Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Point of Care Platelet Function Testing – Is There Still Value?

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Point of Care Platelet Function Testing – Is There Still Value?"— Presentation transcript:

1 Point of Care Platelet Function Testing – Is There Still Value?
Mark B. Effron, MD, FACC, FAHA, FCCP Medical Fellow US Medical Division – Cardiovascular/Critical Care LillyUSA, LLC Advanced Cardiovascular Intervention January 2011 London

2 Disclosures Dr. Effron is an employee and holds equity in Eli Lilly and Company which markets ReoPro® (abciximab) and Efient ® (prasugrel). Please be aware that some of the following presentations will include off-licence clopidogrel doses. 300mg/75mg is the licenced clopidogrel dose in the UK.

3 Platelet function testing: Common testing devices
Light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) Historical standard Aggregation based, platelet rich plasma (PRP) ADP peak platelet aggregation Central laboratory, trained technicians Time consuming VerifyNow® P2Y12 assay Aggregation based, whole blood Bedside test. fully automated Multiplate ® (MULTIple PLATElet) function analyzer Aggregation based, whole blood Bedside test. fully automated Sensitive for aspirin, ADP receptor inhibitor, GP IIb/IIIa antagonists

4 Comparison of Platelet Inhibition as Measured by VerifyNow ® and Light Transmission Aggregometry
Association between PRU (from VerifyNow) and RPA (from LTA) induced with 20-μmol/L ADP after thienopyridinea Maintenance Dose PRU (VN-P2Y12) -20 20 40 60 80 RPA (%) to 20 μM ADP r = 0.79 P<0.0001 y = x 100 200 300 400 Symbols represent individual simultaneous predose measurements on days 14 and 29. Correlation coefficient (r) was calculated by the Pearson method. aTwo thienopyridines, clopidogrel (75 mg) and prasugrel (10 mg), were included in this study. RPA = residual platelet aggregation. Adapted from Varenhorst C, et al. Am Heart J. 2009;157:562.e1-562.e9. 4 4

5 Variability in platelet reactivity with clopidogrel
Maximal aggregation 5 µmol/L ADP (%) following 600 mg loading dose Change in ADP-Induced Platelet Aggregation 75 mg chronic dosing 100 N=1001 N=92 80 60 40 20 2 4 6 8 Time from loading dose to cath (h) Hochholzer et al. Circulation ; Gurbel P et al, Circulation 2003; 107:

6 Scripps Clinic: Event Free survival in DES patients with and without high post-treatment reactivity (HPR) Platelet reactivity < 235 PRU Platelet reactivity ≥ 235 PRU N=258 N=122 Event – Composite of CV death, MI, or stent thrombosis HPR – PRU ≥ 235 Price MJ et al . EHJ. 2008; 29, 992–1000

7 Survival free from primary endpoint
POPULAR: Survival free from primary endpoint Primary Endpoint – Composite of death, MI, definite stent thrombosis, or stroke Breet N et al . JAMA. 2010; 303:

8 GRAVITAS: Patient flow 5429 patients screened with VerifyNow P2Y12
12-24 hours post-PCI 2214 (41%) with high residual platelet reactivity (PRU ≥ 230) 3215 (59%) without high residual platelet reactivity (PRU < 230) Clopidogrel High Dose N=1109 Clopidogrel Standard Dose N=1105 Price. AHA Scientific Sessions, Chicago 2010

9 Pharmacodynamics: Effect of SD vs HD clopidogrel
GRAVITAS: Pharmacodynamics: Effect of SD vs HD clopidogrel 75-mg/d 150-mg/d 500 P = 0.98 P < 0.001 400 PRU ≥ 230 at 30 days Clopidogrel 75mg/d Clopidogrel 150mg/d 62% 40% p < 0.001 PRU value 300 200 100 N=1105 N=1013 N=940 N=1109 N=1012 N=944 Post-PCI 30 d 6 mo Post-PCI 30 d 6 mo ITT population Price. AHA Scientific Sessions, Chicago 2010

10 Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, or stent thrombosis
GRAVITAS: Primary endpoint: CV death, MI, or stent thrombosis 2.3% vs. 2.3% HR 1.01 (95% CI ) P=0.98 Observed event rates are listed; P value by log rank test. Price. AHA Scientific Sessions, Chicago 2010

11 Bleeding events: Safety population
GRAVITAS: Bleeding events: Safety population Severe or life-threatening: Fatal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, or bleeding that causes hemodynamic compromise requiring blood or fluid replacement, inotropic support, or surgical intervention Moderate: Bleeding that leads to transfusion but does not meet criteria for severe bleeding P by log rank test; observed event rates listed. HD, high-dose; SD, standard dose Price. AHA Scientific Sessions, Chicago 2010

12 GRAVITAS: HPR vs no HPR with clopidogrel 75-mg daily Patient flow
5429 patients screened with VerifyNow P2Y12 12-24 hours post-PCI 2214 (41%) with high residual platelet reactivity (PRU ≥ 230) 3215 (59%) without high residual platelet reactivity (PRU < 230) Random selection Clopidogrel High Dose N=1109 Clopidogrel Standard Dose N=1105 Clopidogrel Standard Dose N=586 Non-Randomized Comparison Price. AHA Scientific Sessions, Chicago 2010

13 GRAVITAS: HPR vs no HPR with clopidogrel 75-mg daily
PRU and clinical outcome 500 Red dots: patients with CV death, MI, or stent thrombosis 400 PRU hrs post-PCI 300 230 PRU 200 100 N=1105 N= 586 High Residual Reactivity Not High Residual Reactivity ITT population Price. AHA Scientific Sessions, Chicago 2010

14 GRAVITAS: Summary Compared with standard-dose therapy, high-dose clopidogrel (150-mg/d) achieved a modest pharmacodynamic effect in patients with high residual reactivity. In patients with high residual reactivity measured after PCI, 6-months of high-dose clopidogrel (150- mg/d) did not reduce the rate of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or stent thrombosis and did not increase GUSTO severe or moderate bleeding. Price. AHA Scientific Sessions, Chicago 2010

15 Possible interpretation of results
GRAVITAS: Possible interpretation of results Study Population - Patients with high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) may not benefit from tailoring antiplatelet therapy because HRPR is a risk marker and not a modifiable risk factor Intervention – 150 vs 75 mg of clopidogrel - A projected 50% RRR may have been too robust for 150 mg vs 75 mg of clopidogrel. Alternatively, 150 mg of clopidogrel may not provide a sufficient difference in platelet inhibition. Power – Too little power to show a difference between treatment arms Mega. AHA Scientific Sessions, Chicago 2010

16

17 On-going trials to test the hypothesis whether high levels of P2Y12 inhibition reduce events in HPR
Acronym Clinical Trials Identifier Patient Population Primary Outcome Measure Thienopyridine therapy ARCTIC NCT Elective and NSTEMI PCI patients-DES (N=2466) 12 m Composite end point of death, MI, stroke, Urgent revascularization, ST Therapy based on MD test results DANTE NCT Unstable or NSTEMI-PCI (N=442) 6 and 12 m CV death, nonfatal MI, TVR by PCI or CABG 75 mg qd vs 150 mg qd TRIGGER-PCI NCT Coronary artery disease (CAD)-DES (N=2150) (Prasugrel is licensed for ACS patients undergoing PCI) 6 m CV death, nonfatal MI Prasugrel 60/10 mg vs Clopidogrel 600 mg/75 mg Adapted from Collet J-P, et al. Am Heart J 2011;161:5-12.e5

18 Point of Care Platelet Function Testing:
Learnings from GRAVITAS GRAVITAS does not support a treatment strategy of high-dose clopidogrel (150-mg/d) in low-risk patients with high residual platelet reactivity (HPR) identified by a single platelet function test after PCI. However, GRAVITAS does not invalidate the hypothesis that use of an oral antiplatelet agent which can overcome HPR may improve clinical outcomes. Ongoing clinical trials will help determine the benefit and risk of such a strategy.


Download ppt "Point of Care Platelet Function Testing – Is There Still Value?"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google