Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Master Plan 2014. SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Site Aerial Grade School High School Middle School Athletics Multi-Purpose.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Master Plan 2014. SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Site Aerial Grade School High School Middle School Athletics Multi-Purpose."— Presentation transcript:

1 Master Plan 2014

2 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Site Aerial Grade School High School Middle School Athletics Multi-Purpose

3 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS  School districts cannot use public resources to advocate a position on a ballot measure.  Bond Language must include  The purpose for which the bonds will be used.  The amount and term of the bonds.  The kind of bonds proposed for issue. Pre-Bond Design Construction Define & Establish Needs Educational & Curricular Safety & Security Operational & Maintenance Community Outreach Establish a Project Budget Community Outreach/Live Design Design a project to meet the needs and aesthetics of the community. Confirm Budget

4 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS  Establish Stakeholder Input Process  Community Based Design Meetings / Live Design  Establish multiple design solutions and seek community feedback.  Check the designs against the fixed budget. Adjust and prioritize the elements of the design to ensure on budget delivery.  Get community approval of the direction.  Fine tune the design with the specialists, science, speech etc.  Roll out the final concept for public comment and adjustment. Design

5 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS  What does a resident only school look like?  Enrollment will drop from 1115 (+/-) students to 700 (+/-) students.  This will result in a 50% drop in revenue.  Reduce 4 bus drivers, 3 teacher aides, 1 janitor, 2 principals and 1 office staff  Reduce teaching staff from 62 to 16.8  Due to the required teaching specialties, Special Ed, PE and high school language the teaching staff would in reality be even smaller.  The average class size would be 41.66 BUT in reality because of the required specialists some classes would be more than 50 students per room. It is not possible to get 41.66 students in any of our existing classrooms.

6 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS  Improved Teaching Spaces  Acoustical  Daylighting  Ventilation, fresh air  Larger Classrooms  Better Space Utilization  Seismic Safety  Energy Conservation  Investment in the Future  Parking & Traffic Break up into small groups and discuss what are the most pressing needs of the district: Turn in 3x5 cards Discuss the Issues Turn in 3x5 cards Discuss the Issues

7 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

8  A walkthrough of one potential solution.  Please help us develop other ideas and options.  How do we make the transition between what we have and what we need? (temporary classrooms)  Feedback from the participants.  What other solutions should we explore?  Where should we go from here?

9 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Campus Plan Dining Existing High School Athletics New 2 Story High School Building New Science Building New Locker Rooms Firetruck Turn Around Future Parking (+43)

10 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Campus Plan Dining Middle School Athletics Gathering CourtyardFuture Parking (+43)

11 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Title 9 Locker Rooms

12 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Student Courtyard

13 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Student Courtyard

14 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Temporary Classrooms

15 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Campus Plan Science Building

16 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Science Building Floor Plan

17 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Science Building

18 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Science Building Wind Screens on Covered Walkway

19 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Campus Plan New High School

20 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS High School 1st Floor

21 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS High School 2 nd Floor

22 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS High School North Perspective

23 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS High School Entry Perspective

24 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS South High School Entry / Courtyard

25 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Student Courtyard

26 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Student Courtyard

27 SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS  Wednesday September the 24 th at 7:00pm  Review updated concept based on 1 st meetings feedback  Report on 3x5 card statistics  Discuss further refinement and options  Small group issues discussion  Discuss how to resolve outstanding issues  Wednesday October 8 th at 7:00pm  Review updated concept based on 2 nd meeting  Group prioritize issues  Propose solutions


Download ppt "Master Plan 2014. SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS Site Aerial Grade School High School Middle School Athletics Multi-Purpose."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google