Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAntonio Oliver Modified over 3 years ago

1
1 A Model for an Intrusion Prior Related to Example 4.2: n=10,N=100 (Slides 25-27) Jim Lynch NISS/SAMSI & University of South Carolina

2
2 Framework Y=(y 1,…, y N ) is the Population X*=(x* 1,…, x* n ) is the Released Data The Released Data, X*, will be a random sample, X=(x 1,…, x n ), of Y after it has been masked

3
3 The Random Sample X Let P be a random permutation of size n from N={1,2,…,N} where is uniformly distributed over these permutations. For P=(j(1),…,j(n)), X =(x 1,…, x n )=y P =( y j(1),…, y j(n) ) So f(X|Y)=1/ N P n for X =y P

4
4 The Masked Released Data X* For X =(x 1,…, x n )=y P =( y j(1),…, y j(n) ), x* i = x i m j(i) = y j(i) m j(i) where y j(i) and m j(i) are independent with m j(i) ~ g j(i),P,PThus, f(X*|Y,P) = P g j(i) (x* i /x i )/x i = f(X*|X,P) where P denotes the product over i=1,…,n with P=(j(1),…,j(n)),PP,PSo, f(X*|Y)= P f(X*|Y,P) f(P|Y)= P f(X*|Y,P)/ N P n

5
5 The Prior To construct a prior we need to know the parameter space. Two choices for this, Y and (Y,P). I think it is easier to work with (Y,P).,P,P –Note that since f(X*|X,P)= f(X*|Y,P) in the second case, we can consider the reduced parameter space (X,P). A prior on (X,P) –The intruder is interested in the smallest y WLOG label the smallest as y 1 –Doesnt care about inferring anything else about the population –The intruder uses a supra model to model Y y 2,…, y N where are iid f 2 =f y 1 has density f 1 =Nf(1-F) N-1 This model doesnt seem that unreasonable but, given y 1, perhaps we should have used that y 2,…, y N are iid f 2 (x)=f(x)/(1-F( y 1 )) with x> y 1

6
6 The prior (X,P) If 1 is not in P, (X,P)= f 2 (x i )/ N P n If 1 is in P and j(i)=1, (X,P)=f 1 (x i ) i f 2 (x k )/ N P n where i is over k not equal to i

7
7 The posterior (X,P|X*) If 1 is not in P, (X,P|X*) P g j(i) (x* i /x i )/x i f 2 (x i )/ N P n If 1 is in P = (j(1),…,j(n)) and j(i)=1, (X,P|X*) [f 1 (x i )g 1 (x* i /x i )/x i ] i f 2 (x k )g j(k) (x* k /x k )/x k ]/ N P n where i is over k not equal to i Note that the posterior involves [f 1 (x i )g 1 (x* i /x i )/x i ] i f 2 (x k )g j(k) (x* k /x k )/x k ]. Last time we seemed to integrate this out to do a posterior calculation. In any event the posterior is complicated but calculable –Use this to calculate P(j(i)=1|X*)=p i1 for i=1,…,n –Calculate (P|X*) and (X|P,X*)= (X,P|X*)/ (P|X*) If 1 is in P and j(i)=1(so, y 1 =x i ), (X|P,X*) [f 1 (x i )g 1 (x* i /x i )/x i ] i f 2 (x k )g j(k) (x* k /x k )/x k ]/ N-1 P n-1 Integrating this out over x k, k not equal to i, gives, (dy 1 |P,X*) = [f 1 (x i )g 1 (x* i /x i )/x i ]C(P,X*) Now, (dy 1 |X*) = (dy 1 |P,X*) (P|X*) = [f 1 (x i )g 1 (x* i /x i )/x i ]C(P,X*) (P|X*) where the is the sum over those P where 1 is in P. Note that (dy 1 |X*) is a subdistribution. Integrating y 1 out gives the probability that y 1 has been released and equals [h 1 (x* i )]C(P,X*) (P|X*)= p i1 where h 1 is the multiplicative convolution of f 1 and g

8
8 The posterior (X,P|X*) –If 1 is not in P, (X,P|X*) P g j(i) (x* i /x i )/x i f 2 (x i )/ N P n –If 1 is in P = (j(1),…,j(n)) and j(i)=1, (X,P|X*) [f 1 (x i )g 1 (x* i /x i )/x i ] i f 2 (x k )g j(k) (x* k /x k )/x k ]/ N P n where i is over k not equal to i On slide 25 g i =g for all i. –If 1 is not in P, (X,P|X*) g(x* i /x i )/x i f 2 (x i )/ N P n –If 1 is in P = (j(1),…,j(n)) and j(i)=1, (X,P|X*) [f 1 (x i )g(x* i /x i )/x i ] i f 2 (x k )g(x* k /x k )/x k ]/ N P n where i is over k not equal to i. –Integrating out over X gives (where h i is the multiplicative convolution of f i and g) (P|X*) h 2 (x* i )/ N P n if 1 is not in P (P|X*) h 1 (x* i ) i h 2 (x* k )/ N P n if 1 is in P = (j(1),…,j(n)) and j(i)=1 Thus, (j(i)=1|X*) = [ N-1 P n-1 h 1 (x* i ) i h 2 (x* k )/ N P n ]x{[ N-1 P n-1 h 1 (x* i ) i h 2 (x* k )/ N P n ]+[ N-1 P n h 2 (x* i )/ N P n ]} -1 = [h 1 (x* i )/h 2 (x* i )]x{[h 1 (x* i )/h 2 (x* i )]+(N-n)} -1 For Lamberts example, N=100 and n=10. So, (j(i)=1|X*) =[h 1 (x* i )/h 2 (x* i )]x{[h 1 (x* i )/h 2 (x* i )]+90]} -1 which agrees with Lamberts answer in Section 4.2.4 of her paper.

Similar presentations

OK

METHODS OF ASSIGNING PROBABILITY. The Uniform Probability Model.

METHODS OF ASSIGNING PROBABILITY. The Uniform Probability Model.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on current account deficit greece Ppt on light travels in a straight line Ppt on pricing policy to maximize Ppt on life processes for class 10 cbse Free ppt on physical features of india Ppt on adding and subtracting matrices Ppt on economic systems Ppt on coordinate geometry for class 9 download Ppt on pricing policy benefits Edit ppt on mac