1. AALL-PLL Intellectual Property Sub-Group Presents: Patent Research 101, Part 1 Presented by Kristin Whitman, LandonIP Hosted by Emily Florio, PLL-IP co-chair Part of the AALL PLL-SIS Webinar Series 2012-2013 Presented June 12, 2013

2. Speaker Bio Kristin Whitman is a reference librarian with Landon IP, a private patent research firm, and was one of the founding members of Intellogist (www.Intellogist.com), a free patent searching resource and community. She now serves as a librarian on Landon IP’s internal Reference Desk, promoting knowledge capture and knowledge sharing within the organization. She is a regular contributor to the Intellogist Blog (http://intellogist.wordpress.com/), which provides weekly posts about patent search systems and their features.www.Intellogist.comhttp://intellogist.wordpress.com/ Contact information at the end of this presentation.

3. Agenda Why perform patent research? The challenges of patent metadata Discuss machine translations Determine the status of a patent

4. Why Perform Patent Research? A very short overview of the major patent search types.

5. Why Perform Patent Research? Patentability Search – Is the invention novel? Non-obvious? – What other material is out there? Freedom to Operate/Infringement – Will I get sued for selling my product? – Is someone else infringing on my rights? Validity – Is my competitor’s patent legally enforceable? Did the patent examiner miss something?

6. Why Perform Patent Research? Patent landscaping – Performing high-level analysis on large datasets – Involves careful data cleaning and filtering – Usually includes charts, graphs, maps and other visual aids. Patent landscaping supports business intelligence – Research and development opportunities – Mergers and acquisitions

7. Agenda Defining a patent The challenges of patent metadata Discuss machine translations Determine the status of a patent

8. Patents Dissected Bibliographic Data and Text Fields

9. Topics Patent Number Basics Bibliographic Standards Types of Data On the Patent Face Numbers and Dates In-Depth Patent Families Retrieving Patent Information from the Web

11. Patent Numbers: Country Codes Every country has their own patent system. Every patent number begins with a two-letter “country code.” The country code indicates what country or regional authority issued the document. – Examples: – US – United States – JP - Japan – FR – France

12. Country Codes Sometimes the country codes derive from the native language name of the country, e.g. “Deutschland” for Germany. – Examples: – DE – Germany – GB – UK (Great Britain) – CH – Switzerland – HR - Croatia

13. Publication Numbers Patents are identified by “publication numbers” Challenges: – Each country has a different numbering format – Applications and granted patents also have different numbering (in most countries). Examples: – US 7,541,107 (B2) – US 2005/031930 (A1) – EP 1296389 (A2) – JP 2003100317 (A)

14. Publication Numbers Most database systems make you remove the punctuation, or the search won’t execute – A granted patent is written US 7,721,889 (B2) – Search systems want US7721889

15. Kind Codes Every patent publication number is followed by a one or two character “kind code.” – US 7,721,889 B2 A kind code can be a single letter, or a letter followed by a number, e.g. “A,” “A1” “B2” The kind codes indicate the publication stage, where it is in the patenting process. – Published patent applications aren’t deleted when granted patents issue! They remain in the db.

16. Kind Codes The beginning letter is the most important – If it is followed by a number, that usually indicates some secondary information The typical meanings of kind code letters: – A – first published (usually published apps) – B or C – granted patents – U – utility models (short-term patents) – S – design patents

17. Kind Codes Challenges The meaning of kind code differs by country – Up until 2001, US granted patents had kind code “A” It can also differ based on year of issuance – After 2001, US grants now have B kind codes

18. Topics Patent Number Basics Bibliographic Standards Types of Data On the Patent Face Numbers and Dates In-Depth Patent Families Retrieving Patent Information from the Web

19. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Standards WIPO creates standards that control the format of bibliographic data on patent documents. – Most patent authorities follow these standards Two-digit "INID" codes in parentheses appear next to each data element on a patent face. – e.g (22) denotes "application date" See Further: Handbook on Industrial Property Information and Documentation, WIPO ST.9 www.wipo.int/standards/en/pdf/03-09-01.pdf

20. WIPO Codes and Non-US Docs The WIPO 2-digit codes can help you make sense of non-English documents. On the next two slides, you'll see: - A US patent document with INID codes - A Japanese (JP) patent doc with INID codes Both have application date fields labeled (22)

23. Topics Patent Number Basics Bibliographic Standards Types of Data On the Patent Face Numbers and Dates In-Depth Patent Families Retrieving Patent Information from the Web

24. Inventor vs Assignee/Applicant Inventor - individual or group of individuals who created the invention. – Can be multiple inventors – Never changes Assignee - individual or corporation. Legal owner who has the right to assert the patent. – Changes when the patent changes hands – Change in ownership not reflected on the patent face! Patent is not re-published to reflect change. – Outside of the US, the assignee is called the "applicant."

26. Names (and Addresses) Example from Granted US Patent US 7,541,107 B2

27. Patent Classifications International Classification (IPC) -All major authorities are required to use IPCs National Classification Systems: - US system & European (ECLA) system – being phased out in favor of CPC - Japanese (F-term and File Index) systems Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - Created to harmonize the US and European systems, in use as of Jan 1, 2013

29. Patent Classifications Example from Granted US Patent US 7,541,107 B2 Example below includes IPC and US classes

30. Citations (“References Cited”) Patent applicants are required to disclose any known material which might relate to the patentability of their invention These citations are published on the patent face Citations to other related patents Citations to related “non-patent literature”

31. 111111111111111 1

32. Patent and Non-Patent Citations Example from Granted US Patent US 7,541,107 B2

33. Abstract and Representative Img. Example from Granted US Patent US 7,541,107 B2

34. Patent Sections Title Abstract Drawings – Drawing pages appear directly after the first page Description o Background of Invention o Drawing Descriptions o Examples o Note: the description is sometimes called the patent “specification.”

35. Patent Sections: Claims Claims – The legally enforceable part of a patent. When reading claims, remember: – Language in claims has specific legal meaning – Only an attorney can correctly interpret claims.

36. Misunderstandings about Patents Published Application US 2009/0244009 A1 Title: TABLET COMPUTER Abstract: A tablet computer is composed of a tablet component and a keyboard component. The tablet component houses all the essential hardware… This person really thinks they can patent a tablet computer??

37. Misunderstandings about Patents Read the claims Claim 1: A tablet computer comprising… a counterbalance armature attached to the keyboard component that extends from the keyboard component to oppose a moment of inertia of the tablet computer…

38. Topics Patent Number Basics Bibliographic Standards Types of Data On the Patent Face Numbers and Dates In-Depth Patent Families Retrieving Patent Information from the Web

39. Numbers and Dates Publication Number and Date Filing or Application Number and Date Continuity Information: “Related US application data” Priority Number and Date

40. Publication Data A publication date on a published application is the date of availability to the public. A publication date on a granted patent indicates the date that the patent was issued. - On the face of the granted patent, it will be called "date of patent." - In an electronic database, it will be called a "publication date"

41. Publication Date on Granted Patent “Date of Patent” is called “publication date” in electronic databases

42. Filing/Application Data A "filing date" or "application date" is when the paperwork was filed at the patent office. -In the US it's called a "filing date" -In other sources it may be "application date" An application number is an ID number, assigned at the time of filing, that identifies the (unpublished) application.

43. 1111111111111111

44. Application Data Example from Granted US Patent US 7,541,107 B2 1111111111111111

45. Related US Application Data: Continuation Continuation – A new application filed as a “sister” application to the first – Applicant wants to re-draft the claims of their original application (but no new inventive material) – The original filing date is the “priority date” for the continuation. Note that I am not an attorney and this is not legal advice.

46. Continuation – Same invention, revised claims July 31, 2002 Application 10/208,294 Grant US 6,893,764 Grant US 7,541,107 Aug 19, 2004 July 31, 2002 Application 10/921,628 Both patents have legal protection back to the “priority date” of July 31, 2002

47. Continuation Example Example from Granted US Patent US 7,541,107 B2 1111111111111111

48. Related US Application Data Continuation-in-part – Applicant has new improvements to the invention – Old material protected back to the original filing date – New material only protected back to continuation-in-part filing date Note that I am not an attorney and this is not legal advice.

49. Continuation in part – New inventive material; multiple priority dates introduced Oct 1, 2001 Application 09/914,046 Grant US 7,479,276 Grant US 7,780,882 Apr 2, 2002 Oct 1, 2001 Application 10/113,927 The original material has priority to Oct 1, 2001; the new inventive material only claims priority back to Apr 2, 2002

50. Continuation-in-part Example US 7,780,882 1111111111111111

51. The Importance of "Priority“: International Filings Applicants can also file internationally, creating sister patents in other countries The concept of priority data binds international patent docs together – Again, the “priority” data is from the first application in the chain Electronic databases can use priority data to link related international patents together.

52. Topics Patent Number Basics Bibliographic Standards Types of Data On the Patent Face Numbers and Dates In-Depth Patent Families Retrieving Patent Information from the Web

53. Review Each nation has its own patenting system. Each national patent is only legally enforceable in the country of issuance. When you find a US patent, it is likely that there are related patents in other countries.

54. Example of a Patent Family Patent families include related patents from all over the world Germany, Bulgaria, Italy, France, Poland, Hungary, Austria, Cuba, Mongolia…

55. Patent Family Types

56. Simple Patent Families Some family types are small and exclusive, and all documents are very closely related Simple families mean all documents must share exactly the same priority data Branches that have separate priorities (e.g. from continuations-in-part) will fall off

57. Each blue box represents a published document

58. Inpadoc/Extended Families Some patent families are broad and inclusive These families will contain "branches" off of the original application This approach brings in distantly related inventive material The common broad family type is an called "Inpadoc" or "extended" family – each document must share a priority with at least one other doc in the family

60. Retrieving Patent Families is Essential Takeaway: If someone asks you to retrieve a patent, you should research and provide patent family data.

61. Recommended Sources There are many examples of small family files, many specific to certain for-pay search products. Inpadoc extended family data is widely available in free products – Espacenet, a free search service from the European Patent Office, is one major source – http://worldwide.espacenet.com http://worldwide.espacenet.com

62. EPO Free Patent Search Engine

63. Espacenet Family Search Use the Smart Search box to enter your number

64. Espacenet Family Search Find your patent & click “Inpadoc patent family”

65. Espacenet Family Search Result: list of Inpadoc family members

66. Finding the Patent PDF Find your patent & click “Original Document”

67. Finding the Patent PDF

68. Agenda Why perform patent research? The challenges of patent metadata Discuss machine translations Determine the status of a patent

69. Machine Translations

70. Challenges If you find a non-English patent, you may be asked to find a machine translation o English family members are not always present o Hand translations are expensive; MTs are a good first step Machine translation technology is still evolving o General translation engines can't handle sci/tech vocabulary well o Certain language pairs are less developed (for example, Finnish to English)

71. Tools/Sources Some national patent offices provide English MTs - Japan, Korea, WIPO's Patentscope Commercial systems load pre-translated collections o Can be searched with English keywords Questel's Orbit.com and LexisNexis TotalPatent both contain over 20 full text pre-translated collections Regional authorities have multiple official languages o EPO: English, French and German o WIPO: 8 official languages, including both latin and non- latin character sets

72. Agenda Why perform patent research? The challenges of patent metadata Discuss machine translations Determine the status of a patent

73. Post-Grant Events Maintenance fee payments due – is the patent expired due to non-payment? http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair/ Legal status on Espacenet Re-assignments – who really owns the patent? http://assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/?db=pat Litigation – who is getting sued? – Search federal district court dockets, not patent offices! PACER http://www.pacer.govhttp://www.pacer.gov CourtLink and Westlaw

74. America Invents Act This Act passed in late 2011 o System changed from "first-to-invent" to "first-to-file."  Inventors granted one-year grace period from public disclosure to filing o Curtailment of "patent trolls," those who litigate using patents they have purchased from others  A "troll," or "non-practicing entity," owns IP but does not make any product related to that IP  The law restricts new patent suits to be filed against one company at a time, eliminating the shotgun approach  This makes it more costly to file litigation

75. For More Information http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/patentlaw/

76. For More Information http://www.intellogist.com/wiki/Main_Page

77. For More Information http://intellogist.wordpress.com/

78. For More Information http://www.piug.org/

79. For More Information http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/matters/matters-9609.html

80. For More Information http://www.governmentinfopro.com/ https://www.facebook.com/#!/LexisNexisforGovernment

81. Questions? Kristin Whitman Librarian LANDON IP 1725 Jamieson Avenue Alexandria, Virginia 22314 USA Direct: +1 703-682-4849 Email: kwhitman@landon-ip.comkwhitman@landon-ip.com Twitter: @IPLibrarian

82. Thank You! Patent Research 101, part 2: Wednesday June 19 th *Recordings of both parts will be made available on the PLL-SIS IP website within the week. Private Law Libraries SIS http://www.aallnet.org/sis/pllsis/ IP Subgroup- Looking for volunteers! http://www.aallnet.org/sis/pllsis/Groups/ip.asp Contact Emily Florio (florio@fr.com; 617-368-2102) with questions/comments.florio@fr.com