1. 1 ImplementingJESSICA Brian Field EIB JESSICA Task Force European Week of Cities and Regions OPEN DAYS 6th-9th October 2008

2. 2 OVERVIEW 1.Introducing JESSICA 2.The role of EIB 3.Progress in implementation 4.Key issues & the way forward

3. 3 1. Introducing JESSICA

4. 4 WHAT IS JESSICA? Joint European Support for Sustainable Investment in City Areas Initiative of the European Commission (DG REGIO) launched at end of 2005, and supported by EIB, to strengthen the urban dimension in cohesion policy Applying financial engineering techniques to EU Structural Funds

5. 5 WHY JESSICA? To make Structural Fund support more efficient and effective by using non-grant financial instruments, thus creating stronger incentives for successful project implementation. To mobilise additional financial resources and expertise for PPPs and other urban development projects with a focus on sustainability/recyclability. To utilise financial and managerial expertise from international financial institutions such as EIB.

6. 6 JESSICA COMPONENTS - OVERVIEW HF Manager European Commission ERDF – DG Regio European Commission ERDF – DG Regio Managing Authority EU Level National /or regional Level Holding Fund (« HF »), optional Urban Development Funds ( « UDFs » ) National/regional /Local Level Regional /Local Level Projects PPPs SPVs Loans, Guarantees, Equity Integrated Urban Development Plans Other (Public or Private) Investors Other (Public or Private) Investors Grant: Not repayable as long as EC Regulations adhered to Holding Fund: Established by Managing Authority; Acting on behalf of key public sector agencies & stakeholders HF Manager: Structure investments; Select UDFs; Administer, monitor & report on investments; Attract other investors; Closely collaborate with MAs and other public and private bodies Operational Programme

7. 7 JESSICA COMPONENTS – A SIMPLIFIED MODEL UDF (including professional fund manager) Managing Authority Private Sector Project AProject BProject CProject D ERDF CASH* CASH Investor Level Fund Level Project Level *and land assets(?) invested at the project level or fund level. - subject to EC direction

8. 8 JESSICA COMPONENTS – POSSIBLE OPERATION UDF Managing Authority Private Sector Project AProject B ERDF CASH CASH Investor Level Fund Level Project Level Project B Local Partners Profits Property Assets e.g. Municipality e.g. Private Sector Developer e.g. Other Public Agency Etc Equity Profits

9. 9 JESSICA LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS Art 44 of Council Regulation 1083/2006 outlined the financial engineering instruments requirements, that includes provision for Member States to organise Holding Funds by, amongst others, awarding a grant, without need for tender, to EIB. Art 78 of Council Regulation 1083/2006 outlines eligible expenditure and allows for contributions to either UDFs or Holding Funds to be included in the statement of expenditure for reimbursement. It also outlines rules on the reuse of resources returned on the investment, including interest. Art 43 and 46 of Commission Regulation No 1828/2006 provides implementing provisions for financial engineering instruments, including UDFs. Art 44 of 1828/2006 provides implementing provisions specifically with respect to Holding Funds.

10. 10 JESSICA BENEFITS? Leverage major, long-term private sector finance and expertise Catalysing investment in locations that would otherwise fail Promote/foster financial sustainability/independence Holistic approach to investment (i.e. beyond money- making) Public sector objectives protected by fund structure Responsiveness to change (relative to PPP projects) Risk reduction through area uplift over the long term and cross subsidisation between a portfolio of projects/sites

11. 11 WHAT PROJECTS TYPES ARE APPROPRIATE? Projects that ideally are mixed-use developments. Encouraging people to live in cities by promoting centralisation and discouraging suburbanisation. Creating vibrant neighbourhoods and precincts. In larger cities, use of former industrial sites in central locations, unnecessary ports/logistics nodes in the central area, or large redevelopment areas under public ownership. In smaller towns, use of infill sites and/or redevelopment areas.

12. 12 SOME SPECIFIC PROJECT EXAMPLES Site remediation and preparation Basic urban infrastructure, street furniture, green spaces Urban public transport or energy networks Urban e-government infrastructure Human capital infrastructure – health and education Science parks and business clusters/craft workshops Restoration of historic/listed buildings Cultural complexes and signature/landmark buildings Multi-use recreational complexes

13. 13 SOME INGREDIENTS FOR SUCCESS… A reference integrated urban development plan (in line with sustainable development criteria) Commitment of, and clear benefits for, all relevant public stakeholders (e.g. Ministries, Regions, Cities) Transparent and efficient planning process Where appropriate, contributions in kind – publicly owned land and buildings. Where necessary, technical assistance for project preparation.

14. 14 2. The role of EIB

15. 15 HOW IS EIB CONTRIBUTING TO JESSICA? Promoting & supporting JESSICA implementation in MS: EIB taking a leading role, alongside DG REGIO, in promoting and developing JESSICA in Member States – acting as a conduit between Managing Authorities and the Commission. Technical assistance and dissemination of best practice, based on established expertise in lending to urban renewal/regenerations projects across the EU. Regulations specifically provide for EIB to act as a JESSICA Holding Fund. Providing complementary loan financing where possible.

16. 16 3. Progress in JESSICA implementation

17. 17 JESSICA kick-off meetings undertaken in 18 MS; in all, activities undertaken in 22 MS, representing 94% of EU pop. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS TO DATE Kick-offs completed 18 Countries Activity initiated (without Kick-off) 4 Countries JESSICA Dormant 5 Countries Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech R., France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Slovak R., Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, UK Austria Latvia Malta Romania Denmark Estonia Finland Ireland Netherlands 86% of EU-Population7% of EU-Population JESSICA TASK FORCE ACTIVITIES IN MS

18. 18 20 Evaluation studies launched in EU Member States (Sep 2008) KEY ACHIEVEMENTS TO DATE JESSICA TASK FORCE ACTIVITIES IN MS

19. 19 Partnerships established with key local players in several MS Exchange & networking activities: URBACT, ESPON, INTERREG IV, EUROSTAT, JESSICA EWG Promotional activities: Articles, conferences, liaison with professional bodies / associations Information strategy: Brochure in 14 languages, webpage launched, detailed brochure planned KEY ACHIEVEMENTS TO DATE JESSICA TASK FORCE ACTIVITIES IN MS

20. 20 There is considerable diversity in the operational environment in the 27 EU Member States, precluding deployment of a standardised JESSICA model and necessitating a customised approach to JESSICA intervention. JESSICA OPERATIONS IN MS OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

21. 21 TYPE A: Situation and characteristics: ERDF resources limited; JESSICA used to stretch existing and leverage additional resources Planning environment and integrated urban development approaches sophisticated Project development and implementation capacity high Financial Engineering well developed and applied in urban sector EIB role: HF mandate unlikely; no technical assistance needed, however support re JESSICA conceptualisation and implementation; co-financing on UDF/project level. TYPE B: Situation and characteristics: ERDF resources moderate; JESSICA used to stretch existing and leverage additional resources; complementary to existing promotional programmes Planning environment and integrated urban development approaches relatively well developed Project development and implementation capacity high Financial Engineering instruments in operation, but application in the urban sector limited EIB role: HF mandate possible rather than probable; minimal TA in establishing JESSICA prerequisites; support regarding the establishment and implementation of JESSICA instruments and vehicle architecture; co-financing on (HF)/UDF/project level. JESSICA OPERATIONS IN MS JESSICA CUSTOMISED INTERVENTION TYPOLOGY I

22. 22 TYPE C Situation and characteristics: ERDF resources high; Non-ERDF funding for urban regeneration limited; JESSICA as potentially important instrument for the financing of urban regeneration (incl. stretching as revolving funds) Planning environment developed but outdated; limited experience with integrated urban development concepts Project development and implementation capacity limited Financial Engineering skills and experiences in its infancy, with little or no application in urban sector EIB role: temporary HF operator; TA in establishing JESSICA requisites (planning environment, project preparation); support regarding the establishment and implementation of JESSICA instruments and vehicle architecture, particularly with regard to reconciling local laws with COM regulations; co-financing on HF/UDF/project level TYPE D: Situation and characteristics: ERDF resources high; Non-ERDF funding for urban regeneration limited; JESSICA as a large scale vehicle for the financing of urban regeneration (incl. stretching as revolving funds) Planning environment to develop, almost no experience with integrated urban development Project development and implementation capacity limited Financial Engineering very limited, no application in urban sector EIB role: mid to long-term HF operator; TA in establishing JESSICA requisites (planning environment, project preparation); support regarding the establishment and implementation of JESSICA instruments and vehicle architecture, particularly with regard to reconciling local laws with COM regulations; co-financing on HF/UDF/project level JESSICA OPERATIONS IN MS JESSICA CUSTOMISED INTERVENTION TYPOLOGY II

23. 23 Interest in JESSICA HF/UDF structures 16 Countries Belgium (UDF) Bulgaria (HF) Cyprus (HF/UDF) France (UDF) Germany (UDF) Greece (HF) Hungary (HF) Italy (HF/UDF) Latvia (HF) Lithuania (UDF) Luxembourg (UDF) Poland (HF/UDF) Portugal (HF/UDF) Spain (UDF) Sweden Study UK (HF/UDF) 82% of EU Population WAVE 1 Activity 2007-2009 WAVE 2 Activity 2008-2010 WAVE 3 Activity 2009-2012 United Kingdom (HF + UDFs) Germany (UDFs Länder) Italy (HF + UDF) Poland (HF + UDF) Belgium (UDF Wallonia / Flanders) Bulgaria (Holding Fund) France (National UDF) Greece (HF) Hungary (HF + UDF) Luxembourg (UDF) Portugal (HF) Spain (UDF) Sweden (Study) Cyprus* Czech R.* Latvia (HF) Lithuania (HF) Malta* Romania (HF) Slovenia* Slowak R.* * Contacts at relatively infant stage JESSICA OPERATIONS IN MS INTEREST & ANTICIPATED OPERATIONS

24. 24 PROGRESS BAROMETER JESSICA OPERATIONS IN MS

25. 25 4. Key issues & the way forward

26. 26 OBSERVATIONS & KEY ISSUES 1.JESSICA – a flexible instrument: JESSICA interpreted differently in different constituencies Replicability limited, but knowledge-sharing important 2.Clarification of legal matters required Member States have differing legal structures within which the JESSICA instrument will be deployed The perceived flexibility of regulations needs to be tested in practice 3.Pan-European exchange and co-operation useful

27. 27 PENDING QUESTIONS… HF Manager European Commission ERDF – DG Regio European Commission ERDF – DG Regio Managing Authority EU Level National /or regional Level Holding Fund (« HF »), optional Urban Development Funds ( « UDFs » ) National/regional /Local Level Regional /Local Level Projects PPPs SPVs Loans, Guarantees, Equity Integrated Urban Development Plans Other (Public or Private) Investors Other (Public or Private) Investors Operational Programme Accounting of UDF Management Cost ? Procurement (Implications of COCOF note) ? Art.55 on revenue- generating projects ? OP reference to JESSICA a requirement or just preferrable? If required, accellerated procedure to include JESSICA in OP ? Criteria for re-use of returned resources ?

28. 28 NEXT STEPS Clarify and streamline. Clarify uncertainties and simplify procedures to facilitate embedding JESSICA in Member States Develop Urban Development Funds. Assist Member States in identifying/developing Urban Development Funds in the various countries Develop JESSICAble projects. Assist MS/MA/UDF in developing a portfolio of JESSICAble projects – integrated and sustainable transformation

29. 29 JESSICA COUNTRY CONTACTS

30. 30 www.eib.org EIB CONTACT INFORMATION JESSICA Task Force European Investment Bank 100, Bvd. Konrad Adenauer L-2950 Luxembourg Tel.: +352 4379 83069 Fax.: +352 4379 63099 email : jessica@eib.orgjessica@eib.org