Presentation on theme: "Protecting the Public through Disciplinary Action Maryann Alexander, PhD, RN, FAAN Kathleen Russell, JD, RN."— Presentation transcript:
Protecting the Public through Disciplinary Action Maryann Alexander, PhD, RN, FAAN Kathleen Russell, JD, RN
The Boards Duty Is To Protect The Public Not Punish The Licensee
Criminal Justice System Punishment does not improve behavior Emphasis is needed on examining what happened and how can we prevent you from doing this again. Support and resources lessen the chance of recidivating.
TERCAP Data Individuals disciplined by their employer have a much higher chance of being disciplined by the board of nursing at sometime in the future
,000 people die from medical errors a year (Andel, et al, 2012) More than 130,000 Medicare beneficiaries experienced one or more adverse events in hospitals in a single month. (HHS, OIG, 2012). When quality life adjusted years (QALYs) are applied to patients that die, the errors committed on an annual basis translates into $1 trillion dollars a year (Andel, et al, 2012)
What does all this mean? Regulation and health care facilities need to work together. We need to effectively prevent errors. Examine system as well as individual errors. Punishment may not be the best option for preventing future errors or poor performance. Remediation, counseling, supervision are tools that need to be considered as part of disciplinary action.
Punishment People tend to hide errors Prevents fixing the system Risk to patient Focus is on punishment Effective when used in the right way.
Questions When do we take no action? When do we counsel, remediate and supervise? When do we punish/remove from practice?
a system of justice (disciplinary and enforcement action) that reflects what we now know of socio-technical system design, human free will and our inescapable human fallibility. Just Culture
A Single Event Repetitive Events Repetitive errors – yes, there is a process Repetitive at-risk behaviors – yes, there is a process Both may lead to disciplinary action… The Just Culture Model
Alternative to Discipline Programs Only effective if the remediation is truly directed towards preventing future occurrence. Monitoring and mentoring. Institution must be aware and involved. Remediation
Deliberate Behavior Discipline May warrant permanent revocation of license
Regulatory Action Pathway Consistent way of evaluating BON cases Based on principles of James Reason, Just Culture, patient safety movement Transparent Patient centered Relies on remediation Partnership with hospitals
Regulatory Action Pathway Encourage good choices beginning with reporting and identification of errors that might lead to better systems Identify the difference between errors that are caused by human fallibility, risk-taking behaviors and recklessness Direct discipline according to the type of error.
Regulatory Action Pathway Patient centered Examines intention and distinguishes between types of errors Encourages reporting of errors Encourages partnership between BON and institution Emphasis on corrective activities Accounts for system related issues Looks at repeated occurrences Discipline when needed