Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Is there a usage gap? The effects of online access to journals on the usage of print- based collections.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Is there a usage gap? The effects of online access to journals on the usage of print- based collections."— Presentation transcript:

1 Is there a usage gap? The effects of online access to journals on the usage of print- based collections

2 Introduction Karen R. Harker, MLS UT Southwestern Medical Center Library Large academic medical library (basic information)basic information

3

4 Print-Only Journals 942 journals still not available online 75% (approx.) – no full-text content available 25% (approx.) – full-text is available How has usage of these journals been affected by online availability of other journals?

5 Book Circulations

6 Photocopy use

7 Least-Effort Principle Zipf, 1949: ease of access ranks high in source selection Research in 1960s supported principle Continues today The relevant literature overwhelmingly favors accessibility as the single important (variable) determinant of use. Pinelli, et al Hertzum, Morten. The importance of trust in software engineers assessment and choice of information soruces. Information and Organization, vol. 12(1):1-18.

8 Methodology Two groups of journals examined: Print-only (PO): titles not available online Print and Electronic (PE): titles available in both electronic and print formats Measurements taken: Journal Usage Survey: local use of print journals Impact Factors: global use affected by citations

9 Journal Usage Survey Measures print usage All loose issues and bound volumes are scanned into ILS system prior to being re- shelved. In use since 1995.

10 Expected:Found: total use decrease steadily decreased, then increased difference increase decreased, then increased

11 Impact Factor Measure citation rates of journals: # of citations in 2000 to articles published in 1998 and 1999 # of articles published in Controversial Accepted objective standard of the importance of a journal in science

12 Impact Factors as measurements of usage Assumption: most, if not all, articles cited have been read by the author. Local usage vs. impact factor – not closely related Impact Factors vary year-to-year.

13 Expected:Found: Increase in area of difference Increase was not significant

14 Conclusions It is too early to tell. Variations or trends? Need more in-depth statistical analysis Need more time Need cleaner data

15 Future Studies Usage of electronic versus print formats Who? Why? When? How? Where? Measurements of electronic usage Impact Factors as a measure of global usage

16 Contact Karen R. Harker, MLS cfdocs/library/presentations/ mlapaper2002.ppt cfdocs/library/presentations/ mlapaper2002.ppt


Download ppt "Is there a usage gap? The effects of online access to journals on the usage of print- based collections."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google