1. TsunamiReady Open Forum Tyree Wilde Warning Coordination Meteorologist Portland, OR NTHMP Coordination Committee Meeting Portland, OR – June 16, 2008 Jenifer Rhoades NOAA Tsunami Program Coordinator Silver Springs, MD

2. Overview Overview of NTHMP Coordination Committee Background on TsunamiReady (TR) Program Strengthen the TR Program Update on topics from Tsunami Summits –San Diego, CA (2007) –Ocean Shores, WA (2008) Open Discussion on key issues

3. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program Mission: Provide scientifically accurate assessments of tsunami hazard, mitigation the threat through public outreach, planning and education, and lend guidance to optimize the real-time warnings to communities on all U.S. Coastlines Membership: –NOAA, USGS, FEMA, NSF –28 Coastal States, Territories and Commonwealths

4. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program Program Components: Inundation models –Improve inundation mapping –Assess vulnerable coastal/nearshore areas Promote and improve community outreach and education networks Integrate tsunami preparedness and mitigation programs Promote the adoption of tsunami warning and mitigation measures

5. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program Three Sub-Committees –Warning Guidance –Mapping and Modeling –Mitigation and Preparedness Coordinating Committee -Serves as “Steering Committee” for NTHMP body oRecommend how funds appropriated for the program will be allocated oProvide recommendations to NWS how to improve TsunamiReady Program –Chair; representatives from each Federal Agency & member states –Meetings of the Coordination Committee concerning funding are open to committee members only

6. TsunamiReady Fund Distribution NOAA distributes funds to state members via Grants process –Apply via www.grants.gov Annual request for member proposals –Communities must submit request thru their state –States should include local initiatives in their requests Proposal submission Annual meeting to review past year performance and new proposals –NTHMP Coordinating Committee presents recommendation to NOAA on how to distribute funds during each fiscal year

7. NTHMP Funding Plan FY08 – FY12 ($K) Fund SourceFY08FY09FY10FY11FY12 NOAA Base$2,377 Spectrum$1,200$4,300$4,600$5,100$5,400 Total$3,577$6,677$6,977$7,477$7,777 Note 1: FY08 only $896,020.00 will be funded through grants; and a transfer to USGS; Remaining $303,980 to be discussed at NTHMP CC Meeting. Note 2: This represents NTHMP Funding only; NTHMP is a portion of NOAA’s Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program Note 3: Total Tsunami Ready Funding, including Spectrum, expected to be $1,650K in FY09

8. Tsunami Ready

9. TsunamiReady Background TsunamiReady Program established in 2001 –Extrapolation of StormReady Program Established in 1999 in Oklahoma Program to help communities prepare for severe weather 57 TsunamiReady communities to date –Ocean Shores first TR community in US Followed by Long Beach, WA –Cannon Beach first TR community in OR Long Beach, WA Cannon Beach, OR

10. TsunamiReady Background Main components Multiple ways to Receive and Disseminate Warnings Multiple ways to Receive and Disseminate Warnings Monitor Weather and Water Conditions Education And Outreach Education And Outreach Tsunami And Hazardous Weather Plan Tsunami And Hazardous Weather Plan 24 hour Warning PointEmergency Ops Center

11. Sumatra event (December 2004) June 14, 2005 Tsunami Warning, West Coast of U.S. GAO Report on U.S. Tsunami Preparedness, June 2006 Tsunami Warning and Education Act, Public Law 109-424, December 2006 TSUNAMIS: IS THE U.S. PREPARED? HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JANUARY 26, 2005 Strengthening TsunamiReady Program

12. Sumatra event (December 2004) –Led to expansion of NOAA’s Tsunami Program to the Atlantic and Caribbean Challenge: communities hurricane prepared; must also be prepared for a tsunami –Need for state of the art tsunami inundation modeling Inundation / evacuation maps are not available for much of the U.S. –Staffing at NOAA’s Tsunami Warning Centers to conduct 24/7 operations

13. Strengthening TsunamiReady Program June 15, 2005 Tsunami Warning for the West Coast of the U.S. –Several things went well that evening Message received and acted upon Several communities successfully evacuated citizens –Some things didn’t go well Uncovered some weaknesses –Communication failures –Mis-interpretation of messages (media, some communities) –Everyone from the nation’s capitol to individuals living in local beach communities (and all points between) learned something that evening

14. Strengthening TsunamiReady Program GAO Report on US Tsunami Preparedness: June, 2006 –It is too limited in scope—emphasizing warning infrastructure, but not requiring specific evacuation and mitigation plans –More focus on education –“…the name TsunamiReady promotes a false sense of perception of readiness, since preparedness is a continuous process.”

15. Strengthening TsunamiReady Program Tsunami Warning and Education Act, Public Law 109-424, December 2006 NTHMP provides recommendations to the NWS on how to improve the TsunamiReady Program –Particularly on ways to make communities more Tsunami Resilient through use of inundation maps and other mitigation practices You’re input is valuable to this committee!

16. Recap of Tsunami Summits San Diego, CA Ocean Shores, WA

17. TsunamiReady Summit – San Diego San Diego, CA (Aug, 2007) –Evolve the TsunamiReady recognition guidelines Promote tsunami resilience rather than minimal readiness Identify and use local communities ‘best practices” for community preparedness –Enhance partnerships with other agencies (media, local, state, federal, tribal, non-profit, public, etc) –Discussion of a point based system that rewards or provides incentive for communities to keep improving their preparedness activities beyond their initial recognition

18. Tsunami Summit – Ocean Shores Ocean Shores, WA (Apr 2008) – Strong desire to adopt a name change for the program “The TsunamiReady name by nature leads to a false sense of preparedness…” –Especially in the eyes of local community members –It’s an on-going process that is never really complete TsunamiAware, TsunamiResilent were some ideas tossed around

19. Tsunami Summit – Ocean Shores Ocean Shores, WA (Apr 2008) –Enhance guidelines Currently centered around Preparedness and Response Program should be centered around –Mitigation –Preparedness –Response –Recovery –Strengthening process underway Need to integrate mitigation, recovery phases

20. Discussion Topics Name Change Expand / Enhance Recognition Guidelines Other issues of concern

21. Open Discussion Topics Name Change –Detective work by NWS staffers revealed Some costs involved (manpower and $$) No legal constraints Strategic concerns No show stoppers –Your input/feedback extremely valuable –Ideas ??

22. Discussion Topics Enhance / Expand Recognition Guidelines –Mitigation –Preparedness –Response –Recovery Other ideas

23. Conclusion Thank you! Your input is valuable and will help steer the program for tomorrow