Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byTrinity Meyer Modified over 4 years ago

1
An Analytical Study of Low Delay Multi-tree-based Overlay Multicast György Dán and Viktória Fodor School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden Peer-to-Peer Streaming and IP-TV Workshop

2
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Motivation Live peer-to-peer streaming Many proposed systems Push-based vs. Pull-based Tree-based vs. mesh-based vs. unstructured Multi-hop data delivery Failures – node departures, packet losses Delivery time hard to predict Playback delay and playout buffer dimensioning

3
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Does playback delay matter? Designers goal: Control the playback delay (minimize?) Our goal: Identify sources of delay

4
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri A packets eye view of the overlay Four components of delay: D d =D p +D tr,o +D pr +D tr,i (a: pkt size, C in : input bandwidth, C out : output bandwidth) R A spanning tree of the overlay traversed by a packet D pr D tr,i =W in +a/C in DpDp D tr,o =W out +a/C out DdDd Tree properties depend on Tree-based: Overlay maintenance Unstructured: Scheduling algorithm

5
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri One-hop propagation model Possession-propagation-reception DdDd 1 1 Layer l-1 Layer l h Possession probability h Per-hop delay Reception probability h

6
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri One-hop propagation model Possession-propagation-reception DdDd h 1 h 1 Layer l-1 Layer l h Possession probability Per-hop delay Reception probability

7
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Multi-hop propagation model Without FEC Apply the one hop model to every layer Result is the convolution of the per-hop delays R With FEC Apply the one hop model to every layer Calculate the result iteratively

8
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Multi-hop propagation model Probability of reception by time h in layer l for packet j Probability of possession by time h in layer l for packet j Source node – initial condition Numerical solution Converges Scalable A control theoretic interpretation: Dynamical system with Input signal Output signals

9
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Multi-hop propagation model Probability of possession with playback delay b (playout deadline of packet j: h j =b+(j1)a/B) Probability of possession for arbitrary node and packet Inputs of the model Initial condition N l number of nodes in layer l F d (h) node-to-node delay distribution - Source playout strategy - Overlay structure - Scheduling, structure

10
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Application – Multi-tree overlay Source and N nodes Source capacity > m*B t trees, each node forwards in d trees Retransmissions and FEC(n,k) for error control Packets sent at round-robin from the source R1 586239 741 R3 187254 396 R2 176439 825 Tree 2Tree 3Tree 1 P1 P2 P3 h 1 j=1j=2j=3 Initial condition

11
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Overlay structure Number of nodes per layer (N l ) Calculated recursively based on Node output capacity distribution Prioritization scheme Capacity allocation scheme Prioritization schemes Contribution based Contributors prioritized over non-contributors (NP) Priority proportional to potential contribution (P) Capacity allocation schemes In case of excess capacity Proportional contribution (MM) Non-proportional contribution (FU)

12
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Node-to-node Delay Input link D tr,i =W in +a/C in W in waiting time of a packet in a G/D/1 queue Output link D tr,o =W out +uIdat/( r B), whereI [1, r /d] d.r.v W out waiting time as seen by an arriving batch of r /d packets in a GI X /D/1 queue Retransmissions Loss detection, etc Arrival processes What is a realistic model? h

13
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Model validation Discrete event driven simulator Steady state Media server on a 10Mbps-20Mbps link (m=50) Low bitrate media, B=112kbps Nodes buffer 15s worth of packets Input and output capacity constraints Propagation delays Random network topology – GT-ITM Node churn for randomness Results shown for packet losses

14
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Deterministic arrival process Inf.cap. C in = C out = 10 Mbps Inf.incap. C in =10 Mbps C out =128 kbps Fin.cap. C in = C out = 128kbps Number of trees influences the delay – is there an optimal number? D pr plays a minor role – but increasing importance N=10 4,p=0.1

15
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Poisson arrival process Inf.cap. C in =C out =10Mbps Inf.incap. C in =10Mbps C out =128kbps Fin.cap. C in =C out =128kbps Queuing delay significant Decrease utilization N=10 4,p=0.1

16
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Simulation Inf.incap. C in =10 Mbps C out =128 kbps Fin.cap. C in =C out =128 kbps Similar to deterministic arrival process N=10 4,p=0.1

17
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri FEC and retransmissions Dynamically adjust playback delay FEC cannot achieve (b)=1 But FEC can help to keep the playback delay low Scalability?

18
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Capacity allocation and prioritization Scen.ShareC out [kbps] CH100%256 CI 65%128 35%512 Prioritization and uneven capacity allocation best: increases the average output capacity of the contributing nodes Inhomogeneous upload capacity can help to achieve better performance Capacity allocation MM: proportional FU: non-proportional Prioritization NP: contributor/non- contributor P: proportional to contribution FU+P MM+P N=10 4

19
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Conclusion Main factors that determine the delay Average upload capacity of contributing nodes Waiting times in queues at the nodes The ways to decrease the end-to-end delay are decreasing the number of layers (by prioritization), FU allocation, and by increasing m as much as possible – no fairness... using an adequate number of trees (though using a few trees only might imperil the stability of the overlay for given n, k, p) dynamically adjusting the FEC redundancy using a bitrate not too close to E[C out ]

20
http://www.ee.kth.se/~gyuri Open questions Application to pull-based systems Modeling tree structure and delay distributions Scalability in terms of delay Optimal chunk size and out-degree Easy to control in multi-tree-based overlays (?) How to control in a pull based overlay?

21
An Analytical Study of Low Delay Multi-tree-based Overlay Multicast György Dán and Viktória Fodor School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden Peer-to-Peer Streaming and IP-TV Workshop

Similar presentations

OK

Playback-buffer Equalization for Streaming Media using Stateless Transport Prioritization Dan Tan, HPL, Palo Alto Weidong Cui, UC Berkeley John Apostolopoulos,

Playback-buffer Equalization for Streaming Media using Stateless Transport Prioritization Dan Tan, HPL, Palo Alto Weidong Cui, UC Berkeley John Apostolopoulos,

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google