2 What's the main differences between the solution in this draft and that in Y.1731? For both one-way and two-way throughput estimationBinary Search vs. Increase rate with fixed stepOAM msg exchange vs. No OAM msg exchangeResult got At initiator MEP vs. At the remote MEPFor only two-way throughput estimationTwo individual results vs. One minimum result(No loopback at the remote MEP) (Loopback at the remote MEP)
3 Why the solution in this draft is recommended? More efficient – In most cases, binary search will take less time than fixed step lengthMore precise – In most cases, binary search will return more precise result than fixed step lengthMore convenient – The operator may provision and obtain result at only one MEPMore reasonable – For two-way throughput estimation two individual results return
4 What’s updated in 01 version? Remove ACH TLVsAlign format of test data packets with data plane loopback draftAdd exception process into the proceduresAdd one open issue
5 Next Steps Request comments to improve this draft Move forward to WG draft
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.