We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJoseph O'Brien
Modified over 3 years ago
AUDIT INTERREG LP Seminar on Financial Management and Auditing: Financial Reporting from auditors perspective Kirsi Toivanen Manager, Audit Turku, Finland 12 th November, 2004
2 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Background Audit of NeLoC-project Project ended in February 2004 CMS (Centre for Maritime Studies) was the Lead Partner (LP) for the project CMS was responsible for drawing up an activity report and a financial report of the whole project to JS In order to do this separate activity reports and financial reports were received from all other partners involved in NeLoC-project
3 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Background When the project started two possible ways of organising the Financial Management System were considered The LP Pool Model where all invoices and all money transactions would have been entered into the bookkeeping of LP Lead Partner / Project partner model where each partner enters their invoices and transactions in their own bookkeeping, draws up own Progress Reports and has own auditor to check the reports
4 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Background The Project Manager and the auditor had several discussions at that time to decide which model would be most appropriate both advantages and disadvantages were considered finally the latter model was chosen the possible difficulties in deducting the VAT in the LP Pool Model some partners insisted on having their own bookkeeping It is important that the auditor of each Project partner will be contacted in the early stage of the project in order to have discussions with him / her all the way through the project.
5 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Methodology How does the auditor proceed? What will be checked? Does the auditor have his/her own checklists? Are own audit reports generated? As CMS had the Lead Partner role in the project the audit of the Financial report could be divided into two sections: the audit of reports of other partners and the audit of costs generated by CMS Separate checklists have not been used but practically almost all the issues in the Guidelines for auditing of BSR INTERREG III B projects have been handled at some stage
6 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Methodology The audit of reports of other partners. The procedures performed included among others to check that all reports have been audited check that the costs from the partner reports have been correctly transferred to the summary files that include the whole project check that budgets have not been exceeded The audit of CMS. The procedures performed included among others to check that costs are eligible and belong to activities reported check that costs have been paid during the reporting period
7 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Methodology check that budget has not been exceeded check that the allocation between work packages is logical check that the allocation between budget lines is logical reconcile the bookkeeping of the project (Excel-file) to the original bookkeeping of Turku University No separate reports have been issued but possible observations have been discussed with the Project Manager
8 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Experiences What were the main problems/questions arising during the audit? What were noticed to be the most common mistakes in the reports? In the beginning of the project main questions were related to the selection of the model as stated above As the model had been selected the questions were related to what is eligible and what is not what is the starting date for the project what to do when budgets include mistakes Some projects have had budget over-runs costs have been deducted by the Lead Partner
9 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Experiences Personnel costs As the persons involved in the project may vary from time to time it is very important to keep proper records of what different persons have done during the period they have been engaged in the project These papers shall be part of the material that auditor receives If the person is not involved in the project full-time the calculation principles behind used percentages of total salary shall be part of the material Invoices Proper explanations shall be written on invoices to clearly show the eligibility
10 © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the Finnish member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved Good practices The project manager keeps auditor well informed of the relevant issues Auditor is included in email posting lists Things are considered together Questions are asked both ways Reports are prepared carefully and the calculations are clear Copies of all invoices are attached to the calculations Copies of general ledger are attached
11 Presenters contact details Kirsi Toivanen KPMG Finland +358 (2) 273 2720 email@example.com The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. © 2004 KPMG Wideri Oy Ab, the member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
Factors Associated with IT Audits by the Internal Audit Function Discussant Comments October 2, 2009 INFORMATION RISK MANAGEMENT ADVISORY.
© 2007 KPMG, the Malaysian member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. 1 Differing Roles of Internal Auditor and Risk.
External auditors’ perspective
September 30, 2008 BIBA ROUNDTABLE Regulatory Panel.
TRANSACTION SERVICES ADVISORY Romania conference – IPO process Victor Kevehazi, Senior Partner 18 October 2005.
Marc Vael Chief Security Officer KPMG Brussels June 2 nd 2004 ICT ADVISORY eID usage within KPMG.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Financial Report BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Rostislav Zatloukal.
Views on TRAC and the UWE workload model 12 th December 2013.
GLOBAL SERVICE/ INDUSTRY AUDIT / TAX / ADVISORY / LINE OF BUSINESS Current Topics in Global Trade Management John Patrick O’Shea Senior Manager Trade and.
OMB Circular A-123 Lessons Learned OMB Circular A-123 Lessons Learned FEDERAL ADVISORY Sean Hoffman Partner KPMG LLP.
Institute of Operational Risk Breakout Session - Operational Risk Nirvana KPMG Giles Triffitt Peter Watson Peter Docherty 1 November 2013.
Interim report I The Northern Beauty Barents visual arts in
Trade Compliance Considerations April 13, © 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network.
Audit Sampling: A Basic Understanding AGA-Baltimore Johnny Ramsey, Senior Manager KPMG Government Industry Sector September 20, 2012.
© 2007 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International,
Start-ups & big business Competition or competitive advantage? Imperial Business Insights Lecture 13 February 2014.
Introduction to Accounting 120 Chapter 6: The Journal and Source Documents Mr. Binet Moncton High School.
Tacis Contracting Procedure Documents to be submitted together with the application: Original Declaration by the Financial Lead Partner for Tacis Partnership.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden First level controls - Certification of Expenditure INTERREG IIIC.
© 2005 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK registered company, limited by guarantee, and a member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
2 Slovenia Signed Contract of Confidence for the period Compliance assessment for one programme for the new period Experience of a Certifying.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
Els Hostyn Partner Internal Audit, Risk & Compliance Services Forensic 13 October 2009 FORENSIC ADVISORY Internal Audit and other assurance providers.
Actuarial Considerations In Connection with Captive Insurance Companies September, 2007 George Levine KPMG LLP.
KPMG GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE The Future of Government Financial Reporting: Where Do We Go From Here? AGA Baltimore Chapter AUDIT Andrew C. Lewis, CPA, CGFM,
1 K P M G L L P A D V I S O R Y Changes in the IT Audit Profession Stephen G. Hasty, Jr. National Partner in Charge IT Advisory Savannah, GA January 4,
S8: Audit Planning Memorandum
1 CENTER FOR LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT Extracting Value From Post-course Evaluations Using Advanced Statistical Techniques November 12, :30 – 6:00P.
GMV – Centre for Environment and Sustainability How we receive money to the project - How funds and information flow in INTERREG.
19 Costing Systems: Process Costing Principles of Accounting 12e
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Legal framework:
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Progress report – structure and contents BSR INTERREG III B Joint.
Personal Budgets. Introduction Name Andrea Woodier Organisation Leicestershire County Council Telephone number address
2004 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar SOP 97-3 Department of Labor Special Fund Assessments September 13, 2004 Bill Stanfield, ACAS, MAAA.
Accountancy as a Profession
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
Evidence and Documentation
ACTUARIAL SERVICES ADVISORY Other Balance Sheet Reserves: SAO & Reinsurer Concerns Las Vegas September 2004.
Chapter 13 Prepared by Richard J. Campbell Copyright 2011, Wiley and Sons Auditing Human Resources Processes: Personnel and Payroll in Service Industries.
LLP – Leonardo da Vinci Contact Seminar “A contact in Rome, an action in Europe” How to submit a correct and relevant Mobility project Parco Tirreno Suitehotel.
Lecture 7 Audit Documentation
Focused Assessments and Quick Response Audits Developing an Effective Strategy April 14, 2011 TAX.
A clear and compelling business case… …for the individual
ADVISORY What do CIOs need for Career Progression? 18 th May 2005 Kumar Parakala, Global Chief Operating Officer, IT Advisory, KPMG 8 May 2007, Sydney,
Experience in Final Reporting from INTERREG III B “Castle Tomorrow” project perspective Marika Rudzite, Project coordinator (Head of Investment and Development.
Auditor 1 Workshop # Has everyone signed the roster? Please use your legal name, home address and phone, and birth date.
From cost to value: 2010 Global Survey on the CIO Agenda June 15 th, 2010 IT ADVISORY KPMG INTERNATIONAL.
IAS 16―Property, Plant & Equipment IFRS vs. GAAP AUDIT The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances.
Kolarctic ENPI CBC Programme Project implementation training session under the 1st Call for Proposals FINANCIAL ISSUES Joint Managing Authority.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.