We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRachel Daniels
Modified over 6 years ago
Collaborative Intellectual PropertyUnderstanding Critical Issues with Joint Development Agreements Peter Lando 17th Annual Advanced Licensing Institute at Pierce Law January 9, 2009 © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Background Collaboration -- basis StrategiesNew considerations Current IP landscape Strategies Joint Development Agreements IP rights General considerations © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Collaborative IP In most industries, new technologies – and products and services utilizing those technologies – are necessary to establish and/or maintain a competitive advantage. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Collaborative IP In addition to the economic rationale to expand a company’s technology base and commercial products, collaboration can pay dividends by bringing longer term value to a company, and current issues in IP may influence more companies to explore technology collaborations. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
New Considerations* All about relationships:Can be more important than money. Innovation has become more heterogeneous, technologies more interconnected. A top strategy for accelerating innovation is to increase licensing and other IP-enabled collaboration with outside firms. *“New Rules for Licensing In A New World,” Marshall Phelps, published in les Nouvelles, March 2008 © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
New Considerations Relationships – making and nurturing them – will drive “new rules” for licensing: IP should serve the business Leverage inclusivity Value over money Package IP Collaboration Sell and buy Look beyond the usual suspects Competitor alliances © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
IP Landscape History Last 5 – 10 years Current IP LandscapeUSPTO proposed rules Proposed patent legislation Court decisions © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Collaboration StrategiesNon-competitors Suppliers Customers Indirect competitors © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Joint Development AgreementsMany companies choose to enter into Joint Development projects to join assets and work as a partnership to achieve and create something new of value to both parties. Structuring these agreements – particularly the IP aspects therein – can be challenging. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Joint Development AgreementsUsually a written contract between two or more parties that agree to collaborate and develop IP, wherein each party brings something of value (a complementary proprietary technology, resource and/or expertise) to achieve a stated objective. The agreement will typically include terms to govern the relationship and the mechanisms for the parties to exploit the developed IP individually or together through a separate entity. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Determining IP Rights Defined Background IP Developed IPPrior to the JDA Developed IP Jointly during the JDA Independently during the JDA © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Background IP in JDA For performance of development obligations and to exploit developed IP and to avoid conflict. Usually not controversial to define. More specific the better. Consider use of list or table in the JDA or as an appendix to identify background IP. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Background IP in JDA Example (simple):“Background intellectual property rights means any and all confidential and proprietary information, whether patentable, copyrightable, or not, created or obtained by each party prior to the effective date of this agreement.” © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Background IP in JDA Example (more interesting):“Background intellectual property rights means, without limitation, inventions, patents, registered designs, trademarks (whether registered or unregistered), service marks, copyright (in software or otherwise), unregistered design rights, industrial property, technical developments, know-how and other confidential and proprietary knowledge and information and, where appropriate, applications for the same, that specifically relates to WIDGETS, as defined herein, and which is owned by or licensed to one or more of the parties and was either (a) created prior to the effective date of this Agreement; or (b) was created after the effective date of this Agreement, but not as a result of the performance of the parties’ obligations under this Agreement.” © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Developed IP in JDA Important to agree what will be considered jointly developed intellectual property. May determine ownership, use and control of IP rights during and after termination of the JDA. Sometimes difficult to determine when one party develops the IP independent of the other during the JDA. How independent was the party? © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Developed IP in JDA Jointly developed intellectual property (sometimes referred to as foreground IP) could be defined as any IP related to the shared objective that is developed by either party during the term of the JDA. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Developed IP in JDA Example“Foreground intellectual property rights means, without limitation, inventions, patents, registered designs, trademarks (whether registered or unregistered), service marks, copyright (in software or otherwise), unregistered design rights, industrial property, technical developments, know-how and other confidential and proprietary knowledge and information and, where appropriate, applications for the same, related to WIDGETS, as defined herein, which is generated during the term as a result of one or more parties or their agents or subcontractors.” © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Developed IP in JDA JDA may alternatively have separate definitions for truly jointly developed IP and independently developed IP. . . . jointly by the parties or their agents or subcontractors related to the shared objective of the JDA. . . . independently of the other party and not related to the shared objective JDA. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Ownership of IP in JDA Ownership of IP arising out of development work can be divided in a wide variety of ways. Most commonly (default) ownership follows inventorship. IP created solely by a party is owned by that party (and licenses its use to the other party to the JDA), and IP created jointly by the parties is jointly owned. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Ownership of IP in JDA Alternatives may include ownership based on other factors, regardless of inventorship (may require assignments and licenses within the JDA). Technology areas (fields of use) Funding Markets Territories © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Joint Ownership of IP in JDAAbsent express agreement, setting forth rights, restrictions, and obligations of each party, the statute and case law present legal issues for jointly owned IP (particularly in the context of patents/inventions) that can be avoided. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Joint Ownership Inventorship is a “muddy” determination (may require third party determinations). To be considered a joint inventor an individual needs to only make a contribution to only a single claim of a patent. Each co-inventor (and co-owner) owns an undivided interest in the entire patent and can independently use and (non-exclusively) license the patent/invention without accounting to the other co-inventor/owner. Co-owner may assign patent rights without consent. However, co-owner cannot sue infringers without consent. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Ownership of IP in JDA Another option is an assignment to a separate legal joint venture entity. Important to assign all relevant background IP to the separate entity as well. However addressed, ownership is important to clarify in the JDA. Any assignment of patent rights must be properly drafted. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Use of IP in JDA Party typically wants to use what the other party owns. Common for parties in a JDA to license IP to each other to address objectives of the agreement. Licenses frequently include restrictions. Field of use, Timing, Payments, Sub-licensing © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
Control of IP in JDA Responsibilities of ownership of IPEnforcement of IP Rights/control Expenses Recovery File, prosecute and maintain patent applications. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
General Considerations in JDAContributions of each party Scope of the work (objectives); where, when, by whom; schedules; and contacts. Confidential information Further disclosures and its use. Timing and scope. Competitive risks. Expenses © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
General Considerations in JDATermination How and when a party may terminate. Ownership of pending developed IP. Continuing rights and obligations. Improvements. Further business relations Dispute resolution Breach/remedy/repair. © 2009 Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
The Federal Technology Transfer Process: Licenses and Cooperative Research and Development Agreements ADVANCED LICENSING INSTITUTE AT.
Negotiating Technology License Agreements Tamara Nanayakkara.
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business Anil Sinha, Counsellor, SMEs Division World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
“I Get by with a Little Help from My Friends” Legal Issues Related to Corporate Collaboration, Alliances, Sponsorships, Joint Ventures, and Licensing Mark.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Intellectual Property Considerations in Joint Development Agreements Presented by H. Eric Fisher, Ph.D. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC Continuing.
RD51 collaboration meeting October 2008 MoU section on Intellectual Property Bernard Denis, CERN-DSU-TT
Patent Law A Career Choice For Engineers Azadeh Khadem Registered Patent Attorney November 25, 2008 Azadeh Khadem Registered Patent Attorney November 25,
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
So you’ve invented something? A Guide for UMass Faculty, Researchers and Students.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
Patents and trade secrets 6 6 Chapter. Patents Grant of property rights to inventors Issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Permits.
WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AGREEMENTS C. Ian Kyer Armand M. Benitah.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 40 Franchises and Special Forms of Business.
Chapter 40 Franchises and Special Forms of Business
What is Commercialization of IP Josiah Hernandez.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015. Exponential Inventor Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015 Why is IP Important? Everyone makes a big deal.
Constructing the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations Sub Regional Training Program on IP Valuation Maribor November 5 to 7, 2012.
© 2020 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.