and success of the existing control program must be reviewed during QA system audits. C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

21 Rx Medical Device Labeling
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Rx Medical Device Labeling Intended Use Indications for Use Contraindications for Use Warnings, Cautions Description of the Device User Instructions Specifications Corrective Actions (Troubleshooting) C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

22 Labeling Verification
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Labeling Verification Labeling must be verified prior to FDA review and product release. Users should also review labeling. Risk assessment “labeling” mitigations must appear as warnings or cautions. C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

23 Design History File Record of the Development Process Plans
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Design History File Record of the Development Process Plans Specifications V&V Test Results Design Reviews Changes to the Design C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

24 Class Exercise-Design Controls
2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Class Exercise-Design Controls Dr. Bright and Dr. Idea have found a novel way to produce a machine to determine if a heart attack patient has additional blockage in the coronary arteries that may be caused by the surgical bypass procedure (CABG). The machine non-invasively measures arterial flow by using Doppler sonar to determine if the arteries are blocked. It can be used in a patient’s home, by itself, on post heart attack patients who may be at risk for additional heart attacks. It transfers the data to a monitoring station at a EMS facility for 24/7 monitoring. They have formed a company (The Bright-Idea Company), built a prototype and tested it in the lab on sheep and pigs. It worked great. Now they want to begin marketing it for use on humans. Is the machine a medical device? What steps should Dr. Bright and Dr. Idea take before they can begin marketing the machine? What documents do they need to have on file? C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc

25 2/7/2007 Crossing the Threshold - ( FDA Regulatory Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers) Questions C. Richard G.Confer, PE, Inc


Download ppt "Development and Regulation of Medical Products (MEDR-101)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google