We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNathan Bird
Modified over 3 years ago
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 Workshop 2S (Secondary) Using RAISEonline to examine attainment data
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 1 Objectives To examine the data analyses that are available in RAISEonline and how they can be used to explore attainment gaps To use the analyses to identify attainment gaps in the school and agree aspects of focus for improvement
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 22 Resource 2.1S: KS4 capped APS by pupil characteristics – ethnicity Average capped total point score (best 8 subjects) CohortSchoolNationalSig Ethnicity group White British173227.6309.8Sig– Irish1-322.0- Traveller of Irish Heritage1-156.3- Any other White background2343.0304.6 Mixed White and Black Caribbean9242.0288.1 Any other mixed background154.0315.9- Asian or Asian British Indian4348.5348.2 Pakistani33286.8302.8 Bangladeshi2329.0308.8 Any other Asian background2413.0320.1 Black or Black British Black Caribbean363.0289.1Sig– Black African3342.0302.7
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 3 Some key points to note The capped APS for White British pupils in this school is about 82 points below the national average – the equivalent of almost 14 GCSE grades across the eight subjects. (Each GCSE grade is worth 6 points.) There is a great deal of variability in the attainment of different groups on this measure, with some performing above the national average (for example, Bangladeshi) and others performing below the national average (for example, Black Caribbean). Scores that are significantly below the national average are identified by the blue Sig– cells in the last column of the table.
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 44 Resource 2.2S: KS4 capped APS by pupil characteristics – gender and FSM Average capped total point score (best 8 subjects) CohortSchoolNationalSig All pupils 234238.6307.8Sig– Male 129213.6297.1Sig– Female 105269.4318.9Sig– FSM 82203.5252.5Sig– Non-FSM 152257.6315.5Sig–
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 5 Some key points to note All the groups shown attain significantly below the national average (Sig–). The school gap between boys and girls is 55.8 points – equivalent to more than nine GCSE grades across the eight subjects. Nationally, this gap is 21.8 points, equivalent to about four GCSE grades across the eight subjects. (Each GCSE grade is worth six points.) The school gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils is 54.1 points, compared to a national gap of 63.0 points. The relatively narrow gap in this school could be explained by good achievement by FSM pupils, or poor achievement by non-FSM pupils.
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 66 Resource 2.3S: KS4 capped APS by pupil characteristics – SEN Average capped total point score (best 8 subjects) CohortSchoolNationalSig No identified SEN 106312.7329.6Sig– School action 68209.5245.6Sig– School action plus 57142.2191.7Sig– SEN with statement 3115.7188.1
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 7 A key point to note Pupils at school action and school action plus attain significantly below the national averages. Pupils with a statement of SEN have an average capped total point score of 115.7 points. This is equivalent to seven GCSEs at grade G (GCSE grade G is equivalent to 16 points). Nationally, statemented pupils gain an average of 188.1 points, the equivalent of eight GCSEs at grade F, or nearly five GCSEs at grade C.
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 8 Resource 2.4S: KS4 capped APS by subject (mathematics) – ethnicity Average points per pupil in mathematics, KS4 EntriesSchoolNationalSig Ethnic group All pupils23424.1 37.7Sig– White British17322.437.6Sig– Irish10.039.5- Traveller of Irish heritage10.024.9- Any other White background222.038.4- Mixed White and Black Caribbean921.634.6Sig– Any other mixed background116.038.4- Asian or Asian British Indian438.542.6 Pakistani3332.136.0 Bangladeshi228.037.5 Any other Asian background243.041.6 Black or Black British Caribbean320.034.3Sig– African336.036.9
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 9 Some key points to note White and Black Caribbean pupils are attaining significantly below the national average in mathematics. The gap of 13 points equates to just over two GCSE grades. Only one group (any other Asian background) has an APS that equates to a grade C or above in mathematics (40 points or more). The nine pupils of White and Black Caribbean origin in the school attain 2.5 points less in mathematics than all pupils in the school – roughly half a GCSE grade. This is similar to the picture nationally, where the attainment gap in mathematics is 3.1 points.
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 10 Key questions about average points scores (1) How does the gender gap in core subjects in the school compare to the gender gap nationally? How well do FSM pupils do, compared to the school average for all pupils? And compared to non-FSM pupils? Is the gap narrowing, or getting wider, compared to previous years? How well do pupils on the SEN register do, compared to the school average? Is the gap narrowing or getting wider, compared to previous years?
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 11 Key questions about average points scores (2) Are sufficiently ambitious targets set for pupils from underachieving ethnic groups? If pupils meet their targets, will this result in a narrowing of the gap between disadvantaged groups and their peers? How are groups that have underperformed historically being targeted for additional support? How much variability in attainment is there across different subjects?
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 12 Resource 2.5S: KS4 attainment thresholds by pupil characteristics – gender and FSM Percentage of pupils achieving each threshold Cohort5+ A*-C (incl Eng and Mat) 5+ A*-C (incl func Eng and Mat 5+ A*-G All pupils 15651132883 Gender Male8149153180 Female7553122485 Free school meals FSM28294764 Non FSM12856163287
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 13 Some key points to note Of the 28 FSM pupils in the cohort, only 4% gain 5+ A*–C including English and mathematics (one pupil), a gap of 9 ppts with all pupils and a gap of 12 ppts with non-FSM pupils. Boys outperform girls on the threshold indicators that include English, mathematics or functional skills.
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 14 Resource 2.6S: Percentage achieving or surpassing each sublevel by subject (English and mathematics) Subject Number of entries Entry as a %age of cohort % A*–A % A*–C % A*–G % Fail APS ENGLISH LITERATURE School6944.24.358.097.12.937.3 National471,87379.518.268.098.02.040.0 ENGLISH/ENG LANGUAGE - SINGLE School15599.41.329.091.68.428.4 National567,55095.714.162.598.61.438.9 MATHEMATICS School15599.40.617.496.13.927.9 National576,45697.214.758.097.82.237.5
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 15 Some key points to note There are significant attainment gaps for higher- attaining pupils, with the percentage of pupils gaining A*–A grades in English literature, English language or mathematics significantly below that seen nationally. The percentage of pupils gaining A*–C grades in English or mathematics is significantly below the national average, with gaps of 33.5 ppts and 40.6 ppts respectively.
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 16 Resource 2.7S: KS4 percentage achieving attainment threshold measures by subject (English/English language) – gender, FSM, SEN Percentage of cohort gaining A* to C in English/English language CohortSchoolNationalDifferenceSignificance All pupils1562966–37Sig– Male812860–32Sig– Female752973–44Sig– FSM281144–33Sig– Non-FSM1283369–36Sig– No identified SEN894375–32Sig– School action391534–19Sig– School action plus22527–22Sig– SEN with a statement6022–22-
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 17 Some key points to note The gap between boys and girls in the school is 1 ppt, compared to 13 ppts nationally. This is because of the marked underperformance of girls compared to the national average. The gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils in the school is 22 ppts, compared to 25 ppts nationally. All groups, except SEN with a statement, are attaining significantly below the national average on this threshold indicator.
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 18 Resource 2.8S: KS4 percentage achieving attainment threshold measures by subject (Eng/Eng language) – gender, FSM and ethnicity Percentage of cohort gaining A*–C in Eng/Eng language CohortSchoolNational All pupils 1562966 GenderFSM eligibilityMain ethnic code FemaleNoWhite British6431– FemaleYesWhite British1118– MaleNoWhite British6134– MaleNoWhite and Asian1100– MaleNo Any other mixed background 10– MaleNoPakistani10– MaleYesWhite British166– MaleYesAfrican10–
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 19 Some key points to note 31% of the non-FSM White British girls gained A*–C in English, while only 18% FSM White British girls achieved this threshold, a gap of 13 ppts. 34% of the non-FSM White British boys gained A*–C in English, while only 6% FSM White British boys achieved this threshold, a gap of 28 ppts.
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 20 Key questions about threshold measures (1) How well do FSM pupils or pupils from minority ethnic groups attain, compared to school and national averages on statutory threshold indicators (5+ A*–C, including English and mathematics)? Are gaps narrowing? Does the school provide good opportunities for pupils on the G&T register, and higher-attaining pupils generally, to gain A*–A grades at KS4?
© Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 21 Key questions about threshold measures (2) Does the school tracking system generate reports that allow leaders and practitioners to see how well key groups are progressing towards ambitious targets? Are targets set that will ensure attainment gaps narrow over time? How are groups that have underperformed historically being targeted for additional support? How much variability in attainment is there across different subjects?
© Crown copyright 2009 Crown copyright The content of this publication may be reproduced for non-commercial research, education or training purposes provided that the material is acknowledged as Crown copyright, the publication title is specified, it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. For any other use of this material please apply to OPSI for a Click-Use, PSI Licence, or by writing to: Office of Public Sector Information Information Policy Team National Archives Kew Richmond Surrey TW9 4DU Email: firstname.lastname@example.org@opsi.gov.uk Web: www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/index.htmwww.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/index.htm The permission to reproduce Crown copyright protected material does not extend to any material in this publication which is identified as being the copyright of a third party, or to Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos, nor does it include the right to copy any photographic or moving images of children or adults in a way that removes the image or footage from its original context. © Crown copyright 2009 00912-2009PPT-EN-03 22
© Crown copyright PPT-EN-01 Workshop 1 Narrowing gaps – setting the scene.
© Crown copyright PPT-EN-05 Workshop 3S (Secondary) Analysing progress data.
Data slides for Key Stage 2–4 progress target setting
© Crown copyright 2009 Yorkshire & Humber ICT consultants network Narrowing the Gap Michael Hawkins Regional Adviser NtG 22 nd October 2009.
PPT-EN-04 - © Crown copyright 2010 Slide 1 Primary mathematics: support for subject knowledge Unit 1: Teaching division in Years 1, 2 and 3.
© Crown copyright PPT-EN-06 Workshop 4 Planning next steps.
© Crown copyright PPT-EN-03 Narrowing the gaps: what schools do to overcome disadvantage A CPD Workshop.
© Crown copyright 2010 Children who appear to get ‘stuck’ at level 2C in mathematics ~ how do we solve the problem? March 2010.
© Crown copyright 2010 Steps in using the Venn analysis.
Session 3 Narrowing the Gap. Objectives Consider the gap in science for free school meals (FSM) pupils Compare the FSM gap to local and national Identify.
© Crown copyright CDO-EN Slide 1 CPDM1: Senior leader briefing: leading change for more advanced EAL learners Ensuring the attainment of.
© Crown copyright CDO-EN Slide 1 CPDM 10: Parents and community: Supporting pupils’ learning Ensuring the attainment of more advanced learners.
© Crown copyright CDO-EN Slide 1 CPDM 3: Making sense of literacy targets: learning objectives and activities Ensuring the attainment of.
© Crown copyright 2009 Assessing pupils’ progress (APP) in science Slide 2.1.
© Crown copyright 2009 Science subject leader development materials Supporting the development of effective HSW and APP practice Autumn 2009.
© Crown copyright CDO-EN Slide 1 CPDM 9: EMA coordinators: developing a strategic approach Ensuring the attainment of more advanced learners.
Slide 1 © Crown copyright 2008 Guided Group Work Mathematics.
Slide 1 © Crown copyright 2008 Every Child a Talker LA launch event.
DWO-EN-20 © Crown copyright 2009Slide 1 Supporting School Improvement Partners (SIPs) working in Schools Causing Concern Working in the context.
© Crown copyright CDO-EN Slide 1 CPDM 7: Reading as a writer: understanding the writer’s purpose Ensuring the attainment of more advanced.
© Crown copyright CDO-EN Slide 1 CPDM 8: Thinking and writing as a writer: the sequence for teaching writing Ensuring the attainment of more.
What’s the point of a gifted and talented programme? Lyn Bull, Gifted and Talented Regional Adviser National Strategies.
Slide 1 © Crown copyright 2008 SEN/AEN Value for Money (VfM) Resource Pack for Schools.
© Crown copyright 2008 TDA NE Regional Network Meeting February 09.
© Crown copyright PPT-EN-03 Using ICT to explore and model mathematics – Number dials ITP Professional development meeting.
Teaching and Supporting Pupils with Dyslexia The Rose Review : Identifying and teaching children and young people with dyslexia and literacy difficulties.
© Crown copyright DOM-EN Mathematics Using Assessing pupils' progress (APP) to support the teaching and learning of mathematics.
Teaching and Supporting Pupils with Speech, language and Communication needs The ‘refreshed’ IDP materials January 2011.
© Crown copyright CDO-EN Slide 1 CPDM 5: Bridging talk and text: formal talk Ensuring the attainment of more advanced learners of English.
Sue Rogers Director of Education KGA Presentation GCSE and Post 16 plus Closing the Gap.
Promoting Disability Equality in Schools National Strategies Disability Equality.
© Crown copyright 2008 Session 3 Aims To inform delegates of updated intervention materials. To identify key interventions endorsed by the LA to support.
© Crown copyright 2010 Gypsy, Roma and Traveller Achievement Programme National Strategies and Beyond 7 March 2011.
© Crown copyright 2009 Mathematics Specialist Teachers – Championing Mathematics in our Primary Schools Stephanie Suter, Primary National Strategy.
© Crown copyright PPT-EN-15 Developing mental mathematics, reasoning and communicating Professional development meeting 1.
Time for a BREAK! You have 45 Minutes. Time Left 44.
© Crown copyright PPT-EN-01 Functional skills in subjects.
Area Headteacher Meetings November 2013 Patrick Leeson Corporate Director Education, Learning and Skills.
© Crown copyright CDO-EN Slide 1 CPDM 4: Talk as a tool for thinking: exploratory talk Ensuring the attainment of more advanced learners.
B Workshop: Making Use of Contextual and Value added Data to Raise Achievement Feyisa Demie Adviser for school self-evaluation and Head of Research & Statistics.
© Crown copyright 2009 What do we know? 7 questions to consider.
Chapter 12 Membrane Transport Essential Cell Biology Third Edition Copyright © Garland Science 2010.
DWO-EN-25 © Crown copyright 2009Slide 1 Supporting School Improvement Partners (SIPs) working with Schools Causing Concern The role of the SIP.
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff Beaver Road Primary School Clive Davies OBE Beaver Road (c)
Chapter 11 Membrane Structure Essential Cell Biology Third Edition Copyright © Garland Science 2010.
PSSA Preparation. Question 1(no calculator) D Question 2 (no calculator)
© Crown copyright Improving teaching and learning in Mathematics Day 2 – Year 1 teachers.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.