Presentation on theme: "Willy Van Puymbroeck European Commission Head of Unit Nanoelectronics"— Presentation transcript:
1 Willy Van Puymbroeck European Commission Head of Unit Nanoelectronics Key Enabling Technologies and HORIZON 2020Willy Van Puymbroeck European Commission Head of Unit Nanoelectronics1
2 Outline presentation KEY Enabling Technologies – KET’s HORIZON 2020 How and whichObservations of the High Level GroupRecommendations by the High Level GroupConsiderations on implementationHORIZON 2020Outlook and budgetImpact, simplification and architectureChallenges and funding schemesNANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling TechnologyEvolution of the areaResearch in EuropeAddressing value chains2
3 Value adding enabling Role Technology-Intensity KEY Enabling Technologies How and which – Key Performance IndicatorsScreening of the common high-tech areas at Member State-levelInitial selectionEconomic PotentialValue adding enabling RoleTechnology-IntensityCapital IntensityGDP contributionEmploymentMarket GrowthSystemic relevanceGeneral PurposeTechnologyInnovation driverProductivity driverSpill-over effectsR&D-IntensityInnovation cyclesKnow-how intensityIPR/ PatentingHigh-skill ratioInitial investmentsCapital expenditure/ Production costsAmortisation ratesInvestment per employeeEconomic criteriaBased on this assessment, five + one key enabling technologies were selected
4 KEY Enabling Technologies How and which Communication COM(2009)512 ofMicro- and nanoelectronics,including semiconductorsAdvancedmaterialsPhotonicsBiotechnologyNanotechnologyAdvanced manufacturing Systems
5 KEY Enabling Technologies How and which – High Level Group 27 High Level Group members + Sherpa Group+ Technology-specific Working GroupsMission of the KETs HLGTo assess the competitive situation of the relevant technologies in the EU with a particular focus on industrial deployment and their contribution to address major societal challenges;To analyse in depth the available public and private R&D capacities for KETs in the EU;To propose specific policy recommendations for a more effective industrial deployment of KETs in the EU.
6 LI-ION BATTERY PRODUCTION KEY Enabling Technologies Observations of the HLG – Disconnect between EU patent base and EU manufacturingUSAEUROPEASIAOTHERSLI-ION BATTERY PRODUCTION2008Patent shareManufacturingshareBIOETHANOLPRODUCTION2009PV CELL30%31%35%4%%1%0%87%12%%34%36%26%7%%USA 54%BRAZIL34%5%3%4%%27%29%42%2%%12%13%57%18%%
7 manufacturing facilities KEY Enabling Technologies Observations of the HLG – The ‘Valley of Death’TechnologicalfacilitiesPilot linesDemonstratorGlobally competitivemanufacturing facilitiesSource: Preliminary HLG KET Report, Brussels, 09/02/2011
8 KEY Enabling Technologies Observations of the HLG – Competition is on – some examples US President Barack H. Obama, in his state of The Union speech, on January , STATED “At stake [right now] is whether new jobs and industries take root in this country, or somewhere else.[…] The rules have changed! […] We need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-built the rest of the world”USCHINAShift form a PRO1- centred innovation system to a firm-centred oneBRAZILJune 2011, Brazilian state-owned development bank BNDES announced that it will make $18-22 billion in loans to the sugarcane and ethanol sector.The technology of magnetic random access memory was recently mastered and led to development and commercialisation in Europe. This type of memory could replace traditional memory on silicon as it is faster, less expensive and consumes less energy. This year, RUSNANO, the Russian government controlled investment fund, tasked with the mission of creating by 2015 a “Nano industry” took high JV stake in the relevant European industry.RUSSIA
9 KEY Enabling Technologies Recommendations by the HLG Recommendation n°1: Make KETs a technological priority for EuropeThe High Level Group recommends that an integrated KETs policy should be implemented, that KETs should be visibly prioritised in EU policies and financial instruments and that the European Investment Bank group should pro-actively support KETs initiatives in Europe.Recommendation n°2: The EU should apply the TRL scale R&D definitionThe High Level Group recommends the EU to align its RDI activities on the TRL scale in line with the OECD definition. The Commission should also systematically apply this definition in order to include technological research, product development and demonstration activities within its RDI portfolio.Recommendation n°3: Fully exploit the scope of relevant R&D definitionsThe High Level Group recommends that the EU should apply R&D definitions in its programmes which support the full and simultaneous implementation of the three pillar bridge model along the innovation chain, from basic research, through technological research, product development and prototyping up to globally competitive manufacturing.Recommendation n°4: Rebalancing of EU RDI funding programmesThe High Level Group recommends that the EU and Member States firmly rebalance their RDI funding in KETs-related programmes towards technological research, product development (including pilot lines, prototypes, first-in-kind equipment and facilities and demonstrator activities). In particular in the future CSF, the EU should set indicative targets for the percentage of funding dedicated to basic research, technological research and development activities.
10 KEY Enabling Technologies Recommendations by the HLG Recommendation n°5: A strategic approach to KETs programmesThe High Level Group recommends that the European Commission defines and implements a strategic, industry driven and coordinated approach to KETs programmes and related policies across EC RDI funding programmes and instruments (CSF, ERDF).Recommendation n°6: Establish an appropriate set of rules to implement KETs programmesThe High Level Group recommends that the European Commission adapts its selection criteria and implementation rules in the CSF programme to maximise its impact on the value and innovation chains. In particular, a "value chain correctness" criterion should be addedRecommendation n°7: Combined funding mechanismsThe High Level Group recommends that the EU should introduce a tripartite financing approach based on combined funding mechanisms involving Industry, Commission, and national authorities (Member States and local government), when required by the high costs of the KETs RDI projects, and put in place the appropriate program management and mechanisms to allow the combination of EU funding (CSF, structural funds), to enable the optimum investment in significant KET pilot line and manufacturing facilities across Europe.Recommendation n°8: KETs state aid provisionsThe High Level Group recommends that the EU adapts state aid provisions to facilitate RDI activities and large-scale investment in KETs, in particular through the introduction of a matching clause in the EU state aid framework across the board, review of the scaling-down mechanism for larger investments increased thresholds for notifications, faster procedures and the use of projects of common European interest.
11 KEY Enabling Technologies Recommendations by the HLG Recommendation n°9: Globally competitive IP policy in EuropeThe High Level Group recommends that the selection criteria and terms of the consortium agreements of EU RDI funding programmes should be amended to ensure that participating consortia have a clear and explicit plan for both the ownership of and first exploitation of IP resulting from the project within the EU. It should explicitly include provisions similar to those of the “Bayh-Dole Act” and “Exception Circumstances”-like provisions to encourage the first exploitation and manufacturing of products based on this IP within the EU.Recommendation n°10: Build, strengthen and retain KETs skillsThe High Level Group recommends that the EU should create a European Technology Research Council (ETRC) to promote individual excellence in technologically focused engineering research and innovation and establish the appropriate framework conditions through the ESF regulation in order to support KETs skills capacity building at national and regional level.Recommendation n°11: A European KETs observatory and consultative bodyThe High Level Group recommends that the European Commission establishes a European KETs Observatory Monitoring Mechanism tasked with the mission of performing analysis and a “KETs Consultative Body” comprised of stakeholders across the entire innovation chain to advise and monitor the progress in Europe of the HLG KET recommendations towards the development and deployment of KETs for a competitive Europe this should include all relevant data regarding policies and strategies evolution outside EU.
12 Key Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies Considerations on implementationKey Enabling TechnologiesAn Industrial Policy forthe Globalisation Era
13 Horizon 2020 Outlook and budget Proposal by the Commission in ‘A budget for Europe 2020’ on Research and InnovationBudget for of EUR 80 billion in constant 2011 pricesBring together FP7, the innovation part of Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP) and European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)Structured around three distinct reinforcing blocksExcellence in the science baseTackling societal challengesCreating industrial leadership and competitive frameworksIncludes both agenda-driven activities and more open areas for applicationsImplementation will be simplified and standardised
14 Horizon 2020 Increasing impact FROM different priorities in each programme and initiativeTO common strategic priorities, focusing on societal challenges, competitiveness and research excellenceFROM gaps between the stages (R&D, demonstration, piloting, market uptake …)TO coherent support for projects and organisations across the innovation cycle
15 Horizon 2020 Achieving simplification FROM a large variety of funding schemes within and between programmesTO a rationalised toolkit of funding schemes across the CSFFROM different rules in each programme and initiativeTO more standardised rules across all initiatives – which meet the different needs and with flexibility where neededFROM multiple websites, guidance documents, applicationsTO common entry point, one stop shop, common IT platform
16 Horizon 2020 Architecture Shared objectives and principles Creating Industrial Leadership & Competitive FrameworksLeadership in enabling technologiesICTNanotech, Production, MaterialsBiotechSpaceAccess to risk finance & venture capitalHigh potential SMEsExcellence in the Research BaseFrontier research (ERC & FET Flagships)Skills and career development (Marie Curie)Research infrastructures incl. e-InfrastructuresTackling Societal ChallengesHealth, demographics and wellbeingFood security and bio-based economySecure, clean and efficient energySmart, green and integrated transportResource efficiency & climate impactInclusive, innovative & secure society(EIT)Common rules, toolkit of funding schemesShared objectives and principles
17 Horizon 2020 Challenges and funding schemes – a comprehensive picture Infrastructures and skillsStrategic,Roadmap basedOpen, AgileUser-driven testing, pilotingSocietal challengese.g. support to EIPsLight WPAnytimee.g. Living labsPilotsIndustrial leadershipe.g. HPC accessSmall sizeSMEs specifice.g. PPPsPilotsExcellence in scienceERCe.g. FET FlagshipseInfrastructures
18 NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Evolution of the areaIncreasing complexity and costThis triggered major changes:Further Globalisation of Semiconductor R&D and ManufacturingShift of markets and Investments to AsiaGlobal strategic alliances for process RTD & manufacturingChanging Business Models and ConsolidationShift from IDM to fab lite, fabless and foundryFocus on products rather than on technologyComplex value chainsChanging R&D Models:Multi-disciplinarity, system level view Global alliances for process R&D - sharing of R&D infrastructure Application driven derivatives “at home”- Tremendous integration achievements, usually described by Moore’s law.Miniaturisation reached levels where first technological limits start to play a role, physical not yet reached, but costs start to be enormous due to technological complexity and a spiral of workaround solutions and side effectsGlobalisation enforced, R&D and business models changedManufacturing went were labor was cheaper and incentives higher; labor cost not so much any longer the main differentiator, but labor qualification and still incentives!-
19 More than Moore: Diversification NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling TechnologyResearch in Europe- Advanced components in advanced systems enabling pervasive applications -More than Moore: DiversificationMoore’s Law: MiniaturizationBaseline CMOS: CPU, Memory, Logic130nm90nm65nm45nm32nm22nmBeyond & Extended CMOSAnalog/RFPassivesHV PowerSensors ActuatorsBiochipsInformationProcessingDigital contentSystem-on-Chip(SoC)Interacting with people and environmentNon-digital content SoC & System-in-Package (SiP)Combining SoC and SiP: Higher Value Systems,Beyond & Extended CMOS technologies need to meetthe criteria of integratability and systemability and manufacturability
20 NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Research in EuropeThe dynamics of two decades of computer chip technology development and their mineral and element impacts.In the 1980s, computer chips were made with a palette of twelve minerals or their elemental components. A decade later, sixteen elements were employed. Today, as many as sixty different minerals (or their constituent elements) are used in fabricating the high-speed, high-capacity integrated circuits that are crucial to this technology.Source: CT IC
21 Vision, Mission, Strategy NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling TechnologyAddressing value chainsFP7MSVision, Mission, StrategySpecific ProgrammeFP7EU LevelApplication oriented
22 NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Addressing value chainsProgrammeSub-programmeNoCOOPERATIONICT-Nanoelectronics (including Design)38ICT-Micro/Smart Systems17ICT-Photonics/Organic Electronics18ICT-other7ICT-FET8NMP5JTI/JUENIAC28EUREKAMEDEA+39CATRENE25CAPACITIESResearch for SMEs1Research PotentialPEOPLEMarie-Curie Industrial-Academic Partnerships3IDEASERC Advanced Investigator Grants191 projects analysed in total20% funded by Nanoelectronics Unit directly50% in MEDEA+/CATRENE/ENIAC2222
23 NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Addressing value chains14 FP7 EQUIPMENT Projects18 FP7 DESIGN Projects35 FP7 INTEGRATION Projects26 FP7 APPLICATION ProjectsEQUIPMENT & MATERIALSSUPPLIERSDESIGNCOMPANIESIDMs & FOUNDRIESOEMsNo984325% of Total (94)9%8%43%25%Major players here are defined as those who are prominent in current manufacturing supply chains (taken from EC reports, e.g. ICT MAN study):OEMs: NOKIA, ERICSSON, BOSCH, SIEMENS (5), PHILIPS (5), THALES (9), EADS, FIAT (5)IDMs and Foundries: INTEL, STM (24), INFINEON (12), GLOBAL FOUNDRIES, NXP (4), NUMONYX, BOSCH, AMS, ARMDesign Companies: CADENCE, PHOENIX, SYNOPSYS (4)Equipment and Materials Suppliers: SILTRONIC, SOITEC, APPLIED MATERIALS, KLA-TENCOR (3), LAM, ASMI, AIXTRON, SUSS MICROTEC, ADIXEN, ION BEAM SERVICESFP7 is successfully involving major players across the supply chain in line with the types of projects being funded, but participation of key players is patchy and there are significant omissions23
24 EQUIPMENT & MATERIAL SUPPLIERS NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling TechnologyAddressing value chainsIDMs & FOUNDRIESOEMsDESIGN COMPANIESEQUIPMENT & MATERIAL SUPPLIERS62122543897Top OEMs – THALES, FIAT, PHILIPS and SIEMENS - are involved in 18 projects. Another 7 projects involve other OEMs eg EricssonTop IDMs – STM and INFINEON - are involved in 33 projects. Another 10 projects involve other IDMs eg Numonyx, Bosch, NXP, Global24
25 THANK YOU Willy.VanPuymbroeck@ec.europa.eu Information Society and Media:European research on the web: