We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJoseph O'Brien
Modified over 2 years ago
AUDIT INTERREG LP Seminar on Financial Management and Auditing: Financial Reporting from auditors perspective Kirsi Toivanen Manager, Audit Turku, Finland 12 th November, 2004
2 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Background Audit of NeLoC-project Project ended in February 2004 CMS (Centre for Maritime Studies) was the Lead Partner (LP) for the project CMS was responsible for drawing up an activity report and a financial report of the whole project to JS In order to do this separate activity reports and financial reports were received from all other partners involved in NeLoC-project
3 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Background When the project started two possible ways of organising the Financial Management System were considered The LP Pool Model where all invoices and all money transactions would have been entered into the bookkeeping of LP Lead Partner / Project partner model where each partner enters their invoices and transactions in their own bookkeeping, draws up own Progress Reports and has own auditor to check the reports
4 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Background The Project Manager and the auditor had several discussions at that time to decide which model would be most appropriate both advantages and disadvantages were considered finally the latter model was chosen the possible difficulties in deducting the VAT in the LP Pool Model some partners insisted on having their own bookkeeping It is important that the auditor of each Project partner will be contacted in the early stage of the project in order to have discussions with him / her all the way through the project.
5 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Methodology How does the auditor proceed? What will be checked? Does the auditor have his/her own checklists? Are own audit reports generated? As CMS had the Lead Partner role in the project the audit of the Financial report could be divided into two sections: the audit of reports of other partners and the audit of costs generated by CMS Separate checklists have not been used but practically almost all the issues in the Guidelines for auditing of BSR INTERREG III B projects have been handled at some stage
6 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Methodology The audit of reports of other partners. The procedures performed included among others to check that all reports have been audited check that the costs from the partner reports have been correctly transferred to the summary files that include the whole project check that budgets have not been exceeded The audit of CMS. The procedures performed included among others to check that costs are eligible and belong to activities reported check that costs have been paid during the reporting period
7 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Methodology check that budget has not been exceeded check that the allocation between work packages is logical check that the allocation between budget lines is logical reconcile the bookkeeping of the project (Excel-file) to the original bookkeeping of Turku University No separate reports have been issued but possible observations have been discussed with the Project Manager
8 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Experiences What were the main problems/questions arising during the audit? What were noticed to be the most common mistakes in the reports? In the beginning of the project main questions were related to the selection of the model as stated above As the model had been selected the questions were related to what is eligible and what is not what is the starting date for the project what to do when budgets include mistakes Some projects have had budget over-runs costs have been deducted by the Lead Partner
9 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Experiences Personnel costs As the persons involved in the project may vary from time to time it is very important to keep proper records of what different persons have done during the period they have been engaged in the project These papers shall be part of the material that auditor receives If the person is not involved in the project full-time the calculation principles behind used percentages of total salary shall be part of the material Invoices Proper explanations shall be written on invoices to clearly show the eligibility
10 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Good practices The project manager keeps auditor well informed of the relevant issues Auditor is included in posting lists Things are considered together Questions are asked both ways Reports are prepared carefully and the calculations are clear Copies of all invoices are attached to the calculations Copies of general ledger are attached
11 Presenters contact details Kirsi Toivanen KPMG Finland +358 (2) The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
© 2007 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International,
Els Hostyn Partner Internal Audit, Risk & Compliance Services Forensic 13 October 2009 FORENSIC ADVISORY Internal Audit and other assurance providers.
1. Performance Management Objectives In this training you will learn the most effective methods to create constructive performance evaluations and how.
PLANNING THE AUDIT Individual audits must be properly planned to ensure: Appropriate and sufficient evidence is obtained to support the auditors opinion;
Page 1 First Call for Proposals Improving services in the informal areas, enhancing employability and promoting income generation Training Session (First.
The University of Montana Research & Sponsored Programs.
Agenda of the workshop WELCOME! Presentation on Programme requirements and questions & answers Clustering Exercise: Speed Dating Brainstorming (Management.
Manage an IT Project. Aim This presentation is prepared to support and give a general overview of the ‘How to Manage and IT Project’ Guide and should.
Presenting: Units A1 and A2 Who is this presentation for? Assessor-candidates working towards the Unit Assess candidates using a range of methods (A1)
Presenting: Unit V1 Who this presentation is suitable for? Internal verifier-candidates working towards Unit V1: Conduct internal quality assurance of.
1 K P M G L L P A D V I S O R Y Changes in the IT Audit Profession Stephen G. Hasty, Jr. National Partner in Charge IT Advisory Savannah, GA January 4,
© 2005 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK registered company, limited by guarantee, and a member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
School Board Audit Committee Training Module 1 Roles, Responsibilities and Relationships 1.
SubCAT Purpose built Job and Business Administration for Australian and New Zealand Trade Contractors By Construction People for Construction People.
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process Week 3/4 Week 3/4.
Introduction New Form Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Feedback Conversation Career Development SMART Goals Competency Framework Documents There are also links.
Improvement SAE Book The Improvement Project is designed to be used by anyone attempting to improve the value or appearance of the home, place of employment,
How to write a good AHRC grant application (Research Grants & Fellowships) Arts and Humanities Research Council.
Technical and financial management of the project Joint Technical Secretariat Seminar on Reporting 13 August Rezekne, Latvia.
What lessons to draw from multiple regional case studies: between comparability and specificity Julie Pellegrin CSIL – Centre for Industrial Studies.
UNIT-V DEFECT PREVENTION 1Defect prevention (Arun)
4 th Quarter Accounting, Reporting and Tax Update January 10, 2007 CONFERENCE CALL KPMG LLP.
The New Jersey Department of Education Presents: Grants Management Training for FY02 Grant Recipients.
Arts and Humanities Research Council The AHRC Funding Opportunities.
PIC INTERREG IIIC Sud “Robinwood” Mr. Paolo Forno Financial Manager Sub-projects Financial Management.
Operating your collaboration Why would you use it?How does it work? Operating a collaboration, collaborative governance or federation is challenging. Schools.
Balance Sheet Account Reconciliation Tutorial.. Reconciliation Definition: The process of analyzing two related records and, if differences exist between.
SIB Diploma of Salon Management SIRXHRM001A Administer human resource policy E-LEARNING MATERIAL & ASSESSMENTS DEMONSTRATION UNIT DELIVERY STYLE.
High Growth Technology Group Managing your money TeachFirst Innovation Booster 23 November 2013 Ju-Vern See, KPMG Patrick Imbach, KPMG.
IPA Cross-Border Programme Serbia – Bosnia and Herzegovina Workshop for Potential Applicants Užice, 25 April, 2012.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.