We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAudrey McKinney
Modified over 2 years ago
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Using Signals in TestDescription & Capability and a TestResults Example
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Signal Capture Generating 1641 Signals from a Product Acceptance Specification (PAS) Translation from the PAS to 1641 signals is reasonably straightforward –This is because PAS is written in terms of UUT –Extraction is a manual process E.g.: Monitor SK2-F with respect to 0V at SK2-s and verify that the voltage is +5.0V +/-0.2V Translates into: PAS 1641 Signals
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 In older ATPs, this is often all that is available. Code, style & structure may be unfamiliar Contain ATE specific information. Extracting any large amounts of information manually is very laborious and, thus, prone to error. Irregular structure and ATE specifics mean that automatic extraction of signals is not possible –Without standardised extraction, the test program is being virtually re-written and must go through acceptance. Signal Capture Generating 1641 Signals from Existing Source Code Test Program 1641 Signals
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Test Description. < Signal ….
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Test Program ' Create EU Power Supply Signal Set psu = ate.Require("PSU") psu.Name = "PSU1" psu.ampl = "23.5 errlmt ±0.5V" psu.current_limit = "550mA" Set tw = ate.Require("TwoWire") tw.Name = "TW1" tw.In = "PSU1" tw.hi = "BatteryPos" tw.lo = "BatterNeg" psu.Out.Run ' Create Measuremnt Set monitor = ate.Require(" " & _ " " & _ " ") monitor.Out.Run 5000 monitor.Out.Stop Set monitor = Nothing.NET (e.g. TestBase) TestStand
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Capability The resource description of a Racal4152A DMM and associated connection to the UUT. : :
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Architecture
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Test Signal Run-Time System Signal Interface (RAI?) Test Requirement Test Program ATE TestResults Logger UUT Native Driver Native Driver Switch RFSynth Signal Interface Native Driver DMM General Architecture Using a Signal Interface
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 TestResults Sample ==================== PROGRAM NUMBER M ISSUE 2 MY TEST PROGRAMME UUT SERIAL NUMBER :- DATE : T12:24:28 OPERATOR NAME :- MCORNISH ==================== ==================== TEST PASS HIGH SOURCE TEST T HL = MV = LL = ==================== TEST PASS HIGH SOURCE TEST T HL = MV = LL =
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Results Data Vs. Modelled Data No significant differences found between the native and 1641 r.f. test results (Aeroflex)
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Synthetic Instruments e e e e e e e
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Comparison of Effort Typical Effort to Generate Parametric Tests in the Power/Frequency Domain (Aeroflex) Port IVI Test to 1641 (TestStand) 1 month 1 week time Generate Native Test from General Documentation Port Native Test to IVI (TestStand) (given the presence of the 1641 elements) 1 Day
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Where Were Up To IEEE Std Signal & Test Definition –Signal-based test definition standard. –Requirement of MoD ATS Procurement Policy. –Utilised in areas of IEEE P1671 ATML. IEEE 1641 implementation studies: –Phase 1 - Analogue signals/3 test platforms - Racal Instruments. –Phase 2 - Complex RF and a Synthetic Test Platform – Aeroflex. –Phase 3 - Digital signals/ test platforms - under negotiation. –Phase 4 – Parallel development; comparison of traditional vs
© Copyright EADS TEST & SERVICES 2006 Conclusions IEEE Std has been shown to be capable of defining: –Portable analogue signals, –Typical RF parametric tests. Significant effort required to extract the information required to define a 1641 (platform independent) test, from an existing, non-standard or proprietary, test architecture. Though not a unique approach, 1641 represents a departure from many existing test methodologies. –Training would address many issues. No significant differences observed (existing vs. 1641) for: –Test results. –Speed of execution.
Page1 Framework Working Group 2007 ATML Use cases Use of ATML by external agencies is gathering momentum.
Lockheed Martin Simulation, Training & Support ATML on LM-STAR ® Michelle Harris Alicia Helton
ATML Readiness For Use Phase II. Phase II Readiness For Use The ATML: Phase II will build on the Core phases, adding additional ATML components and features.
ISO New England Demand Resource Measurement & Verification Standards Manual Overview April 11, 2007 NAESB Development of DSM/EE Business Practices Washington,
Validation | Slide 1 of 39 August 2006 Validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006.
Computing Higher - SD Process – Topic 2 St Andrew’s High School Unit 2 Software Development Process.
©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 29Slide 1 Chapter 29 Configuration Management.
Lecture 5: Requirements Engineering Dr Valentina Plekhanova University of Sunderland, UK
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface Introduction to NSI Guy Roberts.
Acceptance and Unit Testing (introduction) Alessandro Marchetto Fondazione Bruno Kessler - IRST.
1 Software Communications Architecture and Related Specifications Overview Kevin Richardson 09 April 2006.
1 Note content copyright © 2004 Ian Sommerville. NU-specific content copyright © 2004 M. E. Kabay. All rights reserved. Configuration Management IS301.
© 2005 Altera Corporation © 2006 Altera Corporation Simulation with Mentor Graphics ModelSim.
AQute R4 By Peter Kriens CEO aQute OSGi Technology Officer and OSGi Fellow.
Software Development QA Best Practices May 20, 2010 Suzette Hackl, CSM Senior Project Manager Skyline Technologies, Inc.
The world leader in serving science Managing Change in an ISO/IEC Environment Kelly Huckabone, MLT, ASQ, CQIA.
1 Note content copyright © 2004 Ian Sommerville. NU-specific content copyright © 2004 M. E. Kabay. All rights reserved. Software Re-use IS301 – Software.
DC-API: Unified API for Desktop Grid Systems Gábor Gombás MTA SZTAKI.
WMO ET-ADRS: April WMO ET-ADRS Hierarchical Data Format (HDF) Manuel Fuentes (ECMWF) Erdem Erdi (Turkish State Meteorological Service)
A Taste of Visual Studio 2005 David Grey. Introduction In this session we will introduce Visual Studio 2005 and its features and examine those features.
1 UK MOD Policy and ATML Malcolm Brown UK MoD Support Policy Team Automatic Test Systems AutoTestCon Orlando Florida Sept 2010.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 6 Slide 1 Software Requirements.
Slide 1 Shall Lists. Slide 2 Shall List Statement Categories Functional Requirements Non-Functional Requirements.
©Ian Sommerville 2000 Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 5 Slide 1 Chapter 5 Software Requirements.
CYPRESS Software Testing By Rick Clements
Doc.: IEEE /0208r1 Submission March 2005 Charles Cook, QwestSlide 1 Service Provider Requirements Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared.
©Ian Sommerville 2000 Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 10Slide 1 Chapter 10 Architectural Design.
Components Alexey Golubev, What is a component? What is a component? The father of components? The father of components? Components and their.
Planning an automatic provisioning system for a local telephone operator Instructor: Jorma Virtamo Supervisor: Jorma Virtamo This thesis was done at Partel.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.