1. Low risk of accidents because of multiple safety systems (except in 35 poorly designed and run reactors in former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe) Moderate land use Moderate land disruption and water pollution (without accidents) Emits 1/6 as much CO2 as coal Low environmental impact (without accidents) Large fuel supply Spreads knowledge and technology for building nuclear weapons No acceptable solution for long-term storage of radioactive wastes and decommissioning worn-out plants Catastrophic accidents can happen (Chernobyl) High environmental impact (with major accidents) Low net energy yield High cost (even with large subsidies) AdvantagesDisadvantages Fig. 14.35, p. 349

2. Coal Ample supply High net energy yield Very high air pollution High CO2 emissions 65,000 to 200,000 deaths per year in U.S. High land disruption from surface mining High land use Low cost (with huge subsidies) Nuclear Ample supply of uranium Low net energy yield Low air pollution (mostly from fuel reprocessing) Low CO2 emissions (mostly from fuel reprocessing) About 6,000 deaths per year in U.S. Much lower land disruption from surface mining Moderate land use High cost (with huge subsidies) Fig. 14.36, p. 349

3. F. Advantages of Nuclear Power: 1. Don’t emit air pollutants 2. Water pollution and land disruption are low

4. G. Nuclear Power Plant Safety 1. Very low risk of exposure to radioactivity 2. Three Mile Island - March 29, 1979; No. 2 reactor lost coolant water due to a series of mechanical failures and human error. Core was partially uncovered 3. Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimates there is a 15-45% chance of a complete core meltdown at a US reactor during the next 20 years. 4. US National Academy of Sciences estimates that US nuclear power plants cause 6000 premature deaths and 3700 serious genetic defects each year. http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/chapter1.html

5. Steam generator Water pumps Crane for moving fuel rods Turbines Reactor Cooling pond Cooling pond Reactor power output was lowered too much, making it too difficult to control. Additional water pump to cool reactor was turned on. But with low power output and extra drain on system, water didn’t actually reach reactor. Automatic safety devices that shut down the reactor when water and steam levels fall below normal and turbine stops were shut off because engineers didn’t want systems to “spoil” experiment. Radiation shields Almost all control rods were removed from the core during experiment. Emergency cooling system was turned off to conduct an experiment. Fig. 14.37, p. 350 Chernobyl

6. H. Low-Level Radioactive Waste 1. Low-level waste gives off small amounts of ionizing radiation; must be stored for 100-500 years before decaying to levels that don’t pose an unacceptable risk to public health and safety 2. 1940-1970: low-level waste was put into drums and dumped into the oceans. This is still done by UK and Pakistan 3. Since 1970, waste is buried in commercial, government-run landfills. 4. Above-ground storage is proposed by a number of environmentalists. 5. 1990: the NRC proposed redefining low-level radioactive waste as essentially nonradioactive. That policy was never implemented (as of early 1999).

7. I. High-Level Radioactive Waste 1. Emit large amounts of ionizing radiation for a short time and small amounts for a long time. Must be stored for about 240,000 2. Spent fuel rods; wastes from plants that produce plutonium and tritium for nuclear weapons.

8. J. Possible Methods of Disposal and their Drawbacks 1. Bury it deep in the ground 2. Shoot it into space or into the sun 3. Bury it under the Antarctic ice sheet or the Greenland ice cap 4. Dump it into descending subduction zones in the deep ocean 5. Bury it in thick deposits of muck on the deep ocean floor 6. Change it into harmless (or less harmful) isotopes 7. Currently high-level waste is stored in the DOE $2 billion Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, NM. (supposed to be put into operation in 1999)

9. Clay bottom Up to 60 deep trenches dug into clay. As many as 20 flatbed trucks deliver waste containers daily. Barrels are stacked and surrounded with sand. Covering is mounded to aid rain runoff. Fig. 14.38b, p. 351

10. What covers waste Clay Gravel Sand Compacted clay Soil Topsoil Grass Gravel Fig. 14.38c, p. 351

11. Waste container Steel wall Several steel drums holding waste Lead shielding 2 meters wide 2–5 meters high Fig. 14.38a, p. 351

12. Storage Containers Fuel rod Primary canister Overpack container sealed Fig. 14.39c, p. 352

13. Underground Buried and capped Fig. 14.39d, p. 352

14. Ground Level Unloaded from train Lowered down shaft Fig. 14.39a, p. 352

15. Personnel elevator Air shaft Nuclear waste shaft 2,500 ft. (760 m) deep Fig. 14.39b, p. 352

16. K. Worn-Out Nuclear Plants 1. Walls of the reactor’s pressure vessel become brittle and thus are more likely to crack. 2. Corrosion of pipes and valves

17. 3. Decommissioning a power plant (3 methods have been proposed) A. immediate dismantling B. mothballing for 30-100 years C. entombment (several thousand years) 4. Each method involves shutting down the plant, removing the spent fuel, draining all liquids, flushing all pipes, sending all radioactive materials to an approved waste storage site yet to be built.

18. Connection between Nuclear Reactors and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons 1. Components, materials and information to build and operate reactors can be used to produce fissionable isotopes for use in nuclear weapons. Los Alamos Muon Detector Could Thwart Nuclear Smugglers

19. M. Can We Afford Nuclear Power? 1. Main reason utilities, the government and investors are shying away from nuclear power is the extremely high cost of making it a safe technology. 2. All methods of producing electricity have average costs well below the costs of nuclear power plants.

20. N. Breeder Reactors 1. Convert nonfissionable uranium-238 into fissionable plutonium-239 2. Safety: liquid sodium coolant could cause a runaway fission chain reaction and a nuclear explosion powerful enough to blast open the containment building. 3. Breeders produce plutonium fuel too slowly; it would take 1-200 years to produce enough plutonium to fuel a significant number of other breeder reactors.

21. O. Nuclear Fusion 1. D-T nuclear fusion reaction; Deuterium and Tritium fuse at about 100 million degrees 2. Uses more energy than it produces