Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Willy Van Puymbroeck European Commission Head of Unit Nanoelectronics Key Enabling Technologies and HORIZON 2020.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Willy Van Puymbroeck European Commission Head of Unit Nanoelectronics Key Enabling Technologies and HORIZON 2020."— Presentation transcript:

1 Willy Van Puymbroeck European Commission Head of Unit Nanoelectronics Key Enabling Technologies and HORIZON 2020

2 2 Outline presentation KEY Enabling Technologies – KETs How and which Observations of the High Level Group Recommendations by the High Level Group Considerations on implementation HORIZON 2020 Outlook and budget Impact, simplification and architecture Challenges and funding schemes NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Evolution of the area Research in Europe Addressing value chains

3 3 Screening of the common high-tech areas at Member State-level Initial selection Based on this assessment, five + one key enabling technologies were selected Value adding enabling Role Technology-Intensity Capital Intensity Economic Potential Initial investments Capital expenditure/ Production costs Amortisation rates Investment per employee GDP contribution Employment Market Growth Systemic relevance R&D-Intensity Innovation cycles Know-how intensity IPR/ Patenting High-skill ratio General Purpose Technology Innovation driver Productivity driver Spill-over effects Economic criteria KEY Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies How and which – Key Performance Indicators

4 Nanotechnology Micro- and nanoelectronics, including semiconductors Photonics Advanced materials Biotechnology Communication COM(2009)512 of Advanced manufacturing Systems KEY Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies How and which

5 5 KEY Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies How and which – High Level Group Mission of the KETs HLG 1.To assess the competitive situation of the relevant technologies in the EU with a particular focus on industrial deployment and their contribution to address major societal challenges; 2.To analyse in depth the available public and private R&D capacities for KETs in the EU; 3.To propose specific policy recommendations for a more effective industrial deployment of KETs in the EU. 27 High Level Group members + Sherpa Group + Technology-specific Working Groups

6 6USAEUROPEASIAOTHERS LI-ION BATTERY PRODUCTION 2008 Patent share Manufacturing share BIOETHANOLPRODUCTION2009 Patent share Manufacturing share PV CELL PRODUCTION2009 Patent share Manufacturing share % 31%35%4% % 1%0%87%12% 30% 34%36%26%7% USA 54% BRAZIL 34% 5%3%4% 12%13%57%18% 27%29%42%2% % % % % KEY Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies Observations of the HLG – Disconnect between EU patent base and EU manufacturing

7 7 Source: Preliminary HLG KET Report, Brussels, 09/02/2011 Technological facilities Pilot lines Demonstrator Globally competitive manufacturing facilities KEY Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies Observations of the HLG – The Valley of Death

8 US CHINA BRAZIL RUSSIA US President Barack H. Obama, in his state of The Union speech, on January , STATED At stake [right now] is whether new jobs and industries take root in this country, or somewhere else.[…] The rules have changed! […] We need to out- innovate, out-educate, and out-built the rest of the world The technology of magnetic random access memory was recently mastered and led to development and commercialisation in Europe. This type of memory could replace traditional memory on silicon as it is faster, less expensive and consumes less energy. This year, RUSNANO, the Russian government controlled investment fund, tasked with the mission of creating by 2015 a Nano industry took high JV stake in the relevant European industry. June 2011, Brazilian state-owned development bank BNDES announced that it will make $18-22 billion in loans to the sugarcane and ethanol sector. Shift form a PRO 1 - centred innovation system to a firm-centred one KEY Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies Observations of the HLG – Competition is on – some examples

9 9 Recommendation n°1: Make KETs a technological priority for Europe The High Level Group recommends that an integrated KETs policy should be implemented, that KETs should be visibly prioritised in EU policies and financial instruments and that the European Investment Bank group should pro-actively support KETs initiatives in Europe. Recommendation n°2: The EU should apply the TRL scale R&D definition The High Level Group recommends the EU to align its RDI activities on the TRL scale in line with the OECD definition. The Commission should also systematically apply this definition in order to include technological research, product development and demonstration activities within its RDI portfolio. Recommendation n°3: Fully exploit the scope of relevant R&D definitions The High Level Group recommends that the EU should apply R&D definitions in its programmes which support the full and simultaneous implementation of the three pillar bridge model along the innovation chain, from basic research, through technological research, product development and prototyping up to globally competitive manufacturing. Recommendation n°4: Rebalancing of EU RDI funding programmes The High Level Group recommends that the EU and Member States firmly rebalance their RDI funding in KETs-related programmes towards technological research, product development (including pilot lines, prototypes, first-in-kind equipment and facilities and demonstrator activities). In particular in the future CSF, the EU should set indicative targets for the percentage of funding dedicated to basic research, technological research and development activities. KEY Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies Recommendations by the HLG

10 10 Recommendation n°5: A strategic approach to KETs programmes The High Level Group recommends that the European Commission defines and implements a strategic, industry driven and coordinated approach to KETs programmes and related policies across EC RDI funding programmes and instruments (CSF, ERDF). Recommendation n°6: Establish an appropriate set of rules to implement KETs programmes The High Level Group recommends that the European Commission adapts its selection criteria and implementation rules in the CSF programme to maximise its impact on the value and innovation chains. In particular, a "value chain correctness" criterion should be added Recommendation n°7: Combined funding mechanisms The High Level Group recommends that the EU should introduce a tripartite financing approach based on combined funding mechanisms involving Industry, Commission, and national authorities (Member States and local government), when required by the high costs of the KETs RDI projects, and put in place the appropriate program management and mechanisms to allow the combination of EU funding (CSF, structural funds), to enable the optimum investment in significant KET pilot line and manufacturing facilities across Europe. Recommendation n°8: KETs state aid provisions The High Level Group recommends that the EU adapts state aid provisions to facilitate RDI activities and large-scale investment in KETs, in particular through the introduction of a matching clause in the EU state aid framework across the board, review of the scaling-down mechanism for larger investments increased thresholds for notifications, faster procedures and the use of projects of common European interest. KEY Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies Recommendations by the HLG

11 11 Recommendation n°9: Globally competitive IP policy in Europe The High Level Group recommends that the selection criteria and terms of the consortium agreements of EU RDI funding programmes should be amended to ensure that participating consortia have a clear and explicit plan for both the ownership of and first exploitation of IP resulting from the project within the EU. It should explicitly include provisions similar to those of the Bayh-Dole Act and Exception Circumstances-like provisions to encourage the first exploitation and manufacturing of products based on this IP within the EU. Recommendation n°10: Build, strengthen and retain KETs skills The High Level Group recommends that the EU should create a European Technology Research Council (ETRC) to promote individual excellence in technologically focused engineering research and innovation and establish the appropriate framework conditions through the ESF regulation in order to support KETs skills capacity building at national and regional level. Recommendation n°11: A European KETs observatory and consultative body The High Level Group recommends that the European Commission establishes a European KETs Observatory Monitoring Mechanism tasked with the mission of performing analysis and a KETs Consultative Body comprised of stakeholders across the entire innovation chain to advise and monitor the progress in Europe of the HLG KET recommendations towards the development and deployment of KETs for a competitive Europe this should include all relevant data regarding policies and strategies evolution outside EU. KEY Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies Recommendations by the HLG

12 12 Key Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies KEY Enabling Technologies Considerations on implementation

13 13 Proposal by the Commission in A budget for Europe 2020 on Research and Innovation –Budget for of EUR 80 billion in constant 2011 prices –Bring together FP7, the innovation part of Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP) and European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) –Structured around three distinct reinforcing blocks Excellence in the science base Tackling societal challenges Creating industrial leadership and competitive frameworks –Includes both agenda-driven activities and more open areas for applications –Implementation will be simplified and standardised Horizon 2020 Horizon 2020 Outlook and budget

14 14 FROM different priorities in each programme and initiative TO common strategic priorities, focusing on societal challenges, competitiveness and research excellence FROM gaps between the stages (R&D, demonstration, piloting, market uptake …) TO coherent support for projects and organisations across the innovation cycle Horizon 2020 Horizon 2020 Increasing impact

15 15 FROM a large variety of funding schemes within and between programmes TO a rationalised toolkit of funding schemes across the CSF FROM different rules in each programme and initiative TO more standardised rules across all initiatives – which meet the different needs and with flexibility where needed FROM multiple websites, guidance documents, applications TO common entry point, one stop shop, common IT platform Horizon 2020 Horizon 2020 Achieving simplification

16 16 Creating Industrial Leadership & Competitive Frameworks Leadership in enabling technologies ICT Nanotech, Production, Materials Biotech Space Access to risk finance & venture capital High potential SMEs Excellence in the Research Base Frontier research (ERC & FET Flagships) Skills and career development (Marie Curie) Research infrastructures incl. e-Infrastructures Tackling Societal Challenges Health, demographics and wellbeing Food security and bio-based economy Secure, clean and efficient energy Smart, green and integrated transport Resource efficiency & climate impact Inclusive, innovative & secure society (EIT) Common rules, toolkit of funding schemes Shared objectives and principles Horizon 2020 Horizon 2020 Architecture

17 17 Horizon 2020 Horizon 2020 Challenges and funding schemes – a comprehensive picture Societal challenges Industrial leadership Excellence in science Infrastructures and skills Strategic, Roadmap based Open, AgileUser-driven testing, piloting Pilots ERC Small size SMEs specific Light WP Anytime e.g. support to EIPs e.g. PPPs e.g. FET Flagships eInfrastructures e.g. HPC access e.g. Living labs

18 18 Increasing complexity and cost This triggered major changes: Further Globalisation of Semiconductor R&D and Manufacturing Shift of markets and Investments to Asia Global strategic alliances for process RTD & manufacturing Changing Business Models and Consolidation Shift from IDM to fab lite, fabless and foundry Focus on products rather than on technology Complex value chains Changing R&D Models: Multi-disciplinarity, system level view Global alliances for process R&D - sharing of R&D infrastructure Application driven derivatives at home NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Evolution of the area

19 19 More than Moore: Diversification Moores Law: Miniaturization Baseline CMOS: CPU, Memory, Logic 130nm 90nm 65nm 45nm 32nm 22nm Beyond & Extended CMOS Analog/RFPassivesHV Power Sensors Actuators Biochips Information Processing Digital content System-on-Chip (SoC) Interacting with people and environment Non-digital content SoC & System-in- Package (SiP) Combining SoC and SiP: Higher Value Systems, Beyond & Extended CMOS technologies need to meet the criteria of integratability and systemability and manufacturability - Advanced components in advanced systems enabling pervasive applications - NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Research in Europe

20 20 Source: CT IC computer chip The dynamics of two decades of computer chip technology development and their mineral and element impacts. In the 1980s, computer chips were made with a palette of twelve minerals or their elemental components. A decade later, sixteen elements were employed. Today, as many as sixty different minerals (or their constituent elements) are used in fabricating the high-speed, high-capacity integrated circuits that are crucial to this technology. NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Research in Europe

21 21 Specific Programme FP7FP7 Vision, Mission, Strategy FP7FP7 NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Addressing value chains

22 projects analysed in total 20% funded by Nanoelectronics Unit directly 50% in MEDEA+/CATRENE/ENIAC ProgrammeSub-programmeNo COOPERATION ICT-Nanoelectronics (including Design) 38 ICT-Micro/Smart Systems 17 ICT-Photonics/Organic Electronics 18 ICT-other7 ICT-FET8 NMP5 JTI/JU ENIAC28 EUREKA MEDEA+39 CATRENE25 CAPACITIESResearch for SMEs1 Research Potential1 PEOPLE Marie-Curie Industrial-Academic Partnerships 3 IDEAS ERC Advanced Investigator Grants 1 NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Addressing value chains

23 23 –Major players here are defined as those who are prominent in current manufacturing supply chains (taken from EC reports, e.g. ICT MAN study): OEMs: NOKIA, ERICSSON, BOSCH, SIEMENS (5), PHILIPS (5), THALES (9), EADS, FIAT (5) IDMs and Foundries: INTEL, STM (24), INFINEON (12), GLOBAL FOUNDRIES, NXP (4), NUMONYX, BOSCH, AMS, ARM Design Companies: CADENCE, PHOENIX, SYNOPSYS (4) Equipment and Materials Suppliers: SILTRONIC, SOITEC, APPLIED MATERIALS, KLA-TENCOR (3), LAM, ASMI, AIXTRON, SUSS MICROTEC, ADIXEN, ION BEAM SERVICES 23 EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS SUPPLIERS DESIGN COMPANIES IDMs & FOUNDRIESOEMs No % of Total (94)9%8%43%25% 26 FP7 APPLICATION Projects 35 FP7 INTEGRATION Projects 18 FP7 DESIGN Projects 14 FP7 EQUIPMENT Projects FP7 is successfully involving major players across the supply chain in line with the types of projects being funded, but participation of key players is patchy and there are significant omissions NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Addressing value chains

24 24 Top OEMs – THALES, FIAT, PHILIPS and SIEMENS - are involved in 18 projects. Another 7 projects involve other OEMs eg Ericsson 24 IDMs & FOUNDRIES OEMs DESIGN COMPANIES EQUIPMENT & MATERIAL SUPPLIERS Top IDMs – STM and INFINEON - are involved in 33 projects. Another 10 projects involve other IDMs eg Numonyx, Bosch, NXP, Global NANOELECTRONICS – A Key Enabling Technology Addressing value chains

25 THANK YOU Information Society and Media: European research on the web:


Download ppt "Willy Van Puymbroeck European Commission Head of Unit Nanoelectronics Key Enabling Technologies and HORIZON 2020."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google