Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byJuan Mitchell Modified over 4 years ago

1
**Granular flow in silos - observations and comments**

SAMSI Workshop on Fluctuations and continuum Equations for Granular flow, April 16-17, 2004 Granular flow in silos - observations and comments Jørgen Nielsen Danish Building and Urban Research

2
**Silo versus hydrostatic pressure**

Unfortunately it is not that simple. Liquid pressure may call for a stocastic treatment cocerning the filling height, while it is much more complicated with silos – even to decide where the stocastic treatment should start.

3
**Focus on understanding phenomena**

Observations from silo tests Comments related to Physical and mathematical modelling – Continuum / discrete particles Phenomena observed in silos Stochastic approach

4
**Physical modelling versus mathematical modelling**

Mathematical modelling is needed to generalise our understanding of physical phenomena and to predict behaviour under specified circumstances Physical modelling is wanted for controlled experiments in order to systematically observe and explore phenomena as a basis for mathematical modelling - and to verify such models

5
Silo scales

6
**A good scientific physical model is more than just a small scale structure**

The creation of a model law calls for some considerations: Which phenomena to cover? Discrete particles or continuum approach? Which mathematical model to be based on? – Must be precisely formulated, but you may not be able to solve the equations Leads to the model law: Model Requirements and a Scaling Law Ref: J. Nielsen ”Model laws for granular media and powders with special view to silo models”, Archives of Mechanics, 29, 4, pp , Warzawa, 1977

7
Particle history

8
Discrete particles Equations of continuity, movement + stress strain relations for solids (individual particles) and fluids (air in pores) from basic continuum mechanisc. The model requirements must be satisfied if scale errors shall not be foreseen Some may be arranged for – as the field of gravity – becomming a model requirement Others comes out as Scaling laws

9
**Model law – discrete, particles**

Model requirements Kx (scaled particles) Kg = 1/ Kx (centrifuge) …….. Scaling law K = 1 K = 1 Kt = Kx (Forces of inertia) Kt = 1 (Time dep. Konst. rel.) Kt = 1 (Pore flow)

10
**The centrifuge model - filling**

11
**Centrifuge, continuum approach**

12
**Stacking the particles**

13
Landslide

14
Cone squeeze

15
Distributed filing

16
Fluidized powder

17
**Anisotropy from inclined filling**

18
**Preferred orientation - anisotropy**

19
**Outcomes of filling from the stacking process**

Density Pore pressure Homogeneity Anisotropy - and thus strength, stiffness and rupture mode of the ensiled solids

20
**From contact forces to pressure**

21
**From contact forces to pressure**

Relative standard deviation Test Diameter of particle Pressure cell diameter Surface area of pressure cell

22
**Pressure cell reading -fluctuations**

23
**Pressure distribution with time and height**

24 4

24
**Circumferential distribution of maximum discharge pressures – Wheat, eccentric inlet and outlet**

25
**Circumferential distribution of maximum discharge pressures – Barley, eccentric inlet and outlet**

26
**Large pressure gradients**

27
**Geometrical wall imperfections**

28
**Load consequences of geometrical wall imperfections**

29
**Dilating boundary layer**

30
**Dilating boundary layer, details**

31
**Rotational symmetrical pressure distribution – almost (Jørgen Munch-Andersen)**

32
**Formation of rupture planes in dense materials**

33
Dynamics

34
**On the search of a suitable model for the stress-strain relationship in granular materials**

35
**The modelling challenges**

Silo Model Natural field of gravity Centrifuge field of gravity Grain Imperfections Boundary layer Scaled particles Filling Powder (Cohesion) Pore pressure (Filling) P.S. Time dependent material behaviour may cause scale errors

36
**A ”friendly” silo problem**

- may be characterised by: A non-cohesive powder Aerated filling Low wall friction Mass flow

37
**A ”bad” silo problem - may be characterised by:**

Coarse-grained sticky particles Eccentric filling High wall friction Pipe flow expanding upwards until the full cross section has become involved

38
**Items for a stochastic/statistic treatment**

Redistribution of pressure due to imperfections of wall geometry The value of material parameters for the (future) stored material The wall friction coefficient The formation of unsymmetrical flow patterns in symmetrical silos – and their load implications Wall pressure fluctuations - load redistributions The formation of rupture planes in dense materials

Similar presentations

OK

1 Interpretation and Visualization of Model Test Data for Slope Failure in Liquefying Soil Bruce L. Kutter Erik J. Malvick R. Kulasingam Ross Boulanger.

1 Interpretation and Visualization of Model Test Data for Slope Failure in Liquefying Soil Bruce L. Kutter Erik J. Malvick R. Kulasingam Ross Boulanger.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google