1. Improving the energy efficiency of buildings in the Dartmouth Park Conservation Area Review of questionnaire responses (February 2012)

2. The Background Over 3,700 questionnaires were sent out to residents of Dartmouth Park (DP) in Febraury 2012 The consultation ran for a 2 week period (6/02/12 – 20/02/12) The aim of questionnaire was to capture the views of residents with regard to energy efficiency measures in DP and how these might affect the character and appearance of the conservation area 463 questionnaire responses were received (this represents a 12% response rate) The following slides summarise the results of the questionnaire responses

3. Summary of Questionnaire responses 42% of respondents have heard of the Green Deal but 46% have not. 40% of respondents said they would consider taking out a Green Deal loan whilst 20% responded that they would not. 25% of respondents needed to know more information about what it involves. Respondents considered the following as obstacles to installing energy efficient measures with cost considered to be the largest obstacle by most. – Cost (63%) – Lack of information of what to do and how (40%) – Potential disruption from the works (35%) – Need for planning permission and other consents (32%) – Finding local suppliers/fitters (25%) – Ownership issues (17%)

4. Summary of Questionnaire responses The majority of respondents (66%) are worried about future energy price rises although they can manage at the moment. 13% of residents currently consider the cost of heating their home to be unaffordable. 30% of respondents consider that external wall insulation should be used wherever possible throughout the conservation area. Just over 50% of respondents are concerned that external solid wall insulation would change the appearance of the conservation area. 38% of residents think it should be encouraged on parts of the property which are not visible from the street. Almost 40% of respondents consider brick slips to be an appropriate finish for external wall insulation, with coloured render and white render supported by 24% and 21% of residents respectively. 17% of respondents do not consider any of the finishes as appropriate in the conservation area. The majority of respondents (almost 70%) would prefer to see sash windows (or casements where relevant) retained at the front and backs of properties but with their performance upgraded. 33% of residents would prefer to see original windows retained at the front but are less concerned about areas not visible from the street. One fifth of respondents do not want to see the use of secondary glazing in the conservation area.

5. Summary of Questionnaire responses 34% of respondents are not concerned with solar electric and solar hot water panels being located on front roof slopes whilst 23% of respondents don’t want to see any changes to the front roof slopes even if this would be the only viable roof top location. Just over half (53%) of respondents would be happy to see doors installed within porches if designed sympathetically to relate to the period character of the building. 18% of residents would rather see front doors replaced with more efficient ones to match, as they consider external draught lobbies would harm the traditional appearance of buildings and the conservation area.

6. Q1. Have you heard of the Government’s national Green Deal?

7. Q.2 Would you consider taking out a Green Deal loan?

8. Q3. What do you consider to be the main obstacles to installing energy efficiency measures in your home?

9. Q.4 Statements on the cost of heating or lighting your home

10. Q5. Statements relating to the appearance of solid wall insulation

11. Q6. Solid wall insulation – possible finishes?

12. Q7. Appearance of windows in the CA

13. Q8. Solar panels and solar slates – appropriateness in the CA

14. Q9. Installation of doors within existing porches