Presentation on theme: "Valuation of Water Resources Glenn-Marie Lange Center for Economy, Environment and Society The Earth Institute at Columbia University."— Presentation transcript:
Valuation of Water Resources Glenn-Marie Lange Center for Economy, Environment and Society The Earth Institute at Columbia University
Water Policy: Treat water as an economic good Dublin Principles and IWRMapproach recommended for MDGs 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg 2003 Third World Water Forum 2006 World Water Development Report Human Development Report 2006 Beyond scarcity: power, poverty and the global water crisis
What do we mean by economic value? A commodity has an economic value when people are willing to pay for it, rather than go without Water is an essential commodity, so the value of a small/basic amount for survival is infinite people would pay any price. This is not useful information for policymakers. But after basic needs are met, people buy water based on its price compared to other goods they might buy. Waters value is the willingness to pay for water It is observed when people make a choice between different products –How much will a household pay for drinking water? –How much will a farmer pay for irrigation water? –How much will a factory pay for clean water?
Why value water? Water as an Economic Good: After basic needs are met, water should be allocated to the highest value uses. Water value provides critical information for decisions about Efficient and equitable allocation of water among competing users, both –within the present generation –between present and future generation Efficient and equitable infrastructure investment in the water sector (how much, where, when) Efficient degree of treatment of wastewater Design of economic instruments: water pricing, property rights, tradable water rights markets, taxes on water depletion and pollution, etc.
Water tariffs and water value SNA values water at price of transaction. Why cant we just use this value? Because the price charged by water suppliersif any often unrelated to value of water, too low Water price often does not even reflect full costs of water supply! Water is not supplied by competitive markets due to natural characteristics –Necessary for human survival –Natural monopoly –Characteristics of public good –Property rights not always well defined for multiple use or sequential use –Bulky commodity (very high transport costs relative to value inhibiting trade)
Water tariffs and water value Some markets for trading water rights are developing –Australia, –California, –Chile but still uncommon, local Price of tradable water rights does not yet provide a reliable indicator of value because markets too thin (too few traders) So we must estimate or impute economic value of water
Can we apply economists techniques for valuing water to the Water Accounts? There are several concerns about using economists non-market valuation techniques 1.Accuracy of water values and cost of valuation 2.Consistency of value concepts with SNA 3.Aggregation: scaling up site-specific values
1. Accuracy of non-market valuation Data requirements are very high, so valuation is costly Value is often uncertain, very sensitive to assumptions Results are often presented as a range of values rather than a point estimate, a single value Values are most reliable for water used as input to –agriculture, –hydroelectric power –other uses where water is a major component of production costs
2. Concepts of value Consistent with the SNA? In principle, SNA measures market values, or sometimes cost of production Water valuation techniques were developed for Cost-Benefit Analysis of projects (not national economy): –CBA often tries to measure of economic welfare (total economic value) not market price –Programming models measure values in an optimizing economy which usually differs from actual economy
3. Aggregation and national water accounts Water values highly site-specific, dependent on local uses, as well as season, water quality and reliability Values are not amenable to benefits transferusing an estimate from one case study for another area Little experience scaling up local values to the national level
Major Imputed Water Valuation Techniques 1. REVEALED PREFERENCE TECHNIQUES (based on observed market values) Residual value Marginal contribution of water to output, measured by subtracting all other costs from revenue Production function approach Marginal contribution measured as the change in output from a unit increase in water input in a given sector Optimization models and programming Marginal contribution measured as the change in sectoral output from reallocation of water across the entire economy Hedonic pricing Price differential paid for land with water resources Opportunity Cost Price differential for alternative (example: replacing hydroelectric power with coal-fired electricity) 2. STATED PREFERENCE (based on surveys of willingness to pay) Contingent Valuation Method Survey of users, especially household water use and recreational services
Methods for Valuing Waters Waste Assimilation Services Waste assimilation services can be valued in 2 ways Pollution damages avoided This approach asks, What would be the cost of damages ( to health, production activities) that would occur if we didnt have this waste assimilation service? Costs of preventing damage Value is measured as the costs of measures to prevent pollution: water treatment technologies, pollution abatement technologies, purchase of alternative goods (bottled water)
Most commonly used water valuation techniques
Residual Value (Value Marginal Product) The easiest & most commonly applied valuation technique where TVP = Total Value of the commodity Produced p i q i = the opportunity costs of non-water inputs to production p w = value of water (its marginal product) q w = the cubic meters of water used in production Non-water inputs include: intermediate inputs,labor, capital costs, land
Challenges to Implementing Residual Value Technique Is the quantity of water measured accurately? Is labor cost accuratehow to value unpaid family labor? Value of landminus water rights Capital costs –Are all capital costs accounted for accurately? –What rate of return to capital should be used? Are there other inputs that have not been included? Do the prices of output & all inputs reflect true economic value, or are they distorted?
Example: Agricultural water use in Namibia (Stampriet area) Farm revenue & costs (in 1999 Namibia $)Data source Gross farm income $ 601,543Output x market prices from survey Inputs of goods and services $ 242,620Inputs x prices from survey Value-added, of which: $ 358,923 Compensation of employees $ 71,964Wages paid + in-kind payments from survey Gross operating surplus, of which: $ 286,959 Imputed value of farmers labour $ 48,000 Imputed based on average salary of hired farm manager Depreciation $ 66,845 Depreciation rates x Farmers estimated cost of capital in survey Cost of working capital $ 17,059Imputed as % of the value of fixed capital Cost of fixed capital including land, 3% -7% $75,739 to $176,724 Based on farmers estimated cost of capital reported in survey Residual value of water $79,316 to -$21,669 Amount of water used (m3)154,869 Farmers best guess; water is not metered Residual value N$/m3$0.51 to -$0.14
Optimization models: Valuing multiple uses of water Residual value and related techniques are good to estimate the value of water in a single use, or several closely related uses To estimate the value of all uses of water in an economy, then modeling is needed –Linear programming –Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) modeling –Econometric modeling But these approaches are better used for evaluating changes in water allocation among users, rather than values in current allocation.
Water Asset Valuation Asset value = Net Present Value of all future benefits (value of water services), the case of 2 uses or When RR is constant for all uses in all years, this formula becomes: Where V = Asset value of water RR = value of water for 2 different uses in a given year, p w x q w r = discount rate
Water Asset Valuation New Zealand & Canada (under development): Water resources with a single use of water: hydropower only Annual water service (hydropower) assumed constant in all future years Valuation method used : –New Zealand: Residual Valuation Method Rent = Net operating surplus – return on fixed capital –Canada: Opportunity Cost, difference between production cost of hydropower & cost of next alternative, thermal/coal power Rent = (C T – C H )QE H Where C T = cost of production per unit of electricity for Thermal power plants C H = cost of production per unit of electricity for hydropower plants QE H = quantity of electricity produced by hydropower plants Asset Value :
Hydropower & Geothermal Power Asset Value in New Zealand
Which Method is Better for Valuing Water for Hydropower? Residual value (New Zealand) Does the price charged for electricity reflect the market value of electricity, or is it regulated? If regulated, the electricity price will not reflect the value of water (rent) and Residual Value Method is not a good technique Opportunity cost (Canada) Based on difference in costs of production, so it is a good technique to estimate value of water even if electricity price is regulated
Can Water Asset Valuation be done in other countries? Yes, but…. Data requirements are considerable : measure of water asset volume & flows over time measure of the annual values of all uses of water over time Water assets in most countries serve multiple purposes : Agriculture –Livestock watering –Irrigation of different crops Hydropower--Drinking water--Fisheries habitat Sink for waste water Will the combination of uses change in future? Will the economic value of each use change?
Approach Water Valuation Cautiously! Value consistent with SNA: include all values but indicate type of value and robustness Accuracy/uncertainty: start with major uses that are easiest to value (agriculture) & indicate range of values Aggregation: implement valuation at local/river basin level Asset value: begin with water bodies with single or few uses that can be easily valued