Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Systemic Foresight Methodology Dr. Ozcan Saritas Manchester Institute of Innovation Research The University of Manchester The 4th International Seville.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Systemic Foresight Methodology Dr. Ozcan Saritas Manchester Institute of Innovation Research The University of Manchester The 4th International Seville."— Presentation transcript:

1 Systemic Foresight Methodology Dr. Ozcan Saritas Manchester Institute of Innovation Research The University of Manchester The 4th International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA) 12 & 13 May 2011

2 –The increasing importance of innovation (both technological and organisational) and the development of service economies –Increased financial, trade and investment flows –Rapid and accelerating technological progress; ICTs, biotechnology, fuel cells, nanotechnologies –Global value chains and new international regulations and standards on trade, quality, labor, environment, intellectual property rights –Other developments including changes in demographic structures and in cultural practices, and environmental affairs, advancements in S&T –Recognition of the close relationship between S&T and Society Systemic Foresight Methodology

3 Increasing push for greater efficiency and decarbonisation of the energy system because of the environmental and energy security concerns Trends Environmental policies change behaviours and shift societal actions more toward integral or internalized measures – such as recycling requirements Drivers of change

4 Understanding –Real-life systems and natural settings with a multi-contextual focus –Increasing interrelationships and interdependencies and thus more complex and uncertain situations Anticipation –Understanding, appreciating and modelling present & anticipated long-term developments –Intelligence gathering to explore novel ideas and avoid shock s Inclusivity –Interactive and participative ways of debate and analysis –Continuous interaction of stakeholders on equal terms –Establishment of new social networks Policy and action orientation –Elaboration of strategic visions based on a shared sense of commitment –Implications for present-day decisions and actions Methodological support –Using quantitative and qualitative methods and building methodologies by combining them to fit for purpose –Integration of best practices, methods and tools Systemic Foresight Methodology

5 Intelligence –Creates shared understanding and mutual appreciation of issues at hand Imagination –The input from scanning is synthesised into conceptual models of the situations involved in the real world Integration –Analyses the alternative models of the future and prioritises them, through intensive negotiations among system actors and stakeholders, to create an agreed model of the future Interpretation –Translates future visions into long-, medium-, and short-term actions for a successful change programme Intervention –Creates plans to inform present day decisions for immediate change to provide structural and behavioural transformations I nteraction I ntelligence I magination I ntegration I nterpretation I ntervention Systemic Foresight Methodology

6 Scanning Panels Workshops Bibliometrics / Data Mining Literature Review Interviews System Analysis Trends/Drivers Indicators Scanning for Intelligence gathering The systematic examination of potential threats, opportunities and likely future developments which are at the margins of current thinking and planning. Horizon scanning may explore novel and unexpected issues, as well as persistent problems or trends (DEFRA, 2002) Selecting the main areas for intervention, the boundaries of the Foresight are drawn and the content of Foresight is built with scanning Scanning provides the basic input to the entire activity and involves analysis of such as Trends, Drivers of Change, Surprises/Shocks, Discontinuities Systemic Foresight Methodology

7 What kind of developments will occur? Which ones of them could be beneficial and which ones harmful? How soon may these developments occur? What might be the first signs that these developments are happening? Where and how might the leading indications of impending change be seen? Who is in a position anywhere to observe these indications? What is worth to minimise the extent of surprise introduced by these indications? Who needs to know about these impending changes? Systemic Foresight Methodology

8 Social system Technological system Economic system Ecological system Political system Values Systemic Foresight Methodology

9

10 10 Urban Poverty – issues (<1999)

11 11 Urban Poverty – issues ( )

12 12 Urban Poverty – issues ( )

13 Urban Poverty - centrality measures based on Freemans degree of centrality < < 1Poverty (170)Poverty (105)Urban (406)Population (36)Rural (18) 2 Urbanisation (156) Slums (92)Poverty (394)Sanitation (36)Poverty (18) 3Food (131)Sanitation (83)Population (379)Water (25)Migration (18) 4Rural (121)Rural (76)Growth (350)Rural (25) Urbanisation (18) 5Population (121)Food (73)Slums (340)Urban (25)Malnutrition (11) 6Water (115)Population (69)Disaster (320) Urbanisation (21) Food (11) 7Migration (110)Migration (69) Public transport (314) Poverty (13)Sanitation (11) 8Sanitation (97) Urbanisation (67) Transport (314)Housing (13)Health (11) 9Urban (94)Urban (66)Policy (281)Transport (13)Land (11) 10Education (88)Health (64)Cities (281)Land (13)Water (11) 11Agreements (75)Defecation (62)Road (268)Health (13)Transport (11) 12Health (70)Water (62)Lifestyle (262)Migration (13)Housing (11) 13Sustainability (70)Toilets (62)Landslide (238)Business (8)Handicrafts (7) 14Environment (70)Economy (58)Catastrophe (238)Economy (8)Environment (7) 15Slums (67)Malnutrition (53)Congestion (238)Agriculture (8)Agriculture (7)

14 Gaming Panels Workshops Scenario Planning Wild Card Weak Signals Network Analysis Modelling / Simulation Agent Based Modelling Imagination is more than knowledge – A. Einstein Generation of new ideas or concepts, or new associations between existing ideas or concepts Production of models to promote understanding of systems and situations within the limits of uncertainties Modelling formalises thought experiments leads to the further development of Foresight process and presentation of the outcome Systemic Foresight Methodology

15

16 People of the year 2000, amazed at the sight of a horse. (French postcard circa 1910) Systemic Foresight Methodology

17 1-year Present The time it takes planet earth to circle the sun once Cycle of seasons Unit of time measurement for human lives Farming and crop rotation 10-year Present Sizeable chunk of a human lifetime Long enough to provide insight into dynamic processes Ideal for noting environmental and ecological factors A reasonable horizon for testing new products and services The time it takes to plan and build major infrastructure items 20-year Present Cycle of generations for human beings: (Veterans, ); (Baby Boomers, ); (Generation Xs ( ); The Nexters ( )) Long enough to observe the economics and social impact of strategic R&D activities, e.g. the identification of CFCs scientifically and the sign of the international contract to take precautionary measures ( ) 50-year Present Incorporates some major concerns of a technologically advanced culture Culturally significant period to understand trends and change processes Enough to judge the impacts and implications of existing and new technologies 100-year Present Boundary of a single lifetime Long cycles can be distinguished The rise and fall of regions, industries and ecosystems Theories and history and futures begin to flourish 200-year Present Ideal timeframe for cultures in transition A time with which generations are linked Enough to develop intergenerational biography and dialogue The rise and fall of cultures, empires and entire ecosystems Macro view of history; the panorama of the centuries Systemic Foresight Methodology

18 From Networks to Evolutionary Scenarios The history of the future < 1999 T Wi Di We D T Di We D T Wi Di D Wi We

19 SWOT Analysis Panels Workshops Multi Criteria Analysis Cross Impact Analysis Prioritisation / Delphi Benefit/Cost /Risk Analysis Scoring Voting/Rating Concerned with the systemic analysis of future alternatives and building a vision The analysis and selection of a desired system is multifaceted as there is a variety of worldviews and expectations to be negotiated. For a system to be viable in the long term, the claims of different stakeholders must be considered adequately, and attention must be given to ethical and aesthetic aspects for the pursuit of ideals such as beauty, truth, good and plenty (Ackoff, 1981). The end product of this phase is an agreed model of the future Systemic Foresight Methodology

20 Backcasting Panels Workshops Road Mapping Relevance Trees Logic Charts Strategic Planning Linear Programming Translates visions into strategies for a successful change programme. Conditions for the successful transformation strategies: -Assessment (e.g. processing information; developing an understanding of the continuously changing context; and becoming an open learning system) -Leadership (e.g. having a context-sensitive leadership; creating capabilities for change; and linking actions with resources) -Linking strategic and operational change (e.g. supplying visions, values and directions) -Management of human resources (e.g. demonstrating the need for change in people and behaviours) -Coherence (e.g. adaptive response to environment; and maintaining competitive advantage) Systemic Foresight Methodology

21 Priority Lists Panels Workshops Impact Assessment R&D Planning Critical/Key Technologies Operational Planning Action Planning Any Foresight exercise has to inform policies and actions. Foresight suggests actions concerning immediate change actions to implement structural and behavioural transformations. Actions for change are determined by considering the following capabilities of the system under investigation: -Adapting -Influencing and shaping its context -Finding a new milieu or modelling itself virtuously in its context -Adding value to the viability and development of wider wholes in which it is embedded Systemic Foresight Methodology

22 Interaction Shift from government to governance and thus a new regulatory system –Inclusiveness and equity through freedom of association and expression, and an organised civil society with full protection of human rights –Democratic society influencing, restraining or blocking policy design and implementation –Contributions from society, firms, institutions, and associations to enhance public policy within a new normative and legal framework –Effectiveness and efficiency in meeting societys expectations and sustainable use of resources The quest for new forms of governance is structured around three pillars: Governance, Socio-cultural evolution & Corporate industrial activity Systemic Foresight Methodology

23 Science & Ecology Technology & Economics Socioeconomics Politics & Values What is possible? What is desirable? What is feasible? Systemic Foresight Systemic Foresight Methodology

24 InterventionInterpretation Imagination Intelligence Integration Scanning Panels Workshops Interaction Bibliometrics / Data Mining Literature Review Interviews System Analysis Trends/Drivers Indicators Priority Lists Panels Workshops Impact Assessment R&D Planning Critical/Key Technologies Operational Planning Action Planning Gaming Panels Workshops Scenario Planning Wild Card Weak Signals Network Analysis Modelling / Simulation Agent Based Modelling SWOT Analysis Panels Workshops Multi Criteria Analysis Cross Impact Analysis Prioritisation / Delphi Benefit/Cost /Risk Analysis Scoring Voting/Rating Backcasting Panels Workshops Road Mapping Relevance Trees Logic Charts Strategic Planning Linear Programming Systemic Foresight Methodology

25 Objectives of the Regional Foresight exercise: Policies and strategies for the Renewable Energies sector (e.g. improve competitiveness of companies, scientific organizations and intermediaries; establish the capital region as relevant and attractive location; improve services; and exploit a large market in the region and beyond) Identification of key technologies (e.g. identify key technologies for the next years; promote technology learning; strengthen technology transfer; utilize existing technologies; and involve in the development, shaping and expert technologies) Structural and organizational improvement of the sector (e.g. improve collaboration among actors; improve supplier / value chains; initiate new partnerships and investments; establish state-wide SME network; and establish international activities) Systemic Foresight Methodology

26 Scanning: For the analysis of STEEPV systems to understand what type of energies will be needed and what kind of demand will come out Key Indicators / Forecasting: For the analysis of sectoral forecasts and long term projections Mega trend analysis: To understand the broad policy tendencies at the Global/European/National levels Synthesis of previous work: Large amount of the work on energy futures exists including plenty of scenario work (reviewing those scenarios would be useful to suggest a set of synthesis scenarios) Scenarios: To discover alternative futures on policy developments SWOT analysis of the regional capabilities against the visionary scenario Roadmapping: Illustrating the priority areas, the actions to be taken in long, medium and short terms and the distribution of initiatives among the actors in the sector Policy Recommendations: Policy actions to be taken in the short term Systemic Foresight Methodology

27 Scanning: For the analysis of STEEPV systems and discuss their implications on technologies Bibliometrics/Literature Review: For the review the technologies to generate energy and discuss in panels which are relevant and promising for the region Key Indicators/Forecasts: Analysis of sectoral forecasts and long term projections on technologies Synthesis: For the review and synthesis of the previous Foresight work Scenarios with wide participation (including citizens) identify the demands of society from the technology Delphi: Represents the supply side – whether the demands in the scenarios are possible and feasible or not. Helps to define time of realisation for selected technologies and technology areas. Also helps to identify priority technologies Roadmaps: For the development of Technology Roadmaps for prioritised technologies at different levels such as Technology – Product / Capability / Development / Research Produce a list of critical technologies Suggest R&D projects and plan R&D activities and resources Systemic Foresight Methodology

28 System Analysis: Analysis of the value chain helps to come to a better understanding of how the sector works and what the actors / stakeholders are Clustering by stakeholder mapping helps to map the actors in the sector and to indicate who is doing what Mega trend analysis: Sectoral megatrends will give clues on changing roles in the sectors and inclusion of new actors / stakeholders in the process in the future Scenarios: Various scenarios around Input-Output relationships illustrate the future organisation of the sector SWOT analysis of the existing structures against the structures suggested in the visionary / most desirable scenario Delphi: To identify types of collaborations needed among stakeholders in order to establish new links in the system Strategic plans: for the restructuring of the sector in the medium term Action planning: To suggest immediate actions to change / improve structures and organisations and to introduce new rules and regulations Systemic Foresight Methodology

29 METHODSPolicy PathTech PathStructural Path Scanning Bibliometrics Literature Review Key Indicators Stakeholder Mapping System Analysis Megatrend Analysis Scenarios Weak Signals SWOT Analysis Delphi Survey Roadmapping Relevance Trees Strategic Planning Critical / Key Techs R&D Planning Policy Recommendations Action Planning

30 Foresight practice has moved from being systematic to systemic Systemic Foresight Methodology (SFM) concerns situations, which is characterised by sets of events that may be that may be coincident or serial or both that create a situation not a problem Provides greater awareness and understanding and appreciation of complex Social, Technological, Economic, Ecological, Political and Value (STEEPV) systems SFM involves a soft process of inquiry, which is characterised by subjective opinion SFM meets expectations for inclusivity, transparency and inclusivity Systemic Foresight Methodology

31


Download ppt "Systemic Foresight Methodology Dr. Ozcan Saritas Manchester Institute of Innovation Research The University of Manchester The 4th International Seville."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google