Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

UNEP Making Right Choices: A Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Technology (SAT) Surya Prakash CHANDAK Senior Programme Officer United Nations.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "UNEP Making Right Choices: A Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Technology (SAT) Surya Prakash CHANDAK Senior Programme Officer United Nations."— Presentation transcript:

1 UNEP Making Right Choices: A Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Technology (SAT) Surya Prakash CHANDAK Senior Programme Officer United Nations Environment Programme Division of Technology, Industry and Economics International Environmental Technology Centre (UNEP DTIE IETC)

2 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre2 Structure of Presentation About SAT Methodology Key Characteristics of SAT methodology Use of SAT Key elements Methodology / Decision making process of SAT

3 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre3 Why integrate Sustainable Development in Technology Assessment? Technology plays an important role in Development The dominant system of decision making in technology selection, focuses on economic considerations and tends to disassociate social and environmental factors A fragmented approach in making technology choices has implications on efficiency and sustainability of technology Integration of Economic, Social and Environmental considerations ensures Resource (Economic and Environmental) Efficiency and Social Acceptability

4 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre4 Sustainable Assessment of Technology (SAT) SAT Methodology … … Integrates Environmental, Social and Economic Considerations … Focuses on environment and development together and puts them at the centre of the economic and political decision making process... Can be adapted to country specific parameters and constraints

5 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre5 SAT – Some Key Characteristics It Undergoes progressive assessment (Tiered) procedure (screening, scoping and detail assessment) thereby optimizing information requirements. It operates on strategic as well as operational level It is a quantitative procedure allowing objective assessment, sensitivity analyses and incorporation of scenarios It incorporates Continuous improvement through Plan-Do- Check-Act (PDCA) cycle It is not an automated process thereby making country specific adaptation possible

6 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre6 Use of SAT Policy and Government Level For Strategic Planning and Policy making Financing Institution Level For Assessing projects for funding Operational Level For assessment of alternative technologies Community and Cluster Level For assessment and comparison of collective alternative technologies Community / Enterprise Level For comparing technology options

7 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre7 Application of SAT The application areas include: Environment and health related programs Provision of basic infrastructure such as roads, power, water etc. Bio-diversity management End-of pipe water and waste management technologies Water and waste recycling programs Process technology modernization at shop floors and at industrial clusters

8 SAT Methodology Screening Public Information / Consultation Define targets Issues to be addressed / Problems to be solved Strategic Level Assessment Preferred Technology Options Operational Level Assessment Detailed engineering design & costing Monitoring / Performance Evaluation Scoping Detailed Assessment Customized Criteria and Indicators considering environmental, social and economic considerations Implementation Situational Analysis Anticipating Future Scenarios

9 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre Examples of problems related to healthcare waste management Lack of healthcare waste management has resulted in public health problems in the community as people are exposed to needles and contaminated waste Improper healthcare waste management practices pose a risk to the health and safety of health workers, waste collectors and patients in the health facility Poor healthcare waste treatment methods have created a serious environmental problem in the local community causing resentment among neighbors affected by foul odors, smoke, air pollutants, contaminated water, or toxic ash from the health facility Inadequate waste management practices are putting a strain on the solid waste management system and undermine the potential for material recovery and recycling. 9

10 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre10

11 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre11 SAT Methodology – Situation Analysis Situation Analysis and Defining Targets The Situation Analysis includes: Baseline data collection Stakeholder consultation Mapping and analyses These two Steps help to identify issues, assess their significance and leads to setting of targets that should be addressed by proper technology intervention. Situational Analysis Define targets

12 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre12 SAT Methodology – Strategic Level Assessment Strategic level assessment This is done by planners, decision–makers, elected representatives through participatory sessions The outcomes are important as it Helps to develop customized criteria and indicators for operational level from generic level. Facilitates short-listing and identification of suitable options Provides leads to future scenario building (e.g. population growth, tighten legal requirement) there by putting more light on technology choice. Strategic Level Assessment

13 Examples of issues and targets at strategic level ISSUESTARGETS All health facilities in the area do not have a way to treat their infectious waste Implementation of a large-scale central treatment technology to handle infectious waste from all generators in the area; promulgation of policies to require treatment of all infectious waste Long distances and poor roads between districts preclude one central treatment facility for the province Designation of a cluster treatment hub in each district and deployment of technology at each hub Health facilities are remotely located and too far from each other Implementation of a decentralized treatment scheme with a technology appropriately sized for each facility The health facility plans to expand the number of beds, types of services, and its area of coverage in the future Deployment of technology that is modular and can be easily scaled up Strong public opposition to open burning and air pollution Deployment of technology with little or no air emissions Inadequate space in the landfillUse of technology that results in significant volume reduction; expansion of existing recycling infrastructure Lack of information and training in healthcare waste management among health workers Development of training programs as part of facility accreditation and/or professional licensing 13

14 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre14 SAT Methodology – Operational Level Assessment Operational level assessment Engineers and technical staff assess the available technology options In community or enterprise level, operational level assessment can be the first step. The level of expert opinion and technical information is very important. Operational Level Assessment

15 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre15 SAT Methodology - Three -Tier Assessment Screening Scoping Detailed Assessment Customized Criteria and Indicators considering environmental, social and economic considerations

16 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre16 SAT Methodology - Screening In this Step: The short listed systems from Operational level Assessment, undergoes objective YES/NO type answers Options which do not qualify one or more conditions, are eliminated.

17 Operational level assessment - Generic Screening Criteria HeadingCriteriaNotes ComplianceCompliance with local environmental laws The technology must comply with environmental laws of the city, municipality, district and/or province, such as air pollution or landfill regulations. ComplianceCompliance with national environmental laws The technology must comply with national environmental laws, in particular, air pollution, wastewater, and solid waste disposal laws, and healthcare waste or hazardous waste management regulations. Some countries or local governments have banned incineration. Others specify only approved technologies for the treatment of one or more classifications of healthcare waste. ComplianceCompliance with multilateral environmental agreements Many countries are parties to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, and the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal. Both of these Conventions have guidance related to healthcare waste treatment. The technology should be consistent with this guidance and the countrys National Implementation Plans for these treaties. Other requirements Consistency with WHO policies Many countries have adopted the World Health Organizations policy on Safe health-care waste management (2004) Other requirements Meeting the objectives of 3R programs Many local governments promote reduce-reuse-recycling programs. The technology should meet the objectives of these local environmental programs. Other requirements Other basic criterionInclude other basic criterion from the stakeholder consultation workshops. Examples that might be raised during a consultation are: proven technology, good environmental performance, no smoke stack or visible smoke, safe handling of infectious waste, etc.

18 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre18 SAT Methodology - Scoping It is a Comprehensive and Qualitative type (High/Medium/Low) assessment Various technology options are assessed against generic or customized criteria and indicators with use of computational methods such as: –The weighted sum technique –Sensitivity analysis –Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM): By Expert choice, a software using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to carry out MCDM

19 Operational level assessment – General Scoping Criteria A. Technical Suitability CriteriaNotes Preference for locally manufactured technologiesCan the equipment be manufactured locally to reduce cost and support local employment Availability of spare parts and usage of local materialsTo minimize downtime, consumable items and spare parts should be readily available. If there are no locally manufactured technologies, preference could be given to technologies that make use of locally made accessories, consumable items, and spare parts. Availability of local expertiseIt would be essential to have the necessary local expertise for commissioning as well as operation, maintenance and repair of the technology. If local expertise is not available, preference could be given to vendors that are willing to train local operators and technicians to run and maintain the technology. Compatibility with existing technology or management system In some cases, it is possible that the new technology system would build upon some existing system. As such, it is essential that the new system is compatible with the existing infrastructure/ technology systems as well as the organizations management systems.

20 Operational level assessment – General Scoping Criteria B. Environment (Resources and Emissions) CriteriaNotes Air emissions Some technologies, such as steam-based systems, have minimal air emissions while others, such as incinerators, release significant air contaminants that require air pollution abatement. Liquid effluents Liquid effluentssuch as sterile condensate, wastewater with high biological oxygen demand, spent chemical disinfectants, or contaminated effluents from scrubbersare released in varying amounts and impact the environment differently. Solid residues Some residues, such as sterilized plastics, have lower health/safety and environmental risks, compared to other residues, such as unshredded needles or incinerator ash. Volume reduction Higher reduction in volume could mean lower transportation and disposal costs and lower impact on landfill space. NoiseHammer mills and some shredders may generate unacceptable levels of noise especially if the treatment plant is adjacent to the community.

21 Operational level assessment – General Scoping Criteria C. Economic/financial aspects CriteriaNotes Capital cost of the treatment technology The capital costs should include shipment, customs, installation, start-up, testing, and commissioning costs could vary widely for different technologies. Particularly in developing countries, the capital cost could be an important consideration. Capital costs of all accessories and related equipmentThe capital costs of all necessary accessories and related equipment should also be considered. These accessories could include containers, bins, trolleys, weighing scales, conveyors, bin loaders and other waste handling equipment, transport vehicles, boilers, computer controls, shredders, compactors, skips or dumpsters, water treatment systems, air pollution control systems, wastewater treatment systems, etc. Operation and maintenance costsThe main operating costs are labor, fuel (diesel, gas, etc.), electricity, water, consumables (personal protection equipment, disposable boxes and bags, labels, cleaning supplies, etc.), sewage, and landfill disposal costs, as well as preventive maintenance and repair costs including replacement parts. Installation requirementsIf installation costs are not included in the capital cost of the technology, they should be estimated based on vendor information, technology fact sheets and expert opinions. Installation includes site preparation, foundation, construction or renovation of the space where the treatment technology will be located

22 Operational level assessment – General Scoping Criteria D. Social/cultural aspects CriteriaNotes Community acceptance of the technologySome technologies are easier to understand than others. For example, where pressure cookers and microwave ovens are common, communities are able to accept autoclave and microwave technologies more readily. Hospital personnel are generally already familiar with autoclaves and incinerators. However, many communities may be opposed to the siting of incinerators in their neighborhoods. Income generation potentialJob potential may be an important consideration in the community. The job potential can be assessed primarily by referring to vendor information, technology fact sheets and expert opinions. Acceptability of treatment residuesThe acceptability of residues may depend on religious or cultural norms. Some communities may require that all healthcare waste be rendered unrecognizable. Others may require the burial of body parts and may not accept the burning, sterilizing or chemical decomposition of anatomical waste. Extent of necessary resettlement of peopleTechnology systems that use a lot of space or that should be sited far away from populations may mean the relocation of people. There may be other important social equity issues related to this criterion. Visible or aesthetic impactMany communities are opposed to the sight of flue gas stacks and visible smoke.

23 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre23

24 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre24 SAT Methodology - Detailed Assessment The options with best overall ratings from Scoping are selected for detailed assessment The Assessment level is situation specific and requires detailed and quantitative information. The outcome is a list of technology options ranked as per their scores

25 Process stability 805.5, 922.5, 1008 Level of automation Estimated useful life Fuel consumption Electricity consumption Savings in energy Capital investment O & M costs Financial incentives Payback period NPV / IRR Secondary contaminant generation PPE requirement for staff Safety risk for workers and communities Noise levels Odour levels Person-power requirements Technical knowledge requirements Technology 1 Technology 2 Technology 3 Composite Star Diagram for Detailed Assessment

26 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre26 SAT Methodology - Anticipating Future Scenario In order to check the robustness of selected technology options, same methodology with simulated future scenarios to be applied so at to confirm that the technology stands the test of time.

27 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre27 SAT Methodology - Preferred Technology Options Before discarding low scoring options and/or final decision on selection of technology one must keep in mind Highest score technology option for current scenario needs to be carefully reviewed for different scenarios as it may not be equally eligible as feasible option in other scenarios On the other hand, the technology options with less score may qualify for different scenarios with suitable technology transfer/capacity building efforts.

28 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre28 SAT Methodology - Implementation and Monitoring Once the decision on Suitable Option is made, this step covers the following: Engineering design Tendering Actual construction and commissioning Evaluation of technology during operational phase ensures meeting of desired objective against criteria considered in SAT process

29 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre29 SAT Methodology – Reporting, Monitoring and Feedback Reporting the outcome of monitoring and evaluation to stakeholders, govt. agencies and decision makers acts as basis for situation analysis for future projects and helps in making informed decisions It helps refine and build the Methodology by - –Inclusion of additional criteria –Disqualification of technology in future for similar situations due to negative experiences.

30 UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre30 THANK YOU For further information:

Download ppt "UNEP Making Right Choices: A Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Technology (SAT) Surya Prakash CHANDAK Senior Programme Officer United Nations."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google