Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1
**Creating new states of matter:**

Experiments with ultra-cold Fermi gases Selim Jochim MPI für Kernphysik and Universität Heidelberg Henning Moritz ETH Zürich

2
**Today The molecular BEC – what can we do with it?**

Crossover to a gas of (weakly bound) Cooper pairs Fundamental excitations, gap Fermi Superfluidity With tunable interactions: Model system for High-TC superconductors, Neutron stars, Quark-Gluon Plasma and more ….

3
**The molecular condensate:**

What makes it special? Why does it work? What can we do with it? How cold is it?

4
**Change the magnetic field!**

molecular BEC na3 = 0.04

5
**exploring the crossover**

na3 = 0.28 molecular BEC na3 = 0.04

6
**exploring the crossover**

Bosons Fermions na3,kF|a| = na3 = 0.28 molecular BEC na3 = 0.04

7
**exploring the crossover**

Bosons Fermions na3,kF|a| = na3 = 0.28 kF|a| = 6 molecular BEC na3 = 0.04

8
**exploring the crossover**

Bosons Fermions na3,kF|a| = na3 = 0.28 kF|a| = 6 molecular BEC degenerate Fermi gas na3 = 0.04 kF|a| = 1 Bartenstein et al, PRL 92, (2004)

9
**crossover reversible and lossless !**

reversibility BEC 1s Fermi gas 1s BEC BEC after 2s crossover reversible and lossless ! T/TF 0.03 in Fermi gas limit Carr et al.,PRL 92, (2004) for 90% condensate fraction in BEC limit

10
**BEC – BCS crossover 1980 crossover molecules Cooper pairs**

strong coupling Cooper pairs weak coupling crossover 1980

11
**A tunable BEC-BCS gas! 6Li2 BEC critical temperature**

We can freely change the interaction without increasing the entropy B-field kBTF: Fermi energy Epair : pairing energy M. Holland et al., PRL (2001)

12
**What determines the shape of a BEC?**

Noninteracting atoms: ground state of the trap

13
**Shape of a BEC Interacting atoms: mean field**

V n = N/V N ri r Valid for na3<<1 !!!

14
**Gross-Pitaevskii equation**

Describe system as single particle wave function external potential interaction chemical potential kinetic term Ignore kinetic term: Thomas-Fermi approx.

15
**Size of a Fermi gas Ignoring interactions:**

With interactions: no analytic expression, even difficult to calculate numerically RF Fermi energy EF=kBTF

16
Interacting Fermi gas Description difficult: kinetic energy is dominant (Fermi momentum), or of similar magnitude as interaction, simple mean field interaction only works for a<< 1/kF More general: scattering cross section is limited:

17
Unitary interaction For unitary interaction (k>>1/a), the mean field energy scales just as the kinetic energy: This results in a rescaling of the Fermi energy by a constant factor (1+b) EF,unitary=(1+b)EF,ideal

18
**Universal behavior on resonance!**

EF,unitary=(1+b)EF,ideal is supposed to be a universal parameter independent of the physical system: In neutron stars, nuclei, quark-gluon plasma Hard to determine quantitatively Now measured experimentally Also quantum Monte Carlo and other methods are now in good agreement, best precision caclulation so far: b=-0.58(1) Astrakharchik et al. PRL (2004)

19
**How to measure b ? Simply measure cloud size!**

shape should be the same as for noninteracting gas … Unfortunately: Precision very poor!

20
**More precise measurements**

Which quantities can be measured with the highest accuracy?

21
**collective modes cigar-shaped trap nr = 755(10) Hz, nz 22 Hz axial**

radial

22
**collective modes two kinds of radial modes: „breathing“ compression**

„quadrupole“ surface mode

23
**axial coll. excitation on resonance: frequency (normalized to sloshing**

mode) 600 800 1000 1200 magnetic field (G) on resonance:

24
axial coll. excitation frequency (normalized to sloshing mode)

25
**axial coll. excitation frequency (normalized to sloshing mode) 600 800**

1000 1200

26
**radial coll. excitation**

27
**What kind of mode was excited?**

surface mode? compression mode? need to have a closer look! Lee, Huang, Yang prediction

28
**More frequency measurements …**

Radio frequency spectroscopy rf ~80MHz breaking molecules costs energy → molecular signal up-shifted breaking pairs costs energy → pair signal up-shifted mI= -1 |3> |2> 1 |1> high B-field

29
**rf spectra in BEC limit atoms only atom-molecule mixture**

no evaporation T >> Tc atoms only atom-molecule mixture evaporation to T Tc P = 300 mW molecular signal: two-body physics !! evaporation to T < 0.4 Tc P = 35 mW pure molecular sample (BEC) rf offset (kHz) 100kHz 4.8mK 0.4neV

30
**rf spectra in BEC limit T ≈ 0.2 TF double-peak structure:**

very large pos. sc. length T ≈ 0.2 TF double-peak structure: atoms and pairs T = 0.0? TF pairs only ! pair signal shifts with EF ! many-body physics rf offset

31
**rf spectra in crossover regime**

very large neg. scatt. length rf offset (kHz)

32
**rf spectra in crossover regime**

large neg. sc. length rf offset (kHz) 100kHz 4.8mK 0.4neV 1kHz 48nK 4peV!

33
**gap vs. interaction strength**

Fermi energy at two different levels of trap power 1.1µK (23 35mW 3.3µK (68 1 W

34
**gap vs. interaction strength**

comparison with radial trap frequency

35
**universal lineshape data taken on resonance,**

frequency scale normalized to Fermi energy 0.16 EF

36
**Where’s superfluidity?**

We’ve seen the gap: But is there superfluidity?? Is there a “condensate”??? Yes, there it is!! Condensate above resonance, 900G Zwierlein et al., MIT First observation: JILA Observe bimodal distributions, with both condensed pairs and thermal cloud

37
**Condensate Fraction Data: MIT (2004)**

Temperature measurement difficult: Alternative: measure condensate fraction

38
Superfluidity??? Bimodal distributions are a strong indication for a phase transition, but is there a superfluid phase? To date best method: Rotating superfluid needs to develop a vortex lattice Challenge: The visibility of the vortices might be very small: condensate fraction is rather tiny in BCS regime

39
**Observation of vortices!**

MIT experiment (2005) Vortices on BEC side of resonance!

40
**Vortices in the cross over**

792G 740G 766G 812G 833G 843G 853G 863G Now a tool to check superfluidity!!!

41
Polarized gases What happens if you change the balance between the two different spin states in the experiment? What would that correspond to in a superconductor? …..

42
**Many different answers ….**

43
**Superfluidity in an imbalanced gas**

MIT

44
Condensate fraction …. MIT

45
**Polarization detection scheme**

MIT experiment

46
Phase separation MIT experiment

47
**Condensate fraction vs. P**

MIT experiment

48
**Phase separation (elongated trap)**

Rice University

49
**A matter of temperature??**

This trap is very elongated!!

50
**tomorrow Condensed Matter Physics with atoms?**

Periodic potentials, bosonic Case: Mott isolator Fermions: The Fermi Surface Interactions of Fermions in optical lattices Low dimensional systems Future directions with optical lattices Final discussion Slides available at

Similar presentations

OK

Experimental determination of Universal Thermodynamic Functions for a Unitary Fermi Gas Takashi Mukaiyama Japan Science Technology Agency, ERATO University.

Experimental determination of Universal Thermodynamic Functions for a Unitary Fermi Gas Takashi Mukaiyama Japan Science Technology Agency, ERATO University.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on planet mercury Ppt on intelligent manufacturing software Ppt on new product marketing Ppt on machine translation programs Download ppt on red fort delhi Ppt on barack obama leadership skills Ppt on areas related to circles class 10th Ppt on power sharing in india download Download ppt on oxidation and reduction worksheet Ppt on condition based maintenance navy