Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CO 2 Development of the Velo Thermal Control System (VTCS)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CO 2 Development of the Velo Thermal Control System (VTCS)"— Presentation transcript:

1 CO 2 Development of the Velo Thermal Control System (VTCS)
CO2 cooling activities at NIKHEF Development of the Velo Thermal Control System (VTCS) Bart Verlaat National Institute for Particle Physics (NIKHEF) Amsterdam, The Netherlands CO 2 CERN, 13 March 2008

2 (Silicon) Particle Detectors and Cooling
(Silicon) Particle detectors have specific needs for thermal control: Many distributed heat sources over large volumes. Serial evaporators Low temperature gradients between these sources. Low pressure drop, constant heat transfer coefficients Permanent cooling (<0ºC, With or without heat load) Irradiated detectors will get damaged when becoming warm Low mass inside detectors Light weight evaporators, low volume, => mini-channels Low structural impact Small diameter tubing, wiggly structure Radiation resistant cooling fluid Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer Silicon Tracker Particle detection surface (Low material, homogeneous and stabile temperature) The above mentioned properties have led to the development of CO2 loops at Nikhef, because CO2 is: Radiation hard Has excellent thermodynamic properties for micro-channels. Low dT/dP Low mass Low liquid/vapor density ratio Low viscosity High latent heat High heat transfer coefficient Multiple electronic stations (All need cooling)

3 Typical temperature distribution of a heated tube
Saturated vapor Saturated liquid Partial dry-out Tube temperature Temperature (°C ) Fluid temperature Tube length (m) Target flow condition Dry-out zone Sub cooled liquid 2-phase liquid / vapor Super heated vapor

4 Property Comparison (1)
R744 (CO2) R218 (C3F8) R116 (C2F6) Source Refprop NIST R744 (CO2) R218 (C3F8) R116 (C2F6) Critical Point 73.8 bar 26.4 bar 30.5 bar Triple point -56.6ºC -147.7ºC -100ºC Boiling 1 bar -78.4ºC Subli-mation ! -36.8ºC -78.1ºC

5 Property comparison (2)
Latent Heat of Evaporation Saturation Temperature (ºC ) Latent heat of evaporation (kJ/kg) Better Refrigerant “R” numbers: R744=CO2 R218=C3F8 R116=C2F6 Density Ratio (ρvapour/ ρliquid) Saturation Temperature (ºC ) ρvapour/ ρliquid Better Liquid Viscosity Saturation Temperature (ºC ) Liquid Viscosity (Pa*s) Better Surface Tension Saturation Temperature (ºC ) Surface Tension (N/m) Better dT/dP Saturation Temperature (ºC ) dT/dP (ºC/bar) Better

6 Example of and Atlas upgrade stave
2x 20 wafers à 17 Watt Cooling Q = 680 Watt Tube = 4 meter Refrigerant “R” numbers: R744=CO2 R218=C3F8 R116=C2F6 1 Atlas stave : 2 meter length 4mm ID Tube 2mm ID Tube Calculations based on 75% Vapor quality at exit Mass -35ºC Φ R744= 2.9 g/s Φ R218= 8.7 g/s Φ R116= 9.6 g/s dP calculation according to Friedel/Blasius

7 Heat transfer and dry-out of CO2 in the VTCS evaporator (1mm ID tube)

8 Cooling Fluid Choice: Facts, advantages and disadvantages
When looking to the presented data CO2 seems the most promising candidate for detector cooling. Small diameter tubing Isothermal behavior (Low dT) Although CO2 has relative high heat transfer coefficients, the possible small diameters (=small heat exchange surface), need special attention. CO2 is easy to use especially for testing, it is cheap and allowed to vent into the atmosphere. High system pressure not a problem in small tubes. CO2 can not be liquid in atmospheric conditions, a leak is in general not problematic. It produces snow as in a fire extinguisher

9 How to get the ideal 2-phase flow in the detector?
Vapor compression system Always vapor needed Dummy heat load when switched off Oil free compressor, hard to find Direct expansion into detector with C3F8 compressor Warm transfer lines Boil-off heater and in detector Temperature control by back-pressure regulator Atlas method: Liquid Vapor 2-phase Pressure Enthalpy Compressor Heater BP. Regulator Detector Warm transfer over distance Cooling plant Pumped liquid system Liquid overflow, no vapor needed No actuators in detector Oil free pump, easy to find Standard commercial chiller CO2 liquid pumping Cold concentric transfer line No components in detector Temperature control by 2-phase accumulator LHCb method: Liquid Vapor 2-phase Pressure Enthalpy Compressor Pump Detector Chiller Liquid circulation Cold transfer over distance Cooling plant

10 The 2-Phase Accumulator Controlled Loop (2PACL)
13 10 Flooded evaporator Heat out Condenser Heat out 9 Heat in Heat in 2 5 1 Heat exchanger Restrictor Pump 2PACL principle ideal for detector cooling: Low vapor quality for serial evaporators. No local evaporator control, evaporator is passive in detector. No maintenance in hostile area No actuators in radiation zone.

11 LHCb Detector Overview
Electron Hadron Proton beam Goals of LHCb: Studying the decay of B-mesons to find evidence of CP-violation LHCb Cross section Vertex Locator Muon 20 meter

12 The LHCb-VELO Thermal Control System (LHCb-VTCS) A 2-Phase Accumulator Controlled Loop
Detectors and electronics Temperature detectors: -7ºC Heat generation: 1600 W 23 parallel evaporator stations capillaries and return hose VELO Thermal Control System CO2 Evaporator section

13 LHCb-VTCS Overview A 2-Phase Accumulator Controlled Loop
Accessible and a friendly environment Inaccessible and a hostile environment R507a Chiller Cooling plant: Sub cooled liquid CO2 pumping CO2 condensing to a R507a chiller CO2 loop pressure control using a 2-phase accumulator Evaporator : VTCS temperature ≈ -25ºC Evaporator load ≈ Watt Complete passive CO 2

14 LHCb-VTCS Cooling Components
Accumulators VTCS Evaporator Valves Pumps Condensers CO 2

15 VTCS Units Installed @ CERN
Freon Unit CO2 Unit July- August 2007 CO 2

16 VTCS 2PACL Operation CO 2 Start-up in ~2 hours A B C D A B C D time 16
Pump head pressure (Bar) System pressure (Bar) Accumulator Level (%) Accu liquid temp. (ºC) Pump inlet temp. (ºC) A B C D CO 2 time A B C D 16 Start-up in ~2 hours

17 VTCS Evaporator performance (Stability and response to heat-load changes)
Evaporator Temp (ºC) Accu Temp ≈ Set-point (ºC) Detector Power (Watt) 600 Watt Accu level (‰) Accu Cooling Power (Watt) Pumped Liquid Temp (ºC) (A/Left side) @Setpoint =-25ºC: Accumulator temperature: ºC Evaporator temperature (No Load): ºC Evaporator temperature (600 W Load): -23.0ºC Stabilization time from 0 to 600 Watt: ca. 7min Temperature stability : <0.25ºC CO 2

18 VTCS Transfer line Operation (Internal heat exchanger)
B C Accumulator set-point B [5] Evaporator liquid in (ºC) [10] Evaporator pressure (Bar) C [14] Accumulator pressure (Bar) Cooling plant side Evaporator side [10] Evaporative temp. (ºC) [13] Condenser Inlet (ºC) Transfer line temperature profile [1] Pump inlet (ºC) A: Condenser and evaporator single phase B: Evaporator 2-phase, condenser single phase C: Both evaporator and Condenser 2- phase CO 2

19 VTCS Accumulator Control
2PACL Start-up Cooling spiral for pressure decrease (Condensation) Pump head (Bar) Accumulator Pressure (Bar) Heater temp. (ºC) Accu Level (%) Decrease heater power near critical point to prevent dry-out Liquid temp. (ºC) Heater power (%) Pump inlet (ºC) Accumulator Properties: Volume 14.2 liter (Loop 9 Liter) Heater capacity 1kW Cooling capacity 1 kW CO 2 Thermo siphon heater for pressure increase (Evaporation)

20 VTCS filling and sizing
Single-phase cold operation is worst-case for minimum level (Heater need to be submerged all the time) Two-phase cold operation is worst-case for maximum level (Significant part of the cooling coil need to be in vapor phase) VTCS Design Loop fill ratio: 500 gram/liter Loop fill ratio: 650 gram/liter Loop fill ratio: 725 gram/liter Loop fill ratio: 575 gram/liter Over critical filling Under critical filling Accumulator Liquid level Under critical fillings (<468 g/L) cause dry-out of accumulator near critical point. Fillings just above critical density show best performance (500 – 600 g/L) Ratio accumulator volume / loop volume: >1.5 (AMS-TTCS & LHCb-VTCS) CO 2

21 Conclusions CO2 is a very good cooling fluid for detector cooling
Low thermal gradients Small tube sizes High heat transfer The 2PACL method turned out to be a good method for circulating the cooling fluid. Easy to operate Standard industrial components Stable operation Large operational temperature range Passive in detector Heat load independent Easy start-up and cool-down procedure 2PACL is easy to set-up and use. This is ideal for lab-experiments. Not proven, but the 2PACL method it must work for other fluids too.

22 What brings the future (1) ?
Future projects at NIKHEF: Development of a desktop CO2 cooler for laboratory and prototype use. Upgrade Altas SCT cooling (CO2?) Small cooling projects: Medipix,.... Studies on small cooling pipes. Understand the pro‘s & con’s. Verify lacking theory. Heat exchange Flow pattern Cooperation with CMS? Pressure drop

23 What brings the future (2) ?
How to communicate in the future and benefit from each other in the development phase. Organize a general detector cooling workshop and present eachothers experiences (Atlas, CMS, LHCb, Allice, etc……) Follow closely the refrigeration technologies at IIR- conferences (International Institute of Refrigeration) GL-2008 Copenhagen, Natural refrigerants mainly CO2 Heat transfer conferences, Conference on Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Microscale, Whistler, Canada, Hefat South Afrika………etc, etc…. Adopt new technologies developed for commercial CO2 cooling. Aluminum micro channel heat exchangers Primary CO2 chillers for better operation around -40’C (tricky area for Freon)


Download ppt "CO 2 Development of the Velo Thermal Control System (VTCS)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google