We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrianna Hoffman
Modified over 2 years ago
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 LSP-Ping and BFD for MPLS-TP draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd- procedures-00 N. Bahadur (Juniper) R. Aggarwal (Juniper) T. Nadeau (BT) N. Sprecher (NSN) Y. Weingarten (NSN)
2 Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net What is the Problem (1)? LSP-Ping as defined in RFC 4379, draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp- ping and BFD for MPLS LSPs as defined in draft-ietf-bfd- mpls, draft-katz-ward-bfd-multipoint requires IP encapsulation and addressing In particular, in these cases the LSP-Ping and BFD packets generated by an ingress LSR are encapsulated in an IP/UDP header with the destination address from the 127/8 range and then encapsulated in the MPLS label stack Requires an IP host stack to process packets in the 127/8 range Requires IP addressing
3 Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net What is the Problem (2)? LSP-Ping and BFD for MPLS-TP LSPs When IP addressing is used on MPLS-TP LSPs RFC 4379 and draft-ietf- bfd-mpls are sufficient to use LSP-Ping and BFD respectively on MPLS- TP LSPs Default addressing as per draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-02.txt Reverse path from egress to ingress LSR MUST use the MPLS LSP from the egress to ingress LSR IP forwarding is not required There is a MPLS-TP requirement to support non-IP addressing or/and the use of non-IP encapsulation draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-02.txt LSP-Ping and BFD require extensions to support non-IP addressing This is the problem the draft addresses
4 Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net Solution Encapsulate LSP-Ping and BFD packets in ACH A new ACH code-point for LSP-Ping Reuse the ACH code-point used by BFD for PWs with no IP encapsulation Draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-bfd New source and destination address TLVs for LSP-Ping Carried in the LSP-Ping packet Non IP source identifier for BFD LSP-Ping ping and trace procedures to handle the non-IP addressing case BFD procedures to handle the non-IP source identifier
5 Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net MPLS-TP Design Team Update Proposal (1) Reflects only face-to-face discussion between members of the design team present in the Stockholm design team meeting Use BFD for pro-active CC and CV The definition of CV in this case is met by existing BFD for MPLS procedures Requires verifying the source address of the OAM packet Use LSP-Ping for on-demand CV CV functionality is larger than that provided by BFD Use LSP-Ping for on-demand route trace
6 Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net MPLS-TP Design Team Update Proposal (2) Split draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-bfd-lsp-ping into 2 drafts The first draft would focus on LSP-Ping and BFD ACH encapsulation and non-IP identifiers The second draft would specify any new LSP-Ping procedures required to support non-IP addressing The two new drafts will include contributions and review from other members of the design team In parallel there is an ongoing effort to discuss BFD extensions required to support non-IP addressing
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 BGP based Virtual Private Multicast Service Auto-Discovery and Signaling.
MPLS-TP 76th IETF - Hiroshima 1 MPLS-TP BFD for CC- CV proactive and RDI functionalities draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv-01 MPLS WG, 76th IETF - Hiroshima,
OAM Overview draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-02 Tal MizrahiMarvell Nurit SprecherNokia Siemens Networks Elisa BellagambaEricsson Yaacov WeingartenNokia.
Nov 2009 draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-06.txt A framework for MPLS in Transport networks draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-06.txt Stewart Bryant (Cisco), Matthew.
March 2010IETF 77, MPLS WG1 Carrying PIM-SM in ASM mode Trees over P2MP mLDP LSPs draft-rekhter-pim-sm-over-mldp-01.txt Y. Rekhter, Juniper Networks R.
MPLS-TP Alarm Suppression tool draft-fulignoli-mpls-tp-ais-lck-tool-01.txt MPLS WG, 75th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden.
MPLS-TP Ring Protection draft-weingarten-mpls-tp-ring-protection draft-ceccarelli-mpls-tp-p2mp-ring Yaacov Weingarten ) Stewart.
LDP extensions for Explicit Pseudowire to transport LSP mapping draft-cao-pwe3-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-02.txt Mach Chen Wei Cao.
MPLS-TP Ring Protection draft-weingarten-mpls-tp-ring-protection Yaacov Weingarten (NSN ),Marco Corsi (Altran), Stewart Bryant (Cisco), Bo Wu (ZTE), Nurit.
1 IEEE 1588v2 Clock Synchronization & P2MP LSP with co-routed reverse path Lizhong Jin (ZTE) Frederic Jounay (France Telecom Orange)
George Swallow. Updated draft based on presentation in Stockholm Changed LSP-ID to have only one LSP-Num since this is sufficient to be unique within.
MPLS-TP OAM based on Y.1731 Italo Busi (Editor) Huub van Helvoort (Editor) Jia He (Editor)
OLD DOG CONSULTING MPLS-TE Doesn’t Scale Adrian Farrel Old Dog Consulting
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-fault-01 George Swallow
George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.
MPLS-TP - 74th IETF (SanFran)1 Linear Protection for MPLS-TP draft-weingarten-mpls-tp-linear-protection-01.txt Stewart Bryant Yaacov Weingarten Nurit Sprecher.
Virtual Links: VLANs and Tunneling CS 4251: Computer Networking II Nick Feamster Spring 2008.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-sfv-mpls-tp-fault-00 George Swallow
CC, CV and RDI for MPLS-TP draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi.03 Last call comments.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 79th IETF - Beijing VPLS PE Model with E-Tree Support Yuanlong Jiang.
MPLS-TP Lock Instruct MPLS WG, IETF 76, Hiroshima, 9 Nov 2009 draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00 ZTE Corporation Xuehui.
© 2005 JDSU. All rights reserved.JDSU CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION1 1 Carrier Ethernet Technologies and Test Applications Reza Vaez-Ghaemi, Ph.D.
Japan Telecom Information & Communication Labs Achieving Multimedia QOS over Hybrid IP/PSTN Infrastructures: IP Traffic and Congestion Control April 26,
G : DCM Signaling Mechanism Using GMPLS RSVP-TE ITU-T Workshop on IP-Optical, Chitose, Japan 7/11/2002 Dimitrios Pendarakis, Tellium, Inc. ITU-T.
The Future of Packet Handling Alan Taylor. The Future of Packet Handling From Internet to Infrastructure Legacy Data Internet New Public Network Voice.
MPLS VPN. MPLS/BGP VPNs Goals MPLS/BGP VPN Features Implementation Conclusions.
Identity and Locators in IPv6 IAB Meeting IETF 60 August 2004.
Architectural Approaches to Multi-Homing for IPv6 A Walk-Through of draft-huston-multi6-architectures-00 Geoff Huston June 2004.
Mobile IP How Mobile IP Works? Agenda What problems does Mobile IP solve? Mobile IP: protocol overview Scope Requirements Design goals.
MPLS Multiple Topology Support draft-zhao-mpls-ldp-multiple-topology-01 draft-zhao-mpls-rsvp-te-multiple-topology-01 IETF 80 – Prague.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.