Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byBlake Caldwell Modified over 4 years ago

1
The Importance of Different Social Networks for Infectious Diseases Fredrik Liljeros Stockholm University Karolinska institutet Supported by the Swedish Institute for Public Health and The Swedish Emergency Management Agency S-GEM

2
Stockholm Group for Epidemic Modelling, S-GEM Johan Giesecke SMI/KI Åkes Svensson SMI/SU Fredrik Liljeros SU/KI S-GEM

3
Why model epidemics? Will there be an outbreak? How many will be infected? The speed of the outbreak? How can we best limit the effects of an outbreak How many must be vaccinated? Who should be vaccinated? S-GEM

4
Outline Traditional Models Networks Empirical Network Studies S-GEM

5
Key Concepts Variation in number of contacts Assortative interaction Clustering/Transitivity Small World Network S-GEM

6
Epidemic models Deterministic models Stochastic models Agent-based models (Micro simulation models) S-GEM

7
A model should be as simple as possibly (But not to simple) S-GEM

8
Deterministic Models S-GEM

9
A very simplified example S-GEM Suceptible Infected

10
A simple differential equation- model S-GEM

11
Global saturation S-GEM

12
Our model is to simple capture global saturation S-GEM

13
We have to ad the number of susceptible into the model (K-I) S-GEM

14
It is possible to study important properties of deterministic models analytically S-GEM

15
The Basic reproduction rate, R 0 S-GEM

16
The SIS-model S-GEM

17
The SIS-model S-GEM

18
It is possible to let a deterministic model capture many relevant properties Individuals may become immune Individuals may die New individuals may be borned Individuals may belong to different groups with different type of behavior S-GEM

19
What are the implicit network assumptions in deterministic models S-GEM

20
Erdös-Rényi network (1960) Pál Erdös Pál Erdös (1913-1996) S-GEM

21
Clustering/transitivity S-GEM

22
Clustering/transitivity S-GEM

23
Clustering/transitivity Suceptible Infectious S-GEM

24
Variation in number of contacts S-GEM

25
What do variation in number of contacts have on R 0 ? S-GEM

28
Assortative Interaction S-GEM

29
Struktural effects Variation in contacts Clustring assortativity Lower epidemic treshold Smaller outbreaks Slower outbreaks S-GEM

30
Why care about social networks? S-GEM

31
What do we know about structural properties of social networks? S-GEM

32
Collecting network data S-GEM

33
We can not use random samples S-GEM

34
Milgrams Study Nebraska Kansas Massachusetts Pamela Five persons S-GEM

35
But we know that social networks are clustred Should not the distance between randomly selected individuals be long? S-GEM

36
? The Small-world effect S-GEM

38
C(p) : clustering coeff. L(p) : average path length (Watts and Strogatz, Nature 393, 440 (1998)) Watts-Strogatz Model (from http://www.aip.org/aip/corporate/2000/watts.htmhttp://www.aip.org/aip/corporate/2000/watts.htm & http://tam.cornell.edu/Strogatz.html)http://tam.cornell.edu/Strogatz.html

39
Ongoing Reserch and Verbal preliminary results S-GEM

40
Swedish Smallpox Model S-GEM

41
Take Home messages Variation in number of contacts Assortative interaction Clustering/Transitivity Small World Network S-GEM

Similar presentations

OK

Gennaro Cordasco - How Much Independent Should Individual Contacts be to Form a Small-World? - 19/12/2006 How Much Independent Should Individual Contacts.

Gennaro Cordasco - How Much Independent Should Individual Contacts be to Form a Small-World? - 19/12/2006 How Much Independent Should Individual Contacts.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google