Presentation on theme: "Promoting Trade in Environmental Goods: How Can RTAs Contribute?"— Presentation transcript:
1Promoting Trade in Environmental Goods: How Can RTAs Contribute? Mahesh SugathanWorkshop on Regional Trade Agreements and the EnvironmentOECD-UNU-IAS and Ministry of Environment, Japan(Tokyo, June 2007)
2Overview of presentation The Doha MandateWhat are environmental goods?EGS and Sustainable DevelopmentWTO negotiations-value-addition, developments and state of playMain Challenges faced by WTO NegotiatorsDomestic and Crosscutting ChallengesRelevance of RTAs to EGSTrade creation and trade diversionExamples of RTA Provisions and Activities Relevant to EGSPromoting EGS Trade through RTAs: Opportunities and Constraints
3The Doha Mandate on Environmental Goods and Services Para 31 (iii) –Doha Ministerial Declaration calls for the “ reduction or, as appropriate, elimination of tariffs and non-tariff barriers on environmental goods and services.”No prior definition of ‘environmental goods’.
4What are environmental goods? No universally accepted definition.Lists developed by APEC and OECD (illustrative) used as starting point for discussions.Both lists derive from OECD/Eurostat definition of environment industry agreed in 1995:“The environmental goods and services industry consists of activities which produce goods and services to measure, prevent, limit, minimise or correct environmental damage to water, air and soil, as well as problems related to waste, noise and eco-systems. This includes cleaner technologies, products and services that reduce environmental risk and minimise pollution and resource use.
5What are Environmental Goods (..contd?) In addition some would include environmentally preferable products within the scope of environmental goods. UNCTAD defines these as:Products which cause significantly less ‘environmental harm’ at some stage of their life cycle than alternative products that serve the same purpose, or products the production and sale of which contribute significantly to the preservation of the environment.” (UNCTAD, 1995),
6‘Traditional’ Environmental Goods vs Environmentally Preferable Products (EPPs) Main purposeTraditional GoodsTo address an environmental problemMain purposeEPPsOther usesProductionE.g. Organic agricultureTo note:For every EPP there exists a substitute or ‘like product’ or substitute with a similar use that is not as environmentally friendlyBut environmental benefits arise duringConsumption/UseE.g. Solar carsDisposalE.g. Jute Bags
7EGS and Sustainable Development Lower trade barriers to EGS can contribute to increased access.Increased access can yield:positive environmental benefits in terms of ‘source’- resource-use efficiency and ‘sink’-pollution prevention, control of air and water pollution and CO2 emissions.Positive social benefits: better health, lower mortality and pollution-induced diseasesPositive economic benefits: economic growth and employment through trade and investment in EGS
8But trade liberalisation may also have adverse impacts Job losses in incumbent EGS industries especially SMEsLoss of tariff-revenueIf domestic regulation is weak: access to EGS may result but not equitable accessLack of meaningful technology transfer or absorptionInherent tension may arise between most efficient environmental protection methods and other sustainable development concerns.Hence need for crafting trade policy in the context of domestic sustainable development framework
9What is the value-added in WTO Negotiations on EGS ? Argued that environmental benefits through trade in EGS can be realised unilaterallyReciprocal exchange of concessionsHowever WTO rules can act as a global instrument to shape trade-flow dynamics and ‘lock-in’ polices affecting EG flows.Also has scale effect of collective action as opposed to unilateral initiativesGreater predictability and stability of trade-flows
10What has happened in the WTO? ENVIRONMENTAL GOODSAt a meeting of the CTE special session in March 2002, Members agreed that paragraph 31(iii) should be implemented in the context of NAMA and Services negotiations but that the CTE could contribute by examining what constituted environmental goods.Annex B of the General Council Decision of 1 August 2004 encourages the Negotiating Group on NAMA to work closely with the CTE Special Session with a view to addressing the issue of non-agricultural environmental goods covered in Paragraph 31(iii) of the Doha Ministerial Declaration.Currently specific goods submitted by WTO Members are all industrial.
11Brief State of Play on Negotiations Originally WTO Members submitted 480 products at the 6-digit HS level.‘Friends of EGS Group’ have revised down their collective number of products to 153.Problems of ‘dual-use’, environmental relevance, NTBsWTO Members deadlocked over approach to liberalisation or ‘how to liberalise’ ‘list vs project’ approach
12Main challenges faced by WTO Negotiators 1.Ensuring ‘environmental’ relevance and end-use-what to liberalise and how to liberalise?2.Broadening the export basket for developing countries3.Effects of EGS on Domestic Industries4. Uncertainty with regard to non-tariff barriers5.Creating and Enhancing Domestic Capacities and Technology Transfer6.Coherence and linkage with other negotiating bodies especially environmental services
14‘Dual-Use’: Type 2 Example-Specific Good itself Pipe- a single product but can be used both for removing wastewater (environmental use) as well as transporting oil and gas (non-environmental use) .
15Brief State of Play on Negotiations (..contd) Main features of ‘Project Approach’Project which meets criteria agreed by the Special Session of the CTE to ensure transparency, would be considered by a Designated National Authority (DNA).Temporary Binding Liberalisation : If approved, the goods and services included in a project would qualify for specified concessions for the duration of the project.Scope of Concessions include, inter alia, equipment, services, investment, financial aid and transfer of technology.Commitments that Members agree to undertake may include reduction or elimination of:tariffs on import of all project related goodsreduction, elimination or appropriate treatment of standards, licensing restrictions, non-tariff barriers and other related issuesspecific commitments required in all modes of service delivery.”Temporary Concessions to be subject to WTO Dispute Settlement
16Domestic Considerations Important Trade Policy applied through WTO has collective impact.But Trade Policy is determined by domestic considerations responds to economic, social and environmental priorities. (Claro and Lucas, 2007).May involve ‘trade-offs’ but ‘win-win-wins’ also possible.Sometimes uncertainty of ‘ex-post’ impacts of liberalisation on sustainable development may also influence trade policy-i.e. information gaps.These determine immediate challenges faced by negotiators.
17Crosscutting considerations Coherence between different committees in WTO and between goods and services negotiatorsFramework to deal with NTBs and changes of technologyFramework for technical assistance
18The Relevance of RTAs to EGS? Many RTAs have shared ecosystems affected by regional trade.Geography and regional dynamics important in much of trade flows in EGS. Eg: US accounted for 60 % of Mexican imports of water-pollution equipment. Japan leading supplier of solid, hazardous waste-treatment equipment in Malaysia.South-South trade in EGS has regional significance. ‘Hubs’ of EGS could establish presence in region through RTAs. Eg: Malaysian firms like Sadec Consortium active in water-treatment facility in Vietnam. Brazil’s CETESB provided consultancy services to other Latin American countries.Need to determine how much of regional and North-South trade in EGS is influenced by RTAs and how much by actual (applied) rates of tariff-protection.
19Trade Creation and Trade Diversion RTAs signed that involve competitive producers of EGS will imply ‘trade creation’ otherwise may lead to ‘trade-diversion’ if RTAs give preference to less competitive producersOn the other hand RTAs, ‘strategically concluded’ could open up regional markets for both developed and developing country EGS producers much more rapidly than WTO liberalisation.
20Examples of Provisions and Activities relevant to EGS in RTAs EGS SpecificUS-CAFTA DR Envt Coop Agreement: refers to developing and promoting environmentally beneficial goods and servicesMorocco-US RTA: recognize that strengthening their co-operative relationship on environmental matters can encourage increased bilateral trade in environmental goods and services.Japan-Mexico: (Environmental Cooperation chapter): encouragement of trade and dissemination ofenvironmentally sound goods and servicesAPEC: Developed lists of EGs influential in Doha Round; Energy Working Group focuses on energy efficiency; renewable energyNAFTA: NACEC’s Environment, Economy and Trade Programme focuses on purchasing of environmentally-friendly productsCARICOM: Some regional work on development and dissemination of renewable energy technologiesSingapore-Korea: MoU on CNG Technologies
21Examples of RTA Provisions and Activities relevant to EGS Crosscutting but with potential impacts on EGS sectorsMorocco-US RTA; Morocco-EU Partnership Agreement: Environmental capacity buildingEU-ACP EPA: Article 30-Regional cooperation to support environment, water resource management and energy, disposal of hazardous waste and sustainable tourism among others
22Key Challenges Related to Env Goods Liberalisation Promoting EGS trade through RTAs: What are the opportunities and constraints?Key Challenges Related to Env Goods LiberalisationWTO NegotiationsRegional Trade Agreements1.MandateSpecific mandate for liberalising EGSUsually no separate mandate; subsumed within overall liberalisation for goods2.Impact on trade‘Trade-creating’ through MFN LiberalisationTrade-creating or trade diverting depending on participating countries3. ‘Dual-use’ problem and environmental relevance of goodsMostly ‘dual-use’ products at HS 6-digit; reluctance to liberalise among many Members-entail lower ambitionHarmonisation of HS-codes/descriptions difficult to achieve‘Dual-use’ may not be a problem due to ambitious liberalisation at HS-6 digitEven if ex-outs are selected, harmonisation of codes, descriptions may be easier
23Promoting EGS trade through RTAs: What are the opportunities and constraints? Key Challenges Related to Env Goods LiberalisationWTO NegotiationsRegional Trade Agreements4. Standards and Non-tariff barriers (NTBs)NTBs may be subject to multilateral disciplines at WTO.Harmonisation/mutual recognition more difficult.Greater potential for harmonisation and mutual recognition-this makes it easier for internal trade and 3rd parties-but pull effect of stringent standards may require investment.5.Expanding products of interest to developing countriesMay imply ‘offensive’ S&DT; preferential access to EPPs relative to less-envtally friendly substitutes.May result in greater access to all developing country products-but both EPPs and non-EPPs; lesser scope for trade-based discrimination for EPPs incl third country EPPs.
24Key Challenges Related to Env Goods Liberalisation Promoting EGS trade through RTAs: What are the opportunities and constraints?Key Challenges Related to Env Goods LiberalisationWTO NegotiationsRegional Trade Agreements6. Impacts on Domestic Industries in developing countriesScope for general flexibilities including S&DT greater.Ambition of RTAs imply lesser scope for ‘protection’ related flexibility but tailoring to suit specific needs of partners possible.7. Supply-side considerations, institution and regulatory building, technology-transfer and technical assistanceMay imply broader modalities and flexibilities; but operationalisation could be a challenge.Specific tailoring to suit needs of partners possible; depth of integration and partner countries important; bilateral and regional aid flows could be key vehicle.
25Key Challenges Related to Env Goods Liberalisation Promoting EG trade through RTAs: What are the opportunities and constraints?Key Challenges Related to Env Goods LiberalisationWTO NegotiationsRegional Trade Agreements8. Linkage with other areas of negotiations.Separate mandate increases scope for negotiating linkagesMay be difficult to fine-tune coordination between env goods and env services.May not be possible to have linkages as EGs negotiated within industrial or agricultural goods-unless negotiated as a separate sector.Easier to coordinate env goods and env services liberalisation.9. Viability of ‘project-approach’Has raised questions with regard to compatibility with WTO rules.May be easier to negotiate and implement in a regional context if bound import tariffs are not already liberalised under RTAs
26Key Challenges Related to Env Goods Liberalisation Promoting EGS trade through RTAs: What are the opportunities and constraints?Key Challenges Related to Env Goods LiberalisationWTO NegotiationsRegional Trade Agreements10. Negotiating AsymmetryLessMore11. Dispute SettlementAvailableTransparent and accessible dispute settlement mechanisms are essential.