Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byRachel Todd Modified over 4 years ago

1
1 Material Dependence of NBTI Stress & Recovery in SiON p-MOSFETs S. Mahapatra, V. D. Maheta, S. Deora, E. N. Kumar, S. Purawat, C. Olsen 1, K. Ahmed 1, A. E. Islam 2, M. A. Alam 2 Department of Electrical Engineering, IIT Bombay, Mumbai, India 1 Applied Materials, Santa Clara, CA, USA 2 School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN, USA Email: souvik@ee.iitb.ac.in

2
2 Outline Introduction, measurement delay (recovery) issues, fast measurements Material dependence: Time evolution, time exponent Material dependence: Field & temperature acceleration Physical mechanism, isolation of different components Conclusion Recovery – material dependence

3
3 What is NBTI? Issue: p-MOSFET in inversion V G < (V S, V D, V B ) Parametric shift Aggravated for SiON films What is the N dependence? V DD V G =0 Aggravated with –E OX and T E OX1, T 1 V T time E OX1, T 2 E OX2, T 2

4
4 Motivation Proper stress, measurement V T time Stress Extrapolation to operating condition Operation Extrapolation to end of life Lifetime Check if passed Specification Need to know physical mechanism for reliable extrapolation to obtain lifetime

5
5 NBTI measurement challenge Conventional approach – stress / measure / stress Recovery of degradation as soon as stress is stopped Recovery depends on stress to measure voltage difference, time Stress Measurement -V G (M) -V G (S)

6
6 Impact of Measurement Delay Time Stress-Measure-Stress (SMS) Stress Measurement -V G (M) -V G (S) M-time Lower magnitude, higher slope for higher measurement delay

7
7 Impact of Measurement Bias Stress Measurement -V G (M) -V G (S) M-time Higher recovery & higher slope for lower (absolute) measurement bias DC On-the-fly: Rangan, IEDM 2003 Stress-Measure-Stress (SMS)

8
8 On-The-Fly I DLIN (Conventional Scheme) SMU PGU Start I D sampling SMU triggers PGU PGU provides stress pulse at gate Continue I D sampling without interrupting stress Uncertainty in I DMAX measurement: t 0 ~ 1ms I DLIN time Rangan, IEDM 2003 V T = - I D /I DMAX * V GT0

9
9 On-The-Fly I DLIN (Fast Scheme) Start I D sampling SMU triggers PGU PGU provides stress pulse at gate Continue I D sampling without interrupting stress Uncertainty in I DMAX measurement: t 0 ~ 1 s I DLIN time SMU PGU IVC DSO V T = - I D /I DMAX * V GT0

10
10 Captured I DLIN Transients Peak I DLIN (I DLIN0 ) captured within 1 s of stress (V G =V GSTRESS ) Gate pulse transition time adjusted to avoid I DLIN overshoot RTNO shows rapid and larger I DLIN degradation w.r.t PNO

11
11 Outline Introduction, measurement delay (recovery) issues, fast measurements Material dependence: Time evolution, time exponent Material dependence: Field & temperature acceleration Physical mechanism, isolation of different components Conclusion Recovery – material dependence

12
12 Impact of Time-Zero Delay RTNO shows very large initial and overall degradation and much larger impact of t 0 delay compared to PNO Reduction in measured degradation magnitude for higher t 0 delay

13
13 Time Exponent (Long-time): Impact of t 0 Delay Power law time dependence at long stress time Lower time exponent (n) for RTNO compared to PNO Reduction in n with reduction in t 0 delay, saturation for t 0 <10 s

14
14 Time Exponent: Impact of Oxide Field and Temperature E OX independence of n: No bulk trap generation T independence on n: Arrhenius T activation PNO shows higher n compared to RTNO

15
15 NBTI Transient: PNO / RTNO / RTNO + PN N density at Si/SiON interface controls degradation transients Higher Si/SiON N density Higher (short time & overall) NBTI SiON RTNO PNO RTNO+PN Poly-Si Si-substrate N Shallenberger JVST 99; Rauf, JAP 05

16
16 Time Exponent: PNO / RTNO / RTNO + PN D#N DOSE (x10 15 cm - 2 ) N%EOT(Å) A0.0+5.33515.6 B0.8+5.13913 C0.8+0.00618.5 Lower n (independent of E OX, T) for larger Si/SiON N density

17
17 Impact of Post Nitridation Anneal (PNO) PNO without proper PNA: Higher degradation & lower n (like RTNO) D#N DOSE (x10 15 cm -2 )N%EOT(Å) A0.0+2.9 (Correct PNA)1917.7 B0.0+2.0 (Worst PNA)1222.2 C0.0+2.7(Moderate PNA)1620.2

18
18 Time exponent: Impact of PNO dose Reduction in n with increase in N% D#N DOSE (x10 15 cm -2 )N%EOT(Å) A0.0+2.91917.7 B0.0+5.33515.55 C0.0+6.84214.6 T independence of n for all N% E OX independence of n for all N%

19
19 Time exponent: Process dependence PNO (proper PNA) trend line Long-time power law time exponent depends on SiON process (PNO, PNA, RTNO) & N%

20
20 Outline Introduction, measurement delay (recovery) issues, fast measurements Material dependence: Time evolution, time exponent Material dependence: Field & temperature acceleration Physical mechanism, isolation of different components Conclusion Recovery – material dependence

21
21 Temperature Activation RTNO shows higher degradation and lower E A compared to PNO T activation governs by SiON process; shows similar (as time exponent, n) dependence on N% PNO (proper PNA) trend line

22
22 Field Dependence: PNO / RTNO / RTNO + PN PNO: Increased degradation & lower field dependent slope for higher N% D#N DOSE (x10 15 cm -2 )N%EOT(Å) A0.0+2.91917.7 B0.0+5.33515.6 C0.0+6.84214.6 D0.8+5.13913.1 E0.8+0.0618.5 RTNO, RTNO+PN: Very high degradation and low slope Si/SiON interface density governs overall degradation magnitude & oxide field-dependent slope SiON RTNO PNO RTNO+PN Poly-Si Si-substrate N

23
23 Field Acceleration Factor: Process Dependence PNO (proper PNA) trend line Field acceleration governs by SiON process; more importantly by N density at Si/SiON interface

24
24 Summary: Material Dependence Si/SiON interfacial N density plays important role High Si/SiON N density for RTNO process, PNO without proper PNA, or PNO with very high (>30%) N density Si/SiON N density: NBTI magnitude: Time exponent: T activation: E OX acceleration: Low (PNO, proper PNA, lower N, less than 30% at.) Lower High (~0.12 @1 s delay) High (~0.08-0.09 eV) High (~0.6 cm/MV) Increase Reduce

25
25 Outline Introduction, measurement delay (recovery) issues, fast measurements Material dependence: Time evolution, time exponent Material dependence: Field & temperature acceleration Physical mechanism, isolation of different components Conclusion Recovery – material dependence

26
26 Very Long Time Degradation Universally observed very long time power law exponent of n = 1/6 TSMC, IRPS 05 Haggag, Freescale, IRPS 07 Stress time ~ 28Hr TI, IEDM 06

27
27 Interface Traps: Reaction Diffusion Model Poly Si H H Reaction: Si-H bond breaks into Si + and H Si H Diffusion: Released H diffuse away and leave Si + Si H Jeppson, JAP 1977; Alam, IEDM 2003 SpeciesSlope H O 1/4 H 2 1/6 H + 1/2 Power-law dependence, exponent depends on H Chakravarthi, IRPS 2004; Alam, IRPS (T) 2005 Long time experimental data suggests H 2 diffusion

28
28 NBTI physical mechanism Tunneling of inversion holes to Si-H Generation of N IT Si H p n-Si SiO N p + -poly Tunneling barrier Tunneling of inversion holes to N related traps Trapping of N h Hole trapping when added to interface traps reduces n & E A of overall NBTI Identical E OX (governs both inversion holes and tunneling) dependence for N IT and N h

29
29 NBTI Physical Mechanism (Stress) Low Si/SiON N density N IT dominated process, low N h V T (log- scale) stress time (log-scale) Strong T activation Higher Si/SiON N density Significant additional N h component (fast, saturates, weak T dependence) High short-time and overall degradation Low T activation at longer stress time -V G

30
30 Isolation of Interface Trap Generation and Hole Trapping Total degradation sum of N IT and N h contribution Assumption 1: Fast (t<1s) saturation of N h contribution Assumption 2: Power law n=1/6 dependence for N IT contribution at longer stress time Slides 54 – 56: Mahapatra, TED 2009 (Feb)

31
31 Field and Temperature Dependence Identical E OX dependence – same barrier controls N IT, N h and hence total degradation Low T activation of N h, when added to higher T activation of N IT lowers T activation of overall degradation

32
32 Hole trapping – Impact of N% (PNO) Increase in hole trapping with increase in N% causes reduction in n & E A at higher N% Identical T activation of hole trapping over a wide N% range suggests correctness of isolation method

33
33 T Activation of N IT : Universal Scaling Scheme R-D model solution: V T = (k F.N 0 /k R ) 2/3 (Dt) 1/6 E A (k F ) ~ E A (k R ), V T (T,t) ~ [D(T)t] n E A ~ E D * n X-axis scaling provides E D Identical n at all T Y-axis scaling provides E A

34
34 Universal T Activation of Diffusion X-axis scaling P1: 1.2nm (14%), P2: 1.2nm (21%) P3: 1.7nm (28%), P4: 2.2nm (29%) Identical E A for PNO & Control Identical E A for Idlin & C-P measurements E D consistent with power law slope (n) from R-D model E A suggest neutral molecular H 2 diffusion* *Reed, JAP 1988

35
35 T Activation of N IT : Impact of N% (PNO) Validation of E A ~ E D * n for a wide N% range suggests the robustness of isolation method

36
36 Outline Introduction, measurement delay (recovery) issues, fast measurements Material dependence: Time evolution, time exponent Material dependence: Field & temperature acceleration Physical mechanism, isolation of different components Conclusion Recovery – material dependence

37
37 Recovery Transients (UF-OTF I DLIN ) Low N% (low hole trapping) – delayed start of recovery High N% (high hole trapping) – fast start of recovery Difference in recovery shape certainly not ~log(t) Kapila, IEDM 2008

38
38 Recovery Analysis Recovery: Hole detrapping (electron capture in bulk traps) Interface trap passivation Stress: Interface trap generation and hole trapping in pre-existing bulk traps Si H p Trap n-Si SiON p + -poly Tunneling barrier (T.B.) Neutralization of interface trap charge by electron capture; valid for recovery at low V G (~ V T ) only [Reisinger, IRPS 2006; Grasser, IRPS 2008] Gate n-Si At stress V G Isolation of components important to model recovery Gate n-Si At recovery V G

39
39 Recovery Analysis (contd..) Stress Fast hole trapping and gradual interface trap buildup V T (log- scale) stress time (log-scale) Stress recovery time (log-scale) V T (linear- scale) Recovery Recovery Fast hole detrapping and gradual (lock-in) interface trap passivation NhNh N IT Overall recovery spans several orders of time scale

40
40 Recap: Hole Trap Fraction from Stress Based on N IT & N h isolation scheme Hole trap fraction: Increases with N% Reduces with stress time (N h saturation at short stress time) Reduces with stress T (lower T activation for N h ) Slides 65 – 67: Deora, unpublished

41
41 Recovery Contribution by Trapped Holes Assumption: Early recovery phase due to hole detrapping Hole detrapping time: Independent of stress time Independent of stress T Find N h fraction (from stress) Find corresponding recovery (hole detrapping) time

42
42 Recovery: T Dependence Early phase due to hole detrapping weak T dependence Later part due to N IT passivation T activated MSM Larger delay time, T dependent recovery T dependence of n; Not seen for OTF

43
43 Outline Introduction, measurement delay (recovery) issues, fast measurements Material dependence: Time evolution, time exponent Material dependence: Field & temperature acceleration Physical mechanism, isolation of different components Conclusion Recovery – material dependence

44
44 Summary N density at Si/SiON interface plays important role PNO better than RTNO, proper PNA important for PNO Higher N at Si/SiON higher degradation magnitude, lower time exponent, T activation, E OX acceleration Significant contribution from N h (in addition to N IT ) for devices having high Si/SiON N density N IT and N h contributions can be separated consistently N h detrapping and N IT passivation determines early and long-time recovery respectively NBTI recovery impacts measurement lower captured magnitude, higher n & E A uncertain parameters

Similar presentations

OK

Institute of Microelectronics, PKU SINANO Workshop, Montreux, Switzerland Sept. 12~16, 2006 Reliability Degradation Characteristics of Ultra-thin Gate.

Institute of Microelectronics, PKU SINANO Workshop, Montreux, Switzerland Sept. 12~16, 2006 Reliability Degradation Characteristics of Ultra-thin Gate.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google