Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies www.wiiw.ac.at IDEAS Conference, Delhi.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies www.wiiw.ac.at IDEAS Conference, Delhi."— Presentation transcript:

1 Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies www.wiiw.ac.at IDEAS Conference, Delhi 29 January 2012 Session on: Economic integration and its impact Current state and crisis of Europe’s model of integration Michael A Landesmann

2  wiiw 2 Main Issues  What is at the root of the crisis in Europe?  Is the Euro-zone going to pull through? In which shape?  What is the predicament of Europe’s ‘periphery’?  Pitfalls in the ‘European integration model of growth and convergence’?  More generally: growth and catching-up in an era of financial market integration

3  wiiw 3 What is at the root of the crisis in Europe? Why is EU more hit than other advanced economies?  No-bail-out clause plus constitution of the ECB makes the Euro-zone very vulnerable in times of very nervous financial markets; but the additional important ingredient is:  Pronounced developments of external imbalances within the Euro-zone, driven by financial market integration and – mostly – fast private sector debt accumulation  Policy-mechanisms to deal with these imbalances non-existent or in-effective: no established crisis management mechanism at EU/Euro level (ECB mandate, no pooling of debt responsibility; no fiscal stabilisation function); financial markets insufficiently (and nationally) regulated;  real exchange rates diverge persistently driven by capital inflows (interest rate convergence before the crisis); relative price adjustment very slow – hence, during the crisis, rebalancing through incomes;

4  wiiw 4 Current state of the crisis in Europe  Banks very weak; no effective re-capitalisation; implicit liability of states – sovereign debt problem and feed-back processes; national segmentation of responsibility and differentiated vulnerability of countries persists – very slow move towards some ‘mutualisation of debt’  Austerity in fiscal policies, deleveraging processes (corporate, households, banks) generate stagnation; sustainability of debt of both private and public sectors judged (by markets) as unresolved; banking and sovereign debt crisis could further escalate  Any resolution in sight?

5  wiiw 5 Policy master-plan?  Exclusive focus on fiscal consolidation: Germany sees this as a pre- condition for any move towards joint action/mutualisation on the debt problem and widening ECB’s mandate – focus to bring long-term public debt ratios down (constitutional amendments; tightening of fiscal control)  Recapitalisation of banks asked for, but happens through shrinkage of balance sheets – credit crunch  Some moves towards EU-wide regulatory and supervisory bodies; but lacking teeth so far; in the short-run more national segmentation of banking  Measures to monitor development of competitiveness in the future; details to be worked out; unlikely to be very effective  No growth strategy, except lip-service to change revenue and expenditure structures in ‘growth enhancing’ manner; plus liberalisation

6  wiiw 6 Is the Euro-zone going to pull through? In which shape?  Economic issues: - recession(s) 2012/13; then medium-term stagnation/low growth - unfolding of fiscal consolidation; widening of ECB activity – important transitory role; slow build-up of EFSF/ESM (role vis-a-vis banking system and sovereign debt); Greek default – contagion effects – ‘ring-fencing’; access to capital markets will remain/become very problematic for a range of countries (IT,SP,PO,GR,HU, Ro, IRL,...); bank collapses and contagion a possibility  Political issues: - How are polities going to react? espec. in high austerity countries - Technocratic handling of the crisis; reaction against MerkMontozy; tensions in and towards inter-governmental processes; reactions in national polities and parliaments; field for populist/nationalist parties; little debate on alternative strategies

7  wiiw 7 The predicament of Europe’s ‘periphery’  In many countries (Southern and Eastern periphery) high debt levels of private sectors (corporate and household sectors) – deleveraging processes; public sector debt has significantly increased  Foreign banks in retrenchment – credit constraints severe; cross-border banking goes through a process of re-nationalisation  Current accounts adjust strongly – mechanisms different in fix- and flex-exchange rate countries; big differences across countries in underlying strength of export sector; in a range of economies strong legacy of distorted tradable/non- tradable sector structures  FDI and inward capital flows sharply down – ‘catching-up model’ (‘downhill capital flows’) will have to be significantly rethought (stronger focus on industrial policy; emphasis on tradable sector; less reliance on fixed exch. regimes; EMU?)

8  wiiw 8 Economic Integration and Emerging Economies: general issues emerging from the crisis  International financial markets integration can strongly accentuate the possibility of external and internal imbalances  Exchange rate regimes are very important in this context  Catching-up processes can be seriously derailed due to the build-up of imbalances  Impact on distorting economic structures (domestic savings behaviour, capital allocations across tradable/non-tradable sectors, asset prices, competitiveness – real exchange rates, etc.)  The setting for catching-up economies in (EU)rope is special: affects not only EU members but also economies in the neighbourhood (e.g. Balkans)

9  wiiw 9 The European integration model of catching-up  targeted at ‘deep integration’ with the EU/Euro area  associated with very far-reaching internal and external liberalization (trade, capital transactions, financial market integration, labour mobility)  benefits: ‘downhill’ capital inflows, trade integration, ‘technology’ transfer; institutional convergence  the model worked - ‘convergence process’ – but emergence of severe structural imbalances in important groups of European EMEs; heterogeneity of pre- and post-crisis experience of European EMEs

10  wiiw 10 Growth – GDP at constant prices Average annual growth rates, 2002-2008, in %

11  wiiw 11 European periphery and comparisons with other emerging economies  CE-5: Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia  BB-5: Bulgaria, Romania (SE-2); Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania (B-3)  WB-6: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia;  EU-Coh: Greece, Portugal, Spain  Asia-6: Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, Taiwan and Thailand  Latam-8: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay

12  wiiw 12 Composition of the current account of the balance of payments, 1995-2009 Note: ASIA-6 excl. Taiwan. Source: IMF International Financial Statistics and IMF WEO October 2010.

13  wiiw 13 Net private financial flows in % of GDP, 1993-2009 Source: IMF Balance of Payments Statistics. ASIA-6 excl. Taiwan. LATAM-8 ASIA-6MENA-6 EU-COH CE-5 SEE-2 B-3 WB-6 TR

14  wiiw 14 Credit to the private sector (%GDP, 1995-2009)

15  wiiw 15 Financial integration - Changes in: (i) assets plus liabilities; (ii) credit to private sector in % of GDP (percentage point change), 2001-2007 Note: Assets and liabilities: EU-COH: 265.82%; WB-6: 212.14%. Source: IMF International Financial Statistics. ASIA-6 excl. Taiwan, MENA-6 excl. Lebanon.

16  wiiw 16 External debt: public and private (% of GDP), 2008 Note: ASIA-4 excl. PH, TW. MENA-4 excl. LB, SY. B-3 excl. FYROM, BA, RS. Source: World Bank, World Databank.

17  wiiw 17 External debt: public and private (% of GDP), 2008 Note: ASIA-4 excl. PH, TW. MENA-4 excl. LB, SY. B-3 excl. FYROM, BA, RS. Source: World Bank, World Databank.

18  wiiw 18 CESEE: GDP growth was well above the interest rate before the crisis Nominal interest rate on government debt and nominal GDP growth (%), 2000-2010 Note: Interest rate = government interest expenditures / previous year gross debt.

19  wiiw 19 Debt in % of GDP Gross external debtPublic debtPrivate debt Source: wiiw Annual Database incorporating Eurostat statistics.

20  wiiw 20 Debt in % of GDP Gross external debtPublic debtPrivate debt Source: wiiw Annual Database incorporating Eurostat statistics.

21  wiiw 21 Foreign bank ownership, 1998-2005 (assets owned by foreign banks as % of banking system assets) Note: ASIA-6 excl. Taiwan, MENA-6 excl. Syria. Source: from Claessens et al (2008). B-3 SEE-2 WB-6 CE-2 LATAM-8 MENA-6 Turkey ASIA-6

22  wiiw 22 Industrial Production - Index 1993=100, 2000, 2008 Note: ASIA-6 excl. Taiwan. B-SEE excl. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia. Source: World Bank.

23  wiiw 23 Differences in the composition of FDI 23 Large part in manufacturing, infrastructure, trade in central Europe Large part in real estate, finance in Baltic region

24  wiiw 24 Real exchange rate developments, 1995 to 2010 Appreciation hand-in- hand with catching-up in Central Europe Misalignment in the Baltics/Balkans Stable real X-rate in Asia post crisis

25  wiiw 25 Growth - GDP at constant prices Average annual growth rates, 1995-2010, in % Source: IMF World Economic Outlook, October 2010. EBRD and wiiw Annual Database incorporating national statistics, Eurostat..

26  wiiw 26 Summarizing some of the features of European EMEs  High growth prior to the crisis  High indicators for openness: particularly strong growth in international financial integration  Much greater role of foreign banks in European EMEs compared to other EMEs  Fast growth of credit to private sector in many European EMEs  Public debt situation not that different between European EMEs and other EMEs  Differences in industrial production growth and the build-up of export capacity in different EMEs  Clear link between private credit growth and current account deterioration; and hence foreign debt positions

27  wiiw 27 Summary: Specific features of European EMEs  Opening of the capital account: a rule of the game in the EU; deep financial integration  Reliance on massive imports of capital; only 4 CESEE-countries could avoid skyrocketing external (private) debt  Bank credit: the overwhelming source of external funding  Financial integration: major channel for transmitting shocks (EU- Coh, B-SEE regions hit hardest by the crisis)  So far no meltdown of financial systems in CESEE - advantage of the presence of foreign banks?  Differentiation across CESEE economies linked to extent of build- up of industrial production and export capacity

28  wiiw 28 Principal policy lessons:  In national and EU policy frameworks: neglect of private sector debt build-up relative to public sector  Financial market regulation severely underdeveloped; specific issue in CESEE region: high level of cross-border banking  Fixed exchange rate regimes bear high risks; but what are the options of highly euroized EU members and candidates?  Current situation characterised by very fragile banking system; protracted deleveraging processes; strong financial market pressure prevents use of fiscal space;  Consequence: ‘European integration model of growth’ requires severe re-shaping

29  wiiw 29 Real exchange rate developments 2003=100, CPI deflated Source: IMF: International Financial Statistics, wiiw calculation.

30  wiiw 30 Relationship between pre-crisis credit growth and current account balances Source: IMF World Economic Outlook. average CA/GDP 2004-2007 Change in credit/GDP 2004-2007

31  wiiw 31 Structural features: European and other EMEs LATAM-8ASIA-6MENA-6CE-5EU-COHB-SEE Credit/GDP, change from 2004 to 2008 (percentage points)15.85-8.977.026.6856.8839.21 Real interest rate average, 2005-20074.333.17-0.091.10-3.10-0.26 Current account balance/GDP, 2007 (%)0.143.35-1.42-4.88-10.09-15.21 Gross external debt, 2009 (% of GDP)20.834.820.962.7229.680.4 GDP growth, 2008-20103.823.475.380.50-1.67-1.55 Source: wiiw calculations.

32  wiiw 32 Structural features: the role of exchange rate regimes ‘Fixers’ and ‘floaters’ amongst the CESEEs CESEE floatCESEE fix Credit/GDP, change from 2004 to 2008 (percentage points)20.532.8 Real interest rate average, 2005-20071.6-1.6 Current account balance/GDP, 2007 (%)-6.6-11.8 Gross external debt, 2009 (% of GDP)78.895.6 GDP-growth, 2008-20101.18-1.78 FDI to finance and real estate sectors, 2007 (per cent of total FDI stock)26.540.2 Change in unemployment rate from 2007 to 2010 (percentage points)1.53.9 Source: wiiw calculations.

33  wiiw 33 GDP development, 2005-2012 2008=100 Source: wiiw forecast and IMF World Economic Outlook, October 2010. WB-6 CE-5 SEE-2 B-3 EU-COH LATAM-8 ASIA-6 TR

34  wiiw 34 GDP development, 2005-2012 2008=100 Source: wiiw forecast and IMF World Economic Outlook, October 2010. WB-6 CE-5 SEE-2 B-3 EU-COH LATAM-8 ASIA-6 TR MENA-6

35  wiiw 35 General government gross debt (% of GDP), 1995-2010 Source: IMF World Economic Outlook.

36  wiiw 36 Unemployment at high levels registered unemployment rates in % Source: wiiw Monthly Database. Latvia Lithuania Romania

37  wiiw 37 Indicators - country groups: Pop, GDP, GDP per capita 2008 Population, total (mn) GDP (USD bn) GDP, PPP (USD bn) GDP per capita (USD) GDP, PPP per capita (USD) 2008 LATAM-8445.6733682.7865253.562826311788 ASIA-6460.7012102.7593478.17545647550 MENA-6154.048399.710844.18325955480 EU-COH71.8412462.9282304.3653428332076 CE-566.0161051.9351352.7861593420492 SEE-229.137251.896429.674864514747 B-36.965104.495137.4631500319737 WB-621.364163.707263.539766312335 Turkey73.914730.3371039.858988114068 B-SEE57.466520.098830.676905014455 Source: World Bank, World Databank, wiiw calculation.


Download ppt "Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies www.wiiw.ac.at IDEAS Conference, Delhi."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google