Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Validation and Preparation of Demonstration – D7.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Validation and Preparation of Demonstration – D7."— Presentation transcript:

1 Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Validation and Preparation of Demonstration – D7

2 2 27 March 2003REGNET Final Project Review WP 3 Validation & Preparation Overview of tasks in WP 3 Deliverable 8: Prototype: The REGNET- System: Version 2 Task Briefs T 3.1 Validation of the REGNET demonstrator Responsible: IMAC Interim Report IR 3.1 Methodology of the validation process, test materials Edited by IMAC Due by: Deliverable D7: Technical Report: Validation of the REGNET system operation & Preparation of the REGNET - Demonstration Phase" Compiled & Edited by IMAC Due by T 3.2 Preparation of the Demonstration Phase Responsible: VALT T 3.3 Implementation of version 2 of the REGNET system Responsible: ZEUS Interim Report IR 3.2 Set up of legal framework, technical infrastructure,... Edited by VALT Due by: Interim Report IR 3.3 Edited by VALT Due by: Extension: End of September

3 3 27 March 2003REGNET Final Project Review WP 3 Validation & Preparation WP 3.1 Validation of the REGNET Demonstrator Next Phase Basis for the demonstration phase: a functional and useable system! A prooved methodology for the testing also outside the consortium. Validate the system To ensure that the system meets (or even exceeds) the expectations of: project partners, end users, EC Develop methodology Define tasks & tools Define reporting procedures Carry out tests Collect feedback (reporting) Define (further) requirements WP 3.3: Handling

4 4 27 March 2003REGNET Final Project Review WP 3 Validation & Preparation Validation concept for WP 3.1 Usability Functionality Tasks Content Performance Does it work as promised? ScheduleReporting procedures User Experts Can the (end) user work with the system? Does the content meet expectations? Does it deliver in time, without cracking under heavy load? Test based on functional requirements User exercises, card sorting, heuristics Online tests against defined quality criteria Load and stress tests What? Why? How? + Testing & Training in Group Meetings

5 5 27 March 2003REGNET Final Project Review Interviews/ Inspection Questionnaires Checklists Professionals Administrators (people who should work with the system) Developers People who developed the system and must implement changes Internal Test User (Consortium) Experts People with special know-how (e. g. designer which could judge about special aspects of the system ( e. g. usability) Validation PM IMAC Instruments & Guidelines Results (Reporting workflow) WP 3 Validation & Preparation Test strategy - 1st phase WP 4: Demonstration Phase Tests with external user groups

6 6 27 March 2003REGNET Final Project Review WP 3 Validation & Preparation Main achievements & results Functionality: Detailed test reports (test cases) Usability: Improvements reported (REGNET Usability Index) Navigation: Revised navigational structure Databases: Individual database reports Test types & reports Integration not fully achieved (data, functionalities) Usability lacks Not all needed functions are realised Incomplete translations Main problems First Strengths & Weaknesses- Profiles Baseline for further development & improvement 1. Functionality 2. Heuristic 3. Card sorting 4. First usability tests

7 7 27 March 2003REGNET Final Project Review WP 3 Validation & Preparation WP 3.2 Preparation of the Demonstration Phase CSC Development - Strategies, Business, Infrastructure Services to be offered by CSCs Service & Product Portfolio Identification & Development of (individual) Strategies Region, Languages, Partners, Naming, Legal Framework Infrastructure Working environment, CSC Infrastructure Next: Content Cases to illustrate individual WP 3/ WP 4 scenarios

8 8 27 March 2003REGNET Final Project Review 1: not useful, 2: Not necessary, 3: Useful, 4: Mandatory Green: >= 3.5 – Yellow: = 3.5 – Yellow: < 3 Function AITSUSUIMACSPACETARXZEUSMean News & archive ,2 Theme explorer Collection Virtual tours ,7 Search Search guide ,8 Search profile ,5 Copyright ,7

9 9 27 March 2003REGNET Final Project Review Function AITSUSUIMACSPACETARXZEUSMean Topic Map Entry ,5 Data Entry ,8 Event Calendar Virtual Exhibition ,3 Virtual tours Tickets ,7 1: not useful, 2: Not necessary, 3: Useful, 4: Mandatory Green: >= 3.5 – Yellow: = 3.5 – Yellow: < 3

10 10 27 March 2003REGNET Final Project Review Function AITSUSUIMACSPACETARXZEUSMean Forum ,8 Guest book ,8 Address book ,8 Job offers ,5 Membership ,5 Feedback ,3 Personalize ,5 1: not useful, 2: Not necessary, 3: Useful, 4: Mandatory Green: >= 3.5 – Yellow: = 3.5 – Yellow: < 3

11 11 27 March 2003REGNET Final Project Review 1: not useful, 2: Not necessary, 3: Useful, 4: Mandatory Green: >= 3.5 – Yellow: = 3.5 – Yellow: < 3 Function AITSUSUIMACSPACETARXZEUSMean Training catalogue ,8 Event calendar ,8 Cooperative thesauri eShop Eprocureme nt Delivery ,2 Auction ePublishing ,8 WAP Access ,3


Download ppt "Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Validation and Preparation of Demonstration – D7."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google