Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Contaminated Food – How to Evaluate Risk Liability Claims Subcommittee Meeting Washington DC September 17, 2009.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Contaminated Food – How to Evaluate Risk Liability Claims Subcommittee Meeting Washington DC September 17, 2009."— Presentation transcript:

1 Contaminated Food – How to Evaluate Risk Liability Claims Subcommittee Meeting Washington DC September 17, 2009

2 Real Events Happening Daily to Real People  76 million cases of foodborne illness annually  325,000 hospitalizations  5,000 deaths  Medical costs, productivity losses, costs of premature death costs $6.9 billion dollars a year  May be as high as $137 billion dollars a year

3 And It is Happening Today  The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) issued a press release announcing an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7.  The CDC eventually revealed that 80 people in 33 states have been sickened, and that epidemiological evidence was strong that the vehicle was Nestle Toll House uncooked cookie dough

4 Marler Clark, LLP PS  Since 1993 Marler Clark has represented thousands of legitimate food illness victims in every State.  Only a fraction of the victims who contact our office end up being represented.  Who do we turn away?  Why?

5 The Chaff Just like Insurers we need to quickly and reliably recognize unsupportable claims How Do We Do It?

6 Basic Tools of the Trade  Symptoms  Incubation  Duration  Food History  Medical Attention  Suspected source  Others Ill Health Department Involvement

7 Matching Symptoms with Specific Characteristics of Pathogens  E. coli O157:H7  Hepatitis A  Salmonella  Shigella  Campylobacter  Vibrio

8 Matching Incubation Periods Incubation Periods Of Common Pathogens PATHOGENINCUBATION PERIOD Staphylococcus aureus 1 to 8 hours, typically 2 to 4 hours. Campylobacter 2 to 7 days, typically 3 to 5 days. E. coli O157:H7 1 to 10 days, typically 2 to 5 days. Salmonella 6 to 72 hours, typically 18-36 hours. Shigella 12 hours to 7 days, typically 1-3 days. Hepatitis A15 to 50 days, typically 25-30 days. Listeria 3 to 70 days, typically 21 days. Norovirus24 to 72 hours, typically 36 hours.

9 Epidemiologic Assessment  Time  Place  Person association  Part of a recognized outbreak?

10 Medical Attention  Health care provider  Emergency Room  Hospitalization

11 FOIA/Public Records Request

12

13 Communicable Disease Investigation  Reportable Disease Case Report Form  Enteric/viral laboratory testing results –Human specimens –Environmental specimens

14 Molecular Testing Results  PFGE/MLVA  PulseNet

15 Traceback Records POS A POS B POS C POS D FIRM A FIRM B FIRM C FIRM D FIRM E FIRM G FIRM H FIRM F FIRM I FIRM J FIRM K FIRM L FIRM M FIRM N FIRM O GROWER A GROWER B GROWER B GROWER D GROWER C Firm Name Firms A,C,D,G, H,I,L,M,N Growers A&C Firms B,E,F,J,K Firm O, Grower D Grower B No. of outbreaks Assoc. with firm/ Total no. of outbreaks 1/4 2/4 3/4 4/4

16 The Legal Arsenal  Interrogatories  Requests for production  Requests for inspection  Request for admission  Third-party subpoenas  Depositions  Motions to compel

17 Litigation At Work – A Bit(e) of History Jack in the Box - 1993 Odwalla - 1996

18

19

20 The Plaintiff

21

22 A Real Life Example Benton Franklin Health District OCTOBER 1998  Call from Kennewick General Hospital infection control nurse

23 Finley Schools  Finley School District –K-5 –Middle School –High School  Rural area –Water supply –Irrigation water –Septic system –Buses

24 Epidemiologic Investigation  Classroom schedules  Bus schedules  Lunch schedules  Recess schedules  Case-Control Study  Cohort Study of Staff  Cohort Study of Meals Purchased

25 Environmental Investigation  Playground Equipment –Puddles –Topography –Animals  Water system  Sewage system

26 Results  8 confirmed cases of E. coli O157:H7  3 probable cases  1 secondary case  8 PFGE matches

27 Results  Ill students in grades K-5  All but one ill child ate a taco meal  No other common exposures detected  No ill staff members

28 Results  Food handling errors were noted in the kitchen  There was evidence of undercooked taco meat  No pathogen found in food samples

29 The Lawsuit  Eleven minor plaintiffs: 10 primary cases, 1 secondary case  Parents also party to the lawsuit, individually and as guardians ad litem  Two defendants: Finley School District and Northern States Beef  Mediation offer $500,000 – “last and final”

30 The Basic Allegations  Students at Finley Elementary School were infected with E. coli O157:H7 as a result of eating contaminated taco meat  The E. coli O157:H7 was present in the taco meat because it was undercooked  The resulting outbreak seriously injured the plaintiffs, almost killing one of them

31 At Trial: The Plaintiff’s Case  The State and the BFHD conducted a fair and thorough investigation  Final report issued by the WDOH concluded the taco meat was the most likely cause of the outbreak  The conclusion reached as a result of the investigation was the correct one

32 More of The Plaintiff’s Case  There were serious deficiencies in the District’s foodservice operation  There were reasons to doubt the District’s explanation of how the taco meat was prepared  The law only requires a 51% probability to prove the outbreak’s cause-in-fact

33 The School District’s Defense  The taco meat was safe to eat because: –We love children –We are always careful to cook it a lot

34 More of the School District’s Defense We’ve never poisoned anyone before The health departments botched the investigation and jumped to a hasty conclusion Something else caused the outbreak

35 What Will a Jury Think? A Jury=12 Consumers

36 What Did This Jury Think?  The investigation was fair and thorough  More probably than not, undercooked taco meat caused the children to become ill  The School District was ultimately responsible for ensuring the safety of the food it sold to its students

37 In The End  After a six week trial, plaintiffs were awarded $4,750,000  The District appealed the verdict on grounds that product liability law did not apply  September 2003 the WA State Supreme Court dismissed the District’s case  Final award - $6,068,612.85

38 QUESTIONS?


Download ppt "Contaminated Food – How to Evaluate Risk Liability Claims Subcommittee Meeting Washington DC September 17, 2009."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google