Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

APNOMS Special Session Questionnaire Summary Special Session I number of collection 32 meet interest Usefulness Average 3.78 3.63 most useful Martin Creaner.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "APNOMS Special Session Questionnaire Summary Special Session I number of collection 32 meet interest Usefulness Average 3.78 3.63 most useful Martin Creaner."— Presentation transcript:

1 APNOMS Special Session Questionnaire Summary Special Session I number of collection 32 meet interest Usefulness Average most useful Martin Creaner 13 topic 10, experience 3, idea 3, practice 1,technology 1 Nobuo Fujii 11 topic 8,idea 2, experience 1, practice 1 Teerapat S. 3 topic 2, idea 1 Alexander Kostin 0 most understandable Martin Creaner 18 talking 13, speaker's expertise 5, material 5, experience 1 Nobuo Fujii 8 speaker's expertise 5, talking 2, mateiral 1 Teerapat S. 1 your expertise 1 Alexander Kostin 0

2 APNOMS Special Session Questionnaire Summary Special Session II number of collection 21 meet interest Usefulness Average most useful Dousik Yun 6 practice 3, topic 1, idea 1,technology 1 Hiroyuki Okazaki 6 topic 5, practice 1 Yougseok Park 3 topic 2 Hideyuki Shinonaga 2 topic 1, technology 1 (martin creaner) 2 topic 2 Si-Hong Lee 0 most understandable Hiroyuki Okazaki 8 talking 4, speaker's expertise 3, material 2 DongSik Yun 5 material 2, talking 1, speaker's expertise 1, your expertise 1 Hirdeyuki Shinonaga 2 talking 2 Yongseok Park 2 talking 2 (martin creaner) 1 talking 1 Si-Hong Lee 0

3 Expected Topics in future APNOMS (Session 1 and 2) next generation (future) network management 2 Modeling (business, Information, business process) 3 Technology(management platform, SOAP,XML,Web service) 4 Real case study of commercial system 2 QoS(SLA,SQM,e2e) 4 Trend reporting; (3G/4G business, ubiquitous network, wireless network mgmt,TMN) 4 Standard (IETF,OIF related OAM, NGOSS) 2 Protection/Restoration in MPLS or Optical 1

4 Evaluation form might be better to modify most useful, second useful, (medium useful), etc. to be able to hear the other presenters usefulness! APNOMS objective is to collect many presenter from around AP. It s not fit to do such kind of ranking question. We need to take a little bit care of presenters quality in addition to the content. The procedure of session chair should be defined more detail. ( I missed to count the number of attendee, there was no questionnaire prepared before session start) I was not sure if I take care of presentation files.


Download ppt "APNOMS Special Session Questionnaire Summary Special Session I number of collection 32 meet interest Usefulness Average 3.78 3.63 most useful Martin Creaner."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google