Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Vijay V Vijayakumar.  SOX Act  Difference between IT Management and IT Governance  Internal Controls  Frameworks for Implementing SOX  COSO - Committee.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Vijay V Vijayakumar.  SOX Act  Difference between IT Management and IT Governance  Internal Controls  Frameworks for Implementing SOX  COSO - Committee."— Presentation transcript:

1 Vijay V Vijayakumar

2  SOX Act  Difference between IT Management and IT Governance  Internal Controls  Frameworks for Implementing SOX  COSO - Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission  COBIT - Control Objectives for Information and related Technology  Comparison of COSO and COBIT  Issues

3  Need ◦ Wide Spread Malpractices in financial accounting of Public Corporations e.g. Enron ◦ Cost investors billions of dollars ◦ Sarbanes-Oxley Act(SOX) was passed in 2002 to prevent such occurrences ◦ All public corporations have to comply with SOX  Intent ◦ To protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws, and for other purposes. ◦ Create new standards for corporate accountability as well as new penalties for acts of wrongdoing.  Impact: More focus on IT Governance(Internal Controls), transparency in business practices, more responsibility and accountability on Top Management.

4 6 Areas of Importance  Auditor Oversight  Auditor Independence  Corporate Responsibility  Financial Disclosures  Analyst conflicts of interest  civil and criminal penalties for fraud and document destruction

5  Auditor Oversight ◦ common source of error. ◦ No getting away from errors whether done intentional or unintentional by the auditor  Auditor Independence ◦ More independence to auditors  Corporate responsibility –  requires CEOs and CFOs to certify that reports have been reviewed and to the best of their knowledge.  CEO’s must evaluate internal controls before every reporting

6  Financial Disclosures: All disclosures should be attested by top management. All events that might have impact on financial conditions must be reported as soon as 48 hrs  Analyst conflicts of interest : Manipulation is under scrutiny of top management thereby reducing analyst conflicts of interest.  Civil and criminal penalties : fine of up to $1,000,000, or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both IT Governance can be helpful in placing internal controls and thereby comply with SOX Act

7  IT Management: ◦ Narrow focus ◦ ensures supply of IT services for normal operation.  IT Governance: ◦ includes IT Management ◦ to plan how the organization could meet its goals through optimal use of IT resources.

8  What are Internal Controls?  policies, procedures, practices, and organizational structures put in place to reduce risks  Are put in place all through the organization to reduce risks involved in various stages of operation  Objectives:  economy and efficiency of operations  reliability of financial and management reports  compliance with laws and regulations

9  Unified approach for evaluation of Internal Control System  Focuses on processes and people  Has 5 control components that assures sound business practices: ◦ Control Environment: management defines and communicates policies and procedures to employees ◦ Risk Management: Should be able to identify and analyze risks involved in business. ◦ Control Activities: Processes like approval, authorization, verification. Covers entire organization.

10 ◦ Information and Communication: Information should be able to make its way to the appropriate person in a timely way through proper communication channels. ◦ Monitoring: Controls checked for proper functioning periodically. Remedies made known to auditors and action taken.  Latest Version includes Objective setting, event identification and risk response

11  Framework consistent with COSO.  Rich, robust and most widely used  4 domains, 34 control objectives  Latest version is 4.1  Aligns IT with business objectives, quality standards, monetary controls and security needs

12  Planning and Organization : Assess how IT will be able to meet business needs  Acquisition and Implementation : IT solutions have to be developed or acquired to meet objectives  Delivery and Support : Continuous delivery and support of systems  Monitoring: monitors all IT process for quality and compliance with control requirement

13  COSO is useful for management while COBIT is useful for IT management, users, and auditors.  COSO is focused on effectiveness, efficiency of operations, reliable financial reporting, and compliance with laws and regulations  COBIT is used to support business requirements and the associated IT resources and processes  COSO is the model of choice for The Security and Exchange Commission

14  Cost of Compliance: Average industry spending per year – $6 billion. Not suitable for small corporations.  Continuous checking of Internal Controls  Maintaining Data Integrity  Security  Communication and Integrity

15  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COBIT#COBIT_st ructure http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COBIT#COBIT_st ructure  http://www.sox-online.com


Download ppt "Vijay V Vijayakumar.  SOX Act  Difference between IT Management and IT Governance  Internal Controls  Frameworks for Implementing SOX  COSO - Committee."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google