1. U.S. Department of Education Privacy Initiatives Kathleen M. Styles Chief Privacy Officer U.S. Department of Education April 18, 2011

2. Privacy Initiatives  Chief Privacy Officer  Privacy Technical Assistance Center  Technical Briefs  FERPA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

3. Chief Privacy Officer: Organizational Structure Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Management Kathleen Styles Chief Privacy Officer Privacy, Information, and Records Management Services Family Policy Compliance Office FOIA ServicesPrivacy Safeguards Information Collection Clearance Records & Documents Management

4. My Background  Attorney  Certified in government privacy  Worked on the 2010 Census and American Community Survey  Prior position: Director, Office of Analysis and Executive Support, U.S. Census Bureau

5. CPO Responsibilities  Compliance  Advice  Training  Outreach  Advocacy

6. Initial Areas of Emphasis  Considering comments to FERPA NPRM  Process improvements  Working with PTAC and the Technical Briefs  Open Government/transparency  Data management

7. Privacy Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) 7 Mission: To be a “one-stop" resource for state longitudinal data systems for information about privacy, confidentiality, and security assistance. Oversight: Privacy Advisory Committee http://nces.ed.gov/programs/Ptac/Home

8.  “Privacy Toolkit” including FAQs and documents of interest  Technical Assistance Site Visits  Training Materials  Support Center  Regional Meetings Privacy Technical Assistance Center

9. Technical Briefs – The Basics 9 http://nces.ed.gov/programs/Ptac/TechnicalBriefs  Intended to assist states with their development of longitudinal data systems.  Seeking input that can help inform future development of official guidance  Three are currently available: Basic Concepts and Definitions Data Stewardship Statistical Methods for Data Protection  Send comments to SLDStechbrief@ed.govSLDStechbrief@ed.gov

10. 10 Proposed Changes to FERPA  Stronger enforcement  Ensuring student safety  Promote wise investment of taxpayer funds in educational programs  Promote effectiveness research

11. FERPA: Stronger Enforcement Enforcement Authority No clear authority to bring enforcement actions against entities that have no students Department could enforce against entities that receive Department funds, even if no students in attendance Department could take enforcement action to ensure that State SLDS are FERPA compliant CURRENT INTERPRETATION EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGE PROPOSED INTERPRETATION 11

12. FERPA: Ensuring Student Safety Limited Directory Information None Clarify that Educational agencies may specify that Directory Information will be disclosed only for specified purposes. Gives entities greater discretion in releasing Directory Information CURRENT INTERPRETATION EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGE PROPOSED INTERPRETATION 12

13. FERPA: Ensuring Student Safety Student ID Badges Unclear whether students can be required to wear ID badges if they opt out of directory information. Clarify that a school may require a student to wear an ID badge that exhibits information that has been designated as directory information. Allows schools the discretion to require the wearing of ID badges by all students. CURRENT INTERPRETATION EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGE PROPOSED INTERPRETATION 13

14. FERPA: Ensuring Program Effectiveness Term Definitions None Education Program Any program principally engaged in education Authorized Representative Any entity designated by educational agency to conduct audit, evaluation or compliance or enforcement activity Taken together would allow a State or local educational authority to designate another agency as an authorized representative to audit or evaluate one of their education programs CURRENT INTERPRETATION EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGE PROPOSED INTERPRETATION 14

15. FERPA: Ensuring Program Effectiveness Legal Authority to Conduct Audit/Evaluations Using PII to conduct an audit or evaluation – requires legal authority Clarifies that authority may be express or implied Audits/evaluations could be done on education programs using PII for the recipient’s own state or federally supported program and the disclosing entity’s programs. CURRENT INTERPRETATION EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGE PROPOSED INTERPRETATION 15

16. FERPA: Ensuring Program Effectiveness Written Agreements Written agreements are not required under the audit/evaluation exception Written agreements would be required under the audit/evaluation exception Would increase accountability to protect information and use it appropriately CURRENT INTERPRETATION EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGE PROPOSED INTERPRETATION 16

17. FERPA: Ensuring Program Effectiveness Reasonable Methods NONE Specify that disclosing entities must use reasonable methods to ensure receiving entities are FERPA compliant Would increase the responsibility of disclosing entities to ensure recipients are FERPA compliant CURRENT INTERPRETATION EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGE PROPOSED INTERPRETATION 17

18. FERPA: Promoting Research on Effectiveness Authority to Conduct Study Preamble to 2008 Regulations indicates that an SEA may not give PII to a researcher unless the SEA has separate legal authority to act on behalf of LEA Clarify that state educational agencies may enter into agreements with researchers on behalf of LEAs SEAs would be able to enter into agreements with researchers for studies across districts CURRENT INTERPRETATION EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGE PROPOSED INTERPRETATION 18

19. 19 Please Comment on the NPRM Submit formal comments:  In writing  By May 23, 2011  According to instructions in the Federal Register  Specific and clear

20. 20 Wrap Up  Questions or comments?  My contact information: Email: Kathleen.Styles@ed.gov