Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Analytical epidemiology Disease frequency Study design: cohorts & case control Choice of a reference group Biases Impact Causal inference Alain Moren,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Analytical epidemiology Disease frequency Study design: cohorts & case control Choice of a reference group Biases Impact Causal inference Alain Moren,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Analytical epidemiology Disease frequency Study design: cohorts & case control Choice of a reference group Biases Impact Causal inference Alain Moren, 2006 Stratification - Effect modification - Confounding Matching Significance testing Multivariable analysis

2 Exposure Outcome Third variable

3 Two main complications (1) Effect modifier (2) Confounding factor - useful information - bias

4 To analyse effect modification To eliminate confounding Solution = stratification stratified analysis Create strata according to categories inside the range of values taken by third variable

5 Variation in the magnitude of measure of effect across levels of a third variable. Effect modification is not a bias but useful information Effect modifier Happens when RR or OR is different between strata (subgroups of population)

6 Effect modifier To identify a subgroup with a lower or higher risk To target public health action To study interaction between risk factors

7 AR NV - AR V VE =----------------------------- AR NV VE = 1 - RR Vaccine efficacy

8 VE= 1 - RR = 1 - 0.28 VE = 72%

9 Vaccine efficacy by age group

10 Effect modification Different effects (RR) in different strata (age groups) VE is modified by age Test for homogeneity among strata (Woolf test)

11 Oral contraceptives (OC) and myocardial infarction (MI) Case-control study, unstratified data OC MIControlsOR Yes 693 3204.8 No 307 680Ref. Total1000 1000

12

13 Physical activity and MI

14

15 * * * * * 40 50 6070 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 Relative risk (RR) of dying from coronary heart disease for smoking physicians, by age groups, England & Wales, RR Age Doll et Hill, 1966 30 2010 Effect (OR or RR) is a function of the effect modifier Effect function

16 Any statistical test to help us? Breslow-Day Woolf test Test for trends: Chi square Heterogeneity

17 Confounding Distortion of measure of effect because of a third factor Should be prevented Needs to be controlled for

18 Simpsons paradox

19 Second table

20 Day 2, one table only

21

22

23 Birth order Age or mother Down syndrom

24

25 Confounding Exposure Outcome Third variable To be a confounding factor, 2 conditions must be met: Be associated with exposure - without being the consequence of exposure Be associated with outcome - independently of exposure

26 To identify confounding Compare crude measure of effect (RR or OR) to adjusted (weighted) measure of effect (Mantel Haenszel RR or OR)

27 Are Mercedes more dangerous than Porsches? 95% CI = 1.3 - 1.8

28 Crude RR = 1.5 Adjusted RR = 1.1 (0.94 - 1.27)

29 Car type Accidents Confounding factor: Age of driver

30 AgePorschesMercedes < 25 years550(55%)300 (30%) >= 25 years450700 Chi 2 = 127.9 AgeAccidentsNo accidents < 25 years370 (44%)480 >= 25 years130 (11%)1020 Chi 2 = 270.7

31 Exposure Outcome Hypercholesterolaemia Myocardial infarction Third factor Atheroma Any factor which is a necessary step in the causal chain is not a confounder

32 Salt Myocardial infarction Hypertension

33 10 - 20 % Any statistical test to help us? When is OR MH different from crude OR ?

34 How to prevent/control confounding? Prevention –Restriction to one stratum –Matching Control –Stratified analysis –Multivariable analysis

35 Mantel-Haenszel summary measure Adjusted or weighted RR or OR Advantages of MH Zeroes allowed OR MH = ------------------- k SUM (a i d i / n i ) i=1 k SUM (b i c c i / n i ) i=1

36 OR MH = ------------------- k SUM (a i d i / n i ) i=1 k SUM (b i c c i / n i ) i=1

37 Examples of stratified analysis

38 Effect modifier Belongs to nature Different effects in different strata Simple Useful Increases knowledge of biological mechanism Allows targeting of PH action Confounding factor Belongs to study Weighted RR different from crude RR Distortion of effect Creates confusion in data Prevent (protocol) Control (analysis )

39 How to conduct a stratified analysis Perform crude analysis Measure the strength of association List potential effect modifiers and confounders Stratify data according to potential modifiers or confounders Check for effect modification If effect modification present, show the data by stratum If no effect modification present, check for confounding If confounding, show adjusted data If no confounding, show crude data

40 How to define strata In each stratum, third variable is no longer a confounder Stratum of public health interest If 2 risk factors, we stratify on the different levels of one of them to study the second Residual confounding ?

41 Logical order of data analysis How to deal with multiple risk factors: Crude analysis Multivariate analysis 1. stratified analysis 2. modelling linear regression logistic regression

42 A train can mask a second train A variable can mask another variable

43

44 What happened? Tables % Fitting Hat Colour Hat fitting higher in Table I (83%) vs table II (13%) Blue and red hats not evenly distributed between the 2 tables - table I, 33 % blue - table II, 66 % blue


Download ppt "Analytical epidemiology Disease frequency Study design: cohorts & case control Choice of a reference group Biases Impact Causal inference Alain Moren,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google