8The process for development of partner reporting tools General call for reporting toolsAnalysis of existing toolsGaps identification and filling in the gapsDevelopment of 4W and other IM tools (based on existing tools)Review by country clusters and incorporating feedbackGuidance developmentField test and incorporating feedbackRoll out
9Gaps identified in countries’ templates Omitted areas of interventionNumber of beneficiaries not always specifiedCross-cutting issues are not addressed (except sometimes gender)Standard indicators are not usedNo standard indicators at global levelMainly only quantity (not quality) of programs monitored
10Properties of the new reporting templates User-friendly (familiar, easy to fill in)Easily adaptable at country levelCan be adapted for L3 as well as for smaller or longer term complex emergenciesPartners want to fill a template in (can be adapted for intra-agency reporting, useful for partners)Provide all necessary for CC information, but not more than neededAddress cross-cutting issues (gender, age, HIV)Number of beneficiaries always specifiedBoth programme and results orientedGive some monitoring of quality of programsScreening: not only screening, but also referrals
11How to adapt to country context Indicators should be linked to strategic objectives of a cluster / sectorNumber of indicators should be minimised to focus on priority areas
12Proposed GNC IM tools 3-4-5Ws reporting template Monthly / weekly reporting templateSurvey reporting templateGuidance note for adaptation at country level
13Feedback received Somalia South Sudan Bangladesh Ethiopia Kenya MauritaniaNepalPakistanThank you!
14Feedback follow up Comments were incorporated If comments were not incorporated a justification was sent to a requesting countrySome comments needs further discussion (today)
15Comments for discussion: ALL TEMPLATES Longitude and latitude vs p-codesStatus of the project:Planned, ongoing, temporary closed, permanently closedProposed/ unfunded; Ongoing; Completed; Fund is released/ secured; SuspendedScheduled, ongoing, completed, suspended
16Comments for discussion: 3-4-5 Ws Beneficiaries: targeted vs reached“Does the partner have a capacity/intention to conduct a survey (yes/no) or to build capacity of staff (yes/no) in this location?”Better to disaggregate beneficiaries more e.g. PLW, AdolescentFor CMAM site – to add if the site isFixed/static or mobile/outreachOther (ex. government/NGO)?
17Comments for discussion: REPORTING TEMPLATE Screening vs BSFP screeningCMAM sheet - Include an indicator for #children under two/caregivers screened for IYCF practices to encourage IYCF screening for all caretakers coming into the CMAM siteCMAM sheet – to disaggregate “other admissions” into their separate components and have another indicator for children relapsedIFE: Better not to mention BMS distribution, it may promote BMS distributionBMS Code monitoring – do we need it and how?
18Comments for discussion: SURVEY TEMPLATE Include column on interpretation of results or even comparison with previous survey or threshold (SMART only?)Nutrition surveys: also include MUAC <12.5 cm, MUAC <11.5 cm
19Next steps Incorporate comments from today’s discussion Field test / new commentsRoll out