Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byKimberly Stanley Modified over 5 years ago

1
**Central Unit on User Needs, Integration and Territorial Statistics**

Data integration: an overview on statistical methodologies and applications. Mauro Scanu Istat Central Unit on User Needs, Integration and Territorial Statistics Poznan 20 October 2010

2
**Summary In what sense methods for integration are “statistical”?**

Record linkage: definition, examples, methods, objectives and open problems Statistical matching: definition, examples, methods, objectives and open problems Micro integration processing: definition, examples, methods, objectives and open problems Other statistical integration methods? Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

3
**Methods for integration 1**

Generally speaking, integration of two data sets is understood as a single unit integration: the objective is the detection of those records in the different data sets that belong to the same statistical unit. This action allows the reconstruction of a unique record of data that contains all the unit information collected in the different data sources on that unit. On the contrary: let’s distinguish two different objectives - micro and macro Micro: the objective is the “development” of a complete data set Macro: the objective is the “development” of an aggregate (for example, a contingency table) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

4
**Methods for integration 2**

Further, the methods of integration can be split in automatic and statistical methods The automatic methods take into account a priori rules for the linkage of the data records The statistical methods include a formal estimation or test procedure that should be applied on the available data: this estimation or test procedure can be chosen according to optimality criteria, and are associated with an estimate error. This talk restricts the attention on the (micro and macro) statistical methods of integration Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

5
**Statistical methods Classical inference**

There exists a data generating model 2) The observed sample is an image of the data generating model 3) We estimate the model from the observed sample Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

6
**Statistical methods of integration**

If a method of integration is used, it is necessary to include an intermediate phase. The final data set is a blurred image of the data generating model Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

7
**Statistical methods of integration**

Statistical methods for integration can be organized according to the available input Input Output Metodo Two data sets that observe (partially) overlapping groups of units Micro Record linkage Two independent samples Macro/micro Statistical matching Sets of estimates from different surveys, that are not coherent Macro Calibration methods Graphical methods Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

8
**Record linkage Input: two data sets on overlapping sets of units.**

Problem: lack of a unique and correct record identifier Alternative: sets of variables that (jointly) are able to identify units Attention: variables can have “problems”! Objective: the largest number of correct links, the lowest number of wrong links Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

9
**Book of life Dunn (1946)* describes record linkage in this way:**

…each person in the world creates a book of life. The book starts with the birth and ends with the death. Its pages are made up of all the principal events of life. Record linkage is the name given to the process of assembling the pages of this book into one volume. The person retains the same identity throughout the book. Except for advancing age, he is the same person… *Dunn (1946) "Record Linkage". American Journal of Public Health 36 (12): 1412–1416. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

10
**When there is the lack of a unique identifier**

If a record identifier is missing or cannot be used, it is necessary to use the common variables in the two files. The problem is that these variables can be “unstable”: Time changes (age, address, educational level) Errors in data entry and coding Correct answers but different codification (e.g. address) Missing items Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

11
**Main motivations for record linkage**

According to Fellegi (1997)*, the development of tools for integration is due to the intersection of these facts: occasion: construction of big data bases tool: computer need: new informative needs *Fellegi (1997) “Record Linkage and Public Policy: A Dynamic Evolution”. In Alvey, Jamerson (eds) Record Linkage Techniques, Proceedings of an international workshop and exposition, Arlington (USA) March 1997. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

12
**Why record linkage? Some examples**

To have joint information on two or more variables observed in distinct data sources To “enumerate” a population To substitute (parts of) surveys with archives To create a “list” of a population Other official statistics objectives (imputation and editing / to enhance micro data quality; to study the risk of identification of the released micro data) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

13
**Example 1 – analysis of mortality**

Problem: to analyze jointly the “risk factors” with the event “death”. The risk factors are observed on ad hoc surveys (e.g. those on nutrition habits, work conditions, etc.) The event “death” (after some months the survey is conducted) can be taken from administrative archives These two sources (survey on the risk factors and death archive) should be “fused” so that each unit observed in the risk factor survey can be associated with a new dichotomous variable (equal to 1 if the person is dead and zero otherwise). Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

14
**Example 2 – to enumerate a population**

Problem: what is the number of residents in Italy? Often the number of residents is found in two steps, by means of a procedure known as “capture-recapture”. This method is usually applied to determine the size of animal populations. Population census Post enumeration survey (some months after the census) to evaluate Census quality and give an accurate estimate of the population size USA - in 1990 Post Enumeration Survey, in 2000 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Italy - in 2001 “Indagine di Copertura del Censimento” Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

15
**Example 2 – to enumerate a population**

The result of the comparison between Census and post enumeration survey is a 22 table: Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

16
**Example 2 - to enumerate a population**

For short, for any distinct unit it is necessary to understand if it was observed 1) both in the census and in the PES 2) only in the census 3) only in the PES These three values allow to estimate (with an appropriate model) the fourth value. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

17
**Example 3 – surveys and archives**

Problem: is it possible to use jointly administrative archives and sample surveys? At the micro level this means: to modify the questionnaire of a survey dropping those questions that are already available on some administrative archives (reduction of the response burden) E.g., for enterprises: Social security archives, chambers of commerce, … Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

18
**Example 4 – Creation of a list**

Problem: what is the set of the active enterprises in Italy? In Istat, ASIA (Archivio Statistico delle Imprese Attive) is the most important example of a creation of a list of units (the active enterprises in a time instant) “fusing” different archives. It is necessary to pay attention to: Enterprises which are present in more than one archives (deduplication) Non active enterprises New born enterprises transformations (that can lead to a new enterprise or to a continuation of the previous one) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

19
**Example 5 – Imputation and editing**

Problem: to enhance microdata quality Micro Integration in the Netherlands (virtual census, social statistical data base) It will be seen later, when dealing with micro integration processing Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

20
Example 6 - Privacy Problem: does it exist a “measure” of the degree of identification of the released microdata? In order to evaluate if a method for the protection of data disclosure is good, it is possible to compare two datasets (the true and the protected ones) and detect how many modified records are “easily” linked to the true ones. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

21
Record linkage steps The record linkage techniques are a multidisciplinary set of methods and practices SEARCH SPACE REDUCTION Sorted Neighbourhood Method Blocking Hierarchical Grouping … DECISION MODEL CHOICE Fellegi & Sunter exact Knowledge – based Mixed … ...... RECORD LINKAGE ...... ...... PRE-PROCESSING Conversion of upper/lower cases Replacement of null strings Standardization Parsing … At a little bit more specific look, record linkage can be seen as a complex multi-disciplinary process, composed by several distinct phases: Reminding just the main ones: pre-processing, search space reduction, decision model, comparison function choice; there will be also the linkage error estimation, the linear programming methods, used in one-to-one linkage problems, and others… In addition for each phase, several techniques can be adopted; for instance, in order to reduce the complexity of the comparison stage, different blocking criteria could be implemented (CLIC), or for the decision phase (CLIC), the Fellegi-Sunter decision model can be applied or an alternative rule can be chosen COMPARISON FUNCTION CHOICE Edit distance Smith-Waterman Q-grams Jaro string comparator Soundex code TF-IDF … Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day Tiziana Tuoto, FCSM 2007, Arlington, November

22
Example (Fortini, 2008)* Census is sometimes associated with a post enumeration surveys, in order to detect the actual census coverage. To this purpose, a “capture-recapture” approach is generally considered. It is necessary to find out how many individuals have been observed: in both the census and the PES Only in the census Only in the PES These figures allow to estimate how many individuals have NOT been observed in both the census and the PES * In ESSnet Statistical Methodology Project on Integration of Survey and Administrative Data “Report of WP2. Recommendations on the use of methodologies for the integration of surveys and administrative data”, 2008 Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

23
**Record linkage workflow for Census - PES**

Step 1 Unmatched households Matched households Step 2 Matched households Unmatched households Step 3.a Step 3.b Matched people Unmatched people Unmatched people Unmatched people Matched people Step 4.b Step 4.a Matched people Matched people Step 5 Matched people Unmatched people Unmatched people Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

24
**Problem: Lack of identifiers**

Difference between step 1 and step 2 is that: Step 1 identifies all those households that coincide for all these variables: Name, surname and date of birth of the household head Address Number of male and female components Step 2 uses the same keys, but admits the possibility of differences of the variable states for modifications of errors Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

25
**Probabilistic record linkage**

For every pairs of records from the two data sets, it is necessary to estimate The probability that the differences between what observed on the two records is due to chance, because the two records belong to the same unit The probability that the two records belong to different units These probabilities are compared: this comparison is the basis for the decision whether a pair of records is a match or not Estimate of this probability is the “statistical step” in the probabilistic record linkage method Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

26
**Statistical step Data set A with na units. Data set B with nb units.**

K key variables (they jointly make an identifier) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

27
**Statistical procedure**

The key variables of the two records in a pair (a,b) is compared: yab=f(xAa,xBb) The function f(.) should register how much the key variables observed in the two units are different. For instance, y can be a vector with k components, composed of 0s (inequalities) or 1s (equalities) The final result is a data set of na x nb comparisons Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

28
**Statistical procedure**

The na x nb pairs are split in two sets: M: the pairs that are a match U: the unmatched pairs Likely, the comparisons y will follow this situation: Low levels of diversity for the pairs that are match, (a,b)M High levels of diversity for the pairs that are non-match, (a,b)U For instance: if y=(sum of the equalities for the k key variables), y tends to assume large values for the pairs in M with respect to those in U Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

29
**Statistical procedure**

If y=(sum of the equalities), the distribution of y is a mixture of the distribution of y in M (right) and that in u (left) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

30
**Statistical procedure**

Inclusion of a pair (a,b) in M or U is a missing value (latent variable). Let C denote the status of a pair (C=1 if (a,b) in M; C=0 if (a,b) in U) Likelihood is the product on the na x nb pairs of P(Y=y, C=c) = [p m(y)]c [(1-p) u(y)](1-c) Estimation method: maximum likelihood on a partially observed data set (EM algorithm – Expectation Maximization) Parameters data p: fraction of matches among the na x nb pairs Y: observed m(y): distribution of y in M C: missing (latent) u(y): distribution of y in U Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

31
**Statistical procedure**

A pair is assigned to M or U in the following way 1) For every comparison y assign a “weight”: t(y)=m(y)/u(y) where m and u are estimated; 2) Assign the pairs with a large weight to M and the pairs with a small weight to U. 3) There can be a class of weights t where it is better to avoid definitive decisions (m and u are similar) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

32
**Statistical procedure**

The procedure is the following. Note that, generally, probabilities of mismatching are still not considered Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

33
Open problems Different probabilistic record linkage aspects should still be better investigated. Two of them are related to record linkage quality What model should be considered a1) on the pairs relationship (Copas and Hilton, 1990) a2) on the key variables relationship (Thibaudeau, 1993) b) How probabilities of mismatching can be used for a statistical analysis of a linked data file? (Scheuren and Winkler, 1993, 1997) Copas J.R., Hilton F.J. (1990). “Record linkage: statistical models for matching computer records”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 153, Thibaudeau Y. (1993). “The discrimination power of dependency structures in record linkage”. Survey Methodology, 19, Scheuren F., Winkler W.E. (1993). “Regression analysis of data files that are computer matched”. Survey Methodology, 19, 39-58 Scheuren F., Winkler W.E. (1997). “Regression analysis of data files that are computer matched - part II”. Survey Methodology, 23, Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

34
Statistical matching What kind of integration should be considered if the analysis involves two variables observed in two independent sample surveys? Let A and B be two samples of size nA and nB respectively, drawn from the same population. Some variables X are observed in both samples Variables Y are observed only in A Variables Z are observed only in B. Statistical matching aims at determining information on (X;Y;Z), or at least on the pairs of variables which are not observed jointly (Y;Z) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

35
Statistical matching It is very improbable that the two samples observe the same units, hence record linkage is useless. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

36
**Some statistical matching applications 1**

The objective of the integration of the Time Use Survey (TUS) and of the Labour Force Survey (LFS) is to create at a micro level, a synthetic file of both surveys that allows the study of the relationships between variables measured in each specific survey. By using together the data relative to the specific variables of both surveys, one would be able to analyse the characteristics of employment and the time balances at the same time. Information on labour force units and the organisation of her/his life times will help enhance the analyses of the labour market The analyses of the working condition characteristics that result from the labour force survey will integrate the TUS more general analysis of the quality of life Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

37
**Some statistical matching applications 1**

The possibilities for a reciprocal enrichment have been largely recognised (see the 17th International Conference of Labour Statistics in 2003 and the 2003 and 2004 works of the Paris group). The emphasis was indeed put on how the integration of the two surveys could contribute to analysing the different participation modalities in the labour market determined by hour and contract flexibility. Among the issues raised by researchers on time use, we list the following two: the usefulness and limitations involved in using and combining various sources, such as labour force and time-use surveys, for improving data quality Time-use surveys are useful, especially for measuring hours worked of workers in the informal economy, in home-based work, and by the hidden or undeclared workforce, as well as to measure absence from work Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

38
**Some statistical matching applications 1**

Specific variables in the TUS (Y ): it enables to estimate the time dedicated to daily work and to study its level of "fragmentation" (number of intervals/interruptions), flexibility (exact start and end of working hours) and intra-relations with the other life times Specific variables in the LFS (Z): The vastness of the information gathered allow us to examine the peculiar aspects of the Italian participation in the labour market: professional condition, economic activity sector, type of working hours, job duration, profession carried out, etc. Moreover, it is also possible to investigate dimensions relative to the quality of the job Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

39
**Some statistical matching applications 2**

The Social Policy Simulation Database and Model (SPSD/M) is a micro computer-based product designed to assist those interested in analyzing the financial interactions of governments and individuals in Canada (see It can help one to assess the cost implications or income redistributive effects of changes in the personal taxation and cash transfer system. The SPSD is a non-confidential, statistically representative database of individuals in their family context, with enough information on each individual to compute taxes paid to and cash transfers received from government. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

40
**Some statistical matching applications 2**

The SPSM is a static accounting model which processes each individual and family on the SPSD, calculates taxes and transfers using legislated or proposed programs and algorithms, and reports on the results. It gives the user a high degree of control over the inputs and outputs to the model and can allow the user to modify existing tax/transfer programs or test proposals for entirely new programs. The model can be run using a visual interface and it comes with full documentation. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

41
**Some statistical matching applications 2**

In order to apply the algorithms for microsimulation of tax–transfer benefits policies, it is necessary to have a data set representative of the Canadian population. This data set should contain information on structural (age, sex,...), economic (income, house ownership, car ownership, ...), health–related (permanent illnesses, child care,...) social (elder assistance, cultural–educational benefits,...) variables (among the others). It does not exist a unique data set that contains all the variables that can influence the fiscal policy of a state In Canada 4 samples are integrated (Survey of consumers finances, Tax return data, Unemployment insurance claim histories, Family expenditure survey) Common variables: some socio-demographic variables Interest is on the relation between the distinct variables in the different samples Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

42
Example (Coli et al, 2006*) The new European System of the Accounts (ESA95) is a detailed source of information on all the economic agents, as households and enterprises. The social accounting matrix (SAM) has a relevant role. Module on households: it includes the amount of expenditures and income, per typology of household Coli A., Tartamella F., Sacco G., Faiella I., D’Orazio M., Di Zio M., Scanu M., Siciliani I., Colombini S., Masi A. (2006). “La costruzione di un Archivio di microdati sulle famiglie italiane ottenuto integrando l’indagine ISTAT sui consumi delle famiglie italiane e l’Indagine Banca d’Italia sui bilanci delle famiglie italiane”, Documenti ISTAT, n.12/2006. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

43
**Example Problem: Income are observed on a Bank of Italy survey**

Expenditures are observed on an Istat survey The two samples are composed of different households, hence record linkage is useless Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

44
Adopted solutions 1 The first statistical matching solution was imputation of missing data. Usually, “distance hot deck” was used. In pratice, this method “mimics” record linkage: instead of matching records of the same unit, this approach “matches” records of similar units, where similarity is in terms of the common variables in the two files. The procedure is 1) Compute the distances between the matching variables for every pair of records 2) Every record in A is associated to that record in B with minimum distance Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

45
**Adopted solutions 1 The inferential path is the following**

Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

46
Adopted solutions 2 It is applied an estimate procedure under specific models that considers the presence of missing items. The easiest model is: conditional independence of the never jointly observed variables (e.g., income and expenditures) given the matching variables. Example: Y = income, Z = expenditures, X = house surface (X,Y,Z) is distributed as a multivariate normal with parameters: Mean vector = Variance matrix = Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

47
**Adopted solutions 2 Estimate the regression equation on A: Y=+X**

Impute Y in B: Yb=+Xb , b=1,…,nB Estimate the regression equation in B: Z=+X Impute Z in A: Za= +Xa , a=1,…,nA Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

48
**Adopted solutions 2 The inferential mechanism assumes that**

Y and Z are independent given X (there is not the regression coefficient of Z on Y given X) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

49
Adopted solutions 2 This method can be applied also with this inferential scheme: the problem is what hypotheses are before the analysis phase Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

50
Adopted solutions 3 We do not hypothesize any model. It is estimated a set of values, one for every plausible model given the observed data Example When matching two sample surveys on farms (Rica-Rea - FADN and SPA - FSS), it was asked the following contingency table for farms Y = presence of cattle (FSS) Z = class of intermediate consumption (from FADN) Using the common variables X1 = Utilized Agricultural Area (UAA) , X2 = Livestock Size Unit (LSU) X3 = geographical characteristics Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

51
Example We consider all the models that we cam estimate from the observed data in the two surveys In practice, the available data allow to say that the estimate of the number of farms with at least one cow (Y=1) in the lowest class of intermediate consumption (Z=1) is between 2,9% and 4,9% Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

52
Inferential machine The inferential machine does not use any specific model It is possible to simulate data including uncertainty on the data generation model (e.g. by multiple imputation) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

53
Quotation (Manski, 1995*) …”The pressure to produce answers, without qualifications, seems particularly intense in the environs of Washington, D.C. A perhaps apocryphal, but quite believable, story circulates about an economist’s attempt to describe his uncertainty about a forecast to President Lyndon Johnson. The economist presented his forecast as a likely range of values for the quantity under discussion. Johnson is said to have replied, “Ranges are for cattle. Give me a number” *Manski, C. F. (1995) Identification problems in the Social Sciences, Harvard University Press. Manski and other authors show that in a wide range of applied areas (econometrics, sociology, psychometrics) there is a problem of identifiability of the models of interest, usually caused by the presence of missing data. The statistical matching problem is an example of this. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

54
**Why statistical matching?**

Applications in Istat SAM Joint analysis FADN / FSS Joint use of Time Use / Labour force Objectives Estimates of parameters of not jointly observed parameters Creation of synthetic data (e.g. data set for microsimulation) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

55
**Open problems Uncertainty estimate (D’Orazio et al, 2006)**

Variability of uncertainty (Imbens e Manski, 2004) Use of sample drawn according to complex survey designs (Rubin, 1986; Renssen, 1998) Use of nonparametric methods (Marella et al, 2008; Conti et al 2008) Conti P.L., Marella D., Scanu M. (2008). “Evaluation of matching noise for imputation techniques based on the local linear regression estimator”. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 53, D’Orazio M., Di Zio M., Scanu M. (2006). “Statistical Matching for Categorical Data: Displaying Uncertainty and Using Logical Constraints”, Journal of Official Statistics, 22, Imbens, G.W, Manski, C. F. (2004). "Confidence intervals for partially identified parameters". Econometrica, Vol. 72, No. 6 (November, 2004), 1845–1857 Marella D., Scanu M., Conti P.L. (2008). “On the matching noise of some nonparametric imputation procedures”, Statistics and Probability Letters, 78, Renssen, R.H. (1998) Use of statistical matching techniques in calibration estimation. Survey Methodology 24, 171–183. Rubin, D.B. (1986) Statistical matching using file concatenation with adjusted weights and multiple imputations. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 4, 87–94. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

56
**Micro integration processing**

It can be applied every time it is produced a complete data set (micro level) by any kind of method. Up to now, applied after exact record linkage Micro integration processing consists of putting in place all the necessary actions aimed to ensure better quality of the matched results as quality and timeliness of the matched files. It includes defining checks, editing procedures to get better estimates, imputation procedures to get better estimates. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

57
**Micro integration processing**

It should be kept in mind that some sources are more reliable than others. Some sources have a better coverage than others, and there may even be conflicting information between sources. So, it is important to recognize the strong and weak points of all the data sources used. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

58
**Micro integration processing**

Since there are differences between sources, a micro integration process is needed to check data and adjust incorrect data. It is believed that integrated data will provide far more reliable results, because they are based on an optimal amount of information. Also the coverage of (sub) populations will be better, because when data are missing in one source, another source can be used. Another advantage of integration is that users of statistical information will get one figure on each social phenomenon, instead of a confusing number of different figures depending on which source has been used. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

59
**Micro integration processing**

During the micro integration of the data sources the following steps have to be taken (Van der Laan, 2000): a. harmonisation of statistical units; b. harmonisation of reference periods; c. completion of populations (coverage); d. harmonisation of variables, in case of differences in definition; e. harmonisation of classifications; f. adjustment for measurement errors, when corresponding variables still do not have the same value after harmonisation for differences in definitions; g. imputations in the case of item nonresponse; h. derivation of (new) variables; creation of variables out of different data sources; i. checks for overall consistency. All steps are controlled by a set of integration rules and fully automated. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

60
**Example: Micro integration processing**

From Schulte Nordholt, Linder (2007) Statistical Journal of the IAOS 24,163–171 Suppose that someone becomes unemployed at the end of November and gets unemployment benefits from the beginning of December. The jobs register may indicate that this person has lost the job at the end of the year, perhaps due to administrative delay or because of payments after job termination. The registration of benefits is believed to be more accurate. When confronting these facts the ’integrator’ could decide to change the date of termination of the job to the end of November, because it is unlikely that the person simultaneously had a job and benefits in December. Such decisions are made with the utmost care. As soon as there are convincing counter indications of other jobs register variables, indicating that the job was still there in December, the termination date will, in general, not be adjusted. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

61
**Example: Micro integration processing**

Method: definition of rules for the creation of a usable complete data set after the linkage process. If these approaches are not applied, the integrated data set can contain conflicting information at the micro level. These approaches are still strictly based on quality of data sets knowledge. Proposition for a possible next ESSnet on integration: study the links between imputation and editing activities and Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

62
**Other supporting slides**

Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

63
**Macro integration: coherence of estimates**

Sometimes it is useful to integrate aggregate data, where aggregates are computed from different sample surveys. For instance: to include a set of tables in an information system A problem is the coherence of information in different tables. The adopted solution is at the estimate level: for instance, with calibration procedures (e.g.: the Virtual census in the Netherlands) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

64
Project The objective of a project is to gather the developments in two distinct areas Probabilistic expert systems: these are graphical models, characterized by the presence of an easy updating system of the joint distribution of a set of variables, once one of them is updated. These models have been used for a class of estimators that includes poststratification estimators Statistical information systems: SIS for the production of statistical output (Istar) with the objective to integrate and manage statistical data given and validated by the Istat production areas, in order to produce purposeful output for the end users Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

65
**Objectives and open problems**

To develop a statistical information system for agriculture data, managing tables from FADN. FSS, and lists used for sampling (containing census and archive data) To manage coherence bewteen different tables To update information on data from the most recent survey and to visualize what changes happen to the other tables To allow simulations (for policy making) Problems Use of graphical models for complex survey data To link the selection of tables to the updating algorithm To update more than one table at the same time Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

66
**Some practical aspects for integration: Software**

There exist different software tools for record linkage record linkage and statistical matching Relais: R package for statistical matching: Look for Statmatch Probabilistic expert systems: Hugin (it does not work with complex survey data) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

67
Bibliography Batini C, Scannapieco M (2006) Data Quality, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg. Scanu M (2003) Metodi statistici per il record linkage, collana Metodi e Norme n. 16, Istat. D’Orazio M., Di Zio M., Scanu M. (2006) Statistical matching: theory and practice, J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester. Ballin M., De Francisci S., Scanu M., Tininini L., Vicard P. (2009) Integrated statistical systems: an approach to preserve coherence between a set of surveys based on the use of probabilistic expert systems, NTTS 2009, Bruxelles. Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

68
**Is this conditional independence?**

Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

69
And this? Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

70
**Statistical methods of integration**

Sometimes a “shorter track” is used. Note! The “automatic methods” correspond to specific data generating model Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

71
**Statistical methods of integration**

Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

72
**Statistical methods of integration**

The last approach is very appealing: Estimate a data generating model from the two data samples at hand Use this estimate for the estimation of aggregate data (e.g. contingency tables on non jointly observed variables) If necessary, develop a complete data set by simulation from the estimated model: the integrated data generating mechanism is the “nearest” to the data generating model, according to the optimality properties of the model estimator Attention! Issue 1 includes hypothesis that cannot be tested on the available data (this is true for record linkage and, more “dramatically”, for statistical matching) Poznan 20 October 2010 World Statistics Day

Similar presentations

OK

1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)

1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)

© 2019 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google