Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

An alternative way of looking at research performance, based on citation patterns (co-citation analysis) rather than traditional journal classifications.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "An alternative way of looking at research performance, based on citation patterns (co-citation analysis) rather than traditional journal classifications."— Presentation transcript:

1 An alternative way of looking at research performance, based on citation patterns (co-citation analysis) rather than traditional journal classifications. Publication data for presentation provided by SciVal Spotlight ™ database, Elsevier B.V., http://www.spotlight.scival.com (downloaded November 2012).http://www.spotlight.scival.com SciVal Spotlight

2 WSU’s Office of Research response to: Weak U.S. economy End of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act WSU’s Office of Research need to analyze our distinctive and emerging strengths to help determine resource allocations Why SciVal?

3 WSU’s strongest Subject Areas How interdisciplinary (or not) WSU is, and how we compare to our peers Who are our publication and citation leaders? How do we compare with our peers? Who we are/should be collaborating with Spotlight Analysis Helps Analyze…

4 Spotlight mines data from the Elsevier Scopus Database The worlds largest abstract and citation database of peer reviewed literature and quality web sources Based on co-citation impact So how does Spotlight mine and classify data? Co-Citation Analysis and “Article Clusters” Scopus Database

5 The Scopus database now collects over 19,500 Journals Including over 3,500 Arts and Humanities Journals 2,148 Journals from Elsevier in Scopus Totaling over 47 million records 70% with Abstracts Also includes many conference proceedings, websites and reports Figures

6 Distinctive Competencies Distinctive if the market share - number of papers in a field of research - is large enough (roughly around or more than 285 papers) AND meets at least one of the following: Publication Leadership Reference Leadership State of the Art Leadership Emerging Competencies Either strong in an emerging market OR Institution has potential as a leader in the area Competencies Defined

7 Circle View Circular display of Competencies Matrix View Grid display of Competencies Explore Competencies

8 WSU Stats Total R&D Expenditures 304,352,000 Ttl R&D Exp./T-TT Faculty 343,901 : 1 Fed R&D Expenditures 113,452,000 Fed R&D Exp/T-TT Facl. 128,194 : 1 Natl. Acad. Members 9 Significant Faculty Awds. 11 Doctorates Awarded 177 Doctorates/T-TT Faculty 0.20 : 1 Postdoc Appointees161 Postdocs/T-TT Faculty 0.18 : 1 Undergrads/T-TT Faculty 27.9 : 1 Tenure & TT Faculty885 Articles/T-TT Faculty 2.2 : 1 Competencies/T-TT Faculty 1 : 7.7 WSU Circle View Comparison 2008 2011 110 Competencies 115 Competencies

9 WSU Stats Total R&D Expenditures 304,352,000 Ttl R&D Exp./T-TT Faculty 343,901 : 1 Fed R&D Expenditures 113,452,000 Fed R&D Exp/T-TT Facl. 128,194 : 1 Natl. Acad. Members 9 Significant Faculty Awds. 11 Doctorates Awarded 177 Doctorates/T-TT Faculty 0.20 : 1 Postdoc Appointees161 Postdocs/T-TT Faculty 0.18 : 1 Undergrads/T-TT Faculty 27.9 : 1 Tenure & TT Faculty885 Articles/T-TT Faculty 2.2 : 1 Competencies/T-TT Faculty 1 : 7.7 WSU Competency Breakdown Areas: 1.CAHNRS – 18 PI’s 2.Engineering and Architecture – 15 PI’s 3.Arts and Sciences – 6 PI’s 4.Veterinary Medicine – 5 PI’s 5.Education – 3 PI’s 6.Health Sciences – 2 PI’s 6. Business – 2 PI’s Departments: 1.Mechanical & Materials Engineering – 10 PI’s 2.Biological Systems Engineering – 4 PI’s 2. Plant Pathology – 4 PI’s 4.Food Science – 3 PI’s 4. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science – 3 PI’s PI Counts inside WSU’s Top 25 Competencies:

10 Total R&D Expenditures 304,352,000250,120,000 548,980,000515,133,000689,624,000 Ttl R&D Exp./T-TT Faculty 343,901 : 1227,589 : 1 328,533 : 1308,648 : 1393,172 : 1 Fed R&D Expenditures 113,452,000109,461,000 232,564,000303,852,000288,173,000 Fed R&D Exp/T-TT Facl. 128,194 : 199,601 : 1 139,176 : 1182,056 : 1164,294 : 1 Natl. Acad. Members 99 245922 Significant Faculty Awds. 1110 133517 Doctorates Awarded 177301 618763578 Doctorates/T-TT Faculty 0.20 : 10.30 : 1 0.37 : 10.46 : 10.33 : 1 Postdoc Appointees161246 334506324 Postdocs/T-TT Faculty 0.18 : 10.22 : 1 0.20 : 10.30 : 10.18 : 1 Undergrads/T-TT Faculty 27.9 : 122.9 : 1 20.5 : 119.6 : 123.0 : 1 Tenure & TT Faculty8851,099 1,6711,6691,754 Scopus Articles /T- TT Faculty 2.2 : 12.6 : 1 2.9 : 13.7 : 13.4 : 1 Competencies/T-TT Faculty 1 : 7.71 : 8.8 1 : 7.31 : 7.9 WSU Aspirational Peers

11 WSU Legislative/GCS Peers Total R&D Expenditures 304,352,000398,169,000679,915,000 302,896,000 Ttl R&D Exp./T-TT Faculty 343,901 : 1313,766 : 1497,741 : 1 317,168 : 1 Fed R&D Expenditures 113,452,000162,566,000332,325,000 211,297,000 Fed R&D Exp/T-TT Facl. 128,194 : 1128,105 : 1243,283 : 1 221,253 : 1 Natl. Acad. Members 91336 5 Significant Faculty Awds. 11 19 7 Doctorates Awarded 177403480 203 Doctorates/T-TT Faculty 0.20 : 10.32 : 1 0.35 : 10.21 : 1 Postdoc Appointees 161215692 227 Postdocs/T-TT Faculty 0.18 : 10.17 : 1 0.50 : 10.24 : 1 Undergrads/T-TT Faculty 27.9 : 119.5 : 119.6 : 1 26.2 : 1 Tenure & TT Faculty 8851,2691,366 955 Scopus Articles /T- TT Faculty 2.2 : 12.5 : 14.3 : 1 2.2 : 1 Competencies/T- TT Faculty 1 : 7.71 : 8.81 : 6.6 1 : 10.3

12 WSU Other Notable Peers Total R&D Expenditures 304,352,000 1,022,740,000329,345,000 238,500,000 Ttl R&D Exp./T-TT Faculty 343,901 : 1 755,905 : 1199,603 : 1 201,266 : 1 Fed R&D Expenditures 113,452,000 829,885,000172,202,000 116,965,000 Fed R&D Exp/T-TT Facl. 128,194 : 1 613,366 : 1104,368 : 1 98,705 : 1 Natl. Acad. Members 9 10220 7 Significant Faculty Awds. 11 409 7 Doctorates Awarded 177 703490 322 Doctorates/T-TT Faculty 0.20 : 1 0.52 : 10.30 : 1 0.27 : 1 Postdoc Appointees 161 1,024202 178 Postdocs/T-TT Faculty 0.18 : 1 0.76 : 10.12 : 1 0.15 : 1 Undergrads/T-TT Faculty 27.9 : 1 26.1 : 138.2 : 1 22.5 : 1 Tenure & TT Faculty 885 1,3531,650 1,185 Scopus Articles /T- TT Faculty 2.2 : 1 6.5 : 12.1 : 1 1.8 : 1 Competencies/T- TT Faculty 1 : 7.7 1 : 4.71 : 9.6 1 : 8.4

13 WSU Matrix View Comparison 2008 2011 110 Competencies 115 Competencies

14 Aspirational Peers

15 Legislative/GCS Peers

16 Other Notable Peers

17 Explore Collaboration Mapping tool showing where, and with whom, WSU is collaborating on publications world-wide Two views: Explore Collaboration Map View – Visual demonstration Explore Collaboration Table View – Listing and count of collaborations

18 Explore Collaboration – Map View

19 Explore Collaboration – Table View –Who WSU IS collaborating with

20 Explore Collaboration – Table View –Who WSU IS NOT collaborating with in our Competencies

21 Collaboration Comparison – A 5 Year Look Tenure & TT Faculty 885 1,353 1,650 1,099 1,671 1,366 955 Total Articles in SciVal Spotlight 2007-2011 8,805 41,974 16,619 13,60622,28628,41110,086 Spotlight Articles/T-TT Faculty 2007-2011 9.9 : 1 31.0 : 1 10.1 : 1 12.4 : 113.3 : 120.8 : 110.6 : 1 Total Citations 2007-2011 50,463 436,195 106,984 87,743133,435228,93164,824 Total Citations/T- TT Faculty 2007- 2011 57.0 : 1 322.4 : 1 64.8 : 1 79.8 : 179.9 : 1167.6 : 167.9 : 1 Articles with a U.S. Collaborator 49.0% 57.8% 46.0% 46.2%45.8%50.4%53.5% Articles with an International Collaborator 26.7% 29.1% 25.7% 31.0%27.4%33.8%28.9% Articles with NO Collaborator 31.2% 30.2% 38.9% 36.9%39.5%31.6%32.0% Notable Notable Aspirational Aspirational Legislative/GCS Legislative/GCS

22 World Rankings Publication and citation data help determine our world-wide University rankings and prestige Academic Ranking of World Universities (Shanghai University Rankings) – 70%. WSU ranked “201-300” worldwide, “90-111” in the United States. Higher Education and Evaluation Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT) – 100%. WSU ranked 294. The Times Higher Education World University Rankings – 38.5%. WSU ranked “301-350”. Research survey and research income combine for another 26.5% QS World University Rankings – 20%. WSU ranked 356. The Center for Measuring University Performance – Arizona State – U.S. ranking site. Pubs N/A.


Download ppt "An alternative way of looking at research performance, based on citation patterns (co-citation analysis) rather than traditional journal classifications."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google