1. Progressing the Work on the MAS TR-0006, TR-0007 Group Name: Management Abstraction and Semantics Source: Tim Carey, ALU, timothy.carey@alcatel-lucent.com Meeting Date: 06-20-2013 Agenda Item:

2. Where are we in the Mgt TR-0006? TR includes 4 Management Technologies – TR-069, OMA-DM 1.x, OMA-LWM2M, OMA-DM 2.0 – Section 5 – Descriptions have been agreed to – Section 6 – Gap Analysis have been agreed to – Section 7 – Architecture Considerations Not Started © 2012 oneM2M Partners 2

3. Section 7 Arch Considerations Section 7 Architecture Considerations – This section is where we give the architecture WG our opinion on how to describe/architect the management CSF within oneM2M – What value can we provide the Architecture WG in this section? Describe the deployment scenarios Describe a generic framework for the management CSF including security/authorization Define any technology specific considerations wrt to deployment scenarios and generic framework

4. How do we complete the work By TP#6 (Using 2 Interim meetings between TP#5-TP#6) – Write and agree to deployment scenarios (ALU) – Write and agree to generalized framework for the X, Y and Z reference points with sections Framework description (ALU) Z Reference point – example MAS-2013-0033R01 (ALU, LGE) X Reference Point – Consider the Application interface (?) Y Reference Point – Consider the embedded/collated framework (?) – Write technology considerations to the generalized framework (Assume - ALU, LGE, Huawei) By TP#7 (Using 2 Interim meetings between TP#6-TP#7) (October) – Agree to each technology consideration to the generalized framework

5. Where are we in Mgt TR-0007? Study_of_Abstraction_and_Semantics_Enablements -v-0.2.0 document describes, collects and evaluates the state-of-art of the existing technologies on abstraction & semantics capability => 20 % complete TR includes 1 technology from ETSI – Section 5 – Introduction on Abstraction and Semantic Capability Enablement in oneM2M - empty – Section 6 – Abstraction Technologies – started Introduction to ETSI M2M Device Abstraction No work on gap analysis and Architectural Considerations – Section 7 – Technologies for Semantic M2M System – started Introduction to ETSI Semantic M2M System No work on gap analysis and Architectural Considerations – Section 8 – Conclusion - empty © 2012 oneM2M Partners 5

6. How do we complete the work Until now there was slow progress on the document WG 5 decided that in this release no functionality that is dedicated to Abstraction & Semantics Capability Enablement is expected. At the end of this release the TR – even if not fully completed – should be approved, documenting the achieved work. – The conclusions section should recommend that no normative work that is dedicated to Abstraction & Semantics Capability Enablement is recommended in this release Contributions to the remaining chapters are expected By TP#7 put under change control and freeze By TP#8 editorial cleanup and TP approval