Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Korea’s Chaebol: Problems of Governance John Ohnesorge University of Wisconsin Law School February 16, 2004.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Korea’s Chaebol: Problems of Governance John Ohnesorge University of Wisconsin Law School February 16, 2004."— Presentation transcript:

1 Korea’s Chaebol: Problems of Governance John Ohnesorge University of Wisconsin Law School February 16, 2004

2 “Korea, Inc.” Authoritarian politics High-speed, export-oriented growth Blurred line between State and private sector Questionable role for law Constitutional law, individual rights Administrative law Judicial independence

3 1987 Democratization New Constitution Constitutional Court created (Kukje case) Democratic Presidential Election (Roh) Legal reforms (especially under President Kim, Yong-Sam) –Administrative Law –Anti-corruption

4 1997: Asian Financial Crisis “IMF Crisis” to Koreans Korean Won collapses Stock market collapses Debt crisis IMF Loans required, come with demands for change –Higher interest rates (bankruptcies; unemployment) –Deregulation; liberalization –Reform/rejuvenate dormant bankruptcy law –Allow foreign investment in financial sector Foreign Interests Reflected in IMF demands?

5 Korea’s Response (5 years) IFIs: “Don’t try to export your way out!” Korean response: Export, export, export Growth returns Repay IMF loans Rationalize Chaebol (“Big Deal” program) Adjust to new structural realities –More liberal financial system –Greater foreign presence –More rights-oriented society

6 Chaebol in “Korea, Inc.” Readings: Woo and Lee (West “Megafirms”) Developmental Function? Political Function? Who Governed the Chaebol? –Shareholders? (which shareholders?) –Product Markets? (local v. export) –Financial markets? –Banks? –Government?

7 Chaebol and 1987 Reading: West How has democratization affected Chaebol? What is Jim West’s assessment of the Kukje case? What are implications of Kukje for Korean governance?

8 Chaebol and the IMF Crisis Can they be blamed? –Non-transparent bookkeeping? –Too much debt? –Debt cross-guaranteed w/in Chaebol? –Too much political influence, block reform? –Management too personalistic, not “Market rational”?

9 Chaebol and Corporate Governance Reading: Kim & Kim What’s wrong with corporate governance of the Chaebol? What is PSPD, and what are its goals? What is overall change sought in corporate governance? Pros and/or Cons of PSPD agenda? Challenges to Korean political system?


Download ppt "Korea’s Chaebol: Problems of Governance John Ohnesorge University of Wisconsin Law School February 16, 2004."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google