1. BREAKING GROUND : PRELIMINARY REPORT OF BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S ALTERNATIVE CUSTODY SUPERVISION PROGRAM

2. ACS Program Details ACS program established to mitigate impacts of AB 109 and serve interests of public safety ACS Deputies oversee offenders removed from the jail and placed on home detention Prior to placement on ACS offenders are assessed to determine potential risk to public safety If the offender is found to be suitable & meets program requirements he or she is accepted into ACS

3. ACS Program Details Offenders are required to wear electronic ankle bracelets so deputies can monitor their location Offenders are not allowed to leave their homes without permission Deputies conduct regular unannounced home visits to ensure compliance Day Reporting Center (DRC) a key component of ACS program

4. A Sample of DRC EBT Programs Moral Reconation Therapy – MRT Drug & Alcohol Abuse Prevention/Recovery Anger Management Theft Prevention Parenting Courses GED Preparation

5. Sheriff’s ACS Program Statistics

6. CSUC - Preliminary Report Released The team of Chico State professors and criminal justice interns working with the Butte County Sheriff’s Office to evaluate the Sheriff’s Alternative Custody Supervision (ACS) program released its initial report at the September 19, 2012, meeting of Butte County’s Community Corrections Partnership. The preliminary report indicates that the Sheriff’s ACS program is on track and showing promise. The report also makes recommendations for overall improvement of the program, which are being implemented.

7. CSUC – Recommendations CSUC recommends BCSO staff conduct a supervision and treatment plan for all potential ACS eligible inmates CSUC recommends BCSO continue its search for an appropriate offender management system that has the capacity to store historical data and network with other county systems CSUC recommends BCSO further formalize the ACS program, to include additional officer training and a comprehensive, evidence-based supervision strategy CSUC recommends that the BCSO explore a population-validated risk assessment tool CSUC recommends the BCSO work proactively to prioritize research projects promoting public safety and resource management

8. THE STATISTICAL DETAILS 1. ACS ELIGIBLE INMATE NEEDS 2. ESTABLISHING A BASELINE RECIDIVISM MEASURE 3. EXPLORING RISK Preliminary Findings

9. ACS Eligible Inmate Needs VariablesObsMeansdMinMax Affordable Housing230.610.5001 Employment230.780.4201 Education230.480.5101 Transportation230.430.5101 Childcare230.220.4201 Vocational Training230.430.5101 Financial Assistance230.520.5101 Public Assistance230.260.4501 Food Stamps230.610.5001 Medical Treatment230.390.5001 Mental Health Treatment230.090.2901 Further college education230.740.4501 Desires to enroll in classes while in custody230.480.5101

10. ACS Participant Descriptive Statistics

11. ACS Survival Descriptive Statistics

12. Royston-Parmar: ProgramFailure FailureOddsP>zSig. Low Risk (Comparison) Medium Risk1.780.42 0 High Risk1.710.34 1 Y-Intercept-1.900.00 0 Number of obs.114 LR chi2(2)1.12 Prob > chi20.5726 Log likelihood-52.384619Pseudo R20.0105

13. Royston-Parmar with Control Variables PredictorsOddsP>zSig. Medium Risk2.010.31 High Risk2.080.22 GPS1.120.82 Age0.880.00** Male0.890.82 Black1.620.46 North1.040.94 Spine_11.700.00** Spine_21.330.01** Spine_30.990.94 Spine_40.980.47 Spine_51.000.93 Spine_60.930.03* Spine_70.970.11 Spine_81.070.03* Spine_90.990.39 Constant1.770.13

14. Royston-Parmar Hazard Ratios

15. Questions or Comments